Adaptation of the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches (Sport Climate Questionnaire) Into Turkish

Gülselin Küçükçakir; Sinan Yıldırım

doi:10.54141/psbd.1634761

Adaptation of the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches (Sport Climate Questionnaire) Into Turkish

Abstract

This study seeks to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish adaptation of the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches (Sport Climate Questionnaire). The research group consisted of 353 active athletes aged between 12 and 18 years (199 females and 154 males; mean age = 13.95 ± 2.08 years). Data were collected using the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches and the Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used for data analysis. The CFA results confirmed the single-factor structure of both the long and short forms of the scale. Criterion-related validity analysis revealed a positive correlation between the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches and the empowering climate dimension, while a negative correlation was found with the disempowering climate dimension. Both forms of the scale demonstrated adequate reliability coefficients, with satisfactory Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability values. Similarly, test-retest correlations were found to be sufficient. In conclusion, the long and short forms of the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches are valid and reliable tools for assessing coaches’ autonomy-supportive behaviors.

Keywords

References

Adie, J. W., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2012). Perceived coach-autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the well-and ill-being of elite youth soccer players: A longitudinal investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.07.008
Alpar, R. (2006). Spor bilimlerinde uygulamalı istatistik [Applied statistics in sport sciences] (3. Baskı [3rd ed]). Nobel Yayın Da˘gıtım [Nobel Publication Distribution].
Amorose, A. J. (2007). Coaching effectiveness: Exploring the relationship between coaching behavior and self-determined motivation. In M. S. Hagger & N. L. D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Self- determination theory in exercise and sport (pp. 209-227). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Appleton, P. R., Ntoumanis, N., Quested, E., Viladrich, C., & Duda, J. L. (2016). Initial validation of the coach-created Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ-C). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.05.008
Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: a motivational basis of performance and weil‐being in two work settings 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x
Balaguer, I., Castillo, I. y Duda, J. L. (2009). Apoyo a la autonomía, satisfacción de las necesidades, motivación y bienestar en deportistas de competición: Un análisis de la teoría de la autodeterminación. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 17, 123-139.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self‐determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Adaptation of assessment scales in cross-national research: Issues, guidelines, and caveats. International Perspectives in Psychology, 5(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000042
Carpentier, J., & Mageau, G. A. (2013). When change-oriented feedback enhances motivation, well-being and performance: A look at autonomy-supportive feedback in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(3), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.01.003
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Cronin, L., Arthur, C. A., Hardy, J., & Callow, N. (2015). Transformational leadership and task cohesion in sport: The mediating role of inside sacrifice. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 37(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2014-0116
Côté, J. (2002). Coach and peer influence on children’s development through sport. In J. M. Silva & D. Stevens (Eds.), Psychological foundations of sport (pp. 520-540). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985b). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
Deci, E. L., La Guardia, J. G., Moller, A. C., Scheiner, M. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). On the benefits of giving as well as receiving autonomy support: Mutuality in close friendships. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 32(3), 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205282148
Felton L, Jowett S. (2013). “What do coaches do” and “how do they relate”: Their effects on athletes' psychological needs and functioning. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 23(2), e130-e139. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12029
George, D., Mallery, P. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Boston, Pearson.
Gözmen Elmas, A., Keskin Akın, N., & Aşçı, F. H. (2018). The Validity and reliability of empowering and disempowering motivational climate questionnaire (EDMCQ-C) for Turkish adolescents athletes. Spormetre: The Journal of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, 16(3), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000376
Isoard-Gautheur, S., Guillet-Descas, E., & Lemyre, P.-N. (2012). A prospective study of the influence of perceived coaching style on burnout propensity in high level young athletes: Using a self-determination theory perspective. The Sport Psychologist, 26(2), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.26.2.282
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson. R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hagger, M.S., Chatzisarantis, N.L.D., Hein, V., Pihu, M., Soos, I. & Karsai, I. (2007). The perceived autonomy support scale for exercise settings (PASSES): Development, validity, and crosscultural invariance in young people. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 632-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.09.001
Hodge, K., & Lonsdale, C. (2011). Prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport: The role of coaching style, autonomous vs. controlled motivation, and moral disengagement. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33(4), 527-547. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.4.527 https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/sport-climate-questionnaire/ Karadağ, D., Gözmen, A, Keskin, N., Aşçı, F. H. (2025). Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Scales of Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coach and Parent in Young Athletes: Methodological Study. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Sports Sciences, 17(1), 52-60. https://doi.org/10.5336/sportsci.2024-105741
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach-athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 883-904. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000140374
Mageau, G. A., Ranger, F., Joussemet, M., Koestner, R., Moreau, E., & Forest, J. (2015). Validation of the perceived parental autonomy support scale (P-PASS). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 47(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039325
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64
Müftüler, M. (2016). Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Exercise Settings: Validity and reliability study for Turkish. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 2158-2169. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3653
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
Özdemir, A. (2008). Yönetim Biliminde İleri Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Uygulamalar (Advanced Research Methods and Applications in Management Science). Beta Yayınları (Beta Publications), İstanbul.
Quested E. & Duda JL. (2011). Perceived autonomy support, motivation regulations and the self-evaluative tendencies of student dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 15(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X1101500101
Reinboth, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004). Dimensions of coaching behavior, need satisfaction, and the psychological and physical welfare of young athletes. Motivation and Emotion, 28(3), 297-313. https://doi.org/0146-7239/04/0900-0297/0
Reynolds, A. J., & McDonough, M. H. (2015). Moderated and mediated effects of coach autonomy support, coach involvement, and psychological need satisfaction on motivation in youth soccer. The Sport Psychologist, 29(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2014-0023
Ryan, R. M. (2009). Self determination theory and well being. Social Psychology, 84(822), 848–849.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., ve Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395793
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
Smoll, F. L., & Smith, R. E. (2002). Coaching behavior research and intervention in youth sports. In F. L. Smoll, & R. E. Smith (Eds.), Children and youth in sport: A biopsychosocial perspective (pp. 211–233). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
Smith, A., Ntoumanis, N., & Duda, J. (2010). An investigation of coach behaviors, goal motives, and implementation intentions as predictors of well-being in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200903403190
Smit, E. S., Dima, A. L., Immerzeel, S. A. M., van den Putte, B., & Williams, G. C. (2017). The virtual care climate questionnaire: development and validation of a questionnaire measuring perceived support for autonomy in a virtual care setting. Journal of medical internet research, 19(5), e155. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6714
Stenling, A., & Tafvelin, S. (2014). Transformational leadership and well-being in sports: The mediating role of need satisfaction. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 26(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2013.819392
Vallerand, R. J., & Losier, G. F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 142-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209908402956
Van Widenfelt, B. M., Treffers, P. D., De Beurs, E., Siebelink, B. M., & Koudijs, E. (2005). Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of assessment instruments used in psychological research with children and families. Clinical child and family psychology review, 8, 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-005-4752-1
Williams, G. C., Grow, V. M., Freedman, Z. R., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.115
Yıldırım, S., & Koruç, Z. (2021). The Effect of Transformational Leadership and Well-Being on Performance of Soccer Players: An Inclusive Model. The Sport Psychologist, 1(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2020-0064

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Sport and Exercise Psychology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Gülselin Küçükçakir
0009-0009-6305-6806
Türkiye

Sinan Yıldırım ^*
0000-0002-0307-7922
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 30, 2025

Submission Date

February 7, 2025

Acceptance Date

July 21, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 16 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1634761

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA53BX59UJ

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Küçükçakir, G., & Yıldırım, S. (2025). Adaptation of the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches (Sport Climate Questionnaire) Into Turkish. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 16(2), 427-448. https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1634761

AMA

1.Küçükçakir G, Yıldırım S. Adaptation of the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches (Sport Climate Questionnaire) Into Turkish. Pamukkale J Sport Sci. 2025;16(2):427-448. doi:10.54141/psbd.1634761

Chicago

Küçükçakir, Gülselin, and Sinan Yıldırım. 2025. “Adaptation of the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches (Sport Climate Questionnaire) Into Turkish”. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences 16 (2): 427-48. https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1634761.

EndNote

Küçükçakir G, Yıldırım S (August 1, 2025) Adaptation of the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches (Sport Climate Questionnaire) Into Turkish. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences 16 2 427–448.

IEEE

[1]G. Küçükçakir and S. Yıldırım, “Adaptation of the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches (Sport Climate Questionnaire) Into Turkish”, Pamukkale J Sport Sci, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 427–448, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.54141/psbd.1634761.

ISNAD

Küçükçakir, Gülselin - Yıldırım, Sinan. “Adaptation of the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches (Sport Climate Questionnaire) Into Turkish”. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences 16/2 (August 1, 2025): 427-448. https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1634761.

JAMA

1.Küçükçakir G, Yıldırım S. Adaptation of the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches (Sport Climate Questionnaire) Into Turkish. Pamukkale J Sport Sci. 2025;16:427–448.

MLA

Küçükçakir, Gülselin, and Sinan Yıldırım. “Adaptation of the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches (Sport Climate Questionnaire) Into Turkish”. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, vol. 16, no. 2, Aug. 2025, pp. 427-48, doi:10.54141/psbd.1634761.

Vancouver

1.Gülselin Küçükçakir, Sinan Yıldırım. Adaptation of the Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Coaches (Sport Climate Questionnaire) Into Turkish. Pamukkale J Sport Sci. 2025 Aug. 1;16(2):427-48. doi:10.54141/psbd.1634761