Abstract
The benefits of green spaces for individuals’ psychological, physical, and social well-being underscore the need to measure satisfaction with green spaces. However, the lack of measurement tools in Turkish culture limits research on satisfaction with green space use. Therefore, this study aims to adapt the Green Space Use Satisfaction Scale (GUSS) to Turkish culture and to conduct validity and reliability analyses. The Turkish form of the scale was subjected to linguistic adaptation by the back translation method and shaped by expert opinions. Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance across gender groups were used to assess construct validity. Reliability analyses were conducted using Cronbach’s alpha, CR, and the split-half method. The study sample comprised 357 students recruited from three public universities in the Mediterranean region of Türkiye via convenience sampling. The findings revealed that the Turkish version of the scale aligns with the original scale structure, demonstrates measurement equivalence across gender groups, and exhibits high internal consistency. Additionally, the concurrent validity test demonstrated a significant and positive relationship between the GUSS and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. This study offers a significant cultural perspective to the literature by adapting the GUSS to Turkish culture, thereby facilitating cross-cultural comparisons in the broader literature
Keywords
Green Space Use Need Satisfaction Outdoor Recreation Life Satisfaction Scale Adaptation Validity and Reliability
Ethical Statement
The study approved by the Ethics Committee of Istanbul Yeni Yuzyil University (2025/03-1492).
References
- Adinolfi, C., Suárez-Cáceres, G. P., & Carinanos, P. (2014). Relation between visitors’ behaviour and characteristics of green spaces in the city of Granada, south-eastern Spain. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(3), 534-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.03.007
- Agyemang, C., Van Hooijdonk, C., Wendel-Vos, W., Lindeman, E., Stronks, K., & Droomers, M. (2007). The association of neighbourhood psychosocial stressors and self-rated health in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(12), 1042–1049. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.052548
- Ambrey, C. L. (2016). Urban greenspace, physical activity and wellbeing: The moderating role of perceptions of neighbourhood affability and incivility. Land Use Policy, 57, 638–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.034
- Aspinall, P. A., Thompson, C. W., Alves, S., Sugiyama, T., Brice, R., & Vickers, A. (2010). Preference and relative importance for environmental attributes of neighbourhood open space in older people. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(6), 1022-1039. https://doi.org/10.1068/b36024
- Atmış, E., Günşen, H.B., (2016). Effect of urbanization on transformation of forestry in Turkey (Period of 1990-2010) Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 66(1): 16-29. https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.6363
- Bai, H., Wilhelm Stanis, S. A., Kaczynski, A. T., & Besenyi, G. M. (2013). Perceptions of neighborhood park quality: Associations with physical activity and body mass index. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 45(1), S39–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9448-4
- Barakat, C., & Yousufzai, S. (2020). Green space and mental health for vulnerable populations: A conceptual review of the evidence. Journal of Military Veteran and Family Health, 6(S3), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.3138/jmvfh-2019-0040
- Bedimo-Rung, A. L., Mowen, A. J., & Cohen, D. A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: a conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.024
- Bell, S. L., Phoenix, C., Lovell, R., &Wheeler, B. W. (2014). Greenspace, health and wellbeing: Making space for individual agency. Health & Place, 30, 287-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.10.005
- Bratman, G. N., Olvera‐Alvarez, H. A., and Gross, J. J. (2021). The affective benefits of nature exposure. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(8), e12630. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12630
- Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
- Browning, M. H., Rigolon, A., & McAnirlin, O. (2022). Where greenspace matters most: A systematic review of urbanicity, greenspace, and physical health. Landscape and Urban Planning, 217, 104233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104233
- Callaghan, A., McCombe, G., Harrold, A., McMeel, C., Mills, G., Moore-Cherry, N., & Cullen, W. (2021). The impact of green spaces on mental health in urban settings: a scoping review. Journal of Mental Health, 30(2), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2020.1755027
- Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Coles, R. W., & Bussey, S. C. (2000). Urban forest landscapes in the UK—progressing the social agenda. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52, 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00132-8
- Conedera, M., Del Biaggio, A., Seeland, K., Moretti, M., & Home, R. (2015). Residents’ preferences and use of urban and peri-urban green spaces in a Swiss mountainous region of the Southern Alps. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.01.003
- Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
- DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.
- Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
- Dunton, G. F., Almanza, E., Jerrett, M., Wolch, J., & Pentz, M. A. (2014). Neighborhood park use by children: use of accelerometry and global positioning systems. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46(2), 136-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.009
- Durak, M., Senol-Durak, E., & Gencoz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale among Turkish university students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 99, 413-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9589-4
- Engledow, J. L. (1977). Was consumer satisfaction a pig in a poke? Business Horizons, 20(2), 87-94.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
- Gavrilidis, A. A., Zakerhaghighi, K., Popa, A. M., Akbarian, S. Z., Onose, D. A., Grădinaru, S. R., & Slave, R. A. (2024). Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services provision by small public urban green spaces: Perspectives from different cultural backgrounds. Urban Ecosystems, 27(3), 699-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01480-3
- George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th ed.). Routledge.
- Gianfredi, V., Buffoli, M., Rebecchi, A., Croci, R., Oradini-Alacreu, A., Stirparo, G., ... & Signorelli, C. (2021). Urban Green Spaces and Public Health Outcomes: a systematic review of literature. European Journal of Public Health, 31, 164-638. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab164.638
- Gobster, P.H., & Westphal, L.M. (2004). The human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning 68(2-3), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00162-2
- Gozalo, G. R., Morillas, J. M. B., González, D. M., & Moraga, P. A. (2018). Relationships among satisfaction, noise perception, and use of urban green spaces. Science of the Total Environment, 624, 438-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.148
- Guite, H. F., Clark, C., & Ackrill, G. (2006). The impact of the physical and urban environment on mental well-being. Public Health, 120(12), 1117–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.005
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
- Halkos, G., Leonti, A., & Sardianou, E. (2021). Activities, motivations and satisfaction of urban parks visitors: A structural equation modeling analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 70, 502-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.04.005
- Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., De Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(1), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
- Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H.-A., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 166-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Jabbar, M., Yusoff, M. M., & Shafie, A. (2022). Assessing the role of urban green spaces for human well-being: A systematic review. GeoJournal, 87, 4405-4423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10474-7
- Jay, M., & Schraml, U. (2009). Understanding the role of urban forests for migrants–Uses, perception and integrative potential. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(4), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.07.003
- Jennings, V., & Bamkole, O. (2019). The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: An avenue for health promotion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030452
- Jim, C. Y., & Chen, W. Y. (2006). Perception and attitude of residents toward urban green spaces in Guangzhou (China). Environmental Management, 38, 338-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0166-6
- Kaczynski, A. T., & Henderson, K. A. (2007). Environmental correlates of physical activity: a review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leisure Sciencess, 29(4), 315-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400701394865
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
- Ko, M. C., & Lee, J. H. (2025). Measuring the psychological benefits of green space usage: development and validation of the Green Space Use Satisfaction Scale. Social Indicators Research, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03536-7
- Kondo, M. C., Fluehr, J. M., McKeon, T., & Branas, C. C. (2018). Urban green space and its impact on human health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030445
- Kong, F., & Nakagoshi, N. (2005). Changes of urban green spaces and their driving forces: a case study of Jinan City, China. Journal of International Development and Cooperation, 11(2), 97-109.
- Lee, J., & Kim, D. H. (2022). Urban forest visit motivation scale: Development and validation. Sustainability, 15(1), 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010408
- Lee, Y. C., & Kim, K. H. (2015). Attitudes of citizens towards urban parks and green spaces for urban sustainability: The case of Gyeongsan City, Republic of Korea. Sustainability, 7(7), 8240-8254. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078240
- Liu, S., Su, C., Zhang, J., Takeda, S., Liu, J., & Yang, R. (2023). Cross-cultural comparison of urban green space through crowdsourced big data: A natural language processing and image recognition approach. Land, 12(4), 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040767
- Maas, J., Van Dillen, S. M., Verheij, R. A., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2009). Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health & Place, 15(2), 586-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.006
- Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., de Vries, S., Spreeuwenberg, P., Schellevis, F. G., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2009). Morbidity is related to a green living environment. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 63(12), 967-973. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.079038
- MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Osborne, J. W., & Overbay, A. (2004). The power of outliers (and why researchers should always check for them). Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7275/qf69-7k43
- Ostoić, S. K., van den Bosch, C. C. K., Vuletić, D., Stevanov, M., Živojinović, I., Mutabdžija-Bećirović, S., ... & Malovrh, Š. P. (2017). Citizens’ perception of and satisfaction with urban forests and green space: Results from selected Southeast European cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 23, 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.005
- Özgüner, H. (2011). Cultural differences in attitudes towards urban parks and green spaces. Landscape Research, 36(5), 599-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2011.560474
- Pala, Ö. N., & Acar, S. (2024). Assessing a greening tool through the lens of green gentrification: Socio-spatial change around the Nation's Gardens of Istanbul. Cities, 150, 105023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105023
- Palliwoda, J., Kowarik, I., & von der Lippe, M. (2017). Human-biodiversity interactions in urban parks: the species level matters. Landscape and Urban Planning 157, 394-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.003
- Pazhouhanfar, M. (2018). Role of space qualities of urban parks on mood change. Psychological Studies, 63, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-017-0434-6
- Pensini, P., Horn, E., & Caltabiano, N. (2016). An exploration of the relationships between adults’ childhood and current nature exposure and their mental well-being. Children, Youth and Environments, 26, 125-147. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.26.1.0125
- Peters, K., Elands, B., & Buijs, A. (2010). Social interactions in urban parks: Stimulating social cohesion? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(2), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.003
- Pizam, A., Neumann, Y., & Reichel, A. (1978). Dimentions of tourist satisfaction with a destination area. Annals of Tourism Research, 5(3), 314-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(78)90115-9
- Pritchard, A., Richardson, M., Sheffield, D., & McEwan, K. (2020). The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 1145-1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00118-6
- Rigolon, A., Browning, M. H., Lee, K., & Shin, S. (2018). Access to urban green space in cities of the Global South: A systematic literature review. Urban Science, 2(3), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2030067
- Shanahan, D. F., Bush, R., Gaston, K. J., Lin, B. B., Dean, J., Barber, E., & Fuller, R. A. (2016). Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 28551. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28551
- Son, J., & Kim, B. (2023). Translation performance from the user’s perspective of large language models and neural machine translation systems. Information, 14(10), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14100574
- Son, J., Lee, Y., Kramer, C., & Saha, S. (2025). Residents’ perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green spaces: A comparative study of Korea and Germany. Basic and Applied Ecology, 88, 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2025.08.002
- Stoltz, J., & Schaffer, C. (2018). Salutogenic affordances and sustainability: Multiple benefits with edible forest gardens in urban green spaces. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 343957. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02344
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
- Tamosiunas, A., Grazuleviciene, R., Luksiene, D., Dedele, A., Reklaitiene, R., Baceviciene, M., ... &Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2014). Accessibility and use of urban green spaces, and cardiovascular health: findings from a Kaunas cohort study. Environmental Health, 13, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-20
- Terefe, A. E., & Hou, Y. (2024). Determinants influencing the accessibility and use of urban green spaces: A review of empirical evidence. City and Environment Interactions, 24, 100159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2024.100159
- Tian, Y., Jim, C. Y., Tao, Y., & Shi, T. (2011). Landscape ecological assessment of green space fragmentation in Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(2), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.11.002
- Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
- White, M. P., Alcock, I., Grellier, J., Wheeler, B. W., Hartig, T., Warber, S. L., ... & Fleming, L. E. (2019). Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 7730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3
- World Bank (2020). World Social Report 2020 Inequality in a Rapidly Changing World. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/02/World-Social-Report2020-FullReport.pdf
- World Bank (2024). Urban Population Indicator. Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS?end=2023&start=1960&view=chart
- World Health Organization. (2017). Urban green space interventions and health: A review of impacts and effectiveness. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen. Retrieved from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/337690/FULL-REPORT-for-LLP.pdf?ua=1
- Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
- Yıldızbaş, N. T., Gençay, G., Birben, Ü., Oskay, F., Perkumienė, D., Škėma, M., & Aleinikovas, M. (2025). Benefits Beyond the Physical: How Urban Green Areas Shape Public Health and Environmental Awareness in Istanbul. Forests, 16(5), 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16050786
- Zhang, F., & Qian, H. (2024). A comprehensive review of the environmental benefits of urban green spaces. Environmental Research, 118837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118837
- Zhang, H., Chen, B., Sun, Z., & Bao, Z. (2013). Landscape perception and recreation needs in urban green space in Fuyang, Hangzhou, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.11.001
- Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Iyer, R. (2014). Engagement with natural beauty moderates the positive relation between connectedness with nature and psychological well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.013
- Zhang, Y., Van den Berg, A. E., Van Dijk, T., & Weitkamp, G. (2017). Quality over quantity: Contribution of urban green space to neighborhood satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(5), 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14050535
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Sports and Recreation |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | July 17, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | November 21, 2025 |
| Early Pub Date | March 7, 2026 |
| Publication Date | March 7, 2026 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1744497 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA33AW85GA |
| Published in Issue | Year 2026 Issue: Advanced Online Publication |
Aim & Scope
Aim
Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences (PJSS) is an open-access, interdisciplinary journal that presents the latest research in the field of sport sciences, operating as the official research journal of Pamukkale University Faculty of Sport Sciences.
PJSS aims to support scientific research and increase knowledge in a wide range of sport sciences subfields such as leisure & sport management, physical activity, health & exercise, social & behavioral sciences, sports performance and teacher education & sport pedagogy. Our aim is to explore different aspects of sport, make significant contributions in these areas and provide valuable resources to our academic community.
Scope
The scope of our journal expands under the following main topics:
Leisure & Sport Management:
- Innovative leisure studies in social, psychological, cultural, political, environmental and health dimensions at individual, group, community, and societal levels.
- Studies that highlight theory, methodology, methods and advance the understanding of leisure receive.
- Studies examining related concepts such as parks and urban spaces, recreation and events, environmental participation, and well-being.
- Studies of organizational theories, behaviors, and strategies in relation to the management, governance, and consumption of sport.
- Studies on sport organization, marketing, and sport policies related to the management, governance, and consumption of sport.
- Studies on sports organization and marketing, consumer behavior, sponsorship, advertising, and licensing.
- Innovative work in areas such as sports tourism, facility, and event management.
Physical Activity, Health & Exercise:
- Investigations examining the effects of physical activity and healthy living habits on general health.
- Investigations examining the effects of exercise on chronic diseases.
- Investigations examining the use of technology in exercise programs for health
- Investigations examining the effects of physical activity on quality of life and health in elderly individuals
- Investigations on injury prevention and rehabilitation strategies for athletes
- Investigations examining the effects of nutrition programs on health, and exercise performance
- Investigations examining the effects of exercise on metabolism.
- Investigations examining the effects of physical activities in different environments (altitude, temperature, etc.)
- Investigations examining how genetic factors influence individuals' exercise responses and how the use of genetic information can be integrated into exercise programs
- Investigations examining the developmental effects of physical activity in children
- Investigations examining the effects of physical activity and exercise programs in people with disabilities
Social & Behavioral Sciences:
- Investigations into sports psychology, athlete behavior, and mental aspects of sports performance.
- Inquiries into the societal impact of sports, encompassing positive and negative influences.
- Studies addressing the sociology of sports, including cultural, gender, and racial dynamics.
- Exploration of sports ethics, sportsmanship, and moral dilemmas in sports.
Teacher Education & Sport Pedagogy:
- Studies addressing teaching, teacher education, and curriculum in physical education and health
- Investigations of educational policies and practices in school physical education
- Inquiries into the coaching pedagogy
- Exploration of interdisciplinary connections in physical education
Sports Performance:
- Investigations examining the various methods used to assess athlete performance
- Investigations examining both acute and chronic-term effects of training
- Investigations on the physiological adaptation of athletes to training
- Investigations examining how technology can optimize athlete performance
- Investigations examining the testing and development of athletes' physical performance
- Investigations examining the analysis of sport performance data
- Investigations examining the biomechanical aspects of sport movements
- Investigations on talent selection in sports
Our journal accepts original research, reviews and application-oriented studies within these areas. We aim to support studies in these different sub-disciplines in the sports sciences area and encourage knowledge sharing.
Author Guidelines
All manuscripts must be submitted online at https://dergipark.org.tr/en/journal/1109/submission/step/manuscript/new following the instructions below. Manuscripts submitted via e-mail will not be considered for publication.
General Structure
All articles should be submitted in Microsoft Word format (doc or docx). The automatic line numbering and page numbering functions to number the lines and pages should be used in the main text.
Four separate documents under the following titles must be uploaded for all manuscripts:
1. Title page (Click for Template)
2. Main Text (Click for Template)
3. Copyright Agreement Form (Click for the form)
Article Types
Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences publishes research articles, reviews, case studies and editorials. The articles submitted to the journal should contain new data on theoretical research, experimental research or practical applications in the field of sport sciences. It is important to note that the submitted articles should not have been published elsewhere.
Review
Review articles survey recent developments in a topical area of sport sciences. The Editor or Associate Editors usually invite review articles. However, self-invited manuscripts would be considered only if the authors have a proven track record of productivity in the relevant field being reviewed. Systematic review and meta-analysis should follow the EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines (https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/prisma/). The main text should start with Abstract, Introduction and end with Conclusion and References sections. Authors may choose to use any subheading in between those sections.
A Case Report is a detailed and in-depth examination (including all types of interventions) of a specific topic, usually involving an athlete, and the results obtained. This comprehensive review should reveal new or rare cases within the selected subject. The detailed analysis should include the history of the subject, the symptoms, the diagnostic methods used, the subtleties of the interventions applied and the final results observed. Case report studies should be oriented towards understanding unique scenarios, promoting continuous learning and increasing the overall knowledge of the relevant field. Case report studies should include an Abstract, Keywords, an Introduction, a Case Description, Discussion, and Conclusion sections.
Research Article
Abstract
The abstract should be limited to 250 words, followed by 3 - 6 keywords that are not included in the title. The abstract should include sentences (without titles) related to the aim of the study, methods, results, and conclusions. Also, non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided. However, If they are necessary, define them in the first instance they are used in the abstract.
Keywords: keyword, keyword, keyword
Introduction
This section should orient the reader to the article's content and provide an understanding of the importance of the research. This section should clearly state the study's purpose, importance and scope. In addition, it should introduce the basic concepts related to the topic. Furthermore, the main questions or hypotheses of the research should be stated and explain to the reader what problems it aims to solve.
Methods
Participants
In this section, research participants should be identified. Demographic information (age, gender, education level, etc.) of the participants should be provided in this section. In addition, information on adherence to ethical rules and ethics committee approval for research involving humans or animals should be included in this section.
Note: In this section, the institution where the ethics committee approval was obtained should be written as XXX University (Year and number). The institution where the ethics committee approval was obtained should be clearly written on the title page.
Procedures
The design used in the research, e.g. cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, etc. and sampling method should be included in this section. In addition, methods such as surveys, interviews, observations, or laboratory experiments should be described in this section. Moreover, while describing these methods, the tools and materials used in the research should also be mentioned in this section.
Data Analysis
In the section, the statistical methods used in the research, the software used, content analysis, etc. should be explained in detail.
Results
All details such as tables, figures, etc. showing the research results should be included in this section. The number of each table, figure, etc. should be expressed primarily in the text. The main findings that are the focus of the research should be explained in detail in this section. In particular, findings that are noteworthy and/or unexpected in the research should be emphasized.
Discussion
In this section, findings should be associated with the literature and important findings should be emphasized. Explanation of contradictory or inconsistent findings, if any. Comparisons between different groups or relationships between variables should be discussed with the support of the literature. Limitations of the study, if any, should be given at the end of this section.
Conclusions
This section should summarize the main findings of the research. Also in this section, the main points of the data obtained should be emphasized and these findings should be related to their general context. In addition, recommendations for future research should be made in this section.
Practical Implications
This section should highlight the implications of the research for daily practice. It should also discuss the potential implications of the findings for practice. This section should explain how the concrete results of the research can be used, providing recommendations for professionals in the sectors.
1. Title Page
Please indicate this file's name as: "Title Page". The title page should contain the following information:
Manuscript Title: Should be clear, descriptive, and not too long.
Running Head: Limited to 50 characters in length, including spaces.
Authors’ Full Name(s) and Surname(s): Do not list academic degrees.
ORCID ID for all Author (s) (http://orcid.org/)
Authors’ Affiliations and e-mail (s): Author’s affiliation should be included: Department, University, City, Country respectively.
Contact details for the corresponding author: The name, institution, mail address, telephone number, and e-mail address of the corresponding author.
Section name to evaluate the study: Choose one of the sections below:
• Leisure & Sport Management
• Physical Activity, Health & Exercise
• Social & Behavioral Sciences
• Sports Performance
• Teacher Education & Sport Pedagogy
Acknowledgements: Information concerning financial support, technical assistance, and intellectual contributions not associated with authorship should be provided.
Conflict of interest declaration: Information concerning conflict of interest should be provided if necessary.
2. Main Text
Please indicate this file's name as: "Blind Main Text" and don't mention any information regarding the author(s)' personal information. Main Text should include the manuscript title in capital letters. The main text must contain the following sections with titles ; Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, Practical Implications, and References.
The abstract should be limited to 250 words, followed by 3 - 6 keywords not used in the title. The abstract should include sentences (without titles) related to the aim of the study, methods, results, and conclusions. Also, from non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided. However, if necessary, they should be defined in the first mentioned place in the abstract.
All references must be written according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.) citation format (known as APA 7). For further information, please visit the website https://apastyle.apa.org/
Reference can be made to sources in text (Arslan & Bulgu, 2010). If multiple sources are given, this should be done in alphabetical order. If the names are the same, years should be considered. For a work with three or more authors, include the name of only the first author plus “et al.” in every citation, including the first citation (Yıldız et al., 2015). Direct quotations in the text “must be written in quotation marks” (Avşar et. al., 2019, p. 400), or Hürmeriç Altunsöz & Yapar (2019) emphasize that direct quotations in the text “must be written in quotation marks” (p. 30).
Sample Bibliography
Arslan, Y., & Bulgu, N. (2010). Socialization via play. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 1 (1), 8–22. https://doi.org/pjss
Yıldız, A., Koçak, S., Altunsöz, I. H., & Devrilmez, E. (2015). Spectators’ Participation Decisions in the Basketball Matches. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/pjss.
Arslan, Y., & Semiz, K. (Eds.). (2020). Beden Eğitimi ve Sporda Öğretim Teknolojileri. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786050370010
Reference to a book chapter
Avşar, Z., Hünük, D. & Demirhan, G. (2019). Physical Education Teacher Education in Turkey. In MacPhail, A., Tannehill, D. ve Avsar , Z. (Eds.), European Physical Education Teacher Education Practices (pp. 397-413). Meyer & Meyer Sports
Yıldız, A. (n.d.). General Information. Retrieved February 3, 2021, from https://www.pau.edu.tr/sbf/en/sayfa/general-information-12
All the copyright of submitted articles must be transferred to PJSS during the article submission process. Therefore, Copyright Agreement Form signed by all authors must be submitted with the article. For Copyright Agreement Form, please click here. For Authorship Form, please click here.
Ethical Principles and Publication Policy
About Journal
The Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences (PJSS) is the official research journal of the Pamukkale University Faculty of Sport Sciences. The PJSS aims to publish articles of international high standards. The PJSS is published three times a year (April, August and December). Manuscripts submitted to the journal for evaluation should be written in English. PJSS publishes research articles and reviews contributing to the knowledge about sport sciences areas.
Publication Ethics and Policy
PJSS editorial, reviewer, authorship and publication processes are organized according to the recommendations of the International Council of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). In addition, the journal complies with the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scientific Publishing (doaj.org/bestpractice).
Research Ethics
Manuscripts submitted to the PJSS must be original, unpublished, and not under evaluation by another journal simultaneously. Authors who wish to withdraw their manuscript for any reason should contact the editor promptly.
Authors conducting research involving human participants must adhere to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki (2013). Ethical approval must be obtained from an institutional review board (the project code and approval date must be stated in the manuscript’s Method section), and informed consent must be collected from participants. For vulnerable populations, such as children or individuals with mental illness, consent must also be obtained from legal guardians.
Animal Research Ethics
Research articles and case studies involving animal subjects must adhere to the Universal Declaration of Animal Rights. Ethical approval from a research ethics committee is required, and the project code and approval date must be stated in the manuscript’s Method section. Animal studies must ensure the welfare of animals by minimizing pain and adhering to the principles of replacement, reduction, and refinement (3Rs).
The journal reserves the right to request supporting documents and will reject submissions that do not comply with these standards.
Duties and Responsibilities of the Editorial Board
• PJSS Editorial Board strives to increase the quality of the publications constantly.
• PJSS Editorial Board is responsible for the establishment and implementation of regulations such as publication, blind review evaluation process and ethical principles.
• PJSS Editorial Board prepares the "Author's Guidelines" that the authors can use in the article submission process and the "Reviewer’s Guidelines" that the reviewers can use during the evaluation process, and updates these guides when necessary.
Ethical Duties and Responsibilities of Editors:
• PJSS Editor-in-Chief and Section Editors are responsible for all ethical components created by the “Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)”.
• PJSS Editors evaluate important components such as the originality of the manuscript, its contribution to the literature, the validity and reliability of the data collection tools, the comprehensibility and fluency of the writing language in the decision-making process for each manuscript submitted, in line with the purpose and scope of the journal.
• PJSS Editors evaluate a manuscript submitted to the journal in terms of its compliance with the publication policy of the journal and have the right to reject it if the editors do not find it appropriate.
• PJSS Editors take a manuscript submitted to the journal in the pre-evaluation stage in terms of the journal's publication policy unless it has a fundamental scientific error.
• PJSS Editors ensure that each article is evaluated within the specified time within the principle of impartiality by applying the policies regarding the double-blind review and evaluation process adopted by the journal and keeping the identity information of the reviewers confidential.
• PJSS Editors are responsible for taking the necessary steps to prevent possible conflicts of interest and evaluate the existing statements that cause a conflict of interest regarding the publication. In the event of a conflict of interest, Editors have the authority to request the original documents such as the Ethics Committee Permission, the Interviewer Voluntary Consent Forms from the author.
• PJSS Editors act in accordance with the journal's policies and procedures in case of a complaint regarding a submitted article that violates ethical principles. The Editors provide the authors with the opportunity to respond to the complaint and implement the necessary sanctions if deemed necessary.
Ethical Duties and Responsibilities of Authors:
PJSS observes the highest standards in research ethics and adopts the principles of international research ethics defined below. The authors are responsible for the compliance of the manuscripts with the ethical rules.
• The principles of integrity, quality and transparency should be ensured in the design of the research, the review of the design and the execution of the research.
• The researchers and the participants should be fully informed about the purpose of the research, its methods and the possible uses anticipated, necessities and, if any, risks of participation to the research.
• Confidentiality of information provided by research participants and respondents should be ensured. Research should be designed in a way that preserves the autonomy and dignity of the participants.
• The author(s) should provide assurance that the manuscript is original, has not been published elsewhere and is not currently being evaluated for publication elsewhere. Copyright laws and treaties in practice must be considered. The materials depend on copyright (e.g. tables, figures or large quotations) should be used with the necessary permission and acknowledgment note.
• The submitted manuscript should have a direct contribution of all authors. In this respect, the "author" has a duty to make a significant contribution to the conceptualization and design of the research, to obtain, analyze or interpret the data, to write the article or to review content critically. All individuals designated as authors must meet all listed criteria, and each individual meeting the above criteria should be cited as authors. The name order of the authors should be a common decision. All authors must confirm the author order by signing the Copyright Agreement Form.
• All individuals who do not meet the sufficient criteria for authorship listed above but contribute to the study should be listed in the "Acknowledgements” section.
• All authors must disclose financial relationships, conflicts of interest and competition of interest that have the potential to affect the results of the research and/or scientific evaluation. If an author detects a significant error or inaccuracy in his or her published article, author bears the responsibility to immediately contact and cooperate with the Editor to correct these inaccuracies.
• Changing the order of authors, removing authors, adding authors to a manuscript submitted for publication should not be suggested to the Editorial Board.
• During the evaluation process, author(s) should submit the expected information to the Editors urgently in case of information or raw data is requested about their manuscripts.
• Research participants should take part in the research voluntarily and should not be under any coercion. Informed consent form should be obtained from the study participants. The legal guardian's consent must be obtained for children and those under guardianship or those with a confirmed mental illness. If the study will be carried out in any institution or organization, approval must be obtained from the authority of this institution or organization. In studies conducted with human subjects, it should be stated that "informed consent" was obtained from the participants and the ethics committee approval was obtained from the institution where the study was conducted in the "method" section.
• In the studies previously presented in a symposium, workshop or congress, the name, place and date of the organization should be specified on the "Title page".
• The final version is re-sent to the corresponding author for the final check before publication in order to prevent any errors that may occur during typesetting. After the final approval of the corresponding author, the article is published as “online first publication”.
Ethical Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewers:
• In PJSS, evaluation is applied according to the double-blind system, and the evaluation period assigned to the referees for submitted articles is 30 days. Reviewers are expected to complete their evaluations within this period and to fill in the evaluation form on the DergiPark system and submit it to the Editor. For each article, 2 reviewers are assigned to evaluate. In case of a difference of opinion in the 2 reviewers’ evaluations, the relevant section editor can engage the third reviewer if necessary, and as a result of these evaluations, the section editor and the editor make the decision about the manuscript.
In this process, our Reviewers are expected to consider the following:
• In cases where the reviewers do not feel confident on the subject of the article, they think they cannot evaluate it on time, or they notice a conflict of interest, they should inform the editor to not to be included in the review process.
• Reviewers are required to complete their evaluations within the time given to them. If the reviewers cannot complete the evaluation within the specified time, they can contact the editor/section editor and request additional time. Otherwise, the editor will be able to change the reviewer, provided that the reviewer is informed.
• Reviewers are expected to take into consideration the journal writing rules as a guide while making their evaluations.
• It must be ensured that personal information and contact information are not included in the reviewer evaluation reports upload to the DergiPark system.
• It is not ethical for reviewers to ask authors to cite their publication(s). We kindly request our reviewers to be sensitive about this issue.
• Reviewers should see the participants’ voluntary consent forms and the consent of the participants. If there is a deficiency in this subject in the study, it must be stated in the reviewer report.
• Reviewers are expected to provide opinions on all parts of the article, including summary, introduction, method, findings and discussion after sharing their general opinions about the manuscript.
• Reviewers are expected to give constructive suggestions to the authors and to make scientific suggestions to improve their manuscripts. In this regard, ambiguous and subjective suggestions are to be avoided.
• Reviewers who decide to reject the manuscript they evaluate are expected to be sure that the reasons and suggestions they convey to the author using a constructive and professional language are concrete.
Copyright Agreement and Authorship
All the copyright of submitted articles must be transferred to PJSS during the article submission process. Therefore, Copyright Agreement Form signed by all authors must be submitted with the article. For Copyright Agreement Form, please click here. For Authorship Form, please click here.
Corrections and Retractions Policy
The PJSS is committed to maintaining the accuracy, integrity, and transparency of the academic record. Comprehensive measures are implemented to address errors, inaccuracies, and ethical concerns systematically and transparently, in alignment with international ethical standards, including the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Corrections Policy
Corrections are issued to address minor errors that do not affect the validity or reliability of the research findings.
• A correction notice will be issued promptly and will be clearly labeled as either an “Erratum” (journal-introduced error) or a “Corrigendum” (author-introduced error).
• The correction notice will be linked to the original article and include a detailed explanation of the changes made.
• The original article will remain accessible to ensure transparency.
Retractions Policy
Retractions are implemented in cases of significant errors or ethical misconduct, such as data fabrication, plagiarism, or duplicate publication.
• A retraction notice will clearly state the reasons for the retraction and will be linked to the original article.
• The retraction notice will be reflected in relevant indexes to maintain the integrity of the academic record.
• The original article will remain accessible but will be marked as retracted.
Ethical Oversight
In cases of ethical misconduct or disputes, the journal will follow COPE guidelines, including relevant flowcharts.
• If necessary, institutions or relevant authorities will be contacted for further investigation.
• Collaborative investigations with other editors or ombudspersons may be conducted to ensure fairness.
Plagiarism Detection
The PJSS editor team will certainly not tolerate any form of plagiarism. Therefore, all manuscripts submitted to PJSS are screened for plagiarism by using intihal.net©. The similarity percentage for the complete manuscript must be less than 20%.
Open Access Policy
PJSS provides open access to its content, based on the principle that offering the public free access to research studies helps towards a better global exchange of knowledge. Each article accepted for publication will be published under a Creative Commons license and will be hosted online perpetuity.
Price Policy
There are no submission fees, publication fees or page charges for this journal.
Indexes
Journal Boards
President, on behalf of Pamukkale University Faculty of Sport Sciences
Editor-in-Chief
Section Editor: Leisure & Sport Management
Section Editor: Physical Activity, Health & Exercise
Section Editor: Social & Behavioral Sciences
Section Editor: Sports Performance
Section Editor: Teacher Education & Sport Pedagogy
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Sport Sciences
