The Effect of Attentional Interference on a Rock Climbing Task: A Pilot Study

Abstract

Preparatory behavior has been identified as being beneficial (i.e., achieving optimal emotional states, focused attention, etc.) to performance within various sport domains.   Participants of risk sport (i.e., rock climbing, surfing, skydiving, among others) have been reported to engage in this behavior (i.e., preparatory routines, plans, strategies, etc.) in an attempt to reduce the degree of uncertainty within their domains. The ability to employ this type of behavior however requires cognitive resources and attentional focus. The present pilot study examined the effect of decreased cognitive resources (i.e., through interference tasks) on performance in a risk sport activity (i.e., rock climbing). Rock climbers (N = 18), whose attentional focus was manipulated through a series of resource-depleting tasks, climbed significantly slower, t (16) = -2.34, p < .03, than climbers who were uninhibited. The necessity of cognitive resources in preparing for a risk sport task and how the depletion of such resources may impair performance in such a task is discussed.

 

Keywords: Risk sport, cognitive interference, planning, performance 

Keywords

• Risk sport, cognitive interference, planning, performance

References

1. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Berntson, G. G., Cacioppo, J.T. & Fieldstone, A. (1996).Illusions, arithmetic, and the bidirectional modulation of vagal control of the heart.Biological Psychology, 44, 1-17.
3. Braun-LaTour, K. A., Puccinelli, N. M., & Mast, F. W. (2007).Mood, information congruency, and overload.Journal of Business Research, 60(11), 1109-1116.
4. Bush, G., Whalen, P. J., Rosen, B. R., Jenike, M. A., McInerney, S. C., & Rauch, S. L., (1998). The counting Stoop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging – validated study with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 270-282.
5. Cazenave, N., Le Scanff, C. & Woodman, T. (2007). Psychological profiles and emotional regulation characteristics of women engaged in risk-taking sports. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 20(4), 421-435.
6. Celsi, R. L, Rose, R. L., & Leigh, T. W. (1993). An exploration of high-risk leisure consumption through skydiving.Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (1), 1-23.
7. Cogan, N. & Brown, R. I. F. (1999).Metamotivational dominance, states and injuries in risk and safe sports.Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 503-518.
8. Cohen, J. C. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.(2nded.). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.

9. Cohen, J. C. (1992). Statistical power anaylsis.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 98-101.
10. Cohn, P. J., Rotella, R. J., & Lloyd, J. W., (1990).Effects of a cognitive-behavioral intervention on the preshot routine and performance in golf.The Sport Psychologist, 4, 33-47.
11. Consiglio, W., Driscoll, P., Witte, M., & Berg, W. P. (2003). Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interface on reaction time in a braking response. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 495-500.
12. Diehm, R. &Armatas, C. (2004). Surfing: An avenue for socially acceptable risk- taking, satisfying the needs for sensation seeking and experience seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 663-677.
13. Eccles, D. W., Walsh, S. E., &Ingledew, D. K. (2002). The use of heuristics during route planning by expert and novice orienteers. Journal of Sport Sciences, 20, 327- 337.
14. Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: an introduction to some of the issues. In The Road to Excellence; The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games (edited by K. A. Ericsson), pp. 1-50. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Ewert, A. E. (1994). Playing the edge: Motivation and risk taking in a high-altitude wildernesslike environment.Environment and Behavior, 26(1), 3-24.
16. Fave, A. D., Bassi, M., &Massimini (2003).Quality of experience and risk perception in high-altitude rock climbing.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15, 82-98.
17. Harirchi, I, Arvin, A, Vash, J. H., &Zafarmand, V. (2005). Frostbite: incidence and predisposing factors in mountaineers. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39, 898- 901.
18. Hatzigeorgiadis, A. & Biddle, S. J. H. (1999).The effects of goal orientation and perceived competence on cognitive interference during tennis and snooker performance.Journal of Sport Behavior, 22(4), 479-501.
19. Hatzigeorgiadis, A. & Biddle, S. J. H. (2001). Athletes’ perception of how cognitive interference during competition influences concentration and effort. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 14(4), 411-429.
20. Heyman, S. R. & Rose, K. G. (1980).Psychological variables affecting SCUBA performance.In Psychology of Motor Behavior and Sport (1979).Human Kinetics Press, Champaign, IL.
21. Hockey, G. R. J. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high work-load: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45, 73-93.
22. Hymbaugh, K. & Garrett, J. (1974).Sensation seeking among skydivers.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38, 118
23. Jackson, R. C. (2003). Pre-performance routine consistency: temporal analysis of goal kicking in the Rugby Union World Cup. Journal of Sport Sciences, 21, 803- 814.
24. Kerr, J. H. &Svebak, S. (1989). Motivational aspects of preference for, and participation in, “risk” and “safe” sports.Personality and Individual Differences, 10(7), 797-800.
25. Kerr, J. H. (1991). Arousal-seeking in risk sport participants.Personality and Individual Differences, 12(6), 613-616.
26. Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load.TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 9.
27. Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339-354.
28. Llewellyn, D. J. & Sanchez, X. (2008). Individual differences and risk taking in rock climbing. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 413-426.
29. Llewellyn, D. J., Sanchez, X., Asghar, A., & Jones, G. (2008). Self-efficacy, risk taking and performance in rock climbing. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 75-81.
30. Lonsdale, C. & Tam, J. T. M. (2008). On the temporal and behavioural consistency of pre-performance routines: An intra-individual analysis of elite basketball players’ free throw shooting accuracy. Journal of Sports Science, 26, 259-266.
31. Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition (2nded.), Gestalt: Thinking as restructuring problems (pp. 38-78). United State of America: W. H. Freeman and Company.
32. Pass, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory.Educational Psychologist, 38, 63-71.
33. Piet, S. (1987). What motivates stunt men? Motivation and Emotion, 11, 195-213.
34. Sangals, J. &Sommer, W. (2010).The Impact of Intervening Tasks on Response Preparation.Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 36, 415-429.
35. Singer, R. N. (2002). Preperformance state, routines, and automaticity: What does it take to realize expertise in self-paced events? Sport Psychology, 24, 359-375.
36. Slanger, E. &Rudestam, K. E. (1997). Motivation and disinhibition in high risk sports: Sensation seeking and self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 355-374.
37. Straub, W. F. (1982). Sensation seeking among high and low-risk male athletes.Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 246-253.
38. Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., &Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23-32.
39. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reaction.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, pp. 643-662.
40. Ward,A. (2004). Attention: A neuropsychological approach. New York: Psychology Press.
41. Zuckerman, M. (1983).Sensation seeking and sports.Personality and Individual Differences, 4(3), 285-292.