The Socialization Process For Women With Disabilities In Sports: A Double Barrier?

Abstract

Sports has long been regarded as an important mediator for all individuals in the socialization process. An individual with disabilities have a limited social life and sports is very influential in their socialization process. The aim of this research is to reveal the mediators that prompt the women with disabilities to sports, (socialization into sports) and what kind of effects the sports have on the lives of these women (socialization via sports). Eight female athletes with physical disabilities participated in the study. In the study conducted by the qualitative research method, the data was collected through an individual interview and focus group interview. According to the results obtained from the research, the most effective mediators for female athletes with disabilities to start sports are the trainers looking for athletes, and their own decisions. When the findings on the socialization processes of the female athletes with disabilities through sports were examined, it was revealed that athletes had experienced major changes in their lives after starting sports in physical, social and emotional dimensions. However, the participants underlined that they had some disadvantages compared to male athletes. 

Keywords

• Disability,socialization,women athletes,sport via socialization,socialization into sports

References

1. Bar-Eli , M., Hartmann, I., & Levy-Korker, N. (1994). Using Goal Setting To Improve physical performance of adolescents with behavior disorders: The effects of goal proximity. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 86-97.
2. Bedini , L., & Anderson , D. (2005). I am nice, I am smart, I like Karate: Girls with physical disabilities’ perceptions of physical recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, Vol. 39(2), 144-130.
3. Bodde , A., & Seo , D. (2009). A review of social and environmental barriers to physical activity for adults with intellectual disabilities. . Disability and Health Journal, 2(2), 57-66.
4. Bourdieu , P. (2001). Masculine Domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak , E., Akgün , Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. . Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 1-360.
6. Coakley , J. (2001). Sport in Society: Issues and Controversies. 7th edition, McGraw-Hill International, New.
7. Creswell, J. (2013). Qualıtatıve Inquıry & Research Desıgn Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
8. French, D., & Hainsworth , J. (2001). 'There aren't any buses and the swimming pool is always cold!': obstacles and opportunities in the provision of sport for disabled people. Managing Leisure, 6(1), 35-49,.

9. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice Hall.
10. Güven , B., & Akcan, F. (2007). The Socialization Process of Wheelchair Basketball Players in Turkey. World Congress 2007 Sport in a Global World – Past, Present and Future.
11. Güven Karahan, B., & Esatbeyoğlu, F. ( 23-27 June 2009). The Socialization Process of Goalball Players in Turkey. In: International Symposium of Adapted Physical Activity (ISAPA) Proceeding Book, (s. 168). Gavle, Sweden.
12. Hanna , W., & Rogovsky , E. (1991). Women and disabilities: Two handicaps plus. Disability. Handicap & Society, 6, 49-63.
13. Holloway I, I., & Wheeler , S. (1996). Qualitative Research for Nurses, Oxford: Blackwell Science.
14. Inckle , K. (2014). A lame argument: Profoundly disabled embodiment as critical gender politics. Disability & Society, 29(3), 388–401.
15. Jime´nez , J., Vargas , M., Santamarı´a ML M, & Jar , J. (2009). Impact of social factors on labour discrimination of disabled women. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 1115–1123.
16. Kavasoğlu , İ., & Macit , A. (2018). Bodies in Control: Feminine Identity Produced in Bikini Fitness. . Journal of National Sport Sciences, 2(1), 42-67.
17. Koca , C., & Bulgu , N. (2005). Sport and gender: An overview. Toplum ve Bilim, 103, 163-184.
18. Koca, C. (2016). Cinsiyetlendirilmiş bir alan olarak spor. C. Koca içinde, Sporun Toplumsal Cinsiyet Halleri (s. 18-37). Ankara: Spor Yayınevi.
19. Korff-Sausse, S. (2001). Des gender studies aux disability studies: repenser les catégories. Champ Psy, L’esprit du Temps , 58, 37–53.
20. Krippendorff , K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to is Methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
21. Kristen, L., Patriksson , G., & Fridlund , B. (2003). Parent’s conceptions of the influence of participation in a sports programme on their children and adolescents with physical disabilities. European Physical Education Review, 9(1), 23-41.
22. Leonard II, W. (1980). A sociological perspective of sport. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.
23. Loy , J., McPherson , B., & Kenyon , G. (1978). Sport and social systems: A guide to the analysis, problems, and literature. Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
24. Merriam , S. (2013). Nitel Araştırma Desen ve Uygulama İçin Bir Rehber, (Çev.Editörü: Selahattin Turan). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
25. Nixon II , H. (2009). Constructing diverse sports opportunities for people with disabilities (Cilt 31). Journal of Sport & Social Issues.
26. Odette, F., Israel , P., Li , A., Ullman , D., Colontonio, A., Maclean, H., et al. (2003). Barriers to wellness activities for Canadian women with physical disabilities. Health Care for Women International, 24(2), 125-134.
27. Parsons , T., & Bales, R. (1951). The Social System. Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2nd edition.
28. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Purdue , D., & Howe, P. (2015). Plotting a Paralympic field: An elite disability sport competition viewed through Bourdieu’s sociological lens. International review for the sociology of sport, 50(1), 83-97.
30. Richard , R., Joncheray , H., & Dugas , E. (2014). Disabled sportswomen and gender construction in powerchair football. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52(1), 61 – 81.
31. Richard, R., Joncheray, H., & Dugas, E. (2014). Disabled sportswomen and gender construction in powerchair football. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52(1), 61 – 81.
32. Rimmer, J., & Rowland, J. (2008). Physical activity for youth with disabilities: a critical need in an underserved population. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 11(2), 141-148.
33. Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research. 2nd edition, Oxford: Blackwell.
34. Sherhilll, C. (1986). Social and psychological dimensions of sports for disabled athletes. C. Sherrill içinde, Sport and Disabled Athletes (s. 21-33). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
35. Sherry , M. (2004). Overlaps and contradictions between queer theory and disability studies. Disability & Society, 19(7), 769–783.
36. Toffoletti , K., & Palmer , C. (2017). New approaches for studies of Muslim women and sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52(2), 146-163.
37. Tolan , B., İsen , G., & Batmaz , V. (1985). Sosyal Psikoloji I. (Ben ve Toplum). Ankara: 1. Basım Teori Yayınları.
38. Turkey Statistical Institute . (2011). 12 12, 2018 http://www.tuik.gov.tr
39. Türnüklü , A. (2000). Eğitimbilim Araştırmalarında Etkin Olarak Kullanılabilecek Nitel Bir araştırma Tekniği: Görüşme. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 6(4), 543- 559.
40. Van der Ploeg, Allard J van der Beek, Luc HV van der Woude, & Willem van Mechelen . (2004). Physical Activity for People with a Disability. Sports Medicine, 34(10), 639–649.
41. Xenakis, N., & Goldberg , J. (2010). The Young Women’s Program: a health and wellness model to empower adolescents with physical disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 3, 125–129.
42. Yazicioglu , K., Yavuz, F., Goktepe , A., & Tan , A. (2012). Influence of adapted sports on quality of life and life satisfaction in sport participants and non-sport participants with physical disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 5(4), 249–253.