Review

Microplastic Footprints in Mountain Ecosystems: A Review of Current Evidence and Scientific Gaps

Volume: 1 Number: 1 June 30, 2025
Hamide Sena Kanat , Hülya Aykaç Özen *
EN TR

Microplastic Footprints in Mountain Ecosystems: A Review of Current Evidence and Scientific Gaps

Abstract

Microplastic pollution has emerged as a pervasive environmental issue, with increasing evidence revealing its presence beyond urban and marine environments, extending into remote mountain ecosystems. This review synthesizes current research on the occurrence, sources, and distribution of microplastics in mountain regions worldwide. Studies demonstrate that microplastics are transported to high-altitude environments primarily through atmospheric deposition, tourism activities, and adjacent human settlements. Despite growing awareness, data on spatial and temporal variability of microplastic contamination in mountainous areas remain limited. Moreover, the ecological impacts of microplastics on mountain biota and ecosystem processes are poorly understood. Methodological inconsistencies across studies further complicate comprehensive assessments. This paper highlights critical scientific gaps and underscores the need for standardized protocols, long-term monitoring, and interdisciplinary approaches to better elucidate the extent and consequences of microplastic pollution in mountain ecosystems. Addressing these gaps is essential for informing conservation strategies and mitigating plastic pollution in these vulnerable environments

Keywords

mountain , atmosphere , ecosystem , pollution , Microplastic

References

  1. PlasticsEurope, “Plastics – the Facts 2021: An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data”, 2021.
  2. J. P. Frias ve R. Nash, “Microplastics: Finding a consensus on the definition”, Marine pollution bulletin, vol. 138, pp. 145-147, 2019.
  3. M. Bergmann, S. Mützel, S. Primpke, M. B. Tekman, J. Trachsel, ve G. Gerdts, “White and wonderful? Microplastics prevail in snow from the Alps to the Arctic”, Science advances, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. eaax1157, 2019.
  4. J. Brahney, M. Hallerud, E. Heim, M. Hahnenberger, ve S. Sukumaran, “Plastic rain in protected areas of the United States”, Science, vol. 368, no. 6496, pp. 1257-1260, 2020.
  5. FAO, “Mountain forests in a changing world: Realizing values, addressing challenges.”, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011.
  6. D. Viviroli, H. H. Dürr, B. Messerli, M. Meybeck, ve R. Weingartner, “Mountains of the world, water towers for humanity: Typology, mapping, and global significance”, Water resources research, vol. 43, no 7, 2007.
  7. S. Padha, R. Kumar, A. Dhar, ve P. Sharma, “Microplastic pollution in mountain terrains and foothills: A review on source, extraction, and distribution of microplastics in remote areas”, Environmental Research, vol. 207, no. 112232, 2022.
  8. S. Allen vd., “Atmospheric transport and deposition of microplastics in a remote mountain catchment”, Nature geoscience, vol. 12, no 5, pp. 339-344, 2019.
  9. Y. Zhang, S. Kang, S. Allen, D. Allen, T. Gao, ve M. Sillanpää, “Atmospheric microplastics: A review on current status and perspectives”, Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 203, no. 103118, 2020.
  10. A. A. Koelmans, M. Kooi, K. L. Law, ve E. Van Sebille, “All is not lost: deriving a top-down mass budget of plastic at sea”, Environmental Research Letters, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 114028, 2017.
APA
Kanat, H. S., & Aykaç Özen, H. (2025). Microplastic Footprints in Mountain Ecosystems: A Review of Current Evidence and Scientific Gaps. Positive Science International, 1(1), 46-56. https://izlik.org/JA62GN73KG