Kültür İle Girşimcilik Algısı Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Üniversite Öğrencilerine Yönelik Karşılaştırmalı Çalışma

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 140 - 161

Yavuz Demirel , Balgasm Ali Almasratı

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, kültür ile girişimcilik algısı arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymaktır. Bu bağlamda iki farklı ülke ekseninde iki üniversite öğrencilerine yönelik bir araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada, kültür, girişimci, girişimcilik, girişimcilik fırsatı, girişimcilik eğitimi algısı gibi temel kavramlar üzerinde durulmuştur. Kültür, bir toplum içerisinde yaşanmış, öğrenilmiş, paylaşılan, inanç ve değerlerin bütünsel bir oluşumudur. Girişimci, kar, risk ve sorumluluğu üzerine alarak bir işi organize eden kişidir. Girişimcilik ise, bir süreç olarak ele alınmaktadır. Girişimcilik, iktisadi mal veya hizmet üretimi için üretim faktörlerinin bir araya getirilerek, bir dönüşümden geçirilmesiyle, önceden keşfedilen ekonomik fırsatların yeni değerlere dönüştürüldüğü bir süreçtir. Çalışmada Hofste’nin sınıflandırdığı kültür boyutları; “belirsizlikten kaçınma, güç mesafesi indeksi, erilliğe karşı dişilik, uzun vadeli yönelime karşı-kısa vadeli yönelim, bireyselliğe karşı-toplumsallık, serbestliğe karşı- sınırlama” temel alınmıştır. Girişimci, girişimcilik ve girişimcilik fırsat algısı ile kültür boyutları arasındaki kavramsal ilişkinin yanı sıra, kültür boyutları ile girişimci, girişimcilik ve girişimcilik fırsat algısı kavramları arasındaki ilişki istatistiki olarak da incelenmiştir. Bu çerçevede, iki farklı ülkede iki farklı üniversiteden toplam 800 öğrenciden elde edilen veriler analize tabi tutulmuştur. Analiz sonucunda araştırmada kullanılan ölçeklerin güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik düzeylerinin yeterli olduğu görülmüştür. Bulgulara göre, genel olarak kültür ve kültürün boyutları ile girişimci, girişimcilik ve girişimcilik fırsat algısı arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişkin olduğu ve kültürün öğrencilerin girişimcilik algısını etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca öğrencilerin ait oldukları kültüre göre girişimci, girişimcilik, girişimcilik fırsat algısı ve girişimcilik eğitim algı düzeylerinin de farklılık gösterdiği saptanmıştır.

Keywords

Ulusal Kültür; Girişimci, Girişimcilik, Girişimcilik Fırsat Algısı

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CULTURE AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP: A COMPARATIVE RESESRCH ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to reveal the relationship between culture and entrepreneurship perception. In this context, a research was conducted on students of two universities in two different countries. In the study, basic concepts such as culture, entrepreneur, entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship opportunity, entrepreneurship education perception are emphasized. Culture is a holistic formation of experienced, learned, shared beliefs and values in a society. An entrepreneur is a person who organizes a business by undertaking profit, risk and responsibility. Entrepreneurship, on the other hand, is considered as a process. Entrepreneurship is a process in which previously discovered economic opportunities are transformed into new values by bringing together and transforming the factors of production for the production of economic goods or services. The study is based on the cultural dimensions classified by Hofste: “uncertainty avoidance, power distance index, masculinity vs. femininity, long-term vs. short-term orientation, individualism vs. collectivism, indulgence vs. restraint”. In addition to the conceptual relationship between entrepreneur, entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship opportunity perception and culture dimensions, the relationship between culture dimensions and the concepts of entrepreneur, entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship opportunity perception is also analyzed statistically. In this context, the data obtained from 800 students from two different universities in two different countries were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the reliability and validity levels of the scales used in the research were sufficient. According to the findings, it has been determined that there is a positive relationship between the dimensions of culture and culture in general and the perception of entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship opportunity, and that culture affects students’ entrepreneurship perception. In addition, it was found that the students’ entrepreneur, entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship opportunity perception and entrepreneurship education perception levels differ according to the culture they belong to.

Keywords

National Culture; Entrepreneur, Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Opportunity Perception.

References

• Akın, H. B., & Demirel, Y. (2015). Entrepreneurship education and perception change: The preliminary outcomes of compulsory entrepreneurship course experience in Turkey. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (34), 15-26.
• Alvarez, S.A,. & Busenitz, L.W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755-775.
• Bailetti, T. (2012). Technology entrepreneurship: Overview, definition, and distinctive aspects. Technology innovation management review, 2(2).
• Bechard, J,. & Toulouse, J. (1998). Validation of a didactic model individual analysis of training objectives in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing. 13 (4), 317- 332.
• Co, M. & Mitchell, B. (2006). Entrepreneurship education in South Africa: A nationwide survey. Education + Training, 48(5), 348-59.
• Coulibaly, S. K., Erbao, C., & Mekongcho, T. M. (2018). Economic globalization, entrepreneurship, and development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 271-280.
• Curry, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship at a historically black university in central Mississippi, A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University
• Galloway, L., Anderson, M., Brown, W., & Wilson, L. (2005). Enterprise skills for the economy. Education+ Training, 47(1), 7-17.
• Garavan, T. & O’Cinneide, B. (1994). Entrepreneurship education and training programmers: a review and evaluation – part 2. Journal of European Industrial Training, 18(8), 13-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090599410068024
• Gibb, A. (1993). The enterprise culture and education: Understanding enterprise education and its links with small business, entrepreneurship and wider educational goals. International Small Business Journal, 11(3), 11-3.
• Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture, New York: Anchor Press.
• Henry, C., Hill, F,. & Leitch, C. (2005). Entrepreneurship education and training: Can entrepreneurship be taught? Part II. Education + Training,. 47(3), 158-69.
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage.
• Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2(1), 2307-0919.http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
• Hytti, U., & O’Gorman, C. (2004). What is “enterprise education”? An analysis of the objectives and methods of enterprise education programmes in four European countries. Education + Training, 46(1), 11-23.
• Jones, C. And English, J. (2004). A contemporary approach to entrepreneurship education. Education + Training, 46, 416-23.
• Kendirli, H. Ç. ve Şenöz, A. (2019). Hizmet sektöründe kadın girişimciler: Çorum araştırması. Uluslararası Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi (IBAD), 4(1), 93-118.
• Kirby, D. A. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: Can business schools meet the challenge?. Education+ training, 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00400910410569632
• Kirby, D. A. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: Can business schools meet the challenge?. Education+ training, 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00400910410569632
• Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin
• Leung, K,. Bhagat, R.S,. Buchan, N.R,. Erez, M,. & Gibson, C.B. (2005). Culture and international business: Recent advances and their implications for future research, Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4), 357–378.
• McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (1992). More like each other than anyone else? A cross-cultural study of entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 419-429.
• McGrath, R. G., MacMillan, I. C., Yang, E. A., & Tsai, W. (1992b). Does culture endure, or is it malleable? Issues for entrepreneurial economic development. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 441-458.
• McGrath, R. G., MacMillan, I. C., Yang, E. A., & Tsai, W. (1992b). Does culture endure, or is it malleable? Issues for entrepreneurial economic development. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 441-458.
• Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770-791.
• Morris, M. H., Davis, D. L., & Allen, J. W. (1994). Fostering corporate entrepreneurship: Cross-cultural comparisons of the importance of individualism versus collectivism. Journal of international business studies, 25(1), 65-89.
• Morris, M. H., Davis, D. L., & Allen, J. W. (1994). Fostering corporate entrepreneurship: Cross-cultural comparisons of the importance of individualism versus collectivism. Journal of international business studies, 25(1), 65-89.
• NKC. (2008). Entrepreneurship in India. http://knowledgecommissionarchive.nic.in/downloads/documents/NKC_Entrepreneurship.pdf 20.04 2021
• Özdamar, K. (2004). Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi, Kaan Kitabevi.
• Pinillos, M. J., & Reyes, L. (2011). Relationship between individualist–collectivist culture and entrepreneurial activity: Evidence from global entrepreneurship monitor data. Small Business Economics, 37(1), 23-37.
• Reynolds, P.D. (2005). Understanding business creation: Serendipity and scope in two decades of business creation studies. Small Business Economics, 24, 359-364.
• Scheinberg, S., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). An 11 country study of motivations to start a business. Babson College.
• Scheinberg, S., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). An 11 country study of motivations to start a business. Babson College. ‏
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & brothers.
• Scott, M.G., & Twomey, D.F. (1988). The long-term supply of entrepreneurs: students' career aspirations in relation to entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 26(4), 5-13.
• Shane, S. (1992). Why do some societies invent more than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 29-46.
• Shane, S. (1993). Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 59-73.
• Shane, S. (1994a). Cultural values and the championing process. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 18, 25-41.
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (1996). Renegade and rational championing strategies. Organization Studies, 17, 15-111.
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (1996). Renegade and rational championing strategies. Organization Studies, 17, 15-111.
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (1996). Renegade and rational championing strategies. Organization Studies, 17, 15-111.
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.
• Shane, S., Kolvereid, L., & Westhead, P. (1991). An exploratory examination of the reasons leading to new firm formation across country and gender. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 431-446.
• Shane, S., Kolvereid, L., & Westhead, P. (1991). An exploratory examination of the reasons leading to new firm formation across country and gender. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 431-446.
• Steensma, H. K., Marino, L., & Weaver, K. M. (2000). Attitudes toward cooperative strategies: A cross-cultural analysis of entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 591-609.
• Steensma, H. K., Marino, L., & Weaver, K. M. (2000). Attitudes toward cooperative strategies: A cross-cultural analysis of entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 591-609.
• Venaik, S., & Brewer, P. (2015). The common threads of national cultures. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 23, 75-85. doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2014.12.001
• Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
• Zhao, X., Li, H., & Rauch, A. (2012). Cross-Country Differences in Entrepreneurial Activity: The Role of Cultural Practice and National Wealth. Frontiers of Business Research in China 6(4), 447-474.