Cognitive and cultural dynamics of melodic structure: a study of post-skip reversals in Rast and Nihavent makams

Abstract

Post skip reversals, where a significant melodic leap is followed by a change, in direction have been recognized in Western Classical music but haven›t been extensively explored in non-Western traditions like Turkish makam music. We investigated the presence of skip reversals in both the Rast and Nihavent makam within SymbTr encompassing 50 and 45 pieces respectively. To compare types of skip reversals in Rast and Nihavent we categorized all melodic intervals based on their median pitch into four types; landing, approaching, departing and crossing. Chi Squared tests were utilized to analyze the significance of direction changes. Our findings reveal that post skip reversals are prevalent in Turkish makam music. In Rast makam 88.62% of crossing leaps resulted in a change of direction. Similarly, for Nihavent makam, 87.38% of crossing leaps exhibited this pattern. These outcomes support the notion that certain cognitive processes associated with reversals may possess traits that align with theories proposing that melodic skips generate a perceptual imbalance necessitating a reversal. Furthermore, cultural practices and stylistic conventions play a role, in influencing the occurrence of skip reversals. For instance, the strong association between crossing leaps and direction changes in Nihavent makam reflects specific stylistic practices within Turkish classical music, such as the emphasis on maintaining a balanced melodic contour. This indicates that while there are aspects to how we perceive music cultural influences play a role in shaping how these processes are expressed. It shows the interplay, between cognitive tendencies and cultural traditions. The findings focus on the complex interplay between universal cognitive processes, cultural practices and physical constraints, which contribute to a wider understanding of melodic organization in different cultures. In future research, the analysis should expand to include a wider range of makams and incorporate qualitative methods for deeper insight into cultural, historical or performance contexts that influence Post-skip reversal.

Keywords

• post-skip reversals
• Turkish makam music
• cognitive music theory
• melodic patterns
• Cognitive ethnomusicology

References

1. Altun, F., & Egermann, H. (2021). Temperament systems influence emotion induction but not makam recognition performance in Turkish makam music. Psychology of Music, 49(5), 1088-1101.
2. Butler, D. (1989). Describing the perception of tonality in music: A critique of the tonal hierarchy theory and a proposal for a theory of intervallic rivalry. Music perception, 6(3), 219-241.
3. Butler, D. (1990). A study of event hierarchies in tonal and post-tonal music. Psychology of Music, 18(1), 4-17.
4. Cuthbert, M. S., & Ariza, C. (2010). music21: A toolkit for computer-aided musicology and symbolic music data. n J. Stephen Downie and Remco C. Veltkamp (Eds.). 11th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR 2010), August 9-13, 2010, Utrecht, Netherlands. pp. 637- 642. Version: Author’s final manuscript http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84963
5. Fox-Strangways, A. H. (1914). The music of Hindostan. Mittal Publications. Huron, D. (1996). The melodic arch in Western folksongs. Computing in Musicology, 10, 3-23. http://www.music.mcgill.ca
6. Huron, D. (2001). Is music an evolutionary adaptation? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 930, 43-61.
7. Huron, D. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. MIT press.
8. Karaosmanoğlu, M.K. (2012). A Turkish makam music symbolic database for music information retrieval: SymbTr. In Proceedings of 13th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference; 2012 October 8-12; Porto, Portugal. Porto: ISMIR, 2012. p. 223–228. International Society for Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR). http:// hdl.handle.net/10230/25700

9. Meyer, L. B. (1973). Explaining music: Essays and explorations. University of California Press.
10. Narmour, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication-realization model. University of Chicago Press.
11. Narmour, E. (1992). The analysis and cognition of melodic complexity: The implication-realization model. University of Chicago Press.
12. Temperley, D. (2014). Probabilistic models of melodic structure: The case of post-skip reversals. Music Perception, 31(4), 339-358.
13. Tierney, A. T., Russo, F. A., & Patel, A. D. (2011). The motor origins of human and avian song structure: A comparison of neural populations and circuitry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(Supplement 1), 15510-15515.
14. Toch, E. (1948). The shaping forces in music: An inquiry into the nature of harmony, melody, counterpoint, and form in music. Dover Publications.
15. Tymoczko, D. (2016). Revisiting post-skip reversals. http://www.dmitri.mycpanel. princeton.edu/postskipreversals.pdf
16. Von Hippel, P., & Huron, D. (2000). Why do skips precede reversals? The effect of tessitura on melodic structure. Music Perception, 18(1), 59-85.
17. Waskom, M. L. (2021). Seaborn: Statistical data visualization. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3021.
18. Watt, H. J. (1924). Melody. Music & Letters, 5(3), 272–285. http://www.jstor. org/stable/726788