Education Policy Transfer and Policy Change: Examining the Case of the National Assessment and Examination Center of Georgia

Abstract

Policy change is an integral part of the modern education policymaking process. Policy changes can be done with different tools, one of which lies in policy transfer. The cons and pros of the education policy change and transfer can be seen comprehensively in post-socialist states, as the education system changed fundamentally in line with transferring policies and its aims, content, and instruments. The article deals with the process of education policy transfer and change based on the National Assessment and Examination Center (NAEC) case of Georgia. Based on the orthodox framework proposed, elaborated with the policy change concept, the article tries to determine the links between policy change and policy transfer and to identify facilitating and hindering factors of education policy change in the case of NAEC. Results show that all hindering factors are more or less linked to Soviet Inertia and post-soviet heritage: societal fears and pressure and the supra-centralization way of policymaking slow down the path of education policy transfer. However, if political, financial, and organizational support, both from outside and inside the country, coincides, it is more likely that education policy transfer and change to be successful. The article's findings can benefit the education policy theory in terms of developing and criticising the proposed assumptions, focusing on either post-soviet education transformation or policy administration.

Keywords

• education policy transfer
• successful policy transfer
• education reform
• education in Georgia

References

1. Bakker, S. (2014). The introduction of large scale computer adaptive testing in Georgia. Political context, capacity building, implementation, and lessons learned. Washington, DC: World Bank.
2. Beech, J. (2006). The theme of educational transfer in comparative education: A view over time. Research in Comparative and international Education, 1(1), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.2304%2Frcie.2006.1.1.2
3. Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy sciences, 25(3), 275-294.
4. Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2011). What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited. Political studies review, 9(3), 366-378. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1478-9302.2011.00240.x
5. Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2012). Policy transfer research: still evolving, not yet through?. Political studies review, 10(3), 333-338. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1478-9302.2012.00273.x
6. Birzea, C. (1994). Educational Policies of the Countries in Transition. Council of Europe, Publishing and Documentation Service, F-67075, Strasbourg, Cedex, France.
7. Bovens, M. ’t Hart, P., & Peters, BG (Eds.).(2001). Success and Failure in Public Governance: A comparative analysis.
8. Bregvadze, T. (2012). Formal general education and private tutoring as parallel systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tbilisi: Ilia State University.(in Georgian).

9. Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2009). Introduction: the multidimensional world of policy dynamics. In European and North American Policy Change (pp. 21-32). Routledge.
10. Chakhaia, L. and Bregvadze, T., 2018. Georgia: Higher education system dynamics and institutional diversity. In 25 Years of Transformations of Higher Education Systems in Post-Soviet Countries (pp. 175-197). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
11. Chankseliani, M. (2013). Rural disadvantage in Georgian higher education admissions: A mixed-methods study. Comparative Education Review, 57(3), 424-456. https://doi.org/10.1086/670739.
12. Chankseliani, M., Gorgodze, S., Janashia, S. and Kurakbayev, K., 2020. Rural disadvantage in the context of centralised university admissions: a multiple case study of Georgia and Kazakhstan. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(7), pp.995-1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1761294.
13. Chankseliani, M., & Silova, I. (2018, January). Reconfiguring education purposes, policies and practices during post-socialist transformations: Setting the stage. Symposium Books.
14. Cheterian, V., 2008. Georgia's rose revolution: change or repetition? Tension between state-building and modernization projects. Nationalities papers, 36(4), pp.689-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905990802230530
15. Coene, F., 2016. Euro-Atlantic discourse in Georgia: the making of Georgian foreign and domestic policy after the Rose Revolution. Routledge.
16. Collier, D., & Messick, R. E. (1975). Prerequisites versus diffusion: Testing alternative explanations of social security adoption. American political science review, 69(4), 1299-1315. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955290
17. Dobbins, M., 2013. post-Rose Revolution georgia: how democratization went wrong-and why authoritarianism also may have backfired. Euxeinos: Governance and Culture in the Black Sea Region, 2013(9), pp.15-21.
18. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x
19. Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance, 13(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00121
20. Dolowitz, D. P. (2003). A policy–maker's guide to policy transfer. The Political Quarterly, 74(1), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.t01-1-00517
21. Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2012). The future of policy transfer research. Political studies review, 10(3), 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1478-9302.2012.00274.x
22. Dolowitz, D. P., & Medearis, D. (2009). Considerations of the obstacles and opportunities to formalizing cross-national policy transfer to the United States: a case study of the transfer of urban environmental and planning policies from Germany. Environment and planning C: government and policy, 27(4), 684-697. https://doi.org/10.1068%2Fc0865j
23. Dussauge-Laguna, M. I. (2012). On the past and future of policy transfer research: Benson and Jordan revisited. Political studies review, 10(3), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00275.x
24. Dundua, S., Karaia, T. and Abashidze, Z., 2017. National narration and Politics of Memory in post-socialist Georgia. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences, 17(2). DOI: 10.1515/sjps-2017-0010
25. Elliott, J., & Tudge, J. (2007). The impact of the west on post‐Soviet Russian education: change and resistance to change. Comparative Education, 43(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060601162420
26. Evans, M. (2004). Introduction: Is Policy Transfer Rational Policy-making?,(Ed.: Mark Evans), Policy Transfer in Global Perspective.
27. Evans, M. (2009). Policy transfer in critical perspective. Policy studies, 30(3), 243-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870902863828
28. Fairbanks, C.H., 2004. Georgia's Rose revolution. Journal of Democracy, 15(2), pp.110-124. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2004.0025
29. Fawcett, P., & Marsh, D. (2012). Policy transfer and policy success: The case of the gateway review process (2001–10). Government and opposition, 47(2), 162-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2011.01358.x
30. Forestier, K., & Crossley, M. (2015). International education policy transfer–borrowing both ways: The Hong Kong and England experience. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(5), 664-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2014.928508
31. Freedom House (2022). Georgia. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/country/georgia/freedom-world/2021 on 25-01-22
32. Gabedava, M. (2013). Reforming the university admission system in Georgia. Global Corruption Report: Education, 155–160. Transparency International.
33. Geostat (2022). Georgia. Retrieved from: https://www.geostat.ge/en on 15-01-2022.
34. Gigauri, N. (2022). Diversification of finances and challenges of intra-party democracy in the Contemporary Georgian Political party spectrum. Politics/პოლიტიკა, 6(2).
35. Gorgodze, S. and Chakhaia, L., 2021. The uses and misuses of centralised high stakes examinations-Assessment Policy and Practice in Georgia. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(3), pp.322-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1900775
36. James, O., & Lodge, M. (2003). The limitations of ‘policy transfer’and ‘lesson drawing’for public policy research. Political studies review, 1(2), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1478-9299.t01-1-00003
37. Janashia, S. (2016). The introduction of per-capita education financing in former USSR countries (Doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University).
38. Jones, S.F. (2012). Reflections on the rose revolution. European security, 21(1), pp.5-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2012.656596
39. Khuroshvili, B. B. (2021). Public Servants’ Policy-making In The Modern Georgian Public Administration. Politics/პოლიტიკა, 5(4).
40. Kobakhidze, M. N. (2016). Teachers as tutors: shadow education market dynamics in Georgia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hong Kong).
41. Kobakhidze, M. N. (2018). Teachers as Tutors. In Teachers as Tutors: Shadow Education Market Dynamics in Georgia (pp. 113-143). Springer, Cham.
42. Kuroptev, E. (2020). Borderisation-The Kremlin’s unending war. New Eastern Europe, (04 (42)), 20-26.
43. Machitidze, I., & Temirov, Y. (2020). Hybrid Regimes’ Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic:“The First Wave” Evidence from Ukraine and Georgia. Mezinárodní vztahy, 55(4), 72-93.
44. Marsh, D., & Evans, M. (2012). Policy transfer: coming of age and learning from the experience. Policy studies, 33(6), 477-481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2012.736795
45. Marsh, D., & McConnell, A. (2010). Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public administration, 88(2), 564-583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01803.x
46. McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Political studies review, 10(3), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1478-9302.2012.00276.x
47. McConnell, A. (2010). Understanding policy success: Rethinking public policy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
48. NAEC. (2019). Report on School Leaving (CAT) and Unified National Examinations. Retrieved from: https://naec.ge/uploads/postData/KVLEVEBI/%E1%83%99%E1%83%95%E1%83%9A%E1%83%94%E1%83%95%E1%83%98%E1%83%A1%20%E1%83%90%E1%83%9C%E1%83%92%E1%83%90%E1%83%A0%E1%83%98%E1%83%A8%E1%83%98.pdf on 25-09-2022.
49. Nóvoa, A. (2002). Ways of thinking about education in Europe. In Fabricating Europe (pp. 131-155). Springer, Dordrecht. hhpts://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47561-8_10
50. Orkodashvili, M. (2010). Higher education reforms in the fight against corruption in Georgia. Demokratizatsiya, 18(4).
51. Papava, V., 2006. The political economy of Georgia's Rose Revolution. Orbis, 50(4), pp.657-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2006.07.006
52. Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2004). Researching policy borrowing: Some methodological challenges in comparative education. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 773-784. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000279495
53. Pojani, D. (2020). Theoretical approaches to studying policy transfer. In Planning for Sustainable Urban Transport in Southeast Asia (pp. 9-16). Springer, Cham.
54. Kitiashvili, Z., & Chkuaseli, K. (2013). About legislative basis of secondary school education in Georgia. Education Sciences and Psychology, (2), 97-110.
55. Rostiashvili, K. (2011). Higher education in transition: From corruption to freedom of information in Post-Soviet Georgia. European Education, 43(4), 26-44. https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934430402
56. Silova, I. (Ed.). (2006). From sites of occupation to symbols of multiculturalism: Re-conceptualizing minority education in post-soviet Latvia. IAP.
57. Silova, I. (2009). The crisis of the post-Soviet teaching profession in the Caucasus and Central Asia. Research in Comparative and International Education, 4(4), 366-383. https://doi.org/10.2304%2Frcie.2009.4.4.366
58. Silova, I. (2018). Comparing post-socialist transformations: Dead ends, new pathways and practices in education. Symposium Books, Southampton (pp. 193-199).
59. Silova, I., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Eds.). (2008). How NGOs react: Globalization and education reform in the Caucasus, Central Asia and Mongolia. Kumarian Press.
60. Steiner‐Khamsi, G. (2006). The economics of policy borrowing and lending: A study of late adopters. Oxford Review of education, 32(5), 665-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980600976353
61. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2012). Understanding policy borrowing and lending: Building comparative policy studies. In World Yearbook of Education 2012 (pp. 3-17). Routledge.
62. Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’of policy. Journal of European public policy, 11(3), 545-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760410001694291
63. Stone, D. (2010). Private philanthropy or policy transfer? The transnational norms of the Open Society Institute. Policy & Politics, 38(2), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557309X458416
64. Stone, D. (2012). Transfer and translation of policy. Policy studies, 33(6), 483-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2012.695933
65. Tabatadze, S. (2019). Far right political stances: the same trend in Georgia?. Review of Nationalities, (9).
66. Tabatadze, S. (2022). Party-Based Euroscepticism: The Case of Georgia. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 30(2), 239-260. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/853510.
67. Temple, P. (2006). Universities without corruption: a new approach for Georgia's higher education. International Higher Education, (42).
68. Tanaka, M. (2005, May). The cross-cultural transfer of educational concepts and practices: A comparative study. Symposium Books Ltd.
69. Vermetten, E. (2020). The Role of Comorbidity and Mediation in Early Management of Trauma and Stressor-Related Disorders: Georgian Experience of Traumatic Events. Risk Management of Terrorism Induced Stress: Guidelines for the Golden Hours (Who, What and When), 148, 130.
70. Transparency International Georgia. (2005). Corruption in education steals the future from the next generation . Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/en/press/corruption-in-education-steals-the-future-from-the-next-generation on 04-10-2022
71. Transparency International Georgia. (2006). Annual report. Retrieved from: https://www.transparency.ge/sites/default/files/TI%20Georgia%20Annual%20Report%202006.pdf on 04-10-2022
72. Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American political science review, 63(3), 880-899. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954434
73. Wheatley, J., 2017. Georgia from national awakening to Rose Revolution: delayed transition in the former Soviet Union. Routledge.
74. Wolman, H. (1992). Understanding cross national policy transfers: The case of Britain and the US. Governance, 5(1), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1992.tb00027.x
75. World Bank. (2012). Fighting corruption in public services: Chronicling Georgia’s reforms. Retrieved from: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents reports/documentdetail/518301468256183463/fighting-corruption-in-public-services-chronicling-georgias-reforms on 04-10-2022
76. World Bank (2022). Georgia. Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/country/GE on 25-01-2022.