Asking Policy Questions of Political Elites: A Descriptive Comparison of Superintendent and School Board Member Survey Response Patterns in Tennessee

Year 2026, Volume: 11 Issue: 1 , 38 - 65 , 30.03.2026

Amanda Frasıer

https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1670988

https://izlik.org/JA96DJ46KB

Abstract

In the United States, superintendents and school board members serve an important role in the local implementation and enactment of policies in schools. Recently, these roles have received increased attention, both in media and in research, due to a nationwide trend of increased partisanship and focus on nationalized issues. However, conducting studies of members of the politically elite can be challenging. This mixed-methods descriptive case study investigates the accessibility and response patterns of superintendents and school board members in Tennessee through a survey of policy perspectives administered in Spring 2023. Overall, superintendents were more accessible and more willing to begin the survey; however, they were also more likely to end the survey or skip potentially contentious questions once the survey required respondents to share policy perspectives.

Keywords

School Board , Superintendent , Educational Policy

References

• Al’Abri, K., Hogan, A., Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2024). Researching policy elites in education. In M. Stacey & N. Mockler (Eds.) Analysing education policy: Theory and method (pp. 235-249). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003353379-19
• Aldrich, M. W. (2022). Tennessee’s shift to partisan school board elections faces its first big test. Chalkbeat. https://www.chalkbeat.org/tennessee/2022/7/12/23204652/tennessee-partisan-school-board-race-law-elections/
• Alsbury, T. L. (2008). School board member and superintendent turnover and the influence on student achievement: An application of the dissatisfaction theory. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(2), 202-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760701748428
• Alsbury, T. L., & Whitaker, K. S. (2007). Superintendent perceptions and practice of accountability, democratic voice and social justice. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(2), 154-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230710732943
• Anderson, S. E. (2013). Diversity in the middle: Broadening perceptions on intermediary levels of school system improvement. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 556-563. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311325703
• Björk, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Kowalski, T. J. (2018). Superintendent Roles as CEO and Team Leader. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 3(2), 179-205. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2018.2.3
• Blazar, D., & Schueler, B. (2022). Why Do School Districts Matter? An Interdisciplinary Framework and Empirical Review. EdWorkingPapers.
• Blazar, D., & Schueler, B. (2023). Effective School District Policies and Practices: Synthesizing Theoretical Frameworks and Empirical Findings across Disciplines. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 17(4), 647-686. http://doi.org/10/1080/19345747.2023.2269923
• Blazar, D., Heller, B., Kane, T., Polikoff, M., Staiger, D., Carrell, S., Goldhaber, D., Harris, D. N., Hitch, R., Holden, K., & Kurlaender, M. (2020). Curriculum reform in the Common Core era. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(4), 966–1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22257
• Castallo, R. T. (2003). Focused leadership: School boards and superintendents working together. Scarecrow Press.
• Chin, M., Kane, T., Kozakowski, W., Schueler, B., & Staiger, D. (2019). School district reform in Newark. ILR Review, 72(2), 323–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793918774318
• Cuban, L. (1988). Managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. State University of New York Press.
• Diem, S., Frankenberg, E., & Cleary, C. (2015). Factors that influence school board policy: The political context of student diversity in urban-suburban districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(5), 712-752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15589367
• Dietrich, S., Hardt, H., & Swedlund, H. J. (2021). How to make elite experiments work in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 27(2), 596-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120987891
• Donaldson, M. L., Mavrogordato, M., Youngs, P., Dougherty, S., & Al Ghanem, R. (2021). “Doing the ‘real’work”: How superintendents’ sensemaking shapes principal evaluation policies and practices in school districts. AERA Open, 7(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420986177
• Feuerstein, A., & Dietrich, J. A. (2003). State standards in the local context: A survey of school board members and superintendents. Educational Policy, 17(2), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904803017002003
• Ford, M. R., & Ihrke, D. M. (2016). Do school board governance best practices improve district performance? Testing the key work of school boards in Wisconsin. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(2), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.982293
• Fraga, L. R., Rodriguez, N., & Erlichson, B. A. (2005). Desegregation and school board politics: The limits of court-imposed policy change. In W. G. Howell (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp. 102-128). Brookings Institution Press.
• Gensterblum, A., Waldron, S. F., Bertrand, A. R., & Jacobsen, R. (2024, April 11). The politics that divide us: What happens when national debates go local? [Paper presentation] 2024 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. https://doi.org/10.3102/2111451
• Grissom, J. A. (2014). Is discord detrimental? Using institutional variation to identify the impact of public governing board conflict on outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 289-315. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus042
• Grissom, J. A., & Andersen, S. (2012). Why superintendents turn over. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1146-1180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212462622
• Henig, J. R. (2013). The end of exceptionalism in American education: The changing politics of school reform. Harvard Education Press
• Howard, A., & Kenway, J. (2015). Canvassing conversations: obstinate issues in studies of elites and elite education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (28)9, 1005-1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2015.1077536
• Jacobsen, R., & Saultz, A. (2012). The polls—Trends: Who should control education? Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs017
• Jochim, A., Diliberti, M. K., Schwartz, H., Destler, K. and Hill, P. (2023). Navigating political tensions over schooling: Findings from the Fall 2022 American School District Panel Survey. Center for Reinventing Pubic Education (CRPE) at Arizona State University (ASU) and RAND. Accessed January 17, 2024 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED626297.pdf
• Kertzer, J. D., & Renshon, J. (2022). Experiments and surveys on political elites. Annual Review of Political Science, 25(1), 529-550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-013649
• Kirst, M. & Wirt, F. (2009). The political dynamics of education. (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
• Kenney, A. W. (2020). Negotiating authority in the ritual of the public school board meeting. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(5), 705-735.
• Koedel, C., Li, D., Polikoff, M. S., Hardaway, T., & Wrabel, S. L. (2017). Mathematics curriculum effects on student achievement in California. AERA Open, 3(1), https:// doi.org/10.1177/2332858417690511
• Kowalski, T. J. (2005). Evolution of the school district superintendent position. In L. G Bjork & T. J Kowalski, (Eds.) The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development, (pp. 1-18). Corwin.
• Kowalski, T. J., McCord, R. S., Petersen, G. J., Young, I. P., & Ellerson, N. M. (2010). The American school superintendent: 2010 decennial study. American Association of School Administrators.
• Land, D. (2002). Local school boards under review: Their role and effectiveness in relation to students’ academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 229-278. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072002229
• Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive analysis in education: A guide for researchers. (NCEE 2017-4023). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
• Louis, K. S. (2013). Districts, local education authorities, and the context of policy analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 550-555. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311325695
• Macartney, H., & Singleton, J. D. (2018). School boards and student segregation. Journal of Public Economics, 164(1), 165-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.05.011
• Maeroff, G. (2010). School boards in America: A flawed exercise in democracy. Springer.
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Mintrop, H., & Sunderman, G. L. (2013). The paradoxes of data-driven school reform: Learning from two generations of centralized accountability systems in the United States. In D. Anagnostopoulos, S. Rutledge, & R. Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability, 23-40. Harvard Educational Press.
• Mountford, M. (2008). Historic and current tensions among board-superintendent teams: Symptom or cause? In T. L. Alsbury (Ed.), The future of school board governance: Relevancy and revelation (pp. 81-113). Rowman & Littlefield.
• Pakulski, J. (2018). The development of elite theory. In H. Best & J. Higley (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites (pp. 9-16.). Palgrave McMillan. https:doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_3
• Podolsky, A., Darling-Hammond, L., Doss, C., & Reardon, S. (2019). California’s positive outliers: Districts beating the odds. Learning Policy Institute.
• Polikoff, M. (2018). The challenges of curriculum materials as a reform lever. Economic Studies at Brookings: Evidence Speaks Reports, 2(58), 1–11.
• Reckhow, S., Henig, J. R., Jacobsen, R., & Alter Litt, J. (2017). “Outsiders with deep pockets”: The nationalization of local school board elections. Urban Affairs Review, 53(5), 783-811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416663004
• Renshon, J. (2015). Losing face and sinking costs: Experimental evidence on the judgment of political and military leaders. International Organization, 69(3), 659-695. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818315000107
• Roberts, K. L., & Sampson, P. M. (2011). School board member professional development and effects on student achievement. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(7), 701-713. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541111172108
• Rogers, J., White, R., Shand, R., Kahne, J., with Stern, S., Castro, C., & Yoshimoto-Towery, A. (2024). The costs of conflict: The fiscal impact of culturally divisive conflict on public schools in the United States. UCLA’s Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access. School of Education.
• Rorrer, A. K., Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. J. (2008). Districts as institutional actors in educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 307-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08318962
• Sawchuk S. (2022, February 28). Superintendent turnover is a real thing. How bad it is? Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/superintendent-turnover-is-a-real-thing-how-bad-is-it/2022/02
• Spillane, J. P. (1998). State policy and the non-monolithic nature of the local school district: Organizational and professional considerations. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 33-63. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312035001033
• Tienken, C. H. (Ed.) (2020). The American superintendent: 2020 decennial study. American Association of School Administrators
• Toppo G. (2022). School superintendents head for the exits. Education Next. www.educationnext.org/school-superintendents-head-for-the-exits-big-districts-new-leaders-fill-vacancies/
• Trujillo, T. M. (2013). The disproportionate erosion of local control: Urban school boards, high-stakes accountability, and democracy. Educational Policy, 27(2), 334-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812465118
• Tyack, D. B., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Harvard University Press.
• Vis, B., & Stolwijk, S. (2021). Conducting quantitative studies with the participation of political elites: Best practices for designing the study and soliciting the participation of political elites. Quality & Quantity, 55(4), 1281-1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01052-z
• White, R. S. (2023a). Ceilings Made of Glass and Leaving En Masse? Examining Superintendent Gender Gaps and Turnover Over Time Across the United States. Educational Researcher, 52(5), 272-285. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231163139
• White, R. S. (2023b). "Trial and error" and "trudging up a hill": Superintendents' beliefs about and engagement in state education policymaking. (EdWorkingPaper: 23-816). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/zmha-pc81
• White, R. S., Evans, M. P., & Malin, J. R. (2023). Political battles in suburbia. Phi Delta Kappan, 104(5), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217231156223
• White, R. S., & Lineburg, M. Y. (2021). Backtalk: School boards and superintendents should work in concert. Phi Delta Kappan, 103(1), 67-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217211043639
• Woulfin, S. L., Donaldson, M. L., & Gonzales, R. (2016). District leaders’ framing of educator evaluation policy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 110-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616661