Leadership Lives in the Middle Ground Between “Best Practices Fit All” and “Context Is Everything”

Huang Wu

doi:10.30828/real.1964379

Leadership Lives in the Middle Ground Between “Best Practices Fit All” and “Context Is Everything”

Abstract

This letter examines a long-standing tension in school leadership: the view that effective leadership rests on a generic set of practices, versus the view that leadership is contingent on context. Accountability policies, combined with an enduring human desire for certainty, have pushed leaders to search for practices that work everywhere. The contextual leadership perspective, by contrast, holds that there is no one-size-fits-all model, and the effectiveness of leadership depends on the broader context, the specific situation, the tasks at hand, and the people being led. This letter argues that navigating this tension is not a matter of choosing one side, combining both, or applying them in sequence. Instead, successful leadership is a continuous process of inquiry and reflective practice that begins with problems in context, draws on evidence-based practices as resources, and through this process, leaders actively work to improve and transform their contexts. The letter also identifies five misconceptions that get in the way of this understanding.

Keywords

References

Berliner, D. C. (2002). Comment: Educational Research: The Hardest Science of All. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031008018
Clarke, S., & O’Donoghue, T. (2017). Educational Leadership and Context: A Rendering of an Inseparable Relationship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2016.1199772
Covey, S. R. (with Collins, J., & Covey, S.). (2020). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: 30th Anniversary Edition. Simon & Schuster.
Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. Minton, Balch & Company.
Drucker, P. F. (2017). The effective executive: The definitive guide to getting the right things done. Harper Business.
Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective Schools for the Urban Poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–18, 20–24.
Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific Culture and Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031008004
Grissom, J. A., Santelli, F. A., & Loeb, S. (2025). Fragmentation, Administration, and Isolation? Evidence on Principal Time Use from Large-Scale Observations in Four Urban Districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 61(2), 195–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X251316589

Grissom, J., Egalite, A., & Lindsay, C. (2021). How Principals Affect Students and Schools: A Systematic Synthesis of Two Decades of Research. The Wallace Foundation. https://doi.org/10.59656/EL-SB1065.001
Hargreaves, D. H. (2007). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects (The Teacher Training Agency Lecture 1996). In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Educational research and evidence-based practice (pp. 3–17). SAGE Publications.
Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the Principal’s Role in School Effectiveness: A Review of Empirical Research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X96032001002
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. F. (1986). The Social Context of Effective Schools. American Journal of Education, 94(3), 328–355. https://doi.org/10.1086/443853
Hanson, E. M. (1979). School Management and Contingency Theory: An Emerging Perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 15(2), 98–116.
Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2010). Collaborative Leadership Effects on School Improvement: Integrating Unidirectional- and Reciprocal-Effects Models. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 226–252. https://doi.org/10.1086/656299
Hitt, D. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2016). Systematic Review of Key Leader Practices Found to Influence Student Achievement: A Unified Framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315614911
Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1973). Contingency views of organization and management / [compiled by] Fremont E. Kast [and] James E. Rosenzweig. Science Research Associates.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the Achievement Gap to the Education Debt: Understanding Achievement in U.S. Schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035007003
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Liebowitz, D. D., & Porter, L. (2019). The Effect of Principal Behaviors on Student, Teacher, and School Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 785–827. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319866133
Maxwell, J. C. (2022). The 21 irrefutable laws of leadership: Follow them and people will follow you (25th anniversary edition). HarperCollins Leadership, an imprint of HarperCollins Focus LLC.
Oc, B. (2018). Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004
Osborn, R. N., Hunt, J. G., & Jauch, L. R. (2002). Toward a contextual theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 797–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00154-6
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
Shen, J., & Wu, H. (2025). The Relationship Between Principal Leadership and Student Achievement: A Multivariate Meta-Analysis with an Emphasis on Conceptual Models and Methodological Approaches. Educational Administration Quarterly, 61(2), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X241286527
Sternad, D. (2024). Develop Your Leadership Superpowers: 50 Key Skills You Need to Succeed as a Leader: 50 Key Skills You Need to Succeed as a Leader. Econcise Gmbh.
Tan, C. Y. (2014). Influence of contextual challenges and constraints on learning-centered leadership. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(3), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2013.866967
Tan, C. Y., Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2024). How school leadership practices relate to student outcomes: Insights from a three-level meta-analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211061445
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
Wu, H., Shen, J., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Examining the effect of principal leadership on student science achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 1017–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1747664
Wu, H., Zhang, S., & Marszalek, J. M. (2026). Principal leadership, school processes, and student achievement: Examining contextual heterogeneity in leadership mechanisms via multigroup multilevel structural equation modeling. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 17411432261434762. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432261434762

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Education Management

Journal Section

Letter to Editor

Authors

Huang Wu ^*
0000-0002-7423-8447
United States

Publication Date

June 27, 2026

Submission Date

June 5, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 17, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 11 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1964379

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA64SS29ZX

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Wu, H. (2026). Leadership Lives in the Middle Ground Between “Best Practices Fit All” and “Context Is Everything”. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 11(2), 561-574. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1964379

AMA

1.Wu H. Leadership Lives in the Middle Ground Between “Best Practices Fit All” and “Context Is Everything.” REAL. 2026;11(2):561-574. doi:10.30828/real.1964379

Chicago

Wu, Huang. 2026. “Leadership Lives in the Middle Ground Between “Best Practices Fit All” and ‘Context Is Everything’”. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership 11 (2): 561-74. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1964379.

EndNote

Wu H (June 1, 2026) Leadership Lives in the Middle Ground Between “Best Practices Fit All” and “Context Is Everything”. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership 11 2 561–574.

IEEE

[1]H. Wu, “Leadership Lives in the Middle Ground Between “Best Practices Fit All” and ‘Context Is Everything’”, REAL, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 561–574, June 2026, doi: 10.30828/real.1964379.

ISNAD

Wu, Huang. “Leadership Lives in the Middle Ground Between “Best Practices Fit All” and ‘Context Is Everything’”. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership 11/2 (June 1, 2026): 561-574. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1964379.

JAMA

1.Wu H. Leadership Lives in the Middle Ground Between “Best Practices Fit All” and “Context Is Everything”. REAL. 2026;11:561–574.

MLA

Wu, Huang. “Leadership Lives in the Middle Ground Between “Best Practices Fit All” and ‘Context Is Everything’”. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, vol. 11, no. 2, June 2026, pp. 561-74, doi:10.30828/real.1964379.

Vancouver

1.Huang Wu. Leadership Lives in the Middle Ground Between “Best Practices Fit All” and “Context Is Everything”. REAL. 2026 Jun. 1;11(2):561-74. doi:10.30828/real.1964379