Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2022, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 81 - 130, 31.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.30828/real.972966

Abstract

References

  • Aittola, H. (2008). Doctoral education and doctoral theses-Changing academic. In J. Valimaa & O. H. Ylijoki (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on higher education practices (pp. 161-178). Springer: Netherlands.
  • Akbulut Yıldırmış, M., & Seggie, F.N. (2018). The development of higher education studies as an academic field: A literature review at international and national levels. Journal of Higher Education (Turkey). 8(3), 357-367.
  • Altbach, P.G. (2014a). Knowledge for the contemporary university: Higher education as a field of study and training. In L.E. Rumbley, P.G. Altbach, D.A. Stanfield, Y. Shimmi, A. de Gayardon, and R. Chan (Eds.), Higher education: A worldwide inventory of research centers, academic programs, and journals and publications (3. edition, pp. 11–21). Bonn: Lemmens Media.
  • Altbach, P.G. (2014b). The emergence of a field: Research and training in higher education. Studies in higher education, 39(8), 1306-1320.
  • Aydın, A., Selvitopu, A., & Kaya, M. (2018). A review of dissertations in the field of higher education management in Turkey. Journal of Higher Education & Science, 8(2), 305-313.
  • Aypay, A. (Ed.) (2015). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim: alanı, kapsamı ve politikaları [Higher education in Turkey: Field, scope and policies]. Ankara: Pegem.
  • Bath, D., & Smith, C. (2004). Academic developers: An academic tribe claiming their territory in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 9(1), 9–27.
  • Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204-213.
  • Boisot, M.H., MacMillan, I.C. & Han, K.S. (2007). Explorations in information space: Knowledge, agents, and organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Brennan, J., & Teichler, U. (2008). The future of higher education and of higher education research. Higher Education, 56(3), 259–264.
  • Chan, R. Y. (2019). Higher education & teacher education and training. Paper presented at Glocal Education in Practice: Teaching, Researching, and Citizenship BCES Conference Books, 17, 124-131. Sofia: Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.
  • CHE (2021). Tez Merkezi-İstatistikler-Yıllara Göre/Thesis Center-Statistics-By Years. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/IstatistikiBilgiler?islem=2 on the 14th of November, 2021.
  • Chen, S.Y., & Hu, L.F. (2012). Higher education research as a field in China: Its formation and current landscape. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(5), 655-666.
  • Clement, N., Lovat, T., Holbrook, A., Kiley, M., Bourke, S., Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., Fairbairn, H., & McInerney, D. (2015). Exploring doctoral examiner judgements through the lenses of Habermas and epistemic cognition. In J. Huisman, & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (Vol. 1, pp. 213–233). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Drysdale, J.S., Graham, C.R., Spring, K.J., & Halverson, L.R. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. Internet and Higher Education, 17, 90-100.
  • Erdem, D. (2011). Türkiye’de 2005–2006 yılları arasında yayımlanan eğitim bilimleri dergilerindeki makalelerin bazı özellikler açısından incelenmesi: Betimsel bir analiz [An analysis of the articles in educational sciences journals published in Turkey between 2005-2006 in terms of certain variables: A descriptive analysis]. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 2(1), 140-147.
  • Ewing, J.C., & Stickler, W.H. (1964). Progress in the development of higher education as a field of professional graduate study and research. Journal of Education, 15(4), 397–403.
  • Forsberg, E., & Geschwind, L. (2016). The academic home of higher education research: The case of doctoral theses in Sweden. In J. Huisman and M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (Vol. 2, pp. 69–93). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Fulton, O. (1992). Higher education studies. In B.R. Clark, and G. Neave (Eds.), The encyclopedia of higher education (Vol. 3, pp. 1810–1820). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
  • Gök, E. & Gümüş, S. (2015). Akademik bir alan olarak yükseköğretim yönetimi [The management of higher education as an academic field]. In A. Aypay (Ed.), Türkiye’de yükseköğretim: Alanı, kapsamı ve politikaları [Higher education in Turkey: Field, scope and policies] (pp. 3–26), Ankara: PegemA.
  • Göktaş, Y., Hasançebi, F., Varışoğlu, B., Akçay, A., Bayrak, N., Baran, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2012). Trends in educational research in Turkey: A content analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 455-460.
  • Goodchild, L.F. (1991). Higher education as a field of study: Origins, programs, and purposes, 1893–1960. In J.D. Fife, and L.F. Goodchild (Eds.), Administration as a profession. New directions in higher education (Vol. 76, pp. 15–33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Harland, T. (2012). Higher education as an open-access discipline. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(5), 703–710.
  • Hendrickson, R.M. (2013). The core knowledge of higher education. In S. Freeman, L.S. Hagedorn, L.F. Goodchild, and D.A. Wright (Eds.), Advancing higher education as a field of study: In quest of doctoral degree guidelines (Vol. 2, pp. 229–240). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
  • Higher Education Information Management System (2021). Retrieved from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/ on the 26th of February, 2021.
  • Horta, H., & Jung, J. (2013). Higher education research in Asia: An archipelago, two continents or merely atomization? Higher Education in Europe, 68(1), 117–134.
  • Hutchinson, S.R., & Lovell, C.D. (2004). A review of methodological characteristics of research published in key journals in higher education: Implications for graduate research training. Research in Higher Education, 45(4), 383-403.
  • Inter-university Board (UAK). (2021). Bilim alanları ve anahtar kelimeler [Scientific fields and keywords]. Retrieved from https://www.uak.gov.tr/Documents/docentlik/2019-ekim-donemi/2019E_BilimAlanlariAnahtarKelimeler_250919.pdf on the 26th of February, 2021.
  • Jung, J. (2015). Higher education research as a field of study in South Korea: Inward but starting to look outward. Higher Education Policy, 28(4), 495-515.
  • Karadağ, N. (2018). Analysis of studies on higher education based on graduate theses. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 29, 512-535.
  • Kehm, B.M. & Musselin, C. (2013). The development of higher education research in Europe: 25 years of CHER. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Kehm, B.M. & Teichler, U. (2013) Organisational strategy and the profile of CHER members, in: B.M. Kehm & C. Musselin (Eds), The development of higher education research in Europe. 25 years of CHER (pp. 25-33). Rotterdam, Taipei: Sense Publishers.
  • Kehm, B.M. (2015). Higher education as a field of study and research in Europe. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 60-74.
  • Kıranlı Güngör, S. & Güngör, M. (2020). Analysis of PhD theses written in the field of higher education in Turkey. Turkish Studies - Education, 15(1), 481-505.
  • Macfarlane, B. (2012). The higher education research archipelago. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(1), 129–131.
  • Melendez, J. (2002). Doctoral scholarship examined: Dissertation research in the field of higher education studies. Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 375.
  • Mullins, G. & Kiley, M. (2002). ‘It is a PhD, not a Nobel prize’: How experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 369-386.
  • Özoǧlu, M., Gür, B.S., & Gümüs, S. (2016). Rapid expansion of higher education in Turkey: The challenges of recently established public universities (2006–2013). Higher Education Policy, 29(1), 21-39.
  • Ritter, S.E. (2012). Methodological orientation of research articles appearing in higher education journals. Marshall University Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 211.
  • Rone, E. C. (1998). Characteristics of higher education doctoral theses: Defrosting some frozen assets. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Toronto.
  • Rumbley, L.E., Altbach, P.G., Stanfield, D.A., Shimmi, Y., de Gayardon, A. & Chan, R.Y. (2014). Higher education: A worldwide inventory of research centers, academic programs, and journals and publications (3rd edition). Bonn: Lemmens Media.
  • Rumbley, L.E., Stanfield, D.A., and de Gayardon, A. (2014). A global inventory of research, training and publication in the field of higher education: Growth, diversity, disparity. In L.E. Rumbley, P.G. Altbach, D.A. Stanfield, Y. Shimmi, A. de Gayardon, and R. Chan (Eds.), Higher education: A worldwide inventory of research centers, academic programs, and journals and publications (3rd edition) (pp. 23–33). Bonn: Lemmens Media.
  • Saunders, D.B., Kolek, E.A., Williams, E.A., & Wells, R.S. (2015). Who is shaping the field? Doctoral education, knowledge creation and postsecondary education research in the United States. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 1-14.
  • Selçuk, Z., Palancı, M., Kandemir, M., & Dündar, H. (2014). Tendencies of the researches published in education and science journal: Content analysis. Education & Science, 39(173), 430-453.
  • Şenay, H.H., Şengül, M., & Seggie, F.N. (2020). Higher education studies in Turkey: Trends and recommendations. Journal of University Research, 3(1), 1-13.
  • Smith, K. (2013). Critical discourse analysis in higher education research. In M. Tight & J. Huisman (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (Vol. 9, pp. 61–79). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Soysal, Y., Radmard, S., Kutluca, A.Y., Ertepınar, H., Ortaç, F.R., Akdemir, Z.G., & Türk, Z. (2019). Conceptual, phenomenal, thematic and methodological choices in the sense of higher education of Turkey. Journal of Higher Education & Science, 9(1), 17-36.
  • Teichler, U. & Sadlak, J. (Eds) (2000). Higher education research: Its relationship to policy and practice. Oxford: Pergamon/IAU Press.
  • Teichler, U. (2000) Higher education research and its institutional basis. In S. Schwarz & U. Teichler (Eds), The institutional basis of higher education research. experiences and perspectives (pp. 13–24), Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Teichler, U. (2003). The future of higher education and the future of higher education research. Tertiary Education & Management, 9(3), 171-185.
  • Teichler, U. (2005) Research on higher education in Europe, European Journal of Education, 4, 447–469.
  • Teichler, U. (2015). Higher education research in Europe. In Adrian Curaj, Liviu Matei, Remus Pricopie, Jamil Salmi & Peter Scott (Eds.), The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies (pp. 815-847). London: Springer.
  • Teichler, U. (2020). Higher education in economically advanced countries: Changes within recent decades. Higher Education Governance & Policy, 1(1), 1-17.
  • Teixeira, P. (2013). Reflecting about current trends in higher education research. In: B.M. Kehm & C. Musselin (Eds.), The development of higher education research in Europe. 25 years of CHER (pp. 103–121). Rotterdam, Boston, Taipei: Sense Publishers.
  • Tekneci, P. D. (2016). Evolution of Turkish higher education system in the last decade. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 6(3), 277-287.
  • Tight, M. (2004). Research into higher education: An a‐theoretical community of practice?. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(4), 395-411.
  • Tight, M. (2007). Bridging the divide: A comparative analysis of articles in higher education journals published inside and outside North America. Higher Education, 53(2), 235-253.
  • Tight, M. (2008). Higher education research as tribe, territory and/or community: A co-citation analysis. Higher Education, 55(5), 593-605.
  • Tight, M. (2012a). Researching higher education (2nd edition). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Tight, M. (2012b). Higher education research 2000–2010: Changing journal publication patterns. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(5), 723-740.
  • Tight, M. (2012c). Levels of analysis in higher education research. Tertiary Education and Management, 18(3), 271-288.
  • Tight, M. (2013). Discipline and methodology in higher education research. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(1), 136-151.
  • Tight, M. (2014). Theory development and application in higher education research: The case of threshold concepts. International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, 10, 249–267.
  • Tight, M. (2015a). Theory development and application in higher education research: Tribes and territories. Higher Education Policy, 28(3), 277-293.
  • Tight, M. (2015b). Theory development and application in higher education research: The case of academic drift. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47(1), 84-99.
  • Tight, M. (2016). Examining the research/teaching nexus. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 293–311.
  • Tight, M. (2018a). Tracking the scholarship of teaching and learning. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2(1), 61-78.
  • Tight, M. (2019). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of higher education research. European Journal of Higher Education, 9(2), 133-152.
  • Tight, M. (2020). Higher education: discipline or field of study?. Tertiary Education and Management, 26(4), 415-428.
  • Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Australia: Blackwell.

The Academic Home of Turkish Higher Education Research: A Demographic, Thematic and Methodological Examination of Doctoral Dissertations

Year 2022, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 81 - 130, 31.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.30828/real.972966

Abstract

This study elaborates on the epistemological foundations of Turkish higher education research drawing on data from 854 doctoral dissertations with an analytical framework based on the institutional organization of researchers and knowledge, the object of study, and the object of knowledge. The results imply that the long-established state higher education institutions (universities) have been the power engines of Turkish higher education research, which gained momentum with the millennium. Male gendered, full professorship, single supervision, and local PhDs were the salient features of advisors. The primary objects of study were topics related to student experience, institutional management, and teaching and learning. As for the object of knowledge, Turkish higher education research was found to be descriptive, regardless of the adopted research methodology. The doctoral dissertations within a maximum of ten different universities and 600 respondents, based on random sampling, had a commanding lead. Undergraduate students and state universities were also fertile components. The paper concludes by proposing the establishment of a dynamic resource database and the incorporation of certain theories and approaches in Turkish higher education research.

References

  • Aittola, H. (2008). Doctoral education and doctoral theses-Changing academic. In J. Valimaa & O. H. Ylijoki (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on higher education practices (pp. 161-178). Springer: Netherlands.
  • Akbulut Yıldırmış, M., & Seggie, F.N. (2018). The development of higher education studies as an academic field: A literature review at international and national levels. Journal of Higher Education (Turkey). 8(3), 357-367.
  • Altbach, P.G. (2014a). Knowledge for the contemporary university: Higher education as a field of study and training. In L.E. Rumbley, P.G. Altbach, D.A. Stanfield, Y. Shimmi, A. de Gayardon, and R. Chan (Eds.), Higher education: A worldwide inventory of research centers, academic programs, and journals and publications (3. edition, pp. 11–21). Bonn: Lemmens Media.
  • Altbach, P.G. (2014b). The emergence of a field: Research and training in higher education. Studies in higher education, 39(8), 1306-1320.
  • Aydın, A., Selvitopu, A., & Kaya, M. (2018). A review of dissertations in the field of higher education management in Turkey. Journal of Higher Education & Science, 8(2), 305-313.
  • Aypay, A. (Ed.) (2015). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim: alanı, kapsamı ve politikaları [Higher education in Turkey: Field, scope and policies]. Ankara: Pegem.
  • Bath, D., & Smith, C. (2004). Academic developers: An academic tribe claiming their territory in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 9(1), 9–27.
  • Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204-213.
  • Boisot, M.H., MacMillan, I.C. & Han, K.S. (2007). Explorations in information space: Knowledge, agents, and organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Brennan, J., & Teichler, U. (2008). The future of higher education and of higher education research. Higher Education, 56(3), 259–264.
  • Chan, R. Y. (2019). Higher education & teacher education and training. Paper presented at Glocal Education in Practice: Teaching, Researching, and Citizenship BCES Conference Books, 17, 124-131. Sofia: Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.
  • CHE (2021). Tez Merkezi-İstatistikler-Yıllara Göre/Thesis Center-Statistics-By Years. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/IstatistikiBilgiler?islem=2 on the 14th of November, 2021.
  • Chen, S.Y., & Hu, L.F. (2012). Higher education research as a field in China: Its formation and current landscape. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(5), 655-666.
  • Clement, N., Lovat, T., Holbrook, A., Kiley, M., Bourke, S., Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., Fairbairn, H., & McInerney, D. (2015). Exploring doctoral examiner judgements through the lenses of Habermas and epistemic cognition. In J. Huisman, & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (Vol. 1, pp. 213–233). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Drysdale, J.S., Graham, C.R., Spring, K.J., & Halverson, L.R. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. Internet and Higher Education, 17, 90-100.
  • Erdem, D. (2011). Türkiye’de 2005–2006 yılları arasında yayımlanan eğitim bilimleri dergilerindeki makalelerin bazı özellikler açısından incelenmesi: Betimsel bir analiz [An analysis of the articles in educational sciences journals published in Turkey between 2005-2006 in terms of certain variables: A descriptive analysis]. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 2(1), 140-147.
  • Ewing, J.C., & Stickler, W.H. (1964). Progress in the development of higher education as a field of professional graduate study and research. Journal of Education, 15(4), 397–403.
  • Forsberg, E., & Geschwind, L. (2016). The academic home of higher education research: The case of doctoral theses in Sweden. In J. Huisman and M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (Vol. 2, pp. 69–93). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Fulton, O. (1992). Higher education studies. In B.R. Clark, and G. Neave (Eds.), The encyclopedia of higher education (Vol. 3, pp. 1810–1820). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
  • Gök, E. & Gümüş, S. (2015). Akademik bir alan olarak yükseköğretim yönetimi [The management of higher education as an academic field]. In A. Aypay (Ed.), Türkiye’de yükseköğretim: Alanı, kapsamı ve politikaları [Higher education in Turkey: Field, scope and policies] (pp. 3–26), Ankara: PegemA.
  • Göktaş, Y., Hasançebi, F., Varışoğlu, B., Akçay, A., Bayrak, N., Baran, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2012). Trends in educational research in Turkey: A content analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 455-460.
  • Goodchild, L.F. (1991). Higher education as a field of study: Origins, programs, and purposes, 1893–1960. In J.D. Fife, and L.F. Goodchild (Eds.), Administration as a profession. New directions in higher education (Vol. 76, pp. 15–33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Harland, T. (2012). Higher education as an open-access discipline. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(5), 703–710.
  • Hendrickson, R.M. (2013). The core knowledge of higher education. In S. Freeman, L.S. Hagedorn, L.F. Goodchild, and D.A. Wright (Eds.), Advancing higher education as a field of study: In quest of doctoral degree guidelines (Vol. 2, pp. 229–240). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
  • Higher Education Information Management System (2021). Retrieved from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/ on the 26th of February, 2021.
  • Horta, H., & Jung, J. (2013). Higher education research in Asia: An archipelago, two continents or merely atomization? Higher Education in Europe, 68(1), 117–134.
  • Hutchinson, S.R., & Lovell, C.D. (2004). A review of methodological characteristics of research published in key journals in higher education: Implications for graduate research training. Research in Higher Education, 45(4), 383-403.
  • Inter-university Board (UAK). (2021). Bilim alanları ve anahtar kelimeler [Scientific fields and keywords]. Retrieved from https://www.uak.gov.tr/Documents/docentlik/2019-ekim-donemi/2019E_BilimAlanlariAnahtarKelimeler_250919.pdf on the 26th of February, 2021.
  • Jung, J. (2015). Higher education research as a field of study in South Korea: Inward but starting to look outward. Higher Education Policy, 28(4), 495-515.
  • Karadağ, N. (2018). Analysis of studies on higher education based on graduate theses. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 29, 512-535.
  • Kehm, B.M. & Musselin, C. (2013). The development of higher education research in Europe: 25 years of CHER. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Kehm, B.M. & Teichler, U. (2013) Organisational strategy and the profile of CHER members, in: B.M. Kehm & C. Musselin (Eds), The development of higher education research in Europe. 25 years of CHER (pp. 25-33). Rotterdam, Taipei: Sense Publishers.
  • Kehm, B.M. (2015). Higher education as a field of study and research in Europe. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 60-74.
  • Kıranlı Güngör, S. & Güngör, M. (2020). Analysis of PhD theses written in the field of higher education in Turkey. Turkish Studies - Education, 15(1), 481-505.
  • Macfarlane, B. (2012). The higher education research archipelago. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(1), 129–131.
  • Melendez, J. (2002). Doctoral scholarship examined: Dissertation research in the field of higher education studies. Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 375.
  • Mullins, G. & Kiley, M. (2002). ‘It is a PhD, not a Nobel prize’: How experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 369-386.
  • Özoǧlu, M., Gür, B.S., & Gümüs, S. (2016). Rapid expansion of higher education in Turkey: The challenges of recently established public universities (2006–2013). Higher Education Policy, 29(1), 21-39.
  • Ritter, S.E. (2012). Methodological orientation of research articles appearing in higher education journals. Marshall University Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 211.
  • Rone, E. C. (1998). Characteristics of higher education doctoral theses: Defrosting some frozen assets. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Toronto.
  • Rumbley, L.E., Altbach, P.G., Stanfield, D.A., Shimmi, Y., de Gayardon, A. & Chan, R.Y. (2014). Higher education: A worldwide inventory of research centers, academic programs, and journals and publications (3rd edition). Bonn: Lemmens Media.
  • Rumbley, L.E., Stanfield, D.A., and de Gayardon, A. (2014). A global inventory of research, training and publication in the field of higher education: Growth, diversity, disparity. In L.E. Rumbley, P.G. Altbach, D.A. Stanfield, Y. Shimmi, A. de Gayardon, and R. Chan (Eds.), Higher education: A worldwide inventory of research centers, academic programs, and journals and publications (3rd edition) (pp. 23–33). Bonn: Lemmens Media.
  • Saunders, D.B., Kolek, E.A., Williams, E.A., & Wells, R.S. (2015). Who is shaping the field? Doctoral education, knowledge creation and postsecondary education research in the United States. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 1-14.
  • Selçuk, Z., Palancı, M., Kandemir, M., & Dündar, H. (2014). Tendencies of the researches published in education and science journal: Content analysis. Education & Science, 39(173), 430-453.
  • Şenay, H.H., Şengül, M., & Seggie, F.N. (2020). Higher education studies in Turkey: Trends and recommendations. Journal of University Research, 3(1), 1-13.
  • Smith, K. (2013). Critical discourse analysis in higher education research. In M. Tight & J. Huisman (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (Vol. 9, pp. 61–79). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Soysal, Y., Radmard, S., Kutluca, A.Y., Ertepınar, H., Ortaç, F.R., Akdemir, Z.G., & Türk, Z. (2019). Conceptual, phenomenal, thematic and methodological choices in the sense of higher education of Turkey. Journal of Higher Education & Science, 9(1), 17-36.
  • Teichler, U. & Sadlak, J. (Eds) (2000). Higher education research: Its relationship to policy and practice. Oxford: Pergamon/IAU Press.
  • Teichler, U. (2000) Higher education research and its institutional basis. In S. Schwarz & U. Teichler (Eds), The institutional basis of higher education research. experiences and perspectives (pp. 13–24), Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Teichler, U. (2003). The future of higher education and the future of higher education research. Tertiary Education & Management, 9(3), 171-185.
  • Teichler, U. (2005) Research on higher education in Europe, European Journal of Education, 4, 447–469.
  • Teichler, U. (2015). Higher education research in Europe. In Adrian Curaj, Liviu Matei, Remus Pricopie, Jamil Salmi & Peter Scott (Eds.), The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies (pp. 815-847). London: Springer.
  • Teichler, U. (2020). Higher education in economically advanced countries: Changes within recent decades. Higher Education Governance & Policy, 1(1), 1-17.
  • Teixeira, P. (2013). Reflecting about current trends in higher education research. In: B.M. Kehm & C. Musselin (Eds.), The development of higher education research in Europe. 25 years of CHER (pp. 103–121). Rotterdam, Boston, Taipei: Sense Publishers.
  • Tekneci, P. D. (2016). Evolution of Turkish higher education system in the last decade. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 6(3), 277-287.
  • Tight, M. (2004). Research into higher education: An a‐theoretical community of practice?. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(4), 395-411.
  • Tight, M. (2007). Bridging the divide: A comparative analysis of articles in higher education journals published inside and outside North America. Higher Education, 53(2), 235-253.
  • Tight, M. (2008). Higher education research as tribe, territory and/or community: A co-citation analysis. Higher Education, 55(5), 593-605.
  • Tight, M. (2012a). Researching higher education (2nd edition). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Tight, M. (2012b). Higher education research 2000–2010: Changing journal publication patterns. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(5), 723-740.
  • Tight, M. (2012c). Levels of analysis in higher education research. Tertiary Education and Management, 18(3), 271-288.
  • Tight, M. (2013). Discipline and methodology in higher education research. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(1), 136-151.
  • Tight, M. (2014). Theory development and application in higher education research: The case of threshold concepts. International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, 10, 249–267.
  • Tight, M. (2015a). Theory development and application in higher education research: Tribes and territories. Higher Education Policy, 28(3), 277-293.
  • Tight, M. (2015b). Theory development and application in higher education research: The case of academic drift. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47(1), 84-99.
  • Tight, M. (2016). Examining the research/teaching nexus. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 293–311.
  • Tight, M. (2018a). Tracking the scholarship of teaching and learning. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2(1), 61-78.
  • Tight, M. (2019). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of higher education research. European Journal of Higher Education, 9(2), 133-152.
  • Tight, M. (2020). Higher education: discipline or field of study?. Tertiary Education and Management, 26(4), 415-428.
  • Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Australia: Blackwell.
There are 70 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Murat Özdemir 0000-0003-2041-211X

Ahmet Aypay

Publication Date March 31, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 7 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özdemir, M., & Aypay, A. (2022). The Academic Home of Turkish Higher Education Research: A Demographic, Thematic and Methodological Examination of Doctoral Dissertations. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 7(1), 81-130. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.972966
AMA Özdemir M, Aypay A. The Academic Home of Turkish Higher Education Research: A Demographic, Thematic and Methodological Examination of Doctoral Dissertations. REAL is a scholarly peer-reviewed publication. March 2022;7(1):81-130. doi:10.30828/real.972966
Chicago Özdemir, Murat, and Ahmet Aypay. “The Academic Home of Turkish Higher Education Research: A Demographic, Thematic and Methodological Examination of Doctoral Dissertations”. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership 7, no. 1 (March 2022): 81-130. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.972966.
EndNote Özdemir M, Aypay A (March 1, 2022) The Academic Home of Turkish Higher Education Research: A Demographic, Thematic and Methodological Examination of Doctoral Dissertations. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership 7 1 81–130.
IEEE M. Özdemir and A. Aypay, “The Academic Home of Turkish Higher Education Research: A Demographic, Thematic and Methodological Examination of Doctoral Dissertations”, REAL is a scholarly peer-reviewed publication, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 81–130, 2022, doi: 10.30828/real.972966.
ISNAD Özdemir, Murat - Aypay, Ahmet. “The Academic Home of Turkish Higher Education Research: A Demographic, Thematic and Methodological Examination of Doctoral Dissertations”. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership 7/1 (March 2022), 81-130. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.972966.
JAMA Özdemir M, Aypay A. The Academic Home of Turkish Higher Education Research: A Demographic, Thematic and Methodological Examination of Doctoral Dissertations. REAL is a scholarly peer-reviewed publication. 2022;7:81–130.
MLA Özdemir, Murat and Ahmet Aypay. “The Academic Home of Turkish Higher Education Research: A Demographic, Thematic and Methodological Examination of Doctoral Dissertations”. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, vol. 7, no. 1, 2022, pp. 81-130, doi:10.30828/real.972966.
Vancouver Özdemir M, Aypay A. The Academic Home of Turkish Higher Education Research: A Demographic, Thematic and Methodological Examination of Doctoral Dissertations. REAL is a scholarly peer-reviewed publication. 2022;7(1):81-130.


esci thomson reuters ile ilgili görsel sonucu     elsevier scopus logo ile ilgili görsel sonucueric logo ile ilgili görsel sonucu     26086 26088  26087 ulrich's periodical directory ile ilgili görsel sonucu