Gender Inequality and Collective Action in School Committees: Evidence from Tanzania

Year 2024, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 334 - 370, 30.09.2024

Kenny Manara

https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1446519

Abstract

The making of education governance reforms has led to the transfer of school management powers to teachers’ and parents’ representatives through primary school management committees. However, the committees have been found to be inadequate in ensuring that collective action is taken by their male and female members in most low- and middle-income countries. In response, this paper examines the possibilities that collective action by school committees is related to gender inequality, controlling for demographic and socio-economic factors across the rural (Iringa District) and urban (Arusha City) contexts of Tanzania. The results of a simple linear regression analysis using Ordinary Least Square techniques show that gender inequality predicts the collective action in school committees in both Arusha City and Iringa District. However, the multiple linear regression model predicts gender inequality in Arusha, and not in Iringa, controlling for membership experience and occupational status for both the rural and urban samples. This paper has implications for both policy and practice. In particular, the next round of school autonomy reforms needs to consider the criteria for school committee membership to incorporate membership experience and occupational status into the qualifications of parents’ representatives. In practice, head teachers need to devise innovative, sustainable approaches using the readily available resources to provide planning, budgeting and monitoring skills-based training to newly elected parent representatives.

Keywords

Gender inequality, Collective action, School committee, Parent representatives, Teacher representatives

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval was granted by the Postgraduate Committee, University of Dar es Salaam and research clearance was given by the Directorate of Research and Publication, University of Dar es Salaam.

Supporting Institution

Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Dar es Salaam

References

• ActionAid Tanzania. (2011). Transforming education for girls in Tanzania: Baseline research summary report. https://actionaid.org/sites/default/files/aategintbaselinetanzaniafinal.pdf
• Akdoğan, N., & Alparslan, K. (2020). Do members of disadvantaged groups possess a motivation of favouritism towards advantaged groups? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 11(4), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2020-0041
• Archambault, C., & Ehrhardt, D. (2022). The committeefication of collective action in Africa. World Development, 153, 105825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105825.
• Barreto, M., & Doyle, D. M. (2023). Benevolent and hostile sexism in a shifting global context. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(2), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00136-x
• Beard, V. & Dasgupta, A. (2006). Collective action and community-driven development in rural and urban Indonesia. Urban Studies, 43(9), 1451-1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600749944
• Becker, J. C., & Wagner, U. (2009). Doing gender differently: The interplay of strength of gender identification and content of gender identity in predicting women's endorsement of sexist beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.551
• Berhanu, K. Z. (2023). Practices, challenges, and prospects of implementing school-based management (SBM) system in Ethiopian schools: Implications for policy makers. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 8(2), 465-504. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1275282
• Branisa, B., Klasen, S., & Ziegler, M. (2009). The construction of the social institutions and gender index (Discussion Papers No. 184). Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research (IAI). https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/57322/1/608908010.pdf
• Brown, B., & Duku, N. (2008). Negotiated identities: dynamics in parents' participation in school governance in rural Eastern Cape schools and implication for school leadership. South African Journal of Education, 28(3), 431-450. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v28n3a122
• Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. A. (2011). Making schools work: New evidence on accountability reforms. World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/483221468147581570/pdf/600500PUB0ID181s0Work09780821386798.pdf
• Caricati, L., & Owuamalam, C. K. (2020). System justification among the disadvantaged: A triadic social stratification perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(40). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00040
• Carr-Hill, R. (2017). Exploring the composition of school councils and its relationship to council effectiveness as an accountability tool (Background Paper). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259567
• Cerise, S., & Francavilla, F. (2012). Tackling the root causes of gender inequalities in the Post-2015 Development Agenda. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=a6ddb787b1419f065e7263553ece588a7aa23f6b
• Cocco, V. M., Vezzali, L., Kola-Daisi, T. I., & Çakal, H. (2023). The role of common ingroup identity in promoting social change among tribes in Nigeria. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231162038
• Coinco, E. (2012). Women’s participation in school‐based management and communities within the complex socio‐cultural context of Nigeria (Programme Report). Education Sector Support Programme in Nigeria (ESSPIN). https://www.esspin.org/resources/reports/programme/supporting-community-and-civil-society-demand
• Cossyleon, J. E., & Woolley, K. R. (2020). Gender and collective action. In Naples, N. A. (Ed.). Companion to women’s and gender studies (pp. 385-408). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119315063.ch20
• De Cristofaro, V., Pellegrini, V., Giacomantonio, M., Livi, S., & van Zomeren, M. (2021). Can moral convictions against gender inequality overpower system justification effects? Examining the interaction between moral conviction and system justification. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(4), 1279–1302. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12451
• Dhakal, R. K. (2019). Promoting gender inclusive governance to deliver better education in Nepal. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 6(1), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v6i1p83
• Dhakal, R. K. (2021). How are ‘included’ excluded and vice-versa: Negotiated participation of women in school governance in Nepal. Journal of Social Inclusion Studies, 7(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/23944811211020369
• Dick, P. (2024). Rethinking gender inequalities in organizations. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar
• Duku, N., & Salami, I. A. (2017). The relevance of the school governance body to the effective decolonisation of education in South Africa. Perspectives in Education, 35(2), 112-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie. v35i2.9
• Gilbert, M. (2007). Rationality in collective action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36(1): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393105284167.
• Guha, P. (2023). School committee composition: Exploring the role of parental andfemale representation in India. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8182&context=lkcsb_research
• Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., & Brewer, M. B. (2017). Social identity: The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217690909
• Holme, J., & Rangel, V. (2012). Putting school reform in its place: Social geography, organizational social capital, and school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 257-283. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211423316
• Jain, C., & Nandwani, B. (2022). Female representation in school management and school quality (Working Paper No. 2022-002). Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR). http://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/publication/WP-2022-002.pdf
• Jost, J. T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12297
• Jost, J.T., & Banaji, M.R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
• Jost, J.T., Banaji, M.R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
• Kekana, L., & Makura, A. (2020). The importance of school governing bodies in the effective governance of the public schools: Do women have a role? The ADVED 2020 - 6th International Conference on Advances in Education, Virtual Conference. https://www.ocerints.org/adved20_e-publication/papers/x255.pdf
• Masanyiwa, Z. S., Magaria, B. R., & Shauri, N. E. (2023). Participation in school committees in monitoring primary school projects in the Nyang’hwale district in Tanzania. Rural Planning Journal, 25(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.59557/kykk3z52
• Mazzuca, S., Moscatelli, S., Menegatti, M., & Rubini, M. (2022). Men’s reactions to gender inequality in the workplace: From relative deprivation on behalf of women to collective action. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 999750. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999750
• Meinzen-Dick, R., Di Gregorio, M. & McCarthy, N. (2004). Methods for studying collective action in rural development (Working Paper No. 33). International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/CAPRiWP33.pdf‎.
• Mikołajczak, G., Becker, J., & Iyer, A. (2022). Women who challenge or defend the status quo: Ingroup identities as predictors of progressive and reactionary collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 626-641. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2842
• Nemes, J. (2013). School committee in the context of preparing and implementing whole school development planning. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(7), 73 –79. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210350
• Norman, G. (2010). Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the “Laws” of Statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459–010–9222–y.
• OECD. (2022), SIGI Country Report for Tanzania. OECD Publishing
• Okitsu, T., & Edwards, B. D. (2017). Policy promise and the reality of community involvement in school-based management in Zambia: Can the rural poor hold schools and teachers to account? International Journal of Educational Development, 56, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.07.001
• Oliver, P. Marwell, G., & Teixeira, R. (1985). A theory of the critical mass: I. Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 522–556. https://doi.org/10.1086/228313
• Owuamalam, C. K., Rubin, M., & Spears, R. (2018). Addressing evidential and theoretical inconsistencies in system-justification theory with a social identity model of system attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417737136
• Owuamalam, C. K., Rubin, M., & Spears, R. (2019). Revisiting 25 years of system motivation explanation for system justification from the perspective of social identity model of system attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12285
• Owuamalam, C. K., Caricati, L., & Bonetti, C. (2023). A large-scale test of the reality constraint and ingroup bias accounts of women’s support for male privilege. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 48(1), 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843231176222
• Pandolfelli, L., Dohrn, S., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2007). Gender and collective action: Policy implications from recent research (CAPRi Policy Brief). International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/32849/
• Peshkovskaya, A., Babkina, T., & Myagkov, M. (2019). Gender effects and cooperation in collective action: A laboratory experiment. Rationality and Society, 31(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463119858788
• Poteete, A. R., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Fifteen years of empirical research on collective action in natural resource management: Struggling to build Large-N databases based on qualitative research. World Development, 36(1), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.012.
• Prinsen, G., & Titega, K. (2008). Uganda’s decentralised primary education: Musical chairs and inverted elite capture in school management committees. Public Administration and Development, 28(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.487
• Robitzsch, A. (2020). Why ordinal variables can (almost) always be treated as continuous variables: Clarifying assumptions of robust continuous and ordinal factor analysis estimation methods. Frontiers in Education, 5(589965), 177. https://doi.org/10.3389/ feduc.2020.589965.
• Rubin, M., Owuamalam, C. K., Spears, R., & Caricati, L. (2023). A social identity model of system attitudes (SIMSA): Multiple explanations of system justification by the disadvantaged that do not depend on a separate system justification motive. European Review of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2022.2046422
• Sijapati, D. P. (2019). Gender status in the community school of Nepal. Patan Pragya, 5(1), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.3126/pragya.v5i1.30476.
• Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse and the very limited usefulness of Cronabch’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336–008–9101–0.
• Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5–4–18.
• Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65 – 93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W.G., & Worchel, S. (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-37). Brooks/Cole
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell
• United Republic of Tanzania. (1995a). The Education and Training Policy 1995. Government Printer
• United Republic of Tanzania. (1995b). The Education (Amendment) Act 1995. Government Printer
• United Republic of Tanzania. (2000). Women and Gender Development Policy. Ministry of Community Development, Women's Affairs and Children
• United Republic of Tanzania. (2001). Primary Education Development Plan. Government Printers
• United Republic of Tanzania. (2018). Education Circular No. 1 2018: Guideline for formation and management of school committee and boards. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MoEST).
• Unterhalter, E., North, A., & Ward, O. (2018). Accountability for gender equality (Background Paper). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261596
• van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
• van Zomeren, M., Kutlaca, M., & Turner-Zwinkels, F. (2018). Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 122–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347
• Wade, R. (1987). The management of common property resource: Finding a cooperative solution. Research Observer, 2(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/2.2.219.
• Wojtkiewicz, R. (2017). Elementary regression modelling: A discrete approach (pp. 53-78). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506303451