Commitment of Married Couples in Marriage and Dyadic Adjustment Prediction of Commitment Styles

Year 2020, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 133 - 152, 30.12.2020

Çağla Girgin Büyükbayraktar , Şahin Kesici

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the commitment and attachment styles which are likely to affect couples’ adjustment in marriage relationships. The study group is made up of 500 couples (N=1000). The data are collected using “Commitment Scale,” “Dyadic Adjustment Scale,” and “Experiences in Close Relationships Scale.” According to the results of the study, when the sub-dimensions of the commitment scale and attachment styles sub-dimensions, and the sub-dimensions of marriage adjustment are considered, a significant relationship is found between the social pressure sub-dimension of the commitment scale and affectional expression, dyadic satisfaction, and dyadic cohesion. When the extent to which the sub-dimensions of the commitment scale and the sub-dimensions of the attachment styles of married individuals who predicted the cohesion sub-dimension of the marriage adjustment scale was investigated, it is discovered that the dedicational and financial alternatives sub- dimensions of the commitment scale, anxiety sub-dimension of the attachment styles scale and concern for partner welfare sub-dimension were significant predictors of the dyadic cohesion sub-dimension, which is one of the sub-dimensions of the dyadic adjustment. The data that are obtained are discussed in the light of the relevant literature.

Keywords

Attachment styles, Commitment, Couples, Dyadic adjustment, Marriage

References

• Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1969). Object relations, dependency, and Attachment: A theoretical review of the Infant-mother relationship. Child Development, 40, 969-1025.
• Akbalık-Doğan, Ö., & Büyükşahin-Sunal, A. (2011). Evliliklerde olumlu yanılsama: İlişki bağlanımı ile nedensellik ve sorumluluk yüklemeleri arasındaki ilişkiler [Positive illusion in marriage: Relations between relation attachment and causality and responsibility loads]. Journal of Turkish Psychology, 26(67), 70-82.
• Amanvermez, P. (2007). Yakın ilişkilerde bağlanma ile gruplara bağlanma arasındaki ilişkiler [Relations between attachment in close relationships and attachment to groups].(Unpublished master thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
• Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1190-1203.
• Atçeken, E. (2014). İlişkilerdeki yüklemelerin, bağlanmanın, eş benzerliğinin ve problem çözme becerilerinin eş desteğini yordaması [Loads in relations, attachment, spousal resemblance and problem solving skills prediction on spousal support]. (Unpublished master thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
• Bahadır, Ş. (2006). Romantik ilişkilerde bağlanma stilleri, çatışma çözme stratejileri ve olumsuz duygu durumunu düzenleme arasındaki ilişki. [The Relationship between attachment styles, conflict resolution strategies and negative mood adjustment in romantic relations]. (Unpublished master thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
• Banse, R. (2004). Adult attachment and marital satisfaction: Evidence for dyadic configuration effects. Journal of Social & Personal Relationship, 21(2), 273-282.
• Bayrakcı, E. (2014). Evli bireylerin benlik saygısı, cinsel tutumları ve kök aile ilişkilerinin çift uyumunu yordaması [Self-esteem, sexual attitudes and root family relationships of married individuals prediction on dyadic adjustment]. (Unpublished master thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
• Beach, S. R., & Broderick, J. E. (1983). Commitment: A variable in women's response to marital therapy. American Journal of Family Therapy, 11(4), 16-24.
• Bifulco, A., & Thomas, G. (2013). Understanding adult attachment in family relationships research assessment and intervention. Oxon: Routledge.
• Burger, J. M. (2006). Kişilik [Personality]. İstanbul: Kaknus Publisher.
• Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L. & Shaver, P R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York: Guilford Press.
• Burgess, E. W., & Cottrell, L. (1939). Predicting success and failure in marriage. New York: Prentice-Hall, pp. 1-11.
• Büyükşahin, A. (2006). Yakın ilişkilerde bağlanım: Yatırım modelinin bağlanma stilleri ve bazı ilişkisel değişkenler yönünden incelenmesi [Attachment in close relations investigation of investment model in terms of attachment styles and some relational variables]. (Unpublished master thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, E.Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Cobb, R. J., Davila, J., & Bradbury, T. N. (2001). Attachment Security and Marital Satisfaction: The Role of Positive Perceptions and Social Support. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 27(9), 1131-1143.
• Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43(5), 721-739. Dallos, R., & Draper, R. (2012). Aile terapisine giriş [Introduction to Family Therapy: Systemic Theory and Practice]. (Ş. Kesici, & C. Kiper, Trans.) Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Dattilio, F. M. (2005). The restructuring of family schemas: a cognitive–behavior perspective. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(1), 15-30.
• Eddy, J. M., Heyman, R. E., & Weiss, R. L. (1991). An empirical evaluation of the Dyadic adjustment scale: Exploring the differences between marital satisfaction and adjustment. Behavioral Assessment, 13(3), 199-220.
• Feeney, J. A. (1999). Adult romantic attachment and couple relationships. In J. Cassidy & PR Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, (pp. 355-377). New York: Guilford Press.
• Fışıloğlu, H., & Demir, A. (2000). Applicability of the dyadic adjustment scale for measurement of marital quality with Turkish couples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 214-218.
• Fuenfhausen, K. K., & Cashwell, C. S. (2013). Attachment, stress, dyadic coping, and marital satisfaction of counseling graduate students. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 21(4), 364-370.
• Girgin-Büyükbayraktar, Ç., Özteke, H. İ., & Kesici, Ş. (2015). The Validity and reliability study for the Turkish version of the commitment scale. Antropologist, 20(3), 523-534.
• Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, L. W. (2000). The Timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 737-745.
• Green, D. U. (2012). The relative influence of deployment, attachment style, and religiosity on marital satisfaction among air force couples. Faculty of the Graduate School of St. Mary’s University in PhD Thesis, San Antonio, Texas.
• Johnson, M. P. (1973). Commitment: A conceptual structure and empirical application. Sociological Quarterly, 14, 395-406.
• Johnson, D. J., & Rusbult, C. E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 967-980.
• Johnson, M. P. (1982). Social and cognitive features of the dissolution of commitment to relationships. In S.W. Duck (Ed.). Personal relationships 4: Dissolvinig personal relationships. Academic Press: London.
• Jones, K. C., Welton, S. R., Oliver, T. C., & Thoburn, J. W. (2011). Mindfulness, spousal attachment, and marital satisfaction: A mediated model. Family Journal, 19(4), 357-361.
• Karasar, N. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research method]. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Kesici, Ş., Mert, A., İlgün, E., & Büyükbayraktar, Ç. (2015). Aile terapisinde kullanılan teknikler [Techniques Used in Family Therapy]. (3rd ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2002). Toward a Theory of family communication. Communication Theory, 12(1), 70-91.
• Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2006). Family communication patterns theory: A social cognitive approach. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 50–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Larson, J. H. (1988). The marriage quiz: College students’ beliefs in selected myths about marriage. Family Relations, 37(1), 3-11.
• Le, B. & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37-57.
• Leik, R. K., & Leik, S. A. (1977). Transition to interpersonal commitment. In R. L. Hamblin & J. H. Kunkel (Eds.), Behavioral theory in sociology: Essays in honor of George C. Homans (pp. 299–322). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
• Lippitt, D. N. (2005). An examination of the relationship between differentiation, adult attachment style, and marital satisfaction: a multi-dimensional approach. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Capella University, Minneapolis.
• Locke, H. J. & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21(2), 251-255.
• Lund, M. (1985). The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2(1), 3-23.
• Morris, A. S., Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., Myers, S. S. & Robinson, L. R. (2007). The role of the family context in the development of emotion regulation. Social Development, 16(2), 361-388.
• Murphy, C. M., & O’Leary, K. D. (1989). Psychological aggression predicts physical aggression in early marriage. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(5), 579-58.
• Ng, K. M., Loy, J. T. C., MohdZain, Z., & Cheong, W. (2013). Gender, race, adult attachment, and marital satisfaction among Malaysians. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 21(2), 198-207.
• Olson, D. (1993). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Assessing family systems. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal Family Processes. New York: Guilford Press.
• Owen, J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2011). The revised commitment inventory: Psychometrics and use with unmarried couples. Journal of Family Issues, 32(6), 820-841.
• Özer, A., & Güngör-Cihan, H. (2012). Yükleme Tarzları, Bağlanma Stilleri ve Kişilik Özelliklerine Göre Evlilik Uyumu [Marriage adjustment by loading styles, attachment styles and personality traits]. Mersin University Education Faculty Journal, 2(8), 11-24.
• Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009). The Pre-Engagement cohabitation effect: A replication and extension of previous findings. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(1), 107-111.
• Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2010). Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationship stability from four aspects of commitment. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(5), 543-550.
• Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and Satisfaction in Romantic Associations: A Test of the Investment Model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186.
• Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101-117.
• Rusbult, C. A., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scfee: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391.
• Schrodt, P. (2009). Family strength and satisfaction as functions of family communication environments. Communication Quarterly, 57(2), 171-186.
• Satir, V. (1988). The New Peoplemaking: Because You Want to be a Better Parent. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books, Inc.
• Selçuk, E., Günaydın, G., Sümer, S., & Uysal, A. (2005). Yetişkin bağlanma boyutları için yeni bir ölçüm: Yakın ilişkilerde yaşantılar envanteri-ii’nin türk örnekleminde psikometrik açıdan değerlendirilmesi. [A new measurement of adult attachment dimensions: psychometric evaluation of close relationships Inventory-II in the Turkish Sample]. Turkish Psychological Writings, 8(16), 1-11.
• Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15 – 28.
• Spanier, G. B., & Cole, C. C. (1976). Toward clarification and investigation of marital adjustment. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 6, 121-146.
• Stanley, S. M., Kline, G. H., & Markman, H. J. (2005). The inertia hypothesis: Sliding vs. deciding in the development of risk for couples in marriage. Paper presented at the Cohabitation: Advancing Research and Theory Conference, Bowling Green, OH.
• Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595-608.
• Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006), Sliding versus deciding: ınertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 5, 499-509.
• Sümer, M. (2006). Yetişkinlerin bağlanma stillerinin duygusal zekâ, ilişkiye bağlılık, ilişkide algılanan tatmin ve bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [Analysis of Adult Attachment Styles According to Emotional Intelligence, Relational Commitment, Perceived Satisfaction in the Relation and Some Variables]. (Unpublished master thesis). Hacettepe University , Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
• Sumer, N., & Güngör, D. (1999). Yetişkin bağlanma stilleri ölçeklerinin Türk örneklemi üzerinde psikometrik değerlendirmesi ve kültürlerarası bir karşılaştırma [Psychometric evaluation of adult attachment measures on Turkish samples and a cross-cultural comparison]. Journal of Turkish Psychology, 14(43), 71-106.
• Turan, F. (2015). Ailede bütünlük duygusunun ve eş desteğinin evlilikte problem çözme becerisini yordaması [Feeling of unity in the family and spousal support prediction on problem solving skills in marriage]. Necmettin Erbakan University, (Unpublished master thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
• Thompson-Hayes, M., & Webb, L. M. (2004). Commitment under construction: A Dyadic and communicative model of marital commitment. The Journal of Family Communication, 4 (3-4), 249-260.
• VanderDrift, L. E., Agnew, C. R., & Wilson, J. E. (2009). Nonmarital romantic relationship commitment and leave behavior: The mediating role of dissolution consideration, PSPB, 35(9), 1220-1232.
• Vuchunic, S. (1987). Starting and stopping spontaneous family conflicts. Journal of Marriage and Family, 49(3), 591-601.
• Whitton, S.W., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2008). Effects of parental divorce on marital commitment and confidence. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(5), 789-793.