Purpose- This study investigates the alignment between airline sustainability strategies and passenger perceptions, focusing on the case of
Turkish Airlines. It aims to identify the gaps between corporate sustainability messaging, operational realities, and consumer awareness and
expectations in the context of an emerging market.
Methodology- A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining an academic literature review with a qualitative field study and a case study
analysis. The field research involved structured interviews with 70 passengers at Ankara Esenboğa Airport to gauge awareness of concepts like
Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) and carbon offsetting. The case study critically evaluates Turkish Airlines' sustainability reports and strategic
initiatives.
Findings- The findings reveal a significant "information gap," with 43% of passengers unaware of key green aviation concepts. While a of travelers (71%) express a willingness to pay more for sustainable flights, this support is conditional upon transparency and trust. exhibit skepticism towards indirect measures like carbon offsetting, preferring tangible actions such as fleet modernization. The Turkish Airlines indicates that while the airline has a strong, credible strategy in fleet modernization, its initiatives in SAF and majority
Passengers
analysis of
carbon offsetting
lack scale and are not effectively communicated, creating a "credibility gap".
Conclusion- This paper contributes to the sustainable aviation literature by empirically demonstrating the disconnect between airline strategy
and consumer perception in the Turkish context. It highlights that gaining a competitive advantage requires airlines to move beyond symbolic
gestures and bridge the credibility gap through transparent communication and measurable, tangible actions.
Aviation Green marketing carbon offsetting sustainability aviation fuel aircraft efficiency consumer awareness
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Behaviour-Personality Assessment in Psychology |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | October 9, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | December 15, 2025 |
| Publication Date | December 31, 2025 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2010 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA78KH86CN |
| Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 12 Issue: 2 |
Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annually and open-access online journal. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The publication language of the Journal is English. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.