Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2021, , 15 - 26, 30.03.2021
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1390

Abstract

References

  • Andreassen, C. C., Hetland, J., & Pallesen, S. (2010). The relationship between ‘workaholism’, basic needs satisfaction at work and personality. European Journal of Personality, 24(1), 3-17.
  • Andreassen, C. C., Hetland, J., & Pallesen, S. (2014). Psychometric assessment of workaholism measures. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(1), 7-24.
  • Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structure equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  • Bolton, S. C., & Houlihan, M. (2009). Are we having fun yet? A consideration of workplace fun and engagement. Employee Relations, 31(6), 556-568.
  • Chan, S. C. H. (2010). Does workplace fun matter? Developing a useable typology of workplace fun in a qualitative study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 720-728.
  • Cooper, P. (2005). A study of innovators’ experience of new product innovation in organizations. R&D Management, 35(5), 525-533.
  • Ersoy-Kart, M. (2005). Reliability and validity of the workaholism battery (work-bat): Turkish Form. Social Behavior and Personality, 33(6), 609-618.
  • Fluegge, E. R. (2008). Who put the fun in functional? Fun at work and its effects on job performance (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0021955/00001
  • Fluegge-Woolf, E. R. (2014). Play hard, work hard: Fun at work and job performance. Management Research Review, 37(8), 682-705.
  • Ford, R. C., McLaughlin, F. S., & Newstrom, J. W. (2003). Questions and answers about fun at work. Human Resource Planning, 26(4), 18-33.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Essex, England: Pearson Education.
  • Karamfilov, K. (2018). Leader's endorsement of idiosyncratic workplace fun, organizational playfulness, climate, and organizational creativity (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest.
  • Karl, K., & Peluchette, J. (2006). How does workplace fun impact employee perceptions of customer service quality? Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(2), 2-13.
  • Karl, K., Peluchette, J. V., & Hall, L. M. (2008). Give them something to smile about: A marketing strategy for recruiting and retaining volunteers. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 20(1), 71-96.
  • Karl, K., Peluchette, J., Hall, L., & Harland, L. (2005). Attitudes toward workplace fun: A three sector comparison. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12(2), 1-17.
  • Karl, K., Peluchette, J. V., & Harland, L. (2007). Is fun for everyone? Personality differences in healthcare providers’ attitudes toward fun. Journal of Human Health Services Administration, 29(4), 409-447.
  • Mainemelis, C., & Ronson, S. (2006). Ideas are born in fields of play: Towards a theory of play and creativity in organizational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 81-131.
  • McDowell, T. (2004). Fun at work: Scale development, confirmatory factor analysis, and links to organizational outcomes (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest.
  • McMillan, L. H. W., Brady, E. C., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Marsh, N. V. (2002). A multifaceted validation study of Spence and Robbins’ (1992) Workaholism Battery. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(3), 357-368.
  • McMillan. L. H. W., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (2004). Workaholism and health: Implications for organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(5), 509-519.
  • Michel, J. W., Tews, M. J., & Allen, D. G. (2019). Fun in the workplace: A review and expanded theoretical perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 29(1), 98-110.
  • Müceldili, B., & Erdil, O. (2016). Finding Fun in Work: The effect of workplace fun on taking charge and job engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 304-312.
  • Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. A. (2005). Attitudes toward incorporating fun into the health care workplace. The Health Care Manager, 24(3), 268-275.
  • Presidency of the Republic of Turkey Investment Office. (2019). The State of Turkish Startup Ecosystem. Retrieved from https://di-digital-innovation.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/di-bulten/files/Bulten+30/WEF_Top_10_Emerging_Technologies_2019_Report.pdf
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689-695.
  • Spence, J. T., & Robbins, A. S. (1992). Workaholism: Definition, measurement, and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58(1), 160-178.
  • Statler, M., Heracleous, L., & Jacobs, C. D. (2011). Serious play as practice of paradox. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(2). 236-256.
  • Stewart, J. B. (2013, March 15). Looking for a lesson in Google’s perks. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/16/business/at-google-a-place-to-work-and-play.html
  • Studholme, N. E. (2014). Silicon Valley Startup Companies: A question of culture (Senior thesis). Retrieved from https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/962
  • [Tech Insider]. (2018, December 19). Exclusive Look Inside Facebook’s Engineering Office in London [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhuDhNLatlk
  • Tews, M. J., Michel, J. W., & Allen, D. G. (2014). Fun and friends: The impact of workplace fun and constituent attachment on turnover in hospitality context. Human Relations, 67(8), 923-946.
  • Tews, M. J., Michel, J. W., & Bartlett, A. (2012). The fundamental role of workplace fun in applicant attraction. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(1), 105-114.
  • Tews, M. J., Michel, J. W., & Stafford, K. (2013). Does fun pay? The impact of workplace fun on employee turnover and performance. Human Resources Management, 54(4), 370-382.
  • Tews, M. J., Michel, J., Xu, S., & Drost, A. J. (2015). Workplace fun matters … but what else? Employee Relations, 37(2), 248-267.
  • Tolentino, C. (2018, July 12). Turkey has highest number of new startups registered in Europe. Travel Daily Media. Retrieved from https://www.traveldailymedia.com/turkey-most-startups-europe/
  • Zait, A., & Bertea, P. E. (2011). Method for testing discriminant validity. Management & Marketing, 9(2), 217-224

ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SCALES FOR ASSESSING WORKPLACE FUN IN TURKEY

Year 2021, , 15 - 26, 30.03.2021
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1390

Abstract

Purpose - Fun in the workplace has frequently been highlighted in the popular media and increasingly attracted research attention. Its various positive outcomes have also been pointed out in the literature. Despite the growing relevance of workplace fun, its measurement has not been extensively tested, particularly in emerging markets. Accordingly, this study was intended to adapt and validate existing scales measuring different aspects of workplace fun in Turkey.
Methodology - Four measures of workplace fun, namely “fun activities”, “fun job responsibilities”, “coworker socializing” and “manager support for fun”, were identified from the literature. These measures were translated and adapted for a Turkish sample. Their face validity and content validity were checked by experts in the field. Subsequently, the measures were tested on a sample of 254 employees working in startups in Turkey. The sample was randomly split into two groups for exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.
Findings - 24 items were derived from the literature. As expected, four factors were revealed in the exploratory factor analysis. One item was removed due to the insufficient factor loading on any factor. The reliability values of all factors were satisfactory. These results were confirmed in the confirmatory factor analysis, which showed that the measurement model had an acceptable fit to the sample data. In addition, the discriminant validity and the convergent validity were established.
Conclusion - The findings of this study suggested that the adapted version of the scales for measuring “fun job responsibilities”, “fun activities”, “manager support for fun”, and “coworker socializing” can be used in Turkey. Researchers can employ these scales to examine the four dimensions of workplace fun as distinct constructs. Additionally, managers can utilize the validated indicators of workplace fun as a basis for creating a fun workplace.

References

  • Andreassen, C. C., Hetland, J., & Pallesen, S. (2010). The relationship between ‘workaholism’, basic needs satisfaction at work and personality. European Journal of Personality, 24(1), 3-17.
  • Andreassen, C. C., Hetland, J., & Pallesen, S. (2014). Psychometric assessment of workaholism measures. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(1), 7-24.
  • Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structure equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  • Bolton, S. C., & Houlihan, M. (2009). Are we having fun yet? A consideration of workplace fun and engagement. Employee Relations, 31(6), 556-568.
  • Chan, S. C. H. (2010). Does workplace fun matter? Developing a useable typology of workplace fun in a qualitative study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 720-728.
  • Cooper, P. (2005). A study of innovators’ experience of new product innovation in organizations. R&D Management, 35(5), 525-533.
  • Ersoy-Kart, M. (2005). Reliability and validity of the workaholism battery (work-bat): Turkish Form. Social Behavior and Personality, 33(6), 609-618.
  • Fluegge, E. R. (2008). Who put the fun in functional? Fun at work and its effects on job performance (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0021955/00001
  • Fluegge-Woolf, E. R. (2014). Play hard, work hard: Fun at work and job performance. Management Research Review, 37(8), 682-705.
  • Ford, R. C., McLaughlin, F. S., & Newstrom, J. W. (2003). Questions and answers about fun at work. Human Resource Planning, 26(4), 18-33.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Essex, England: Pearson Education.
  • Karamfilov, K. (2018). Leader's endorsement of idiosyncratic workplace fun, organizational playfulness, climate, and organizational creativity (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest.
  • Karl, K., & Peluchette, J. (2006). How does workplace fun impact employee perceptions of customer service quality? Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(2), 2-13.
  • Karl, K., Peluchette, J. V., & Hall, L. M. (2008). Give them something to smile about: A marketing strategy for recruiting and retaining volunteers. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 20(1), 71-96.
  • Karl, K., Peluchette, J., Hall, L., & Harland, L. (2005). Attitudes toward workplace fun: A three sector comparison. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12(2), 1-17.
  • Karl, K., Peluchette, J. V., & Harland, L. (2007). Is fun for everyone? Personality differences in healthcare providers’ attitudes toward fun. Journal of Human Health Services Administration, 29(4), 409-447.
  • Mainemelis, C., & Ronson, S. (2006). Ideas are born in fields of play: Towards a theory of play and creativity in organizational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 81-131.
  • McDowell, T. (2004). Fun at work: Scale development, confirmatory factor analysis, and links to organizational outcomes (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest.
  • McMillan, L. H. W., Brady, E. C., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Marsh, N. V. (2002). A multifaceted validation study of Spence and Robbins’ (1992) Workaholism Battery. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(3), 357-368.
  • McMillan. L. H. W., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (2004). Workaholism and health: Implications for organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(5), 509-519.
  • Michel, J. W., Tews, M. J., & Allen, D. G. (2019). Fun in the workplace: A review and expanded theoretical perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 29(1), 98-110.
  • Müceldili, B., & Erdil, O. (2016). Finding Fun in Work: The effect of workplace fun on taking charge and job engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 304-312.
  • Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. A. (2005). Attitudes toward incorporating fun into the health care workplace. The Health Care Manager, 24(3), 268-275.
  • Presidency of the Republic of Turkey Investment Office. (2019). The State of Turkish Startup Ecosystem. Retrieved from https://di-digital-innovation.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/di-bulten/files/Bulten+30/WEF_Top_10_Emerging_Technologies_2019_Report.pdf
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689-695.
  • Spence, J. T., & Robbins, A. S. (1992). Workaholism: Definition, measurement, and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58(1), 160-178.
  • Statler, M., Heracleous, L., & Jacobs, C. D. (2011). Serious play as practice of paradox. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(2). 236-256.
  • Stewart, J. B. (2013, March 15). Looking for a lesson in Google’s perks. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/16/business/at-google-a-place-to-work-and-play.html
  • Studholme, N. E. (2014). Silicon Valley Startup Companies: A question of culture (Senior thesis). Retrieved from https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/962
  • [Tech Insider]. (2018, December 19). Exclusive Look Inside Facebook’s Engineering Office in London [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhuDhNLatlk
  • Tews, M. J., Michel, J. W., & Allen, D. G. (2014). Fun and friends: The impact of workplace fun and constituent attachment on turnover in hospitality context. Human Relations, 67(8), 923-946.
  • Tews, M. J., Michel, J. W., & Bartlett, A. (2012). The fundamental role of workplace fun in applicant attraction. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(1), 105-114.
  • Tews, M. J., Michel, J. W., & Stafford, K. (2013). Does fun pay? The impact of workplace fun on employee turnover and performance. Human Resources Management, 54(4), 370-382.
  • Tews, M. J., Michel, J., Xu, S., & Drost, A. J. (2015). Workplace fun matters … but what else? Employee Relations, 37(2), 248-267.
  • Tolentino, C. (2018, July 12). Turkey has highest number of new startups registered in Europe. Travel Daily Media. Retrieved from https://www.traveldailymedia.com/turkey-most-startups-europe/
  • Zait, A., & Bertea, P. E. (2011). Method for testing discriminant validity. Management & Marketing, 9(2), 217-224
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Wichakorn Sekarawisut This is me 0000-0002-6315-7510

E. Serra Yurtkoru This is me 0000-0002-9476-8445

Publication Date March 30, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021

Cite

APA Sekarawisut, W., & Yurtkoru, E. S. (2021). ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SCALES FOR ASSESSING WORKPLACE FUN IN TURKEY. Research Journal of Business and Management, 8(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1390
AMA Sekarawisut W, Yurtkoru ES. ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SCALES FOR ASSESSING WORKPLACE FUN IN TURKEY. RJBM. March 2021;8(1):15-26. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1390
Chicago Sekarawisut, Wichakorn, and E. Serra Yurtkoru. “ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SCALES FOR ASSESSING WORKPLACE FUN IN TURKEY”. Research Journal of Business and Management 8, no. 1 (March 2021): 15-26. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1390.
EndNote Sekarawisut W, Yurtkoru ES (March 1, 2021) ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SCALES FOR ASSESSING WORKPLACE FUN IN TURKEY. Research Journal of Business and Management 8 1 15–26.
IEEE W. Sekarawisut and E. S. Yurtkoru, “ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SCALES FOR ASSESSING WORKPLACE FUN IN TURKEY”, RJBM, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 2021, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1390.
ISNAD Sekarawisut, Wichakorn - Yurtkoru, E. Serra. “ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SCALES FOR ASSESSING WORKPLACE FUN IN TURKEY”. Research Journal of Business and Management 8/1 (March 2021), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1390.
JAMA Sekarawisut W, Yurtkoru ES. ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SCALES FOR ASSESSING WORKPLACE FUN IN TURKEY. RJBM. 2021;8:15–26.
MLA Sekarawisut, Wichakorn and E. Serra Yurtkoru. “ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SCALES FOR ASSESSING WORKPLACE FUN IN TURKEY”. Research Journal of Business and Management, vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, pp. 15-26, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1390.
Vancouver Sekarawisut W, Yurtkoru ES. ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SCALES FOR ASSESSING WORKPLACE FUN IN TURKEY. RJBM. 2021;8(1):15-26.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.