DÖNÜŞÜMSEL LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ YÖNETİM İNOVASYONU ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE’DE AMPİRİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Year 2016, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 97 - 106, 01.04.2016

Faruk Kalay , Turgay Ozturk

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116548

Abstract

İnovasyonla ilgili akademik araştırmaların sayısı her geçen gün artmaktadır. Ancak bu araştırmaların daha çok teknolojik değişimlerin
ekonomik etkilerine ve teknoloji tabanlı ürün ve süreç inovasyonlarına odaklandığı görülmektedir (Damanpour, 2014). Yönetim
inovasyonuyla ilgili araştırma ve akademik yayın sayısı, teknolojik inovasyona nazaran göreceli olarak daha azdır. Ancak, yönetim
inovasyonlarının yapılması sonucu oluşacak organizasyonel değişimlerin, aslında çoğu zaman teknolojik inovasyonları yapmanın bir ön
koşulu olduğu ifade edilmektedir (Sanidas, 2005). Bu bağlamda bu çalışmanın amacı, dönüşümsel liderlik davranışı alt boyutları olan
idealleştirilmiş etki (karizma), ilham verme (telkinle güdüleme), entelektüel teşvik ve bireyselleştirilmiş ilgi liderlik davranışının yönetim
inovasyonu üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır. Araştırma Türkiye’de bir kamu kurumunda çalışan 198 yöneticiden alınan verilerle
gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analizler sonucunda bireyselleştirilmiş ilgi liderlik davranışının yönetim inovasyonu üzerinde pozitif ve anlamlı bir etkiye
sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bununla birlikte diğer boyutlar olan idealleştirilmiş etki (karizma), ilham verme (telkinle güdüleme) ve
entelektüel teşvik liderlik davranışlarının yönetim inovasyonu üzerinde anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olmadıkları tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Yönetim inovasyonu, inovasyon, dönüşümcü liderlik, liderlik, idari inovasyon

THE IMPACT OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP ON MANAGEMENT INNOVATION: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY

Abstract

The number of academic researches on innovation has been steadily on the rise. Yet these researches focus primarily on economic impacts of technological transformations and product and process innovations based on technology (Damanpour, 2014). The number of researches and academic publications about management innovation are relatively low with respect to technological innovation. Yet organizational innovations occurred as a result of management innovations, are considered as a prerequisite for technological innovations (Sanidas, 2005). In this regard, the aim of this study is to analyze the impact of transformational leadership sub-components such as idealized influence (charisma), inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individual consideration on management innovation. The research data are obtained through 198 Turkish public managers. The analyses reveals that individual consideration has a positive and significant impact on management innovation, whereas other sub-components such as idealized influence (charisma), inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation do not cause a significant impact.

Keywords

Management innovation, innovation, transformational leadership, Leadership, administrative innovation

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76, 76–87.
• Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., & Lay, G. (2008). Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation, 28, 644–657.
• Arrow, K. (1962). The economic implication of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–173.
• Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441–462.
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational Dynamics, 13(3), 26-40.
• Bass, B. M., Jung, D. I., Avolio, B. J., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207–218.
• Battisti, G., & Stoneman, P. (2010). How innovative are UK firms? Evidence from the Fourth UK Community Innovation Survey on synergies between technological and organizational innovations. British Journal of Management, 21, 187–206.
• Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33, 825–845.
• Burns, J. M. G. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
• Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. L. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64, 1– 17.
• CIS (2012). http://www.tuik.gov.tr (bilgi edinme kapsamında anket formuna ulaşılmıştır).
• Damanpour, F. (2014). Footnotes to research on management innovation. Organization Studies, 35(9), 1265-1285.
• Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2012). Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management and Organization Review, 8, 423–454.
• Evangelista, R., & Vezzani, A. (2010). The economic impact of technological and organizational innovations: A firm level analysis. Research Policy, 39, 1253–1263.
• Hamel, G. (2006). The why, what and how of management innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84(2), 72–84.
• Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from: The natural history of innovation. New York: Riverhead Books.
• Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: hypotheses and some preliminary findings. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525–544.
• Kimberly, J. R. (1981). Managerial innovation. In P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (ss. 84–104). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• Mendes, C. (1981). http://www.atam.gov.tr/dergi/sayi-02/ataturk-ve-liderlik (Erişim tarihi: 16.03.2016).
• Nelson, R. R. (1991). Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12, 61–74.
• Nieves, N., & Segarra-Cipres, M. (2015). Management innovation in the hotel industry. Tourism Management, 46, 51-58.
• OECD (2005). Oslo Manual: The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Paris: OECD.
• Sanidas, E. (2005). Organizational innovations and economic growth: Organosis and growth of firms, sectors, and countries. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934/1911). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
• Sosik, J. J. (1997). Effects of transformational leadership and anonymity on idea generation in computermediated groups. Group and Organization Management, 22, 460–487.
• Vaccaro, I. G., Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2012). Management Innovation and Leadership: The moderating role of organizational size. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 28-51.
• Walker, R. M., Damanpour, F., & Devece, C. A. (2011). Management innovation and organizational performance: Mediating role of planning and control. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 367–386.
• Werner, I. (1993). Liderlik ve Yönetim (Çev. Vedat Üner). İstanbul: Rota Yayınevi.
• Whittington, R., Pettigrew, A., Peck, S., Fenton, F., & Conyon, M. (1999). Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992–1996. Organization Science, 10, 583–600.
• Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2003). Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence’. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 545– 568.