Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SIX SIGMA APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF SERVICE AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN TERMS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT

Year 2021, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 167 - 180, 30.09.2021

Aysenur Erdıl

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1449

Abstract

Purpose- This study investigates the development, advantages, customer satisfaction, and problems of six sigma principles, provides a brief
introduction of the six-sigma organizational structure and its application in industry implementation, and highlights the major elements
impacting successful six sigma deployments. In addition, the objective of this research is to evaluate the fundamental ideas of six sigmas, its
advantages, and effective implementation methodologies.
Methodology- Quality Management-Process improvement is already a critical systematic process for gaining a competitive edge and improving
performance. Whereas Six Sigma might have been initially established with manufacturing techniques, it is now employed through service
organizations and service operations in practically every industry and by some service sectors (e.g., transportation, telecom, and healthcare) to
increase profitability and performance. In addressing critical challenges, business managers implement Six Sigma in business marketing,
financial, operations management, regulatory, and employee relations operations. Generally, the Six Sigma approach has been employed in the
industrial sector of industry.
Findings- This research, in terms of direction, includes exemplary practices/applications from the service industry and manufacturing sector, as
well as other industries (e.g., transportation and mobile communications-telecommunications) that are pioneers and entrepreneurs-innovators
in applying the procedures via quality function deployment. We provide insights acquired from past successes. The work incorporates the
principles acquired from outstanding six sigma enterprises, discusses the principles of managerial position and appropriate six sigma application
deployment, and examines future enhancements to the six sigma method.
Conclusion- Six sigma concepts and practices that are beneficial could flourish through constantly improving the management structure.
According to the findings of this study, the principles of effective application comprise higher management endorsement and engagement,
strategic alignment, skills development, platforms, and connections to personnel management efforts- initiatives.

Keywords

Business quality function quality management six sigmas service and manufacturing industry

References

  • Akkawuttiwanich, P. and Yenradee, P. (2018). Fuzzy QFD approach for managing SCOR performance indicators. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 122, 189–201. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.05.044.
  • Anbari, F. T. and Kwak, Y. H. (2004). Success Factors in Managing Six Sigma Projects, Project Management Institute Research Conference, London, UK, England. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, July 11-14, 2004 https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/successfactors-managing-six-sigma-projects-8293
  • Antony, J. (2004). Six-Sigma in the UK Service Organizations: Results from a Pilot Survey, Managerial Auditing Journal, 19 (8), 1006-1013.
  • Berry, T. H. (1991). Managing the Total Quality Transformation, McGraw-Hill, First Edition, USA.
  • Brady, J. E. and Allen, T. T. (2006). Six Sigma Literature: A Review and Agenda for Future Research. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22(3), 335–367. doi:10.1002/qre.769.
  • Björlin, L., S. and Edvardsson, B. (2003). Customer expectations on service guarantees. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 13(5), 338–348. doi:10.1108/09604520310495822
  • Bossert, J.L (1990). Quality Function Deployment: The Practitioner's Approach (Quality and Reliability Series, Volume 21), CRC Press, 125 p., ISBN 13: 9780824783785.
  • Büyüközkan, G. and Çifçi, G. (2013). An integrated QFD framework with multiple formatted and incomplete preferences: A sustainable supply chain application. Applied Soft Computing, 13(9), 3931–3941. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2013.03.014
  • Carnevalli, J. A., Miguel, P. A. C. and Calarge, F. A. (2010). Axiomatic design application for minimising the difficulties of QFD usage. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.002
  • Chakravorty, S. S. (2009). Six Sigma programs: An implementation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(1), 1– 16. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.01.003
  • Cohen, L. (1995). Quality function deployment: How to make QFD work for you. Prentice Hall. Gunther, D. (2000). Quality Function Deployment - How to Make QFD Work for You. Insight, 3(2), 55–56. doi:10.1002/inst.20003255, Book Reviews.
  • Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control (DMAIC), https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/searchSoftwareQuality/downloads/ect01TreasurechestSixSigma.pdf ,13-27 pp. (Access Date: 12.03.2021).
  • Deveci, M., Öner, S. C., Canıtez, F. and Öner, M. (2019). Evaluation of service quality in public bus transportation using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy QFD methodology. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 100387. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2019.100387
  • Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2007). Service Quality Attributes Affecting Customer Satisfaction for Bus Transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 10 (3), 21-34. http://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.10.3.2
  • Ferrin, D., Muthler, D. and Miller, M. (2002). Six Sigma and simulation, so what’s the correlation? Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, 1439–1443.
  • Forrest W. Breyfogle (2003). Implementing six sigma: smarter solutions using statistical methods, Second Edition, John Wiley and Sons., 1231 p., ISBN 13:9780471265726.
  • Fortenot, G., Behara, R. and Gresham, A. (1994). Six Sigma in customer satisfaction, Quality Progress, December, 27(12), 73-76.
  • Franceschini, F. (2001). Advanced Quality Function Deployment, First Edition, CRC Press, 209 p., ISBN 13: 9781574443219.
  • Henderson, K. M. and Evans, J. R. (2000). Successful implementation of Six Sigma: benchmarking General Electric Company. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 7(4), 260–282. doi:10.1108/14635770010378909
  • Jabonski, J. R. (1994). Implementing TQM: Competing in the 90s Through Total Quality Management, 2nd Second Edition, Michigan USA, ISBN- 13: 978-1878821034, 224 p.
  • Jeannine S., Penn M. L. and Erin H. (2005). Relationships Between CMMI and Six Sigma, Technical Note CMU/SEI-2005-TN-005 report number.
  • Johnson, R. S. (1993). Management Processes for Quality Operations, Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press, USA.
  • Kanji, G.K. and Asher, M. (1993). Total Quality Management process, -a systematic approach, Advances in Total Quality Management Series, 4, Carfax Publishing, Abingdon.
  • Kaswan, M. S. and Rathi, R. (2020). Green Lean Six Sigma for sustainable development: Integration and framework. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 83, 106396. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106396.
  • Kwak, Y. H. and Anbari, F. T. (2006). Benefits, obstacles, and future of six sigma approach. Technovation, 26(5-6), 708– 715. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.10.003.
  • Linderman, K., Schroeder, R.G., Zaheer, S. and Choo, A.S. (2003). Six Sigma: a goal-theoretic perspective, Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 193-203.
  • Li, Y.-L., Yang, Q. and Chin, K.-S. (2019). A decision support model for risk management of hazardous materials road transportation based on quality function deployment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 74, 154–173. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.026.
  • Liu, F.-H. F. and Hai, H. L. (2005). The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economics, 97(3), 308–317. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.09.005.
  • Maritan, D. (auth.) (2015). Practical Manual of Quality Function Deployment, Springer International Publishing, First Edition, 199 p., ISBN 13:978- 3-319-08521-0
  • Montgomery, D.C. and Woodall, W.H. (2008). An Overview of Six Sigma, International Statistical Review, 76, 3, 329–346.
  • Natee, S., Low, S. P. and Teo, E. A. L. (2016). Decision Making and Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Quality Function Deployment for Buildable and Sustainable Construction, 17–55. doi:10.1007/978-981-287-849-6_2
  • Nonthaleerak, P. and Hendry, L. C. (2006). Six Sigma: literature review and key future research areas. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 2(2), 105. doi:10.1504/ijssca.2006.010111
  • Ohio University, The 7 Roles of Six Sigma, December 3, 2019, https://onlinemasters.ohio.edu/blog/the-7-roles-of-six-sigma/, Access Date: 12.03.2021)
  • Ocampo, L. A., Labrador, J. J. T., Jumao-as, A. M. B. and Rama, A. M. O. (2020). Integrated multiphase sustainable product design with a hybrid quality function deployment – multi-attribute decision-making (QFD-MADM) framework. Sustainable Production and Consumption. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.06.013
  • Quality Function Deployment (QFD), https://quality-one.com/qfd/ Access Date:10.08.2021
  • Relationship Between Quality and Sustainability, https://mcdcg.com/blog/quality/relationship-quality-sustainability/, Access Date: 13.05.2021.
  • Russ, R., DanaSperling, D., Rometsch R and PeterLouis P. (2008), Applying Six Sigma in the Field of Software Engineering, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer , 5338, IWSM 2008: Software Process and Product Measurement, 36-47.
  • Six Sigma - A complete Step-by-Step Guide by The Council for Six Sigma Certifications (2018), CSSC publishing, 829 p.
  • Smith, G. (1993). Benchmarking success at Motorola, Copyright Soceity of Management Accountants of Canada, March.
  • Trappey, C. V., Trappey, A. J. C. and Hwang, S.-J. (1996). A computerized quality function deployment approach for retail services. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 30(4), 611–622. doi:10.1016/0360-8352(95)00179-4.
  • Ur Rehman, H., Asif, M., Aamir Saeed, M., Asim Akbar, M. and Usman Awan, M. (2012). Application of Six Sigma at cell site construction: a case study. Asian Journal on Quality, 13(3), 212–233. doi:10.1108/15982681211287775
  • Van Iwaarden, J., Van Der Wiele, T., Dale, B., Williams, R. and Bertsch, B. (2008). The six sigma improvement approach: a transnational comparison. International Journal of Production Research, 46 (23), 6739–6758.
  • What is DMADV, Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control (DMAIC), https://www.sixsigmadaily.com/what-is-dmadv/ Access Date: 16.03.2021
  • What is quality? www.quality.org/what-quality, Access Date: 10.05.2021
  • What Is Quality Function Deployment (Qfd)?, https://asq.org/quality-resources/qfd-quality-function-deployment Access Date:10.08.2021.
  • What is Quality Management and Why Does it Matter? https://www.qualitymag.com/articles/95237-what-is-quality-management-and-whydoes-it-matter, Access Date: 10.05.2021
  • Why Quality Is Important for Sustainability, https://www.thewellessentials.com/blog/why-quality-is-important-for-sustainability, Access Date: 13.05.2021
  • Yahya, S. and Kingsman, B. (1999). Vendor Rating for an Entrepreneur Development Programme: A Case Study Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(9), 916-930. doi:10.2307/3010189.
  • Yılmaz, H. (2009). Optimization of the product design through Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and Analaytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): A case study in a ceramic washbasin, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 91-92.
  • Zu, X., Fredendall, L.D. and Douglas, T.J. (2008). The evolving theory of quality management: the role of Six Sigma. Journal of Operations Management, 26(5), 630-50

Year 2021, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 167 - 180, 30.09.2021

Aysenur Erdıl

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1449

Abstract

References

  • Akkawuttiwanich, P. and Yenradee, P. (2018). Fuzzy QFD approach for managing SCOR performance indicators. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 122, 189–201. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.05.044.
  • Anbari, F. T. and Kwak, Y. H. (2004). Success Factors in Managing Six Sigma Projects, Project Management Institute Research Conference, London, UK, England. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, July 11-14, 2004 https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/successfactors-managing-six-sigma-projects-8293
  • Antony, J. (2004). Six-Sigma in the UK Service Organizations: Results from a Pilot Survey, Managerial Auditing Journal, 19 (8), 1006-1013.
  • Berry, T. H. (1991). Managing the Total Quality Transformation, McGraw-Hill, First Edition, USA.
  • Brady, J. E. and Allen, T. T. (2006). Six Sigma Literature: A Review and Agenda for Future Research. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22(3), 335–367. doi:10.1002/qre.769.
  • Björlin, L., S. and Edvardsson, B. (2003). Customer expectations on service guarantees. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 13(5), 338–348. doi:10.1108/09604520310495822
  • Bossert, J.L (1990). Quality Function Deployment: The Practitioner's Approach (Quality and Reliability Series, Volume 21), CRC Press, 125 p., ISBN 13: 9780824783785.
  • Büyüközkan, G. and Çifçi, G. (2013). An integrated QFD framework with multiple formatted and incomplete preferences: A sustainable supply chain application. Applied Soft Computing, 13(9), 3931–3941. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2013.03.014
  • Carnevalli, J. A., Miguel, P. A. C. and Calarge, F. A. (2010). Axiomatic design application for minimising the difficulties of QFD usage. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.002
  • Chakravorty, S. S. (2009). Six Sigma programs: An implementation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(1), 1– 16. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.01.003
  • Cohen, L. (1995). Quality function deployment: How to make QFD work for you. Prentice Hall. Gunther, D. (2000). Quality Function Deployment - How to Make QFD Work for You. Insight, 3(2), 55–56. doi:10.1002/inst.20003255, Book Reviews.
  • Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control (DMAIC), https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/searchSoftwareQuality/downloads/ect01TreasurechestSixSigma.pdf ,13-27 pp. (Access Date: 12.03.2021).
  • Deveci, M., Öner, S. C., Canıtez, F. and Öner, M. (2019). Evaluation of service quality in public bus transportation using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy QFD methodology. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 100387. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2019.100387
  • Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2007). Service Quality Attributes Affecting Customer Satisfaction for Bus Transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 10 (3), 21-34. http://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.10.3.2
  • Ferrin, D., Muthler, D. and Miller, M. (2002). Six Sigma and simulation, so what’s the correlation? Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, 1439–1443.
  • Forrest W. Breyfogle (2003). Implementing six sigma: smarter solutions using statistical methods, Second Edition, John Wiley and Sons., 1231 p., ISBN 13:9780471265726.
  • Fortenot, G., Behara, R. and Gresham, A. (1994). Six Sigma in customer satisfaction, Quality Progress, December, 27(12), 73-76.
  • Franceschini, F. (2001). Advanced Quality Function Deployment, First Edition, CRC Press, 209 p., ISBN 13: 9781574443219.
  • Henderson, K. M. and Evans, J. R. (2000). Successful implementation of Six Sigma: benchmarking General Electric Company. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 7(4), 260–282. doi:10.1108/14635770010378909
  • Jabonski, J. R. (1994). Implementing TQM: Competing in the 90s Through Total Quality Management, 2nd Second Edition, Michigan USA, ISBN- 13: 978-1878821034, 224 p.
  • Jeannine S., Penn M. L. and Erin H. (2005). Relationships Between CMMI and Six Sigma, Technical Note CMU/SEI-2005-TN-005 report number.
  • Johnson, R. S. (1993). Management Processes for Quality Operations, Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press, USA.
  • Kanji, G.K. and Asher, M. (1993). Total Quality Management process, -a systematic approach, Advances in Total Quality Management Series, 4, Carfax Publishing, Abingdon.
  • Kaswan, M. S. and Rathi, R. (2020). Green Lean Six Sigma for sustainable development: Integration and framework. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 83, 106396. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106396.
  • Kwak, Y. H. and Anbari, F. T. (2006). Benefits, obstacles, and future of six sigma approach. Technovation, 26(5-6), 708– 715. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.10.003.
  • Linderman, K., Schroeder, R.G., Zaheer, S. and Choo, A.S. (2003). Six Sigma: a goal-theoretic perspective, Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 193-203.
  • Li, Y.-L., Yang, Q. and Chin, K.-S. (2019). A decision support model for risk management of hazardous materials road transportation based on quality function deployment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 74, 154–173. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.026.
  • Liu, F.-H. F. and Hai, H. L. (2005). The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economics, 97(3), 308–317. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.09.005.
  • Maritan, D. (auth.) (2015). Practical Manual of Quality Function Deployment, Springer International Publishing, First Edition, 199 p., ISBN 13:978- 3-319-08521-0
  • Montgomery, D.C. and Woodall, W.H. (2008). An Overview of Six Sigma, International Statistical Review, 76, 3, 329–346.
  • Natee, S., Low, S. P. and Teo, E. A. L. (2016). Decision Making and Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Quality Function Deployment for Buildable and Sustainable Construction, 17–55. doi:10.1007/978-981-287-849-6_2
  • Nonthaleerak, P. and Hendry, L. C. (2006). Six Sigma: literature review and key future research areas. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 2(2), 105. doi:10.1504/ijssca.2006.010111
  • Ohio University, The 7 Roles of Six Sigma, December 3, 2019, https://onlinemasters.ohio.edu/blog/the-7-roles-of-six-sigma/, Access Date: 12.03.2021)
  • Ocampo, L. A., Labrador, J. J. T., Jumao-as, A. M. B. and Rama, A. M. O. (2020). Integrated multiphase sustainable product design with a hybrid quality function deployment – multi-attribute decision-making (QFD-MADM) framework. Sustainable Production and Consumption. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.06.013
  • Quality Function Deployment (QFD), https://quality-one.com/qfd/ Access Date:10.08.2021
  • Relationship Between Quality and Sustainability, https://mcdcg.com/blog/quality/relationship-quality-sustainability/, Access Date: 13.05.2021.
  • Russ, R., DanaSperling, D., Rometsch R and PeterLouis P. (2008), Applying Six Sigma in the Field of Software Engineering, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer , 5338, IWSM 2008: Software Process and Product Measurement, 36-47.
  • Six Sigma - A complete Step-by-Step Guide by The Council for Six Sigma Certifications (2018), CSSC publishing, 829 p.
  • Smith, G. (1993). Benchmarking success at Motorola, Copyright Soceity of Management Accountants of Canada, March.
  • Trappey, C. V., Trappey, A. J. C. and Hwang, S.-J. (1996). A computerized quality function deployment approach for retail services. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 30(4), 611–622. doi:10.1016/0360-8352(95)00179-4.
  • Ur Rehman, H., Asif, M., Aamir Saeed, M., Asim Akbar, M. and Usman Awan, M. (2012). Application of Six Sigma at cell site construction: a case study. Asian Journal on Quality, 13(3), 212–233. doi:10.1108/15982681211287775
  • Van Iwaarden, J., Van Der Wiele, T., Dale, B., Williams, R. and Bertsch, B. (2008). The six sigma improvement approach: a transnational comparison. International Journal of Production Research, 46 (23), 6739–6758.
  • What is DMADV, Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control (DMAIC), https://www.sixsigmadaily.com/what-is-dmadv/ Access Date: 16.03.2021
  • What is quality? www.quality.org/what-quality, Access Date: 10.05.2021
  • What Is Quality Function Deployment (Qfd)?, https://asq.org/quality-resources/qfd-quality-function-deployment Access Date:10.08.2021.
  • What is Quality Management and Why Does it Matter? https://www.qualitymag.com/articles/95237-what-is-quality-management-and-whydoes-it-matter, Access Date: 10.05.2021
  • Why Quality Is Important for Sustainability, https://www.thewellessentials.com/blog/why-quality-is-important-for-sustainability, Access Date: 13.05.2021
  • Yahya, S. and Kingsman, B. (1999). Vendor Rating for an Entrepreneur Development Programme: A Case Study Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(9), 916-930. doi:10.2307/3010189.
  • Yılmaz, H. (2009). Optimization of the product design through Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and Analaytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): A case study in a ceramic washbasin, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 91-92.
  • Zu, X., Fredendall, L.D. and Douglas, T.J. (2008). The evolving theory of quality management: the role of Six Sigma. Journal of Operations Management, 26(5), 630-50
There are 50 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Aysenur Erdıl This is me 0000-0002-6413-7482

Publication Date September 30, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 8 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Erdıl, A. (2021). ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SIX SIGMA APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF SERVICE AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN TERMS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. Research Journal of Business and Management, 8(3), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1449
AMA Erdıl A. ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SIX SIGMA APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF SERVICE AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN TERMS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. RJBM. September 2021;8(3):167-180. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1449
Chicago Erdıl, Aysenur. “ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SIX SIGMA APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF SERVICE AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN TERMS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT”. Research Journal of Business and Management 8, no. 3 (September 2021): 167-80. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1449.
EndNote Erdıl A (September 1, 2021) ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SIX SIGMA APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF SERVICE AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN TERMS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. Research Journal of Business and Management 8 3 167–180.
IEEE A. Erdıl, “ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SIX SIGMA APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF SERVICE AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN TERMS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT”, RJBM, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 167–180, 2021, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1449.
ISNAD Erdıl, Aysenur. “ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SIX SIGMA APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF SERVICE AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN TERMS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT”. Research Journal of Business and Management 8/3 (September 2021), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1449.
JAMA Erdıl A. ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SIX SIGMA APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF SERVICE AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN TERMS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. RJBM. 2021;8:167–180.
MLA Erdıl, Aysenur. “ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SIX SIGMA APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF SERVICE AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN TERMS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT”. Research Journal of Business and Management, vol. 8, no. 3, 2021, pp. 167-80, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1449.
Vancouver Erdıl A. ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SIX SIGMA APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF SERVICE AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN TERMS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. RJBM. 2021;8(3):167-80.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.