EEG-Based Schizophrenia Detection Under Subject-Wise Cross-Validation: A Multi-Method XAI Benchmark
Abstract
This study evaluates whether subject-wise cross-validation and multi-method explainability analysis can yield reproducible and neurophysiologically interpretable deep learning models for EEGbased schizophrenia detection. Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder for which no objective neurophysiological biomarker is yet established for routine clinical use. Electroencephalography (EEG) offers a cost-effective and temporally precise window into cortical dynamics, yet deep learning models for EEG-based schizophrenia classification are frequently evaluated with segment-level cross-validation that allows participant-specific patterns to leak into test sets, yielding inflated accuracy estimates. This study presents a comprehensive framework combining three architecturally distinct deep learning models — EEGNet, a CNN-LSTM hybrid, and a patch-based EEG Transformer — with six explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods spanning gradient-based (Saliency, Integrated Gradients, DeepLIFT), game-theoretic (SHAP), activation-based (Grad-CAM), and perturbation-based (LIME) paradigms. All models are evaluated under strict subject-wise 5-fold cross-validation on the publicly available 84-participant resting-state EEG dataset from M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, supplemented by a multi-component regularization pipeline. The CNN-LSTM model achieved the highest classification accuracy of 0.8192±0.0543 and AUC-ROC of 0.8776±0.0906. Crucially, XAI analyses were conducted across all five cross-validation folds, yielding 6×3×5 = 90 attribution analyses (6 XAI methods × 3 architectures × 5 folds, corresponding to 15 trained model instances each evaluated under 6 XAI methods). This multi-fold XAI design revealed that the right posterior temporal electrode T6 was identified as the most discriminative channel at the grand-average level in three of the five cross-validation folds, with a grand-average importance score of 0.977. All three model architectures and five of the six XAI methods independently converged on T6 as the top-ranked channel across 5-fold averages; LIME, while identifying T6 among the most important channels, showed greater variability with F8 (right frontal) as its top-ranked channel, consistent with its perturbation-based nature. This aggregate-level convergence, though weaker at the level of individual folds and models (see Section 4.5), provides evidence for the discriminative role of the right posterior temporal scalp region — overlying the superior temporal gyrus, a region critically implicated in auditory processing and auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia, though scalp EEG cannot precisely localize the underlying cortical source.
Keywords
- Deep learning
- Electroencephalography
- Explainable artificial intelligence
- Schizophrenia detection
- Subject-wise cross-validation
Ethical Statement
References
- N. N. Gorbachevskaya and S. Borisov, “EEG data of healthy adolescents and adolescents with symptoms of schizophrenia,” M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State Univ., Fac. Biol., Moscow, Russia, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://brain.bio.msu.ru/eeg_schizophrenia.htm
- V. J. Lawhern et al., “EEGNet: A compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces,” J. Neural Eng., vol. 15, no. 5, Art. no. 056013, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aace8c. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aace8c
- A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), vol. 30, 2017, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762
- S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” in Proc. 31st Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NIPS), pp. 4768–4777, 2017, doi: 10.5555/3295222.3295230. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3295222.3295230
- M. Sundararajan, A. Taly, and Q. Yan, “Axiomatic attribution for deep networks,” in Proc. 34th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), pp. 3319–3328, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/sundararajan17a.html
- R. R. Selvaraju, M. Cogswell, A. Das, R. Vedantam, D. Parikh, and D. Batra, “Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV), pp. 618–626, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2017.74. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.74
- K. Simonyan, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman, “Deep inside convolutional networks: Visualising image classification models and saliency maps,” in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), Workshop Track, 2014, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1312.6034. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.6034
- A. Shrikumar, P. Greenside, and A. Kundaje, “Learning important features through propagating activation differences,” in Proc. 34th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), pp. 3145–3153, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/shrikumar17a.html
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Computing Applications in Health, Artificial Intelligence (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
September 30, 2026
Submission Date
March 27, 2026
Acceptance Date
September 11, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 4