BİLATERAL DEFİSİT'İN ANAEROBİK GÜÇ ÜRETİMİ BİLATERAL DEFİSİT'İN ANAEROBİK GÜÇ ÜRETİMİ.

Abstract

Keywords

• -

Bilateral Defisit’in Anaerobik Güç Üretimi Üzerindeki Etkileri: Derleme

Abstract

Maksimal istemli kas kasılması sırasında, homonymous kasların birbirinden bağımsız olarak (unilateral) aktive edilmesiyle elde edilen gücün toplam miktarı, homonymous kasların eş zamanlı olarak (bilateral) aktive edilmesiyle elde edilen güç miktarından daha fazladır. Bu olay “Bilateral Defisit (BLD)” olarak This phenomenon is known as “Bilateral Deficit” tanımlanmaktadır. BLD’nin nedeni tam olarak açıklanamamasına rağmen harekete katılan yüksek eşikli motor ünite aktivasyonundaki azalma ve transkallozal inhibasyon olduğu varsayılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, BLD’nin anaerobik güç üretimi üzerindeki etkilerinin açıklanmasıdır. Literatür incelemesi sırasında; “Unilateral Hareket (UL), Bilateral Hareket (BL), Bilateral Defisit (BLD), İzometrik El Kavrama Kuvveti, Maksimal İstemli Kas Kasılması ve Spinal Kord Refleksleri “ anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak basılı ve elektronik kaynaklar taranmıştır. Literatürden elde edilen bilgilere göre; belirli bir kassal hareket sırasında bilateral-homonymous (eş zamanlı olarak) kasların aktivasyonuyla üretilen güç miktarı, unilateralnonhomonymous hareketler esnasında üretilen güç miktarından % 7-25 daha azdır. Bilateral el kavrama kuvveti göz önünde bulundurulduğunda ise dominant tarafta gözlenen BLD oranı % 5-14’ tür. Maksimal istemli dinamik ve izometrik kas kasılması BLD’den büyük oranda etkilenmektedir. BLD’nin dikey sıçrama performansı, reaksiyon zamanı ve sprint performansı üzerindeki etkileri konusunda bilgiler oldukça kısıtlı ve çelişkilidir. Bilateral kas kasılması neredeyse bütün antrenman programlarında yer alır ve BLD’nin olumsuz etkileri özel antrenmanlarla değiştirilerek, bilateral fasilitasyona dönüştürülebilir. Bu durum, çift bacakla sıçrama gibi bilateral eş zamanlı kas aktivitesi içeren hareketlerde avantaj sağlayabilir

Keywords

• Unilateral hareket (UL), Bilateral hareket (BL), Bilateral defisit (BLD), Maksimal istemli kas kasılması (MVC)

References

1. Arthur CG, John EH. (2006). The nervous system: A general principles and sensory physiology. Textbook of Medical Physiology. (11st Edition.) Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.
2. Bobbert MF, Graaf WW, Jonk JN, Casius LJR. (2006). Explanation of the bilateral deficit in human vertical squat jumping. Journal of Applied Physiology, 100, 493-499.
3. Bracic M, Supej M, Peharec S, Bacic P, Coh M. (2010). An investigation of the influence of bilateral deficit on the counter-movement jump performance in elite sprinters. Kinesiology, 42, 73-81.
4. Bubanj S, Stankovic R, Bubanj R, Dimic A, Bednarik J, Kolar E. (2010). One-leg vs two leg vertical jumping performance. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: Physical Education and Sport, 81, 89-95.
5. Challis (1998).An investigation of the influence of JH. bi-lateral deficit on human jumping. Human Movement Science, 17, 307-325.
6. Coh M, Jovanovic GD, Bratic M. (2004). Motor learning in sport. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS: Physical Education and Sport, 2, 45-59.
7. Gazzaniga MS, Sperry RW. (1966). Simultaneous double discrimination response following brain bisection. Psychological Science, 4, 261-262.
8. Hanajima R, Ugawa Y, Machii K, Mochizuki H, Terao Y, Enomoto H. ve diğ. (2001). Interhemispheric facilitation of the hand motor area in humans. Journal of Physiology, 531, 849-859.

9. Herbert RD, Gandevia SC. (1996). Muscle activation in unilateral and bilateral efforts assessed by motor nevre and cortical stimulation. Journal of Applied Physiology, 80, 1351-1356.
10. Howard JD, Enoka RM. (1991). Maximum bilateral contractions are modified by neurally mediated interlimb effects. Journal of Applied Physiology, 70, 306-316.
11. Jakobi JM, Cafarelli E. (1998). Neuromuscular drive and force production are not altered during bilateral contractions. Journal of Applied Physiology, 84, 200- 206.
12. Jakobi JM, Chilibeck PD. (2001). Bilateral and unilateral contractions: possible differences in maximal voluntary force. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 26, 12-33.
13. Kawakami Y, Sale DG, MacDougall JD, Moroz JS. (1998). Bilateral deficit in plantar flexion: relation to knee joint position, muscle activation, and reflex excitability. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 77, 212-216.
14. Khodiguian N, Cornwell A, Lares E, DiCaprio PA, Hawkins A. (2003). Expression of the bilateral deficit during reflexively evoked contractions. Journal of Applied Physiology, 94, 171-178.
15. Koh TJ, Grabiner MD, Clough CA. (1993). Bilateral deficit is larger for step than for ramp isometric contractions. Journal of Applied Physiology, 74, 1200- 1205.
16. Li S, Danion F, Latash ML, Li ZM, Zatsiorsky MV. (2000). Finger coordination and bilateral deficit during two-hand Force production tasks performed by right- handed subjects. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 16, 379-439.
17. Oda S, Moritani T. (1994). Maximal isometric Force and neural activity during bilateral and unilateral elbow flexion in humans. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 69, 240-243.
18. Oda S, Moritani T. (1995a). Movement-related cortical potentials during handgrip contractions with special reference to Force and electromyogram bilateral deficit. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 72, 1-5.
19. Oda S, Moritani T. (1995b). Cross-correlation of bilateral differences in fatique during sustained maximal voluntary contraction. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 70, 305-310.
20. Ohtsuki T. (1981). Decrease in grip strength induced by simultaneous bilateral exertion with reference to finger strength. Ergonomics, 24, 37-48.
21. Ohtsuki T. (1983). Decrease ın human voluntary ısometric arm strenght ınduced by simultaneous bilateral exertion. Behavioural Brain Research, 7, 165- 178.
22. Owings TM, Grabiner MD. (1998). Fatigue effects on the bilateral deficit are speed dependent. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30, 1257-1262.
23. Roy MA, Sylvestre M, Katch FI, Katch VL, Lagasse PP. (1990). Proprioceptive facilitation of muscle tension during unilateral and bilateral knee extension. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 11, 289-292.
24. Secher NH, RØrsgaard S, Secher O. (1978). Contralateral influence on recruitment of curarized muscle fibres during maximal voluntary extension of the legs. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 103, 456- 462.
25. Taniguchi Y. (1998). Relationship between the modifications of bilateral deficit in upper and lower limbs by resistance training in humans. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 78, 226-230.
26. Taniguchi Y, Burle B, Vidal F, Bonnet M. (2001). Deficit in motor cortical activity for simultaneous bimanuel responses. Experimental Brain Research, 137, 259-268.
27. Vandervoot AA, Sale DG, Moroz J. (1984). Comparison of motor unit activation during unilateral and bilateral leg extension. Journal of Applied Physiology, 56, 46-51.
28. Vandervoot AA, Sale DG, Moroz J. (1987). Strength- velocity relationship and fatiguability of unilateral versus bilateral arm extension. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 56, 201-205.
29. Van Soest AJ, Roebroeck ME, Bobbert MF, Huijing PA, Van Ingen Schenau GJA. (1985). Comparison of one-legged and two-legged countermovement jumps. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1 (17), 635-639.