BibTex RIS Cite

Ceci n’est pas un mur: Ephesus’un Kentsel Sınırlarının Simgeselliği ve Gerçekliği

Year 2012, Issue: 2, 175 - 199, 01.01.2012

Abstract

In this paper I trace how the physical and conceptual boundary makers of Ephesos shifted as successive communities appropriated their forms to meet changing demands. Physical walls encircled the city, but could not contain a community reaching into wider Mediterranean networks; political, economic, and religious links defied material boundaries. As markers of community gained greater complexity, ideological and representational forms took the place of, or worked alongside, the physical form of the city wall, so that meaning invested in the actual fortifications was reinforced through ritual and imagery, or else transferred to other realms more accessible and immediate to Ephesian concerns.

References

  • Barth 2000 Barth, Fredrik. “Boundaries and Connections.” In Anthony Cohen, ed., Signifying Identities: Anthropological Perspectives on Boundaries and Contested Values (London, 2000), 17.36.
  • Christie 2001 Christie, Neil. War and order : urban remodelling and defensive strategy in Late Roman Italy. In Recent Research in Late-antique Urbanism, ed. Luke Levan et al., 106-122. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology, 2001.
  • Crow 2001 Crow, James. Fortifications and urbanism in late antiquity: Thessaloniki and other eastern cities. In Recent Research in Late-antique Urbanism, ed. Luke Levan et al., 89-105. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology, 2001.
  • De Staebler 2007 De Staebler, Peter D. The City Wall of Aphrodisias and Civic Identity in Late Antique Asia Minor (Roman Empire). Diss. New York University, 2007. Favro 2006 Favro, Diane. The IconiCITY of Ancient Rome. Urban History 33, 1 (2006): 20-38.
  • Fleischer 1973 Fleischer, Robert. Artemis von Ephesos und Verwandte Kultstatuen aus Anatolien und Syrien. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1973.
  • Foss 1979 Foss, Clive. Ephesus after Antiquity: a late antique, Byzantine and Turkish City. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
  • Gregory 1982 Gregory, Timothy E. Fortification and Urban Design in Early Byzantine Greece. In City, Town and Countryside, ed. Robert L. Hohlfelder, 43-64. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.
  • Groh 2006 Groh, Stefan. “Neue Forschungen zur Stadtplanung in Ephesos.” JÖAI 75 (2006): 47-116.
  • Halfmann 2004 Halfmann, Herbert. Ephèse et Pergame: urbanisme et commanditaires en Asie mineure romaine. Pessac: Ausonius, 2004.
  • Herodotus Herodotus. The Histories, translated by A. D. Godley. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1920.
  • Knibbe 2004 Knibbe, D. Via Sacra Ephesiaca. New Aspecta of the Cult of Artemis Ephesia. In Ephesos, Metropolis of Asia: an Interdisciplinary Approach to its Archaeology, Religion, and Culture, ed. Helmut Koester, 141-155.
  • Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press for Harvard Theological Studies/Harvard Divinity School, 2004.
  • Landstatter-Pülz 2007 Landstatter, S. and A. Pülz. Ephesus in the Late Roman and Early Byzantine Period: Changes in its Urban Character from the Third to the Seventh Century AD. Proceedings of the British Academy 141 (2007): 391- 433.
  • LiDonnici 1992 LiDonnici, Lynn R. The Images of Artemis Ephesia and Greco-Roman Worship: A Reconsideration. Harvard Theological Review 85:4 (1992): 389-415.
  • LiDonnici 1999 LiDonnici, Lynn R. “The Ephesian Megabyzos Priesthood and Religious Diplomacy at the End of the Classical Period.” Religion 29 (1999): 201-214.
  • Matheson 1994 Matheson, Susan B. The Goddess Tyche. In An Obsession with Fortune: Tyche in Greek and Roman Art, 18-33. New Haven: Yale University Art Gallery, Bulletin 1994.
  • Richter 2011 Richter, Daniel. Cosmopolis: Imagining Community in Late Classical Athens and the Early Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
  • Scherrer 2000 Scherrer, Peter, ed. Ephesus: The New Guide. Translated by Lionel Bier and George M. Luxon. Istanbul: Ege Yayınları, 2000.
  • Scherrer 2001 Scherrer, Peter “The Historical Topography of Ephesos.” In Urbanism in Western Asia Minor: New Studies on Aphrodisias, Ephesos, Hierapolis, Pergamon, Perge and Xanthos, ed. David Parrish, 57-95. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology, 2001.
  • Scherrer 2004 Scherrer, Peter. “The City of Ephesos from the Roman Period to Late Antiquity.” In Ephesos, Metropolis of Asia: an Interdisciplinary Approach to its Archaeology, Religion, and Culture, ed. Helmut Koester, 1-25.
  • Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press for Harvard Theological Studies/Harvard Divinity School, 2004.
  • Thomas 2004 Thomas, Christine. “At Home in the City of Artemis: Religion in Ephesos in the Literary Imagination of the Roman Period.” In Ephesos, Metropolis of Asia: an Interdisciplinary Approach to its Archaeology, Religion, and Culture, ed. Helmut Koester, 81-118.
  • Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press for Harvard Theological Studies/Harvard Divinity School, 2004. Thomas 1996 Thomas, Julian. Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretive Archaeology. New York: Routeledge, 1996.
  • Trombley Trombley, Frank R. Town and territorium in Late Roman Anatolia (late 5th-early 7th c.). In Recent Research in Late-antique Urbanism, ed. Luke Levan et al., 217-232.
  • Yegül 1994 Yegül, Fikret K. “Street Experience in Ancient Ephesus.” In Streets: Critical Perspectives on Public Space, eds. Z. Celik, D. Favro, and R. Ingersoll, 95- 110. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
  • Zanker 2000 Zanker, Paul. “The city as symbol: Rome and the creation of an urban image.” In Romanization and the City: Creation, Transformations, and Failures. JRA Suppl. 38, ed. E. Fentress, 25-41. Portsmouth, RI: JRA, 2000.

Cecı N’est Pas Un Mur: Representatıon And Realıty In Ephesıan Urban Boundarıes

Year 2012, Issue: 2, 175 - 199, 01.01.2012

Abstract

Bu çalışmadaki amacım Ephesus kentinin fiziksel ve kavramsal olarak kent sınırlarını belirleyenlerin birbirini izleyen dönemlerde oluşan toplumların değişen beklentileri karşısında nasıl bir dönüşüm öngördükleri üzerinde durmaktır. Sur duvarları belki kenti çevrelemektedir ancak çok daha geniş ve Akdeniz’e özgü politik, ekonomik, dinsel bağlantıların bir parçası olan bu toplumu söz konusu surların kapsaması mümkün değildir. Çok daha karmaşık yapıya sahip olmaya başlayan bir toplumda ideolojik ve simgesel kavramlar da kentin surlarının fiziksel formunun belirlemesinde yerini almakta, etkili olmaktadır. Böylece, görünür surlara yüklenen anlama ritüel ve imgeler de eklenmekte; ya da Ephesus’da olduğu gibi çok daha ulaşılabilir ve dolaysız bambaşka bir dünyaya dönüşebilmektedir

References

  • Barth 2000 Barth, Fredrik. “Boundaries and Connections.” In Anthony Cohen, ed., Signifying Identities: Anthropological Perspectives on Boundaries and Contested Values (London, 2000), 17.36.
  • Christie 2001 Christie, Neil. War and order : urban remodelling and defensive strategy in Late Roman Italy. In Recent Research in Late-antique Urbanism, ed. Luke Levan et al., 106-122. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology, 2001.
  • Crow 2001 Crow, James. Fortifications and urbanism in late antiquity: Thessaloniki and other eastern cities. In Recent Research in Late-antique Urbanism, ed. Luke Levan et al., 89-105. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology, 2001.
  • De Staebler 2007 De Staebler, Peter D. The City Wall of Aphrodisias and Civic Identity in Late Antique Asia Minor (Roman Empire). Diss. New York University, 2007. Favro 2006 Favro, Diane. The IconiCITY of Ancient Rome. Urban History 33, 1 (2006): 20-38.
  • Fleischer 1973 Fleischer, Robert. Artemis von Ephesos und Verwandte Kultstatuen aus Anatolien und Syrien. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1973.
  • Foss 1979 Foss, Clive. Ephesus after Antiquity: a late antique, Byzantine and Turkish City. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
  • Gregory 1982 Gregory, Timothy E. Fortification and Urban Design in Early Byzantine Greece. In City, Town and Countryside, ed. Robert L. Hohlfelder, 43-64. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.
  • Groh 2006 Groh, Stefan. “Neue Forschungen zur Stadtplanung in Ephesos.” JÖAI 75 (2006): 47-116.
  • Halfmann 2004 Halfmann, Herbert. Ephèse et Pergame: urbanisme et commanditaires en Asie mineure romaine. Pessac: Ausonius, 2004.
  • Herodotus Herodotus. The Histories, translated by A. D. Godley. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1920.
  • Knibbe 2004 Knibbe, D. Via Sacra Ephesiaca. New Aspecta of the Cult of Artemis Ephesia. In Ephesos, Metropolis of Asia: an Interdisciplinary Approach to its Archaeology, Religion, and Culture, ed. Helmut Koester, 141-155.
  • Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press for Harvard Theological Studies/Harvard Divinity School, 2004.
  • Landstatter-Pülz 2007 Landstatter, S. and A. Pülz. Ephesus in the Late Roman and Early Byzantine Period: Changes in its Urban Character from the Third to the Seventh Century AD. Proceedings of the British Academy 141 (2007): 391- 433.
  • LiDonnici 1992 LiDonnici, Lynn R. The Images of Artemis Ephesia and Greco-Roman Worship: A Reconsideration. Harvard Theological Review 85:4 (1992): 389-415.
  • LiDonnici 1999 LiDonnici, Lynn R. “The Ephesian Megabyzos Priesthood and Religious Diplomacy at the End of the Classical Period.” Religion 29 (1999): 201-214.
  • Matheson 1994 Matheson, Susan B. The Goddess Tyche. In An Obsession with Fortune: Tyche in Greek and Roman Art, 18-33. New Haven: Yale University Art Gallery, Bulletin 1994.
  • Richter 2011 Richter, Daniel. Cosmopolis: Imagining Community in Late Classical Athens and the Early Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
  • Scherrer 2000 Scherrer, Peter, ed. Ephesus: The New Guide. Translated by Lionel Bier and George M. Luxon. Istanbul: Ege Yayınları, 2000.
  • Scherrer 2001 Scherrer, Peter “The Historical Topography of Ephesos.” In Urbanism in Western Asia Minor: New Studies on Aphrodisias, Ephesos, Hierapolis, Pergamon, Perge and Xanthos, ed. David Parrish, 57-95. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology, 2001.
  • Scherrer 2004 Scherrer, Peter. “The City of Ephesos from the Roman Period to Late Antiquity.” In Ephesos, Metropolis of Asia: an Interdisciplinary Approach to its Archaeology, Religion, and Culture, ed. Helmut Koester, 1-25.
  • Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press for Harvard Theological Studies/Harvard Divinity School, 2004.
  • Thomas 2004 Thomas, Christine. “At Home in the City of Artemis: Religion in Ephesos in the Literary Imagination of the Roman Period.” In Ephesos, Metropolis of Asia: an Interdisciplinary Approach to its Archaeology, Religion, and Culture, ed. Helmut Koester, 81-118.
  • Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press for Harvard Theological Studies/Harvard Divinity School, 2004. Thomas 1996 Thomas, Julian. Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretive Archaeology. New York: Routeledge, 1996.
  • Trombley Trombley, Frank R. Town and territorium in Late Roman Anatolia (late 5th-early 7th c.). In Recent Research in Late-antique Urbanism, ed. Luke Levan et al., 217-232.
  • Yegül 1994 Yegül, Fikret K. “Street Experience in Ancient Ephesus.” In Streets: Critical Perspectives on Public Space, eds. Z. Celik, D. Favro, and R. Ingersoll, 95- 110. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
  • Zanker 2000 Zanker, Paul. “The city as symbol: Rome and the creation of an urban image.” In Romanization and the City: Creation, Transformations, and Failures. JRA Suppl. 38, ed. E. Fentress, 25-41. Portsmouth, RI: JRA, 2000.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Brianna Brıcker This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2012 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Brıcker, B. (2012). Ceci n’est pas un mur: Ephesus’un Kentsel Sınırlarının Simgeselliği ve Gerçekliği. Seleucia(2), 175-199.
AMA Brıcker B. Ceci n’est pas un mur: Ephesus’un Kentsel Sınırlarının Simgeselliği ve Gerçekliği. Seleucia. January 2012;(2):175-199.
Chicago Brıcker, Brianna. “Ceci n’est Pas Un Mur: Ephesus’un Kentsel Sınırlarının Simgeselliği Ve Gerçekliği”. Seleucia, no. 2 (January 2012): 175-99.
EndNote Brıcker B (January 1, 2012) Ceci n’est pas un mur: Ephesus’un Kentsel Sınırlarının Simgeselliği ve Gerçekliği. Seleucia 2 175–199.
IEEE B. Brıcker, “Ceci n’est pas un mur: Ephesus’un Kentsel Sınırlarının Simgeselliği ve Gerçekliği”, Seleucia, no. 2, pp. 175–199, January 2012.
ISNAD Brıcker, Brianna. “Ceci n’est Pas Un Mur: Ephesus’un Kentsel Sınırlarının Simgeselliği Ve Gerçekliği”. Seleucia 2 (January 2012), 175-199.
JAMA Brıcker B. Ceci n’est pas un mur: Ephesus’un Kentsel Sınırlarının Simgeselliği ve Gerçekliği. Seleucia. 2012;:175–199.
MLA Brıcker, Brianna. “Ceci n’est Pas Un Mur: Ephesus’un Kentsel Sınırlarının Simgeselliği Ve Gerçekliği”. Seleucia, no. 2, 2012, pp. 175-99.
Vancouver Brıcker B. Ceci n’est pas un mur: Ephesus’un Kentsel Sınırlarının Simgeselliği ve Gerçekliği. Seleucia. 2012(2):175-99.