Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2025, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 915 - 927
https://doi.org/10.56701/shd.1663755

Abstract

References

  • Arndt, Felix. “The German Federal Constitutional Court At the Intersection of National and European Law: Two Recent Decisions”. German Law Journal 2/11 (2001), E4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200003655.
  • Bobek, Michal. “The Effects of EU Law in the National Legal Systems”. European Union Law. ed. Catherine Bernard - Steve Peers. 154-190. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
  • Bobek, Michal. “Thou Shalt Have Two Masters: The Application of European Law by Administrative Authorities in the New Member States”. Review of European and Administrative Law 1/1 (2008), 51-63. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1555674
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 6/60 (16 December 1960). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61960CJ0006
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 9/65 (14 December, 1966). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61965CC0009
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 26/62 (5 February 1963). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61962CJ0026
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 6/64 (15 July 1964). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61964CJ0006
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 11/70 (17 December 1970). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61970CJ0011
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 314/85 (22 October 1987). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:61985CJ0314
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 14/68 (13 February 1969). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61968CJ0014
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 106/77 (9 March 1978). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61977CJ0106
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 120/78 (20 February 1979). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61978CJ0120
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case C-112/00 (12 June 2003). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:62000CJ0112
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case C-6/90 (19 November 1991). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61990CJ0006
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case C-91/92 (14 July 1994). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LT/ALL/?uri=CELEX:61992CJ0091
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case C-58/08 (12 May 2011). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:62009CJ0115
  • Dashwood, Alan. “From Van Duyn to Mangold via Marshall: Reducing Direct Effect to Absurdity?”. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 9 (2007), 81-109. https://doi.org/10.5235/152888712802746858
  • Derlén, Mattias – Lindholm, Johan. “Characteristics of Precedent: The Case Law of the European Court of Justice in Three Dimensions”. German Law Journal 16/5 (2015), 1073–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200021040
  • De Wet, Erika. “The Role of European Courts in the Development of a Hierarchy of Norms within International Law: Evidence of Constitutionalisation?”. European Constitutional Law Review 5/2 (2009), 284–306. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019609002843.
  • De Witte, Bruno. “Direct Effect, Primacy, and the Nature of the Legal Order”. The Evolution of EU Law. ed. Paul Craig et al. 187-227. Oxford, 2021.
  • Figueroa, Dante. “Italy: Law to Establish Compliance with European Union Obligations Enacted”. Access 20 March, 2025. https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2019-06-17/italy-law-to-establish-compliance-with-european-union-obligations-enacted/
  • Kwiecien, Roman. “The Primacy of European Union Law over National Law Under the Constitutional Treaty”. German Law Journal 6/11 (2005), 1479-1495. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200014450
  • Lazzerini, Nicole, “The Horizontal Application of the General Principles of EU Law: Nothing Less than Direct Effect”. Research Handbook on General Principles of EU Law. ed. Katja Ziegler et al. 173-198. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL). Edward Elgar Press, 2022.
  • Mendez, Mario. “The Legal Effect of Community Agreements: Maximalist Treaty Enforcement and Judicial Avoidance Techniques”. European Journal of International Law 21/1 (2010), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chq007
  • Papadopoulos, Thomas. “Criticizing the Horizontal Direct Effect of the EU General Principle of Equality”. European Human Rights Law Review 4 (2011), 437-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1912212
  • Pavel, Carmen E. “The European Union and Diminished State Sovereignty”. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25/4 (2022), 596–603. http://doi:10.1080/13698230.2022.2042956.
  • Spieker, Luke Dimitrios. EU Values Before the Court of Justice: Foundations, Potential, Risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
  • Schutze, Robert. “From Dual to Cooperative Federalism: The Changing Structure of European Law”. European Journal of International Law 21/4 (2010), 1123-1125. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chq073
  • Van Elsuwege, Peter - Gremmelprez, Femke. “Protecting the Rule of Law in the EU Legal Order: A Constitutional Role for the Court of Justice”. European Constitutional Law Review 16/1 (2020), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019620000085.
  • Vasiliki, Kosta. “The Principle of Proportionality in EU Law: An Interest-Based Taxonomy”. EU Executive Discretion and the Limits of Law. ed. Johana Mendes. 198-2019. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
  • Zglinski, Jan. “The New Judicial Federalism: The Evolving Relationship between EU and Member State Courts”. European Law Open 2/2 (2023), 345–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2023.27.

The Impact of EU Law on National Legal Frameworks

Year 2025, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 915 - 927
https://doi.org/10.56701/shd.1663755

Abstract

The presented paper focuses on the complex correlation between European Union and the national legal systems of its member states. It examines the fundamental principles that underpin this relationship, and considers how they are playing out in different national contexts.
The due emphasis on the EU Law primacy principle in cases of conflicts with national laws, which has far reaching legal and political ramifications in a multi-level governance system, including its challenges to national sovereignty and the impact they create legally and politically. The presented study examines how national constitutional courts in member states have differed in their interpretation of this principle and highlights the delicate balance they registered between setting EU obligations on one hand and safeguarding national constitutional identities on the other.
The paper explains the idea of direct effect and the distinctions between vertical and horizontal direct effect as well as their evolution over time and constraints. The debates also underscore the fragmented nature of domestic courts in implementing direct effect, resulting in disparate measures and outcomes for individuals trying to rely on EU rights. The paper also assesses the implications of both of these systemic principles, covered in European treatment as the proportionality principle. The analysis highlights the continued negotiation of power between supranational and national legal systems, and the importance of national courts in interpreting both sets of laws, as well as in their application on the ground.

References

  • Arndt, Felix. “The German Federal Constitutional Court At the Intersection of National and European Law: Two Recent Decisions”. German Law Journal 2/11 (2001), E4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200003655.
  • Bobek, Michal. “The Effects of EU Law in the National Legal Systems”. European Union Law. ed. Catherine Bernard - Steve Peers. 154-190. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
  • Bobek, Michal. “Thou Shalt Have Two Masters: The Application of European Law by Administrative Authorities in the New Member States”. Review of European and Administrative Law 1/1 (2008), 51-63. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1555674
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 6/60 (16 December 1960). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61960CJ0006
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 9/65 (14 December, 1966). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61965CC0009
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 26/62 (5 February 1963). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61962CJ0026
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 6/64 (15 July 1964). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61964CJ0006
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 11/70 (17 December 1970). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61970CJ0011
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 314/85 (22 October 1987). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:61985CJ0314
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 14/68 (13 February 1969). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61968CJ0014
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 106/77 (9 March 1978). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61977CJ0106
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case 120/78 (20 February 1979). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61978CJ0120
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case C-112/00 (12 June 2003). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:62000CJ0112
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case C-6/90 (19 November 1991). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61990CJ0006
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case C-91/92 (14 July 1994). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LT/ALL/?uri=CELEX:61992CJ0091
  • CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, D. Case C-58/08 (12 May 2011). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:62009CJ0115
  • Dashwood, Alan. “From Van Duyn to Mangold via Marshall: Reducing Direct Effect to Absurdity?”. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 9 (2007), 81-109. https://doi.org/10.5235/152888712802746858
  • Derlén, Mattias – Lindholm, Johan. “Characteristics of Precedent: The Case Law of the European Court of Justice in Three Dimensions”. German Law Journal 16/5 (2015), 1073–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200021040
  • De Wet, Erika. “The Role of European Courts in the Development of a Hierarchy of Norms within International Law: Evidence of Constitutionalisation?”. European Constitutional Law Review 5/2 (2009), 284–306. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019609002843.
  • De Witte, Bruno. “Direct Effect, Primacy, and the Nature of the Legal Order”. The Evolution of EU Law. ed. Paul Craig et al. 187-227. Oxford, 2021.
  • Figueroa, Dante. “Italy: Law to Establish Compliance with European Union Obligations Enacted”. Access 20 March, 2025. https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2019-06-17/italy-law-to-establish-compliance-with-european-union-obligations-enacted/
  • Kwiecien, Roman. “The Primacy of European Union Law over National Law Under the Constitutional Treaty”. German Law Journal 6/11 (2005), 1479-1495. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200014450
  • Lazzerini, Nicole, “The Horizontal Application of the General Principles of EU Law: Nothing Less than Direct Effect”. Research Handbook on General Principles of EU Law. ed. Katja Ziegler et al. 173-198. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL). Edward Elgar Press, 2022.
  • Mendez, Mario. “The Legal Effect of Community Agreements: Maximalist Treaty Enforcement and Judicial Avoidance Techniques”. European Journal of International Law 21/1 (2010), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chq007
  • Papadopoulos, Thomas. “Criticizing the Horizontal Direct Effect of the EU General Principle of Equality”. European Human Rights Law Review 4 (2011), 437-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1912212
  • Pavel, Carmen E. “The European Union and Diminished State Sovereignty”. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25/4 (2022), 596–603. http://doi:10.1080/13698230.2022.2042956.
  • Spieker, Luke Dimitrios. EU Values Before the Court of Justice: Foundations, Potential, Risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
  • Schutze, Robert. “From Dual to Cooperative Federalism: The Changing Structure of European Law”. European Journal of International Law 21/4 (2010), 1123-1125. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chq073
  • Van Elsuwege, Peter - Gremmelprez, Femke. “Protecting the Rule of Law in the EU Legal Order: A Constitutional Role for the Court of Justice”. European Constitutional Law Review 16/1 (2020), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019620000085.
  • Vasiliki, Kosta. “The Principle of Proportionality in EU Law: An Interest-Based Taxonomy”. EU Executive Discretion and the Limits of Law. ed. Johana Mendes. 198-2019. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
  • Zglinski, Jan. “The New Judicial Federalism: The Evolving Relationship between EU and Member State Courts”. European Law Open 2/2 (2023), 345–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2023.27.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Law in Context (Other)
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Mariam Jikia 0000-0001-7810-4780

Early Pub Date October 21, 2025
Publication Date October 24, 2025
Submission Date March 23, 2025
Acceptance Date June 14, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 13 Issue: 2

Cite

ISNAD Jikia, Mariam. “The Impact of EU Law on National Legal Frameworks”. Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 13/2 (October2025), 915-927. https://doi.org/10.56701/shd.1663755.

by-nc.png

The published articles in SLJ are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License