Research Article

UNCERTAINTIES DURING THE EVOLUTION OF MARKETING

Volume: 6 Number: 3 September 1, 2017
EN TR

UNCERTAINTIES DURING THE EVOLUTION OF MARKETING

Abstract

In the literature, there are several issues regarding to marketing which has not been finalized yet during the decades. In this context, the objective of this paper is to represent the uncertainties of the marketing during the development of marketing thought. To indicate that effectively, the author will try to ascertain the answers of the following critical questions providing several examples: “Is marketing a distinct field in social sciences?” “Is marketing a science?” “What is the scope of marketing?” and “Do the marketing practitioners and academics collaborate to be more effective” “Is marketing losing its territories”.

Keywords

marketing

References

  1. Alderson, W. and Reavis C. (1948), "Towards a Theory of Marketing," Journal of Marketing. 13 (October), 137-152.
  2. Alvarado, U., H. Kotzab (2001), “Supply Chain Management: The Integration of Logistics in Marketing”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 30, Issue 2, pp. 183–198
  3. Arnt, J., (1983), “The Political Economy Paradigm: Foundation of Theory Building in Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol:47 (Fall), pp.44-54
  4. Baker, M. J. (1995), “Marketing Theory and Practice”, 3rd Edition, UK: Macmillan Press.
  5. Bartels, R. (1951), "Can Marketing be a Science?" Journal of Marketing, 15 (January), 3 19-28.
  6. Bartels, R. (1983), “Is Marketing Defaulting Its Responsibilities? Journal of Marketing, Fall, Vol:47 pp.32-35
  7. Baumol, W. J. (1957), "On the Role of Marketing Theory," Journal of Marketing. 21 (April), 413-18.
  8. Bergen, M., S. Dutta, O. Walker 1992), “Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories”, Journal of Marketing, Vol: 56 (July), pp. 1-24.
  9. Buzzell, R. D. (1963), "Is Marketing a Science?" Harvard Business Review, 41 (January-February), 32.
  10. Clark, F.E. (1923). “Principles of Marketing”. New York: Macmillan.
APA
Çiçek, M. (2017). PAZARLAMANIN EVRİM SÜRECİNDE KARŞILAŞILAN BELİRSİZLİKLER. Sakarya Üniversitesi İktisat Dergisi, 6(3), 37-45. https://izlik.org/JA33XP86WA
AMA
1.Çiçek M. PAZARLAMANIN EVRİM SÜRECİNDE KARŞILAŞILAN BELİRSİZLİKLER. Sakarya Üniversitesi İktisat Dergisi. 2017;6(3):37-45. https://izlik.org/JA33XP86WA
Chicago
Çiçek, Mesut. 2017. “PAZARLAMANIN EVRİM SÜRECİNDE KARŞILAŞILAN BELİRSİZLİKLER”. Sakarya Üniversitesi İktisat Dergisi 6 (3): 37-45. https://izlik.org/JA33XP86WA.
EndNote
Çiçek M (September 1, 2017) PAZARLAMANIN EVRİM SÜRECİNDE KARŞILAŞILAN BELİRSİZLİKLER. Sakarya Üniversitesi İktisat Dergisi 6 3 37–45.
IEEE
[1]M. Çiçek, “PAZARLAMANIN EVRİM SÜRECİNDE KARŞILAŞILAN BELİRSİZLİKLER”, Sakarya Üniversitesi İktisat Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 37–45, Sept. 2017, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA33XP86WA
ISNAD
Çiçek, Mesut. “PAZARLAMANIN EVRİM SÜRECİNDE KARŞILAŞILAN BELİRSİZLİKLER”. Sakarya Üniversitesi İktisat Dergisi 6/3 (September 1, 2017): 37-45. https://izlik.org/JA33XP86WA.
JAMA
1.Çiçek M. PAZARLAMANIN EVRİM SÜRECİNDE KARŞILAŞILAN BELİRSİZLİKLER. Sakarya Üniversitesi İktisat Dergisi. 2017;6:37–45.
MLA
Çiçek, Mesut. “PAZARLAMANIN EVRİM SÜRECİNDE KARŞILAŞILAN BELİRSİZLİKLER”. Sakarya Üniversitesi İktisat Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 3, Sept. 2017, pp. 37-45, https://izlik.org/JA33XP86WA.
Vancouver
1.Mesut Çiçek. PAZARLAMANIN EVRİM SÜRECİNDE KARŞILAŞILAN BELİRSİZLİKLER. Sakarya Üniversitesi İktisat Dergisi [Internet]. 2017 Sep. 1;6(3):37-45. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA33XP86WA