COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND ELECTROCHEMICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES FOR WOOL YARN DYEING EFFLUENTS

Kubra Ulucan Altuntas; Fatih Ilhan; Can Dogan; Ugur Kurt

COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND ELECTROCHEMICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES FOR WOOL YARN DYEING EFFLUENTS

Abstract

Textile industry is one of the sectors that consume plenty of water and this situation increases the threat of contamination on the receiving water environments. In this study, treatment method performances of chemical coagulation, electrocoagulation, Fenton and electrofenton for wool yarn dyeing effluents were investigated by considering COD and TOC parameters and; advantages and disadvantages of each process were evaluated. Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to optimize Fenton process and, in order to achieve COD and TOC removed by 90.5% 77.4%, respectively, 143 minutes of reaction time was found to be required. Optimum pH for Fenton process was determined via RSM as 3.28 pH. The required Fe dosage and H2O2 dosage was found to be 1135 mg/L and 1822 mg/L, respectively. When Fenton, electrofenton, coagulation and electrocoagulation processes were compared in terms of COD removal, the most effective process is found to be Fenton process and 88%, 77%, 30% and 42% of COD removals were observed, respectively. When the amount of sludge formed per treated COD is compared, it was observed that the least sludge was obtained via electrofenton process in term kg sludge/kg COD, where the maximum sludge was obtained in chemical coagulation process with 73% higher than electrofenton.

Keywords

References

[1] A. Aygun, B. Nas, M. F. Sevimli. Treatment of reactive dyebath wastewater by electrocoagulation process: Optimization and cost-estimation. Korean J. Chem. Eng., 36:9 (2019) 1441-1449
[2] A. Kausar, M. Iqbal, A. Javed, K. Aftab, Z.I.H. Nazli, H.N. Bhatti, S. Nouren. Dyes adsorption using clay and modified clay: A review. J Mol Liq. 256 (2018) 395-407.
[3] A. Klepacz-Smolka, J. Sojka-Ledakowicz, K. Pazdzior, S. Ledakowicz. Application of anoxic fixed film and aerobic CSTR bioreactor in treatment of nanofiltration concentrate of real textile wastewater. Chem Pap. 64 (2010) 230-236.
[4] R. Keyikoglu, O. T. Can, A. Aygun, A. Tek, Comparison of the effects of various supporting electrolytes on the treatment of a dye solution by electrocoagulation process. Colloid Interfac Sci. 33 (2019) 100210
[5] A. Dalvand, R. Nabizadeh, M.R. Ganjali, M. Khoobi, S. Nazmara, A.H. Mahvi. Modeling of Reactive Blue 19 azo dye removal from colored textile wastewater using L-arginine-functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles: Optimization. reusability. kinetic and equilibrium studies. J Magn Magn Mater. 404 (2016) 179-189.
[6] M. Moradi, A. Eslami, F. Ghanbari. Direct Blue 71 removal by electrocoagulation sludge recycling in photo-Fenton process: response surface modeling and optimization. Desalin Water Treat. 57 (2016) 4659-4670.
[7] K. Ulucan-Altuntas, F. Ilhan. Enhancing biodegradability of textile wastewater by ozonation processes: Optimization with response surface methodology. Ozone-Sci Eng. 40:6 (2018) 465-472
[8] F. Ilhan, K. Yetilmezsoy, H.A. Kabuk, K. Ulucan, T. Coskun, B. Akoglu. Evaluation of Operational Parameters and Its Relation on the Stoichiometry of Fenton's Oxidation to Textile Wastewater. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q. 23 (2017) 11-19.

[9] E. GilPavas, I. Dobrosz-Gomez, M.A. Gomez-Garcia. Coagulation-flocculation sequential with Fenton or Photo-Fenton processes as an alternative for the industrial textile wastewater treatment. Journal of environmental management. 191 (2017) 189-197.
[10] K. Ulucan, U. Kurt. Comparative study of electrochemical wastewater treatment processes for bilge water as oily wastewater: A kinetic approach. J Electroanal Chem. 747 (2015) 104-111.
[11] C. Zhang, S. Jiang. Applying fenton process in acrylic fiber wastewater treatment and practice teaching. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 121 (2018) 032047
[12] J. Wei. Y. Song. X. Meng. J.S. Pic. Optimization and analysis of homogenous Fenton process for the treatment of dry-spun acrylic fiber manufacturing wastewater. Desalin Water Treat. 56:11 (2015) 3036- 3043
[13] J. Wei, Y. Song, X. Tu, L. Zhao, E. Zhi. Pretreatment of dry-spun acrylic fiber manufacturing wastewater by Fenton process: Optimization, kinetics and mechanisms. Chem Eng J. 218 (2013) 319-326
[14] C. Gong, Z. Zhang, H. Li, D. Li, B. Wu, Y. Sun, Y. Cheng. Electrocoagulation pretreatment of wet-spun acrylic fibers manufacturing wastewater to improve its biodegradability. J Hazard Mater. 274 (2014) 465-472
[15] M.R. Sohrabi, A. Khavaran, S. Shariati, S. Shariati. Removal of Carmoisine edible dye by Fenton and photo Fenton processes using Taguchi orthogonal array design. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 10 (2017) S3523-S3531.
[16] M. Moradi, F. Ghanbari, E.M. Tabrizi. Removal of acid yellow 36 using Box-Behnken designed photoelectro-Fenton: a study on removal mechanisms. Toxicol Environ Chem. 97 (2015) 700-709.
[17] M.S. Nawaz, M. Ahsan. Comparison of physico-chemical. advanced oxidation and biological techniques for the textile wastewater treatment. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 53 (2014) 717-722.
[18] G. Kaykioglu, R. Ata, G.Y. Tore, A.O. Agirgan. Evaluation of effects of textile wastewater on the quality of cotton fabric dye. Membr Water Treat. 8 (2017) 1-18.
[19] K. Barbusiński. The Modified Fenton Process for Decolorization of Dye Wastewater. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 14 (2005) 281-285.
[20] E. Bazrafshan, M.R. Alipour, A.H. Mahvi. Textile wastewater treatment by application of combined chemical coagulation, electrocoagulation and adsorption processes. Desalin Water Treat. 57 (2016) 9203-9215.
[21] H.S. Erkan, S.Y. Guvenc, G. Varank, G.O. Engin. The investigation of chemical coagulation and electrocoagulation processes for tannery wastewater treatment using response surface methodology. Desalin Water Treat. 113 (2018) 57-73.
[22] A. Aouni, A.D. Altinay, F. Ilhan, D.Y. Koseoglu-Imer, Y. Avsar, A. Hafiane, B. Keskinler, I. Koyuncu. The applicability of combined physico-chemical processes for treatment and reuse of synthetic textile reverse osmosis concentrate. Desalin Water Treat. 111 (2018) 111-124.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Kubra Ulucan Altuntas This is me
Türkiye

Fatih Ilhan This is me
0000-0003-3037-2713
Türkiye

Can Dogan This is me
Türkiye

Ugur Kurt This is me
0000-0002-1012-0298
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 1, 2021

Submission Date

December 10, 2019

Acceptance Date

April 28, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 38 Number: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA62LA52DH

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Ulucan Altuntas, K., Ilhan, F., Dogan, C., & Kurt, U. (2021). COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND ELECTROCHEMICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES FOR WOOL YARN DYEING EFFLUENTS. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 38(2), 623-636. https://izlik.org/JA62LA52DH

AMA

1.Ulucan Altuntas K, Ilhan F, Dogan C, Kurt U. COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND ELECTROCHEMICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES FOR WOOL YARN DYEING EFFLUENTS. SIGMA. 2021;38(2):623-636. https://izlik.org/JA62LA52DH

Chicago

Ulucan Altuntas, Kubra, Fatih Ilhan, Can Dogan, and Ugur Kurt. 2021. “COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND ELECTROCHEMICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES FOR WOOL YARN DYEING EFFLUENTS”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 38 (2): 623-36. https://izlik.org/JA62LA52DH.

EndNote

Ulucan Altuntas K, Ilhan F, Dogan C, Kurt U (June 1, 2021) COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND ELECTROCHEMICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES FOR WOOL YARN DYEING EFFLUENTS. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 38 2 623–636.

IEEE

[1]K. Ulucan Altuntas, F. Ilhan, C. Dogan, and U. Kurt, “COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND ELECTROCHEMICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES FOR WOOL YARN DYEING EFFLUENTS”, SIGMA, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 623–636, June 2021, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA62LA52DH

ISNAD

Ulucan Altuntas, Kubra - Ilhan, Fatih - Dogan, Can - Kurt, Ugur. “COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND ELECTROCHEMICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES FOR WOOL YARN DYEING EFFLUENTS”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 38/2 (June 1, 2021): 623-636. https://izlik.org/JA62LA52DH.

JAMA

1.Ulucan Altuntas K, Ilhan F, Dogan C, Kurt U. COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND ELECTROCHEMICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES FOR WOOL YARN DYEING EFFLUENTS. SIGMA. 2021;38:623–636.

MLA

Ulucan Altuntas, Kubra, et al. “COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND ELECTROCHEMICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES FOR WOOL YARN DYEING EFFLUENTS”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 38, no. 2, June 2021, pp. 623-36, https://izlik.org/JA62LA52DH.

Vancouver

1.Kubra Ulucan Altuntas, Fatih Ilhan, Can Dogan, Ugur Kurt. COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND ELECTROCHEMICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES FOR WOOL YARN DYEING EFFLUENTS. SIGMA [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 1;38(2):623-36. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA62LA52DH