A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED MCDM TECHNIQUES

Ahmet Çalık

A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED MCDM TECHNIQUES

Abstract

In recent years, concept of sustainability has emerged with increasing awareness of environment-friendly practices and social issues of organizations, researchers, and the business community. For this reason, enterprises have integrated this concept into supply chain management (SCM) by revising on supply chains. In this study, the sustainability concept is combined with the supplier selection process and an integrated approach is proposed to identify best sustainable suppliers. Because of the uncertainties present in individual judgments in sustainable supplier selection (SSS), fuzzy integrated multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods are applied in this study. Sustainability criteria are identified from the existing literature and narrowed by NGT (Nominal Group Technique) to build a consensus in group decision-making. A two-stage approach is reported after the identification of criteria and suppliers. In the first stage, the fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach is used to obtain the weights of the SSS criteria and the fuzzy TOPSIS, fuzzy VIKOR and fuzzy MULTIMOORA methods are used to generate the ranking of sustainable suppliers in the second stage. The validity and effectiveness of the proposed approach is illustrated in a foundry manufacturer through a case study. Results show that the three applied fuzzy integrated methods reach similar supplier rankings and the economic perspective between the three dimensions of sustainability is held the first rank.

Keywords

References

[1] Büyüközkan, G (2012) An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for green supplier evaluation. International Journal of Production Research 50, 2892–2909. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.564668
[2] Govindan, K, Sivakumar, R (2016) Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches. Annals of Operations Research 238, 243–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-2004-4
[3] Rajeev, A, Pati, RK, Padhi, SS, Govindan, K (2017) Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production 162, 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.05.026
[4] Hong, J, Zhang, Y, Ding, M (2018) Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 3508–3519. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.06.093
[5] Türkiye Döküm Sanayi (2013) 2013 Yılına Girerken Mevcut Durum
[6] Banaeian, N, Mobli, H, Fahimnia, B, et al (2018) Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: A case study from the agri-food industry. Computers & Operations Research 89, 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COR.2016.02.015
[7] Govindan, K, Khodaverdi, R, Jafarian, A (2013) A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 47, 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.04.014
[8] Luthra, S, Govindan, K, Kannan, D, et al (2017) An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production 140, 1686–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.09.078

[9] Azadnia, AH, Saman, MZM, Wong, KY (2015) Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: an integrated multi-objective decision-making process. International Journal of Production Research 53, 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.935827
[10] Bai, C, Sarkis, J (2010) Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics 124, 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2009.11.023
[11] Azadi, M, Jafarian, M, Farzipoor Saen, R, Mirhedayatian, SM (2015) A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context. Computers & Operations Research 54, 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COR.2014.03.002
[12] Humphreys, P., Wong, Y., Chan, FT. (2003) Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 138, 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00097-9
[13] Dickson, GW (1966) An Analysis Of Vendor Selection Systems And Decisions. Journal of Purchasing 2, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1966.tb00818.x
[14] Weber, CA, Current, JR, Benton, WC (1991) Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research 50, 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-R
[15] Igarashi, M, de Boer, L, Fet, AM (2013) What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 19, 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PURSUP.2013.06.001
[16] Saputro, TE, Masudin, I, Daneshvar Rouyendegh (Babek Erdebilli), B (2015) A literature review on MHE selection problem: levels, contexts, and approaches. International Journal of Production Research 53, 5139–5152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1005254
[17] Fallahpour, A, Udoncy Olugu, E, Nurmaya Musa, S, et al (2017) A decision support model for sustainable supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management. Computers & Industrial Engineering 105, 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIE.2017.01.005
[18] Shaw, K, Shankar, R, Yadav, SS, Thakur, LS (2012) Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications 39, 8182–8192. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2012.01.149
[19] Shen, L, Olfat, L, Govindan, K, et al (2013) A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 74, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2012.09.006
[20] Joseph, S, Srinivas, T (2006) A Model for Strategic Supplier Selection. Journal of Supply Chain Management 38, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00117.x
[21] Lin, K-P, Tseng, M-L, Pai, P-F (2018) Sustainable supply chain management using approximate fuzzy DEMATEL method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 128, 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2016.11.017
[22] Zimmer, K, Fröhling, M, Schultmann, F (2016) Sustainable supplier management – a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. International Journal of Production Research 54, 1412–1442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340
[23] Cengiz, K, Ufuk, C, Ziya, U (2003) Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management 16, 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576050310503367
[24] Rouyendegh (Babek Erdebilli), BD, Saputro, TE (2014) Supplier Selection Using Integrated Fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP: A Case Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116, 3957–3970. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.01.874
[25] Rouyendegh (Babek Erdebilli), B (2015) Developing an Integrated ANP and Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Model for Supplier Selection. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 43, 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20130114
[26] Dai, J, Blackhurst, J (2012) A four-phase AHP–QFD approach for supplier assessment: a sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Research 50, 5474–5490. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.639396
[27] Song, W, Xu, Z, Liu, H-C (2017) Developing sustainable supplier selection criteria for solar air-conditioner manufacturer: An integrated approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 79, 1461–1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2017.05.081
[28] Awasthi, A, Govindan, K, Gold, S (2018) Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. International Journal of Production Economics 195, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2017.10.013
[29] Kannan, D (2018) Role of multiple stakeholders and the critical success factor theory for the sustainable supplier selection process. International Journal of Production Economics 195, 391–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2017.02.020
[30] Vahidi, F, Torabi, SA, Ramezankhani, MJ (2018) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Journal of Cleaner Production 174, 1351–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.11.012
[31] Rouyendegh, BD, Yildizbasi, A, Üstünyer, P (2020) Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection problem. Soft Computing 24, 2215–2228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04054-8
[32] Daneshvar Rouyendegh, B, Yildizbasi, A, Arikan, ÜZB (2018) Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS in Site Selection of Wind Power Plants in Turkey. Advances in Fuzzy Systems 2018, 6703798. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6703798
[33] Kannan, D, Khodaverdi, R, Olfat, L, et al (2013) Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production 47, 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.02.010
[34] Gören, HG (2018) A decision framework for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation with lost sales. Journal of Cleaner Production 183, 1156–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.02.211
[35] Lo, H-W, Liou, JJH, Wang, H-S, Tsai, Y-S (2018) An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. Journal of Cleaner Production 190, 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.04.105
[36] Buckley, JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17, 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
[37] Noorul Haq, A, Kannan, G (2006) Design of an integrated supplier selection and multi-echelon distribution inventory model in a built-to-order supply chain environment. International Journal of Production Research 44, 1963–1985. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500381427
[38] Noorul Haq, A, Kannan, G (2006) Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for evaluating and selecting a vendor in a supply chain model. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 29, 826–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-2562-8
[39] İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası (İMKB) (2011) Türk İş Dünyası’nda sürdürülebilirlik uygulamaları değerlendirme raporu

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ahmet Çalık This is me
0000-0002-6796-0052
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 1, 2021

Submission Date

December 14, 2019

Acceptance Date

April 7, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 38 Number: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA43YH56ET

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Çalık, A. (2021). A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED MCDM TECHNIQUES. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 38(2), 835-852. https://izlik.org/JA43YH56ET

AMA

1.Çalık A. A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED MCDM TECHNIQUES. SIGMA. 2021;38(2):835-852. https://izlik.org/JA43YH56ET

Chicago

Çalık, Ahmet. 2021. “A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED MCDM TECHNIQUES”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 38 (2): 835-52. https://izlik.org/JA43YH56ET.

EndNote

Çalık A (June 1, 2021) A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED MCDM TECHNIQUES. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 38 2 835–852.

IEEE

[1]A. Çalık, “A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED MCDM TECHNIQUES”, SIGMA, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 835–852, June 2021, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA43YH56ET

ISNAD

Çalık, Ahmet. “A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED MCDM TECHNIQUES”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 38/2 (June 1, 2021): 835-852. https://izlik.org/JA43YH56ET.

JAMA

1.Çalık A. A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED MCDM TECHNIQUES. SIGMA. 2021;38:835–852.

MLA

Çalık, Ahmet. “A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED MCDM TECHNIQUES”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 38, no. 2, June 2021, pp. 835-52, https://izlik.org/JA43YH56ET.

Vancouver

1.Ahmet Çalık. A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED MCDM TECHNIQUES. SIGMA [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 1;38(2):835-52. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA43YH56ET