MODELING OF BOOST AND CUK CONVERTERS AND COMPARISON OF THEIR PERFORMANCE IN MPPT

Okan Güngör; Halil İbrahim Yüksek

MODELING OF BOOST AND CUK CONVERTERS AND COMPARISON OF THEIR PERFORMANCE IN MPPT

Abstract

The efficiency of photovoltaic (PV) panel systems depends on the structure of the photovoltaic cells and the transfer of energy from the PV panel to load. The focus of this study is energy transfer. The most important component in the energy transfer is maximum power point tracking (MPPT). The MPPT consists of two components: the algorithm for calculation the maximum power and the hardware for power generating. This study investigates how some the DC-DC converters (hardware) impact on the performance of the MPPT under six different environmental conditions by using two different duty cycle calculation methods. Contribution of this study to the literatüre is to analyze the performance of some the DC-DC converters in MPPT by completely eliminating the effect of MPPT algorithms. As a result of this study, while using the Boost converter in MPPT applications, the internal resistance of the PV panel must be equal or smaller than load resistance. However, the Cuk converter can reach to maximum power point in all conditions such as temperature, radiation and load.

Keywords

References

[1] Dimroth, F., Tibbits, T. N., Niemeyer, M., Predan, F., Beutel, P., Karcher, C., ... & Bett, A. W. (2015). Four-junction wafer-bonded concentrator solar cells. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 6(1), 343-349.
[2] Mohapatra, A., Nayak, B., & Mohanty, K. B. (2014, December). Current based novel adaptive P&O MPPT algorithm for photovoltaic system considering sudden change in the irradiance. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
[3] Mohapatra, A., Nayak, B., Das, P., & Mohanty, K. B. (2017). A review on MPPT techniques of PV system under partial shading condition. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 854-867.
[4] Nayak, B., Mohapatra, A., & Mohanty, K. B. (2017). Selection criteria of dc-dc converter and control variable for MPPT of PV system utilized in heating and cooking applications. Cogent Engineering, 4(1), 1363357.
[5] Vivek, P., Ayshwarya, R., Amali, S. J., & Sree, A. N. (2016, April). A novel approach on MPPT algorithm for solar panel using buck boost converter. In 2016 International Conference on Energy Efficient Technologies for Sustainability (ICEETS) (pp. 396-399). IEEE.
[6] Shaw, P. (2019). Modelling and analysis of an analogue MPPT-based PV battery charging system utilising dc–dc boost converter. IET Renewable Power Generation.
[7] Radjai, T., Rahmani, L., GAUBERT, J., & Gassab, S. (2014). Fuzzy Logic Variable Step of P&O MPPT with Direct Control Method Using Cuk Converter. In Proc. 11th International Conference On Modeling and Simulation of Electric Machines, Converters and Systems, Valencia, Spain, ELECTRIMACS-2014 (pp. 324-329).
[8] Singh, S. P., Gautam, A. K., Tripathi, S. P., & Kumar, B. (2017, February). Performance comparison of MPPT techniques using Cuk converter for photovoltaic energy conversion system. In 2017 3rd International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[9] Yadav, A. P. K., Thirumaliah, S., Haritha, G., & Scholar, P. G. (2012). Comparison of mppt algorithms for dc-dc converters based pv systems. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, 1(1), 18-23.
[10] Ramki, T., & Tripathy, L. N. (2015, January). Comparison of different DC-DC converter for MPPT application of photovoltaic system. In International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Signals, Communication and Optimization (EESCO) (pp. 1-6).
[11] Ba, A., Ehssein, C. O., Mahmoud, M. E. M. O. M., Hamdoun, O., & Elhassen, A. (2018). Comparative Study of Different DC/DC Power Converter for Optimal PV System Using MPPT (P&O) Method. Applied Solar Energy, 54(4), 235-245.
[12] Shadlu, M. S. (2019). Comparison of Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) Algorithms to Control DC-DC Converters in Photovoltaic Systems. Recent Advances in Electrical & Electronic Engineering (Formerly Recent Patents on Electrical & Electronic Engineering), 12(4), 355-367.
[13] Macaulay, J., & Zhou, Z. (2018). A Fuzzy Logical-Based Variable Step Size P&O MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic System. Energies, 11(6), 1340.
[14] Agwa, A. M., & Mahmoud, I. Y. (2017). Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Tracking by Artificial Neural Networks. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST), 4(1).
[15] Kumar, M., Kapoor, S. R., Nagar, R., & Verma, A. (2015). Comparison between IC and fuzzy logic MPPT algorithm based solar PV system using boost converter. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, 4(6), 4927- 4939.
[16] Radjai, T., Rahmani, L., Mekhilef, S., & Gaubert, J. P. (2014). Implementation of a modified incremental conductance MPPT algorithm with direct control based on a fuzzy duty cycle change estimator using dSPACE. Solar Energy, 110, 325-337.
[17] Kotak, V. C., & Tyagi, P. (2013). DC to DC Converter in maximum power point tracker. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, 2(12), 6115-6125.
[18] Seyedmahmoudian, M., Horan, B., Rahmani, R., Maung Than Oo, A., & Stojcevski, A. (2016). Efficient photovoltaic system maximum power point tracking using a new technique. Energies, 9(3), 147.
[19] Forsyth, A. J., & Mollov, S. V. (1998). Modelling and control of DC-DC converters. Power engineering journal, 12(5), 229-236.
[20] Middlebrook, R. D., & Cuk, S. (1976, June). A general unified approach to modelling switching-converter power stages. In 1976 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (pp. 18-34). IEEE.
[21] Internet: Energy Matter, URL: https://www.energymatters.com.au/kyocera-85watt-12volt-multicrystal-photovoltaic-module-p-866.html Last Accessed on: 05.05.2020

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Okan Güngör This is me
0000-0001-5258-1765
Türkiye

Halil İbrahim Yüksek This is me
0000-0001-8740-6596
Türkiye

Publication Date

March 1, 2020

Submission Date

November 20, 2019

Acceptance Date

May 11, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 11 Number: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA97YS53AD

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Güngör, O., & Yüksek, H. İ. (2020). MODELING OF BOOST AND CUK CONVERTERS AND COMPARISON OF THEIR PERFORMANCE IN MPPT. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 11(1), 83-101. https://izlik.org/JA97YS53AD

AMA

1.Güngör O, Yüksek Hİ. MODELING OF BOOST AND CUK CONVERTERS AND COMPARISON OF THEIR PERFORMANCE IN MPPT. SIGMA. 2020;11(1):83-101. https://izlik.org/JA97YS53AD

Chicago

Güngör, Okan, and Halil İbrahim Yüksek. 2020. “MODELING OF BOOST AND CUK CONVERTERS AND COMPARISON OF THEIR PERFORMANCE IN MPPT”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 11 (1): 83-101. https://izlik.org/JA97YS53AD.

EndNote

Güngör O, Yüksek Hİ (March 1, 2020) MODELING OF BOOST AND CUK CONVERTERS AND COMPARISON OF THEIR PERFORMANCE IN MPPT. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 11 1 83–101.

IEEE

[1]O. Güngör and H. İ. Yüksek, “MODELING OF BOOST AND CUK CONVERTERS AND COMPARISON OF THEIR PERFORMANCE IN MPPT”, SIGMA, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 83–101, Mar. 2020, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA97YS53AD

ISNAD

Güngör, Okan - Yüksek, Halil İbrahim. “MODELING OF BOOST AND CUK CONVERTERS AND COMPARISON OF THEIR PERFORMANCE IN MPPT”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 11/1 (March 1, 2020): 83-101. https://izlik.org/JA97YS53AD.

JAMA

1.Güngör O, Yüksek Hİ. MODELING OF BOOST AND CUK CONVERTERS AND COMPARISON OF THEIR PERFORMANCE IN MPPT. SIGMA. 2020;11:83–101.

MLA

Güngör, Okan, and Halil İbrahim Yüksek. “MODELING OF BOOST AND CUK CONVERTERS AND COMPARISON OF THEIR PERFORMANCE IN MPPT”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, Mar. 2020, pp. 83-101, https://izlik.org/JA97YS53AD.

Vancouver

1.Okan Güngör, Halil İbrahim Yüksek. MODELING OF BOOST AND CUK CONVERTERS AND COMPARISON OF THEIR PERFORMANCE IN MPPT. SIGMA [Internet]. 2020 Mar. 1;11(1):83-101. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA97YS53AD