A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES

Ufuk Bölükbaş; Ali Fuat Güneri

A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES

Abstract

It is quite surprising that studies on the relationship between technology competency and technology management skills are still rather scarce. There is a particular lack of studies of technology competency in the specific context of technology management. This paper aims to fill this gap and offers a literature review to examine the technology competency based on the management and technology capabilities of manufacturing enterprises. To begin integrating these various aspects of technology management into a new and systematic framework, joint research–review perspective is considered to prepare an infrastructure to identify competencies of technology for small and medium-sized enterprises. This literature review investigates to define dimensions and decision criteria of technology competency analysis based on seven main perspectives; technology management, technology roadmapping, technological innovation, technology evaluation and entrepreneurship, information and communication technologies, innovation management, knowledge management. This study also contributes to the literature on technology management by examining technology competency.

Keywords

References

[1] Horwitch, M. and Stohr, E. A., (2012) Transforming technology management education: Value creation-learning in the early twenty-first century, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(4), 489-507.
[2] Atkinson, R. D. and Andes, S., (2010) The 2010 State New Economy Index: Benchmarking Economic Transformation in the States. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED515552.pdf (accessed 01 April 2015)
[3] Istanbul Chamber of Industry (ICI), Committee of Quality and Technology. (2007) Product Development of the SMEs. 2007-08, ISBN: 975-512-866-2, Improved third edition, Istanbul.
[4] Istanbul Chamber of Industry (ICI), Istanbul Chamber of Industry Committee of Quality and Technology. (2007) Management Approach for the SMEs. 2007-06, ISBN: 975-512-870-0, Improved third edition, Istanbul.
[5] Tosun, S. and Önüt, S., (2014) A Supplier Selection Model For Project Portfolios, Sigma: Journal of Engineering & Natural Sciences/Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 32(3), 365-380.
[6] Sobanke, V., Adegbite, S., Ilori, M. and Egbetokun, A., (2014) Determinants of Technological Capability of Firms in a Developing Country, Procedia Engineering, 69, 991-1000.
[7] Tabatabaeian, S., Naghizadeh, R., Khaledi, A. and Naghizadeh, M., (2010) Composite Index for Technological Capability Monitoring: Investigating Technological Capability Situation of Iran and 69 Countries, In the 4th National Conference on Management of Technology, 77-92.
[8] De Mori, C., Batalha, M. O. and Alfranca, O., (2016) A model for measuring technology capability in the agrifood industry companies, British Food Journal, 118(6), 1422-1461.

[9] Coombs, J. E. and Bierly, P. E., (2001) Looking Through the Kalidescope: Measuring Technological Capability and Performance, In Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, B1-B6.
[10] Coombs, J. E. and Bierly, P. E., (2006) Measuring technological capability and performance, R&D Management, 36(4), 421-438.
[11] Corsatea, T. D., (2014) Technological capabilities for innovation activities across Europe: evidence from wind, solar and bioenergy technologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, 469-479.
[12] Ritala, P., Kraus, S. and Bouncken, R. B., (2016) Introduction to coopetition and innovation: Contemporary topics and future research opportunities (in press), International Journal of Technology Management, 71(1/2), 1-9.
[13] Graziadio, T. and Zawislak, P. A., (1997) The role of informal R&D activities in the evaluation of the SMEs' technological capability-the mechanics industry in Brazil, In System Sciences, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on, 3, 518-526.
[14] Kim, B. K. and Park, S. K., (2015) The role of partner communication on cooperative R&D between SMEs and public research institutes in Korea, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 1-17.
[15] Park, K. and Kim, B. K., (2013) Dynamic capabilities and new product development performance: Korean SMEs, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(2), 202-219.
[16] Panda, H. and Ramanathan, K., (1996) Technological capability assessment of a firm in the electricity sector, Technovation, 16(10), 561-588.
[17] Santhanam, R. and Hartono, E., (2003) Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance, MIS quarterly, 125-153.
[18] Özdemir Güngör, D. and Gözlü, S., (2016) An Analysis of The Links Between Project Success Factors and Project Performance, Sigma: Journal of Engineering & Natural Sciences/Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 34(2), 223-239.
[19] Baysan, S. and Durmuşoğlu, M. B., (2015) Systematic Literature Review for Lean Product Development Principles and Tools, Sigma: Journal of Engineering & Natural Sciences/Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 33(3), 305-323.
[20] Battistella, C., De Toni, A. F., & Pillon, R. (2015) The Extended Map methodology: Technology roadmapping for SMES clusters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 38, 1-23.
[21] Badawy, A.M., (2009) Technology management simply defined: A tweet plus two characters, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26(4), 219-224.
[22] Brent, A. C. and Pretorius, M. W., (2008) Sustainable development: A conceptual framework for the technology management field of knowledge and a departure for further research, South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 19(1), 31-52.
[23] Levin, D. Z. and Barnard, H., (2008) Technology management routines that matter to technology managers, International Journal of Technology Management, 41(1-2), 22-37.
[24] Pilkington, A. and Teichert, T., (2006) Management of technology: Themes, concepts and relationships, Technovation, 26(3), 288-299.
[25] Erensal, Y.C., Öncan, T. and Demircan, M.L., (2006) Determining key capabilities in technology management using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Turkey, Information Sciences, 176(18), 2755-2770.
[26] Liao, S.H., (2005) Technology management methodologies and applications: A literature review from 1995 to 2003, Technovation, 25(4), 381-393.
[27] Kawazoe, M. and Abetti, P. A., (2014) Transition of strategy, marketing, R&D and new product development policies after mergers and acquisitions: a case study of SuperPower Inc. under US, Dutch and Japanese ownership, International Journal of Technology Management, 66(1), 32-56.
[28] Rehn, U. and Abetti, P. A., (2013) Transition of R&D and product development procedures after mergers and acquisitions: a case study of Intermagnetics General and Philips Healthcare, International Journal of Technology Management, 61(2), 109-131.
[29] Grover, H. K. and Pretorius, M. W., (2008) The technology assessment of demand side bidding within the South African context, South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 19(2), 93-108.
[30] Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. and Probert, D. R., (2006) Technology management tools: concept, development and application, Technovation, 26(3), 336-344.
[31] Krishnaswamy, K. N., Mathirajan, M. and Subrahmanya, M. B., (2014) Technological innovations and its influence on the growth of auto component SMEs of Bangalore: A case study approach, Technology in Society, 38, 18-31.
[32] Hameed, M.A., Counsell, S. and Swift, S., (2012) A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 358-390.
[33] Amadi-Echendu, J., Lephauphau, O., Maswanganyi, M. and Mkhize, M., (2011) Case studies of technology roadmapping in mining, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28(1), 23-32.
[34] Cetindamar, D., Phaal, R. and Probert, D., (2009) Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities, Technovation, 29(4), 237-246.
[35] Martín-Rojas, R., García-Morales, V. J. and Bolívar-Ramos, M. T., (2013) Influence of technological support, skills and competencies, and learning on corporate entrepreneurship in European technology firms, Technovation, 33(12), 417-430.
[36] Dereli, T. and Altun, K., (2013). Technology evaluation through the use of interval type-2 fuzzy sets and systems, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 65(4), 624-633.
[37] Xu, K., Huang, K.F. and Gao, S., (2012) Technology sourcing, appropriability regimes, and new product development, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(2), 265-280.
[38] Rampersad, G., Plewa, C. and Troshani, I., (2012) Investigating the use of information technology in managing innovation: A case study from a university technology transfer office, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(1), 3-21.
[39] Dyerson, R., Harindranath, G. and Barnes, D., (2009) National survey of SMEs' use of IT in four sectors, Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation,12(1), 39-50.
[40] Ashrafi, R. and Murtaza, M., (2008) Use and Impact of ICT on SMEs in Oman, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 11(3), 125-138.
[41] Cruz-González, J., López-Sáez, P., Navas-López, J. E. and Delgado-Verde, M., (2015) Open search strategies and firm performance: The different moderating role of technological environmental dynamism, Technovation, 35, 32-45.
[42] Oliveira, M.G., Rozenfeld, H., Phaal, R. and Probert, D., (2015) Decision making at the front end of innovation: the hidden influence of knowledge and decision criteria, R & D Management, 45(2), 161-180.
[43] Othman, I.M., Amaraa, N. and Landrya, R., (2012) SMEs’ degree of openness: the case of manufacturing industries, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 7(1), 186-210.
[44] Yang, J., (2012) Innovation capability and corporate growth: An empirical investigation in China, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(1), 34-46.
[45] Shih, H. Y., (2012) The dynamics of local and interactive effects on innovation adoption: The case of electronic commerce, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 434-452.
[46] Ayerbe, C., Lazaric, N., Callois, M. and Mitkova, L., (2014) The new challenges of organizing intellectual property in complex industries: a discussion based on the case of Thales, Technovation, 34(4), 232-241.
[47] Kukko, M., (2013) Knowledge sharing barriers in organic growth: A case study from a software company, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 24(1), 18-29.
[48] Lee, S., Mortara, L., Kerr, C., Phaal, R. and Probert, D., (2012) Analysis of document-mining techniques and tools for technology intelligence: discovering knowledge from technical documents, International Journal of Technology Management, 60, 130-156.
[49] Mearns, M., (2012) Knowing what knowledge to share: Collaboration for community, research and wildlife, Expert systems with Applications, 39(10), 9892-9898.
[50] Lee, C. L. and Lai, S. Q., (2007) Performance measurement systems for knowledge management in high technology industries: a balanced scorecard framework, International Journal of Technology Management, 39(1-2), 158-176.
[51] Fernández-Olmos, M. and Ramírez-Alesón, M., (2017) How internal and external factors influence the dynamics of SME technology collaboration networks over time, Technovation, 64–65, 16-27.
[52] Ruiz-Jiménez, J. M. and del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, M., (2016) Management capabilities, innovation, and gender diversity in the top management team: An empirical analysis in technology-based SMEs, BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 107-121.
[53] Bölükbaş, U. and Güneri, A. F., (2017) A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Approach For Measuring Technology Competency Performance of SMEs, Sigma, 8(1), 31-40.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Ufuk Bölükbaş This is me
0000-0002-0985-8148
Türkiye

Ali Fuat Güneri This is me
0000-0003-2525-7278
Türkiye

Publication Date

March 1, 2018

Submission Date

October 17, 2016

Acceptance Date

September 20, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 36 Number: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA99HA35NK

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Bölükbaş, U., & Güneri, A. F. (2018). A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 36(1), 123-139. https://izlik.org/JA99HA35NK

AMA

1.Bölükbaş U, Güneri AF. A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES. SIGMA. 2018;36(1):123-139. https://izlik.org/JA99HA35NK

Chicago

Bölükbaş, Ufuk, and Ali Fuat Güneri. 2018. “A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 36 (1): 123-39. https://izlik.org/JA99HA35NK.

EndNote

Bölükbaş U, Güneri AF (March 1, 2018) A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 36 1 123–139.

IEEE

[1]U. Bölükbaş and A. F. Güneri, “A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES”, SIGMA, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 123–139, Mar. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA99HA35NK

ISNAD

Bölükbaş, Ufuk - Güneri, Ali Fuat. “A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 36/1 (March 1, 2018): 123-139. https://izlik.org/JA99HA35NK.

JAMA

1.Bölükbaş U, Güneri AF. A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES. SIGMA. 2018;36:123–139.

MLA

Bölükbaş, Ufuk, and Ali Fuat Güneri. “A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 36, no. 1, Mar. 2018, pp. 123-39, https://izlik.org/JA99HA35NK.

Vancouver

1.Ufuk Bölükbaş, Ali Fuat Güneri. A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES. SIGMA [Internet]. 2018 Mar. 1;36(1):123-39. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA99HA35NK