CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF COMPOSITE COLUMN-REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM JOINTS

Year 2020, Volume: 38 Issue: 3, 1427 - 1445, 05.10.2021

Fethi Şermet Emre Ercan Emin Hökelekli Bengi Arısoy

Abstract

In this paper, behavior of the concrete encased steel profile composite column-reinforced concrete beam connection representing interior beam-to-column joints under cyclic loading is presented. The column was designed as concrete encased I steel profile composite column according to Eurocode 4; beam was designed as regular reinforced concrete beam according to local building codes. The finite element model of the beam-to-column joint was implemented in ABAQUS and numerical analysis was validated by full scale experimental study. The performance of the concrete encased steel profile composite column-reinforced concrete beam joint was compared to reinforced concrete beam-to-column joint, in order to observe the load carrying capacity and ductility. Ductility level and failure type of the joints were studied and performance of connections are compared. Comparisons were made using load-displacement relation and failure mechanism. It is found that the concrete encased steel composite column-reinforced concrete beam joint exhibited slightly ductile behavior relative to reinforced concrete column-beam joint. On the other hand, analysis result show that the failure controlled by behavior of the beam and joint capacity is depend on the shear capacity of the beam.

Keywords

Reinforced concrete joints, composite columns, cyclic loading, finite element modeling

References

• [1] Lee, S. J. Seismic behavior of steel building structures with composite slabs. Thesis resented to Lehigh University at Bethlehem, Pa, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, (1987).
• [2] Lee S-J, Lu L-W. a. Cyclic tests of full-scale composite joint sub assemblages. J Struct Eng, ASCE 1989(8):1977–98.
• [3] Lee, S.-J., Lu, L.-W., Cyclic load analysis of composite connection sub assemblages. In: Connections in steel structures II, Eds: Bjorhovde, Colson, Hajjar, Stark, AISC, Pittsburgh. pp. 209-216.
• [4] J. Fan, Q. Li, J. Nie, and H. Zhou, “Experimental study on the seismic performance of 3D joints between concrete-filled square steel tubular columns and composite beams,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 140, no. 12, Article ID 04014094, 2014.
• [5] Zeng L, Cui Z, Xiao Y, Jin S, and Wu Y. Cyclical Behavior of Concrete-Encased Composite Frame Joints with High Strength Concrete. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015; Article ID 873162.
• [7] Liao FY, Han LH, Tao Z. Behavior of composite joints with concrete encased CFST columns under cyclic loading: Experiments. Engineering Structures 2014; 59: 745–764.
• [8] Chen CC, Chen Chien C, Hoang TT. Role of concrete confinement of wide-flange structural steel shape in steel reinforced concrete columns under cyclic loading. Engineering Structures 2016; 110 : 79–87.
• [9] Weng, C.C., Yen, S.I. Comparisons of concrete-encased composite column strength provisions of ACI code and AISC specification. Engineering Structures, 2002; 24: 59–72.
• [10] Di Sarno, L., Pecce, M.R., Fabbrocino, G. Inelastic response of composite steel and concrete base column connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2007; 6:3 819–832.
• [11] Ellobody, E., Young, B. Numerical simulation of concrete encased steel composite columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2011; 67:211–222.
• [12] Begum M, Driver, R.G. Elwi, A.E. Behaviour of partially encased composite columns with high strength Concrete. Engineering Structures, 2013, 56: 1718–1727.
• [13] Nzabonimpa, J.D. Hong W-K., Jisoon, K. Nonlinear finite element model for the novel mechanical beam-column joints of precast concrete-based frames, Computers and Structures, 2017, 189:31–48.
• [14] Ouyang,Y., Kwan, A.K.H., Lo, S.H., Ho, J.C.M. Finite element analysis of concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) columns with circular sections under eccentric load, Engineering Structures, 2017, 148:387–398.
• [15] Salem, A.S., Taleb, S.A., Tahar, K.A. Static and dynamic behavior of composite concrete-based beams with embedded polymer/FRP components. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 114:173 – 180.
• [16] Wang, K., Lu, X-F., Yuan, S-F., Cao, D-F., Chen-X. Analysis on hysteretic behavior of composite frames with concrete-encased CFST columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 135:176–186.
• [17] Carrera, E., Zappino, E., Li, G. Finite element models with node-dependent kinematics for the analysis of composite beam structures. Composites Part B, 2018, 132:35-48.
• [18] Weng, C.C., Yen, S.I. Comparisons of concrete-encased composite column strength provisions of ACI code and AISC specification, Engineering Structures, 2002; 24: 59–72.
• [19] Di Sarno, L., Pecce, M.R., Fabbrocino, G. Inelastic response of composite steel and concrete base column connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2007; 6:3 819–832.
• [20] Gonçalves, R., Carvalho, J. An efficient geometrically exact beam element for composite columns and its application to concrete encased steel I-sections. Engineering Structures, 2014; 75:213–224.
• [21] ABAQUS (2005), Finite Element Modeling Software, Rhode Island, USA.
• [22] Eurocode 4 : Design of composite steel and concrete structures Part-1 : general rules and rules for buildings. Brussels: European committee for Standardization; 2005
• [23] ACI 318-83 (1986), Building Code Requirements For Reinforced Concrete, American Concrete Institute; Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
• [24] Yu-Feng An, Lin-Hai Han, Roeder, C. Performance of concrete-encased CFST box stub columns under axial compression, Structures 3 (2015) 211–226.
• [25] Paulay T. and Priestley, M. J. N. Seismic design of Reinforced Concrete and masonry buildings.. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1992, p. 744.
• [26] Birely, A.C., Lowes, L.N., Lehman, D.E. A model for the practical nonlinear analysis of reinforced-concrete frames including joint flexibility. Engineering Structures, 2012; 34:455–465.
• [27] Song, T-Y., Han, L-H., Zhong, T. Performance of Steel-Reinforced Concrete Beam-to-Column Joints after Exposure to Fire. J. Struct. Eng., 2016, 142(10): 04016070
• [28] Pantelides, C.P., Okahashi, Y., Reaveley L. D. Seismic Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete Frame Interior Beam-Column Joints with FRP Composites. J. Compos. Constr., 2008, 12(4): 435-445.
• [29] Okahashi, Y., Pantelides, J.P. Str ut-and-tie model for interior RC beam-column joints with substandard details retrofitted with CFRP jackets. Composite Structures, 2017; 165:1–8
• [30] Del Vecchio, C., Di Ludovico, M., Prota, A., Manfredi, G. Analytical model and design approach for FRP strengthening of non-conforming RC corner beam–column joints. Engineering Structures, 2015; 87: 8–20.