OPTIMIZATION OF CATTLE MANURE LIQUID FRACTION ANAEROBIC DIGESTION AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES: MODELLING BY TAGUCHI METHOD

Year 2020, Volume: 38 Issue: 4, 1753 - 1766, 05.10.2021

Elanur Adar

Abstract

In this study, the effect of different parameters (mixing speed, temperature, substrate/inoculation ratio) on the anaerobic digestion of cattle manure liquid fraction was analyzed and optimized with Taguchi method. As a result, it was concluded that mixing speed has an increase of 29% on methane gas production. Optimum operating conditions were determined as 120 rpm, 35 ˚C, and 1.5 S/I ratio. Under these conditions, 465 mL methane in 30 days was produced. 84% COD removal was provided. It has been observed that the liquid fraction of cattle manure can be decomposed under anaerobic conditions and transformed into energy rather than leaving it to the environment. It can be said that the farmers can efficiently digest the liquid part together with the municipal sewage sludge in the farms where solid-liquid separation is performed. Thus, environmental pollution will be prevented.

Keywords

Bio-methane, cattle manure, anaerobic digestion, liquid fraction, Taguchi

References

• [1] FAOSTAT (2020) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (Accessed date: 01.09.2020)
• [2] TSI(2020) Turkey Statistical Institute, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/Start.do (Accessed date: 01.09.2020)
• [3] Tufaner F., Avsar Y., (2019). Economic Analysis of Biogas Production From Small Scale Anaerobic Digestion Systems For Cattle Manure, Environmental Research and Technology, 2(1), 6-12.
• [4] Cetinkaya A.Y., (2018) Investigation of Biomethane Potential of Dairy Industry Wastewater, Journal of Polytechnic 21(2), 457-460.
• [5] Vindis P., Mursec B., Janzekovic M., Cus F., (2009) The Impact of Mesophilic and Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion on Biogas Production, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 36(2), 192-198.
• [6] Nges I.A., Liu J., (2010) Effects of Solid Retention Time on Anaerobic Digestion of Dewatered-Sewage Sludge in Mesophilic and Thermophilic Conditions, Renewable Energy 35(10), 2200-2206.
• [7] Cavinato C., Fatone F., Bolzonella D., Pavan P., (2010) Thermophilic Anaerobic Co-digestion of Cattle Manure with Agro-wastes and Energy Crops: Comparison of Pilot and Full Scale Experiences, Bioresource Technology 101(2), 545-550
• [8] Aich A., Ghosh S.K., (2016) Application of SWOT Analysis For The Selection of Technology For Processing and Disposal of MSW, Procedia Environmental Sciences 35, 209-228.
• [9] Sassi H.P., Ikner L.A., Abd-Elmaksoud S., Gerba C.P., Pepper I.L., (2018) Comparative Survival of Viruses During Thermophilic and Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion, Science of The Total Environment 615, 15-19.
• [10] Kim M., Ahn Y.H., Speece R., (2002) Comparative Process Stability and Efficiency of Anaerobic Digestion; Mesophilic vs. Thermophilic, Water Research 36(17), 4369-4385.
• [11] Labatut R.A., Angenent L.T., Scott N.R., (2014) Conventional Mesophilic vs. Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion: A Trade-off Between Performance and Stability?, Water Research 53, 249-258.
• [12] Qi G., Pan Z., Sugawa Y., Andriamanohiarisoamanana F.J., Yamashiro T., Iwasaki M., Kawamoto K., Ihara I., Umetsu K., (2018) Comparative Fertilizer Properties of Digestates from Mesophilic and Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure: Focusing on Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria (PGPB) and Environmental Risk, Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 20(3), 1448-1457.
• [13] Coskun T., Manav N., Debik E., Binici M.S., Tosun C., Mehmetli E., Baban A., (2011) Anaerobic Digestion of Cattle Manure, Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 3, 1-9.
• [14] Kardos L., Juhasz A., Palko G., Olah J., Barkacs K., Zaray G., (2011) Comparing of Mesophilic and Thermophilic Anaerobic Fermented Sewage Sludge Based on Chemical and Biochemical Tests, Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 9(3), 293-302.
• [15] Murto M., Björnsson L., Mattiasson B., (2004) Impact of Food Industrial Waste on Anaerobic Co-digestion of Sewage Sludge and Pig Manure, Journal of Environmental Management 70(2), 101-107.
• [16] Yen H.W., Brune D.E., (2007) Anaerobic Co-digestion of Algal Sludge and Waste Paper to Produce Methane, Bioresource Technology 98(1), 130-134.
• [17] Alvarez R., Lidén G., (2008) Semi-continuous Co-digestion of Solid Slaughterhouse Waste, Manure, and Fruit and Vegetable Waste, Renewable Energy 33(4), 726-734.
• [18] Agyeman F.O., Tao W., (2014) Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food Waste and Dairy Manure: Effects of Food Waste Particle Size and Organic Loading Rate, Journal of Environmental Management 133, 268-274
• [19] Borowski S., Domanski J., Weatherley L., (2014) Anaerobic Co-digestion of Swine and Poultry Manure with Municipal Sewage Sludge, Waste Management 34(2), 513-521.
• [20] Zhang W., Wei Q., Wub S., Qi D., Li W., Zuo Z., Dong R., (2014) Batch Anaerobic Co-digestion of Pig Manure with Dewatered Sewage Sludge under Mesophilic Conditions, Applied Energy 128, 175–183.
• [21] Rico C., Muñoz N., Fernández J., Rico J.L., (2015) High-load Anaerobic Co-digestion of Cheese Whey and Liquid Fraction of Dairy Manure in a One-Stage UASB Process: Limits in Co-substrates Ratio and Organic Loading Rate, Chemical Engineering Journal 262, 794-802.
• [22] Karim K., Hoffmann R., Thomas Klasson K., Al-Dahhan M.H., (2005) Anaerobic Digestion of Animal Waste: Effect of Mode of Mixing, Water Research 39(15), 3597-3606.
• [23] Kaparaju P., Buendia I., Ellegaard L., Angelidakia I., (2008) Effects of Mixing on Methane Production During Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Manure: Lab-Scale and Pilot-Scale Studies, Bioresource Technology 99(11), 4919-4928.
• [24] Ghanimeh S., El Fadel M., Saikaly P., (2012) Mixing Effect on Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Source-Sorted Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste, Bioresource Technology 117, 63-71.
• [25] Lindmark J., Eriksson P., Thorin E., (2014) The Effects of Different Mixing Intensities During Anaerobic Digestion of The Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste, Waste Management 34(8), 1391-1397.
• [26] Wang H., Larson R.A., Borchardt M., Spencer S., (2019) Effect of Mixing Duration on Biogas Production and Methanogen Distribution in An Anaerobic Digester, Environmental Technology, 1-7.
• [27] Meng L., Maruo K., Xie L., Riya S., Terada A., Hosomi M., (2019) Comparison of Leachate Percolation and Immersion Using Different Inoculation Strategies in Thermophilic Solid-State Anaerobic Digestion of Pig Urine and Rice Straw, Bioresource Technology 277, 216-220.
• [28] Senturk E., (2010) Investigation on The Treatability and Modelling of Potato-processing Wastewaters in a Completely Mixed Anaerobic Contact Reactor under Mesophilic and Thermophilic Conditions, PhD Thesis, Gebze Technical University, Turkey.
• [29] Rico C., Rico J.L., Tejero I., Muñoz N., Gómez B., (2011) Anaerobic Digestion of The Liquid Fraction of Dairy Manure in Pilot Plant For Biogas Production: Residual Methane Yield of Digestate, Waste Management 31(9-10), 2167-2173.
• [30] Rico C., Rico J.L., Lasa C., (2012) Anaerobic Digestion of The Liquid Fraction of Dairy Manure Separated By Screw Pressing and Centrifugation in A Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor at 25° C, Biosystems Engineering 112(4), 344-351.
• [31] Koch K., Drewes J.E., (2014) Alternative Approach to Estimate The Hydrolysis Rate Constant of Particulate Material From Batch Data, Applied Energy 120, 11-15.
• [32] Martin A., Borja R., Garcia I., Fiestas J.A., (1991) Kinetics of Methane Production From Olive Mill Wastewater, Process Biochemistry 26(2), 101-107.
• [33] APHA (2012) American Public Health Association, Standart Methods For The Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22. Ed., Washington DC.
• [34] Unsar-Kokdemir E., (2013) Determination of The Effects of Nanoparticles on Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Waste Activated Sludge, Master Thesis, Environmental Engineering, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
• [35] Erat N., (2018) Optimization of Removal of Astrazon Yellow 5GL Dye Material From Aqueous Media by Fenton and UV/H2O2 Processes Using Taguchi Method, Master Thesis, Ataturk University, Turkey.
• [36] Serencam H., Ucurum M., (2019) Performance Evaluation of Adsorption Properties For Ni(II) Removal with Flying Ash Using Taguchi Experimental Design, Omer Halisdemir University Journal of Engineering Sciences 8(1), 336-344.
• [37] Ozturk M., (2017) Hayvan Gübresinden Biyogaz Uretimi (In Turkish). Environment and Urban Ministry, Ankara, 1-71. http://www.cevresehirkutuphanesi.com/assets/files/slider_pdf/UWDntXjXQmfS.pdf (Accesed date: 05.09.2019).
• [38] Suhartini S., Heaven S., Banks C.J., (2014) Comparison of Mesophilic and Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Sugar Beet Pulp: Performance, Dewaterability and Foam Control, Bioresource Technology 152, 202-211.
• [39] Tufaner F., Avşar Y., (2016) Investigation of Biogas Production Potential and Adaptation to Cattle Manure of Anaerobic Flocular Sludge Seed, Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 7(2), 183-190.
• [40] Tufaner F., Avşar Y., Gönüllü M.T., (2017) Modeling of Biogas Production From Cattle Manure with Co-digestion of Different Organic Wastes Using An Artificial Neural Network.Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(9), 2255-2264.
• [41] Hinds G.R., Mussoline W., Casimir L., Dick G., Yeh D.H., Ergas, S.J., (2016) Enhanced Methane Yields in High-solids Anaerobic Digestion Through Inoculation with Pulp and Paper Mill Sludge, Environmental Engineering Science 33(11), 907-917.
• [42] Parra-Orobio B.A., Angulo-Mosquera L.S., Loaiza-Gualtero J.S., Torres-López W.A., Torres-Lozada P., (2018) Inoculum Mixture Optimization As Strategy For To İmprove The Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste For The Methane Production, Journal of Environmental Chemical Cngineering 6(1), 1529-1535.
• [43] Achinas S., Euverink G.J.W., (2019) Effect of Combined Inoculation on Biogas Production From Hardly Degradable Material, Energies 12(2), 217.
• [44] Zhang J., Qi Q., Mao L., He Y., Loh K.C., Tong Y.W., (2020) Mixing Strategies-Activated Carbon Nexus: Rapid Start-up of Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion with The Mesophilic Anaerobic Sludge As Inoculum, Bioresource Technology 123401.
• [45] Jain S., Jain S., Wolf I.T., Lee J., Tong Y.W., (2015) A Comprehensive Review on Operating Parameters and Different Pretreatment Methodologies For Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Solid Waste, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 52, 142-154.
• [46] Kariyama I.D., Zhai X., Wu B., (2018) Influence of Mixing on Anaerobic Digestion Efficiency in Stirred Tank Digesters: A Review, Water Research 143, 503-517.
• [47] Singh B., Szamosi Z., Siménfalvi Z., (2019) State of The Art on Mixing in An Anaerobic Digester: A Review, Renewable Energy 141, 922-936.
• [48] Inan F.İ., (2012) Comparison of The Efficiencies of Composting and Anaerobic Digestion Processes Used For The Stabilization of Sewage Sludges and Animal Wastes, MSc Thesis, Department of Environmental Engineering, Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey.
• [49] Yakut H.U., (2012) Investigation of The Effect of Mixer Speed on Biogas Production, MSc Thesis, Department of Machine Engineering, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
• [50] Riaño B., Molinuevo B., García-González M.C., (2011) Potential For Methane Production From Anaerobic Co- digestion of Swine Manure with Winery Wastewater, Bioresource Technology 102(5), 4131-4136.
• [51] Ersoy A.E., (2017) The Status of Gas Emissions and The Potential of Biogas Energy From Livestock Manure in Turkey, Master Thesis, Environmental Engineering Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
• [52] Tufaner F., Avşar Y., (2016) Effects of Co-substrate on Biogas Production From Cattle Manure: A Review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13(9), 2303-2312.
• [53] Karadag D., Koroglu O.E., Ozkaya B., Cakmakci M., Heaven S., Banks C., Serna‐Maza A., (2015) Anaerobic Granular Reactors For The Treatment of Dairy Wastewater: A Review. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 68(4), 459-470.
• [54] Bi S., Qiao W., Xiong L., Ricci M., Adani F., Dong R., (2019) Effects of Organic Loading Rate on Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Mesophilic and Thermophilic Conditions, Renewable Energy 139, 242-250.
• [55] Guc M.A., (2010) Production of Biogas From Cattle Manure and Evaluation of The Enviromental Effects on The City of Usak. MSc Thesis, Solar Energy Institute, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.