Evaluation of the technical feasibility aspects of the fishing structures: a case study of Izmir coast

Year 2023, Volume: 41 Issue: 1, 93 - 105, 14.03.2023

Begüm Yurdanur Dağlı Dilay Yıldırım Uncu Ümit Gökkuş

Abstract

This paper was conducted by considering 28 fishing structures in Izmir Coast based on three aspects: inter relation with the fishing ground, technical aspects and market accessibility to determine technical requirements about infrastructure and superstructure facilities. The questionnaires and personal interviews with the main stakeholders were utilized to determine current situation of the fishing structures. The field observation covered the activities such as catch unloading, handling, auction, distribution and marketing of the catching fish. The data of fishing structures were evaluated by using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Method. 13 customer requests and 19 technical requirements were considered for designing House of Quality (HoQ) matrix consisting of 7 sections. A mathematical model represented the relationship between fishing structure and boats was obtained by using Queuing Theory. The suitability of the model with Poisson arrival distribution and negative exponential service time distribution was checked using Chi-Square goodness of fit test. In the conclusion, the most important technical criteria were discussed. The features were identified which need to be improved most.

Keywords

Fishing Structures, Izmir, Quality Function Deployment Method, QFD, Queuing Theory

References

• REFERENCES
• [1] Nurani TW, Lubis E, Haluan J, Saad S. Analysis of fishing ports to support the development of tuna fisheries in the South Coast of Java. Indones Fish Res J 2010;16:69–78. [CrossRef]
• [2] Agerschou H. Planning and design of ports and marine terminals. 2st ed. London: Thomas Telford Press; 2004.
• [3] Israel DC. Analysis of fishing ports in the Philippines (No. 2000-04), PIDS Discussion Paper Series, 2000.
• [4] Ceyhan T, Akyol O, Unal V. An investigation on artisanal fisheries in Edremit bay (Aegean Sea). J Fish Aquat Sci 2006;23:373–375.
• [5] Boran M, Softa SA. An investigation on the coastal fishing structures located in Trabzon province. J Fish Aquat Sci 2016;33:307–311. [CrossRef]
• [6] Chen ZR, Zhang JQ. An overview about the engi-neering technology of fishing port [J], Fishery Modernization 3, 2010.
• [7] Sampathkumar V, Vanjinathan J. Feasibility study on upgrading infrastructure in Jeppiaar fishing har-bor. Int J Oceans Oceanogr 2015;9:127–141.
• [8] Sharaan M, Negm A, Iskander M, Nadaoka K. Egyptian fishing ports challenges and opportuni-ties case study: Mediterranean Sea ports. In: Oates D, Burkhart E, Grob J, editors. 14th Triennial International Conference; 2016 June 12-15; New Orleans, Louisiana: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2016. pp. 540–549. [CrossRef]
• [9] Avcı Softa S. An investigation on the coastal fishing structures located in Trabzon city. Master Thesis. Trabzon, Turkey: Karadeniz Technical University; 2014.
• [10] Yıldız T, Karakulak FS. Current situation of fishing coastal structures in the Istanbul. Gümüşhane Univ J Sci Technol Inst 2013;3:16– 28.
• [11]Ministry of Transportation General Directorate of Railways. Ports and Aircraft Construction, Fisheries Coastal Structures Situation and Needs Analysis Results Report 1-2, Ankara, 2011.
• [12] RG Official Gazette. Regulation of fishing ports (in Turkish), 2016.
• [13] Yıldırım D, Eren A, Gökkuş Ü. Criteria on techni-cal feasibility of fishery harbors, The 16th National Aquaculture Symposium, Antalya, Turkey, 2011.
• [14] Varol BY, Eren A, Gökkuş Ü. Availability of Izmir fishery harbors from aspect of the technical fea-sibility criteria. The 16th National Aquaculture Symposium, Antalya, Turkey, 2011.
• [15] Yalçın E, Gurbet R. Environmental influences on the spatio-temporal distribution of European Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in Izmir Bay, Aegean Sea. Turkish J Fish Aquat Sci 2016;16:1–14.
• [16] Unal V, Goncuoglu H. Fisheries management in Turkey. In: Tokac AC, Gucu BO, editors. The state of the Turkish fisheries.1st ed. Istanbul: Turkish Marine Research Foundation Publication; 2012. p. 263–288.
• [17] Kınacıgil HT, Ilkyaz AT. Sea fishery in Aegean Sea. Ege Univ J Fish Aquat Sci 1997;14:351–367.
• [18] TUIK Bulletin. Fishery products (in Turkish) 2008, Turkish Statistical Institute Publication, Ankara, 125, 2009.
• [19] UDHB. Status and needs, analysis report results for fishing coastal structures. Volume-I, Volume-II,(in Turkish), Ministry of Transport, Directorate of Railway, Harbours and Air Ports Construction, Ankara, 2011.
• [20]Tsinker GP. Port Engineering: Planning, Construction, Maintenance, and Security. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
• [21] Sume V, Yuksek O. Investigation of shoaling of coastal fishery structures in the Eastern Black Sea coasts. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ 2018;33: 843–852.
• [22] Eisma D. Dredging in Coastal Waters. 1st ed. Florida: CRC Press; 2005.
• [23]Belen S. Rehabilitation of fishery shelters, Master Thesis. İzmir, Turkey: Dokuz Eylül University; 2012.
• [24]Yazdani M, Kahraman C, Zarate P, Onar SC. A fuzzy multi attribute decision framework with integra-tion of QFD and grey relational analysis. Expert Syst Appl 2019;115:474–485. [CrossRef]
• [25]Ahmed SM, Sang LP, Torbica ŽM. Use of quality func-tion deployment in civil engineering capital project planning. J Constr Eng Manag  2003;129:358–368. [CrossRef]
• [26]Dikmen I, Birgonul MT, Kızıltas S. Strategic use of quality function deployment (QFD) in the con-struction industry. Build Environ 2005;40:245–255. [CrossRef]
• [27] Lam JSL. Designing a sustainable maritime supply chain: A hybrid QFD–ANP approach. Trans Res E: Logist Transp Rev 2015;78:70–81. [CrossRef]
• [28]Bolar AA, Tesfamariam S, Sadiq R. Framework for prioritizing infrastructure user expectations using Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Int J Sustain Built Environ 2017;6:16–29. [CrossRef]
• [29]Kelesbayev D, Kalykulov K, Yertayev Y, Turlybekova A, Kamalov A. A case study for using the quality function deployment method as a quality improve-ment tool in the universities. Int Rev Manag Mark 2016;6:569–576.
• [30] Bode J, Fung RY. Cost engineering with quality func-tion deployment. Comput Ind Eng 1998;35:587–590.[CrossRef]
• [31] Kurt HS, Yenilmez G. Quality function deployment: an application on shopping malls. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 2017;9:14–29.
• [32]Govers CP. What and how about quality function deployment (QFD). Int J Prod Econ 1996;46:575–
• 585. [CrossRef]
• [33] Bouchereau V, Rowlands H. Methods and tech-niques to help quality function deployment (QFD). Benchmarking: Int J 2000;7:8–20. [CrossRef]
• [34] Hauser JR, Clausing D.The house of quality. Harvard: Harvard Business Review; 1998.
• [35] Chan LK, Wu ML. A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example. Omega 2005;33:119–139. [CrossRef]
• [36] Dragu V, Dinu O, Ruscă A, Burciu S, Roman EA. Queuing theory models used for port equip-ment sizing. ModTech International Conference-Modern Technologies in Industrial Engineering; 2017 June 14-17; Sibiu, Romania: IOP Publishing; 2017. 012040. [CrossRef]
• [37] Wolff RW. Stochastic Modeling and The Theory of Queues. 1st ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1989.