Seismic evaluation of tall RC frames with hybrid friction damper and shape memory alloy designed by PBPD method

Year 2024, Volume: 42 Issue: 6, 1683 - 1696, 09.12.2024

Faramarz Norouzi Ojaey Heydar Dashti Naserabadi , Morteza Jamshidi

Abstract

This paper suggests a novel lateral load-resisting solution for RC (high-rise reinforced con-crete) frames using superelastic SMA wires as friction dampers. The suggested SMA-friction damper has some advantages, such as an easy-to-configure and affordable application, in ad-dition to being able to control the frictional energy dissipation components mechanism in line with the design procedure based on the suggested effectiveness thanks to its self-centering SMA wires. With the least amount of SMA use, it may produce hysteretic behavior and an intense tendency for self-centering. The research used two distinct design modes—common and with the recommended damper—to construct two tall, 18- and 22-story RC frames. Ten farfield earthquakes were studied using OpenSees software in a nonlinear time history fashion. Eighteen and twenty-two-story reinforced concrete frame high-rises were designed in two distinct ways: normally and with the recommended damper. Aside from the major advancement in ductility, the lateral strength and stiffness gave an exceptional capacity for self-centering, resulting in a substantial decrease in most drift and persistent distortions in the structure. The study’s findings showed that the suggested damper may improve the RC frame’s structural performance while using the fewest bracing spans and money.

Keywords

Nonlinear Analysis, Opensees, Performance-Based Design, RC Frames, Shape Memory Alloy, Self-Centering

References

• REFERENCES
• [1] Qian H, Li H, Song G. Experimental investigations of building structure with a superelastic shape memory alloy friction damper subject to seismic loads. Smart Mater Structur 2016;25:125026. [CrossRef]
• [2] Gao Y, Ren W. Theoretical study on vibration control of symmetric structure with shape memory alloy (SMA)-friction damper. Open Mech Eng J 2014;8.[CrossRef]
• [3] Ozbulut OE, Hurlebaus S. Application of an SMA‐based hybrid control device to 20‐story nonlinear benchmark building. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 2012;41:18311843. [CrossRef]
• [4] McCormick J, Aburano H, Ikenaga M, Nakashima M. Permissible residual deformation levels for building structures considering both safety and human elements. in Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seismological Press Beijing Beijing, 2008.
• [5] Meli R, Rosenblueth E. The 1985 Earthquake causes and effects in Mexico City. Concrete International, ACI, Detroit, Mich, 1986;8:12.
• [6] Asgarian B, Salari N, Saadati B. Application of intelligent passive devices based on shape memory alloys in seismic control of structures. Structures 2016;5:161169. [CrossRef]
• [7] Dolce M, Cardone D, Marnetto R. Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 2000;29:945968. [CrossRef]
• [8] Dolce M, Cardone D, Ponzo FC, Valente C. Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 2005;34:16871717. [CrossRef]
• [9] Fanaiea N, Monfared MN. Cyclic behavior of extended end-plate connections with shape memory alloy bolts. Struct Eng Mech 2016;60:507527. [CrossRef]
• [10] McCormick J, DasRoches R, Fugazza D, Auricchio F. Seismic assessment of concentrically braced steel frames with shape memory alloy braces. J Struct Eng 2007;133:862870. [CrossRef]
• [11] Parulekar Y, Seismic response attenuation of structures using shape memory alloy dampers. Struct Control Health Monit 2012;19:102119. [CrossRef]
• [12] Qian H, Li H, Song G, Guo W. Recentering shape memory alloy passive damper for structural vibration control. Math Problems Eng 2013;2013:963530. [CrossRef]
• [13] Salari N, Asgarian B. Seismic response of steel braced frames equipped with shape memory alloy-based hybrid devices. Struct Eng Mech 2015;53:10311049. [CrossRef]
• [14] Salichs J, Hou Z, Noori M. Vibration suppression of structures using passive shape memory alloy energy dissipation devices. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2001;12:671680. [CrossRef]
• [15] Zhang Y, Zhu S. A shape memory alloy-based reusable hysteretic damper for seismic hazard mitigation. Smart Mater Struct 2007;16:1603. [CrossRef]
• [16] Zhang Y, Zhu S. Seismic response control of building structures with superelastic shape memory alloy wire dampers. J Eng Mech 2008;134:240251. [CrossRef]
• [17] Massah SR, Dorvar H. Design and analysis of eccentrically braced steel frames with vertical links using shape memory alloys. Smart Mater Struct 2014;23:115015. [CrossRef]
• [18] Shiravand M, Nejad AK, Bayanifar M. Seismic response of RC structures rehabilitated with SMA under near-field earthquakes. Struct Eng Mech 2017;63:497507.
• [19] Yalciner H, Sensoy S, Eren O. Time-dependent seismic performance assessment of a single-degree-of-freedom frame subject to corrosion. Eng Fail Anal 2012;19:109122. [CrossRef]
• [20] Kumbasaroglu A. Effect of anchor bars on seismic behavior of infilled walled frames. KSCE J Civil Eng 2020;24:29802992. [CrossRef]
• [21] Lee C-H, Kim J, Kim D-H, Ryu J, Ju YK. Numerical and experimental analysis of combined behavior of shear-type friction damper and non-uniform strip damper for multi-level seismic protection. Eng Struct 2016;114:7592. [CrossRef]
• [22] ACI Committee. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-08) and commentary. 2008. American Concrete Institute, 2008.
• [23] International Code Council. International building code. International Code Council, Inc.(formerly BOCA, ICBO and SBCCI), 2006;4051.
• [24] ASCE/SEI41-06. Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. 2006, American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, Virginia, USA.
• [25] AISC341–10, Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. 2010, American Institute of Steel Construction: Chicago, USA.
• [26] OpenSees, Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2015.
• [27] FEMA-P695. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. 2009, Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, USA, 2009.
• [28] Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. 3rd ed. USA: Prentice-Hall; 2008.
• [29] Newmark, NM, Hall WJ. Earthquake Spectra and Design. Engineering Monographs on Earthquake Criteria. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute; 1982.