ÖZEL GEREKSİNİMLİ BİREYLERİN VE AİLELERİNİN TURİZME ERİŞİLEBİLİRLİKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

Abstract

Özet Özel gereksinimli bireylerin ve ailelerinin, bakımın sürekliliği, duygusal yük, sosyal izolasyon ve ekonomik güçlükler gibi çok boyutlu zorluklarla karşı karşıya kalmaktadır. Süreğen bakım süreci, özel gereksinimli birey ve ailelerinde tükenmişlik, stres, depresyon ve toplumsal yaşama katılımda azalma gibi ciddi psikososyal sonuçlar doğurabilmektedir.Bu çalışma özel gereksinimli bireylerin ve ailelerinin turizm deneyimlerini çok boyutlu bir perspektiften ele almaktadır. Özel gereksinimli bireylerin aileleri ve bakıcılarının turizm deneyimlerinde karşılaştıkları psikososyal dinamikleri inceleyen literatür bulgularına dayanmaktadır. Araştırma, doküman analizi ve karşılaştırmalı literatür taraması yöntemleri kullanılarak tasarlanmıştır. Çalışmada, 2000-2025 yılları arasında yayınlanmış ulusal ve uluslararası çalışmalar incelenmiş Web of Science, PubMed ve Google Akademik, TR Dizin veri tabanlarında arama yapılmıştır. Arama sürecinde kullanılan anahtar kelimeler "erişilebilir turizm", "özel gereksinimli bireyler", "aile deneyimleri", "psikososyal ihtiyaçlar", "manevi ihtiyaçlar" olmuştur. Elde edilen çalışmalar, tematik analiz yöntemiyle değerlendirilmiş; içerikler alt temalara ayrılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bu sistematik derleme, özel gereksinimli bireyler ve yakınları için turizm deneyimini şekillendiren çok boyutlu engelleyici ve destekleyici unsurları incelemektedir. Bulgular, erişilebilir turizmin fiziksel düzenlemelerin ötesinde; psikososyal, sosyal, ekonomik, dijital ve hizmet odaklı boyutlarla bütüncül olarak ele alınması gerektiğini göstermektedir. Altyapı ve erişilebilirlik iyileştirmeleri, bireylerin duygusal yük, kaygı, belirsizlik ve kontrol kaybı gibi psikolojik zorluklarını hafifletmektedir. Sosyal dışlanma, toplumsal tutumlar, bakışlara maruz kalma, damgalanma ve ritüel bozulma kaygısı ise bireylerin aidiyet ve saygınlık hislerini tehdit etmektedir. Ekonomik engeller ve sürekli bakım sorumluluğu, ailelerde fiziksel ve zihinsel tükenmişliği artırırken; sosyal turizm programları dinlenme, iyilik hâli, sosyal katılım ve aile dayanıklılığını desteklemektedir. Bilgi ve dijital erişilebilirlik eksiklikleri, belirsizlikle baş etmeyi zorlaştırmakta; güvenli, anlaşılır ve öngörülebilir destinasyonlar ise kontrol hissini artırarak kaygıyı azaltmaktadır. Personel tutumları ve hizmet kalitesi, turizm deneyiminin psikolojik boyutunu doğrudan etkilemekte; eğitimli personel kapsayıcı iletişim, duygusal güvenlik ve aile merkezli hizmet sağlayarak psikososyal iyilik hâlini güçlendirmektedir. Sonuç olarak erişilebilir turizm, çok katmanlı engelleri azaltmayı hedefleyen bütüncül ve kapsayıcı politikalara ihtiyaç duymaktadır.

Keywords

• Erişilebilir Turizm
• Özel Gereksinimli Bireyler
• Özel Gereksinimli Birey Aileleri
• Psikososyal İhtiyaçlar
• Manevi İhtiyaçlar

Supporting Institution

ÇALIŞMAYI DESTEKLEYEN HERHANGİ BİR KURUM YOKTUR.

Ethical Statement

ÇALIŞMA ETİK KURUL İZNİ GEREKTİRMEMEKTEDİR.

Thanks

SİNOP ÜNİVERSİTESİNE TURİZM ALANINDA YAPILAN AKADEMİK ÇALIŞMALARA VERDİĞİ DESTEK İÇİN TEŞEKKÜR EDERİZ.

An Examination of the Tourism Accessibility of Individuals with Disabilities and Their Families

Abstract

Abstract Individuals with disabilities and their families face multidimensional challenges, including continuity of care, emotional burden, social isolation, and economic difficulties. The ongoing care process can lead to burnout, stress, depression, and reduced participation in social life for both individuals with disabilities and their caregivers. This study examines the tourism experiences of people with disabilities and their families from a multidimensional perspective. It is based on findings from the literature exploring the psychosocial dynamics encountered by families and caregivers during tourism activities. The research was designed using document analysis and comparative literature review methods. National and international studies published between 2000 and 2025 were reviewed through searches conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and TR Dizin. The keywords used included “accessible tourism,” “Individuals with disabilities,” “family experiences,” “psychosocial needs,” and “spiritual needs.” The selected studies were evaluated with thematic analysis, and their content was categorized into subthemes. This systematic review examines the multifaceted barriers and facilitators that shape tourism experiences for individuals with special needs and their caregivers. The findings indicate that accessible tourism must be addressed holistically—not only through physical arrangements but also through psychosocial, social, economic, digital, and service-related dimensions. Improvements in infrastructure and accessibility can alleviate psychological challenges such as emotional burden, anxiety, uncertainty, and loss of control. In contrast, social exclusion, societal attitudes, stigmatization, and concerns about disrupted routines threaten individuals’ sense of belonging and dignity. Economic barriers and continuous caregiving responsibilities increase physical and mental fatigue, while social tourism programs enhance rest, well-being, social participation, and family resilience. Lack of information and digital accessibility complicates coping with uncertainty, whereas safe, clear, and predictable destinations strengthen the sense of control and reduce anxiety. Staff attitudes and service quality directly influence the psychological dimension of tourism; trained personnel who provide inclusive communication and family-centered services support psychosocial well-being. Overall, accessible tourism requires holistic and inclusive policies that aim to reduce multilayered barriers.

Keywords

• Accessible Tourism
• Individuals with Disabilities
• Families of Individuals with Disabilities
• Psychosocial Needs
• Spiritual Needs

Supporting Institution

here is no institution supporting this study

Ethical Statement

The study does not require ethics committee approval

Thanks

We would like to thank SInop University for its support of academic studies in the field of tourism

References

1. Accessibility Standards Canada (2024). CAN-ASC 5.3: Accessible Tourism Standard. https://scc-ccn.ca/standards/notices-of-intent/accessibility-standards-canada/can-asc-53-accessible-tourism
2. Akıncı, H., & Sönmez, S. (2017). Türkiye’de engelli bireylerin turizme erişimi: Altyapı ve sosyal engeller. İstanbul: Turizm Araştırmaları Yayınları.
3. Aksu, H., Bulgan, C., & Devile, J. (2019). Engellilik farkındalığı eğitiminin turizm çalışanlarına etkisi. Journal of Inclusive Tourism Studies, 5(2), 45–62.
4. Aşçı, B., & Kervankıran, İ. (2021). Kültürel mekânlarda erişilebilirlik uygulamaları: Türkiye örneği. Kültürel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(1), 78–95.
5. Atalay, A., & Çınar, E. (2021). Engelli çocuklu ailelerin turizm deneyimleri ve sosyal dışlanma. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(3), 112–130.
6. Australian Government – Federal Register of Legislation. (1992). Disability Discrimination Act 1992. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2004A04426
7. Australian Human Rights Commission. (2023). Accessibility and Disability Rights in Tourism. https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/disability-rights
8. Beadle-Brown, J., Bigby, C., & Bould, E. (2015). Observing practice leadership in intellectual and developmental disability services. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 59(12), 1081-1093. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12208

9. Buhalis, D., & Darcy, S. (2011). Accessible tourism: Concepts and issues. Tourism Management, 32(5), 771–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.11.008
10. Bulgan, C. (2017). Turizm sektöründe kapsayıcı hizmet: Personel eğitimi ve tutumlar. Ankara: Turizm Yayıncılık.
11. Bulgan, G. (2017). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de engelli turizmi üzerine yapılan çalışmalar. Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (50), 102-125.
12. Boboc, R. G., Băutu, E., Gîrbacia, F., Popovici, N., & Popovici, D. M. (2022). Augmented reality in cultural heritage: an overview of the last decade of applications. Applied Sciences, 12(19), 9859
13. Bowers, H. ve Cheer, J. M. (2017). Yoga tourism: Commodification and western embracement of eastern spiritual practice. Tourism Management Perspectives, 24, 208-216.
14. Chan, J. B., & Sigafoos, J. (2001). A review of respite care for children with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36(4), 409–416.
15. Çılgın, H., & Ongun, U. (2025). Kırsal turizm bilimsel yayınların bibliyometrik analizi: Web of Science örneği [Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on rural tourism: Web of Science example]. Journal of Gastronomy, Hospitality and Travel, 8(3), 888–915.
16. Darcy, S., & Buhalis, D. (2011). Accessible tourism: Concepts and issues. Channel View Publications.
17. Darcy, S., & Dickson, T. J. (2009). A whole-of-life approach to tourism: The case for accessible tourism experiences. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 16(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1375/jhtm.16.1.32
18. Derguy, C., et al. (2015). Stress and coping in families of children with disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 28(6), 666–674.
19. Devile, E. L., Eusébio, C., & Moura, A. (2024). Traveling with special needs: Investigating constraints and negotiation strategies for engaging in tourism activities. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 7(2), 820–843. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-09-2022-0410
20. Devile, J., & Kastenholz, E. (2018). Professional training and inclusion in tourism services. Journal of Tourism Education, 10(1), 33–49.
21. Domínguez Vila, T. (2024). Accessible Tourism Using Technology to Increase Social Inclusion. Emerald Insight. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/TR-11-2023-0812
22. Domínguez, T., Darcy, S., & González, E. A. (2015). Competing for the disability tourism market. Tourism Management, 47, 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.008
23. Edgell, P. (2012). A cultural sociology of religion: New directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 247-265. Egeberg, M. (2010). The European Commission. European union politics, 3, 125-140.
24. EHRC. (2017). Being disabled in Britain: A journey less equal. Equality and Human Rights Commission. Equality Act. (2010). United Kingdom Legislation. UK Government.
25. ETSI. (2018). EN 301 549: Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services. European Telecommunications Standards Institute.
26. European Commission. (2016). Directive (EU) 2016/2102 on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies.
27. Godtman Kling, K., & Ioannides, D. (2019). Enhancing accessibility in tourism & outdoor recreation: A review of major research themes and best practices. Mid Sweden University.
28. Göktaş, F., & Bulgan, C. (2015). Turizmde bilgi erişimi ve engelli bireyler. Turizm ve Eğitim Araştırmaları, 7(1), 21–38.
29. Gurung, G., Simmons, D. ve Devlin, P. (1996) “Turist rehberlerinin gelişen rolü: Nepal deneyimi” Butler, R. ve Hinch, T. (editörler) Turizm ve Yerli Halklar, s. 107-128. Londra: International Thomson Business Press.
30. Gül, T. (2020). Turist olarak engelli algısı: rehberler üzerine bir çalışma. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 21(52), 575-603. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.vi.720654
31. Harper, A., Dyches, T., Harper, J., Roper, S., & South, M. (2013). Respite care, marital quality, and stress in families of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 2604–2616.
32. Hayes, S. A., & Watson, S. L. (2013). The impact of parenting stress: A meta-analysis comparing parents of children with and without developmental disabilities. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 125–137.
33. Holda, R. (2019). Respite tourism for family caregivers. In Chronic illness and long-term care: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 242-254). IGI Global.
34. Italy Museum Study. (2023). Cultural sites accessibility for children with disabilities. Rome: European Museum Association.
35. Kang, Y., Lee, H., & Kim, S. (2019). Social attitudes toward disabled tourists in public spaces. Tourism and Society, 11(2), 88–105..
36. Koca, C., & Kılıç, M. (2021). Türkiye’de erişilebilir turizm politikalarının analizi. Turizm Akademik Dergisi, 8(1), 45–60.
37. Kouřilová, J., & Kratochvílová, L. (2014). Social tourism support in the Czech Republic. Czech Journal of Tourism, 3(1), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.2478/cjot-2014-0004
38. Korkmaz, Ö., & Sandıkçı, Ö. (2020). Türkiye’de müze erişilebilirliği: Engelli çocuklu aileler perspektifi. Kültürel Miras Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 50–69.
39. Koşar, A. E., & Ciritci, İ. (2025). Yerel-Kırsal Kalkınmaya Katkı Sağlaması Açısından Endüstriyel Mirasın Araç Olarak Kullanılması. Yeni Fikir Dergisi, 17(34), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.57205/yenifikirjournal.1639553
40. Landby, E. (2019). Everyday travel for families with children using wheelchairs: Parents’ perceptions of constraints and adaptation strategies. Children’s Geographies, 17(4): 388-400. doi:10.1080/14733285.2018.1528342
41. MacEachen Institute (2024). The Future of Tourism for People with Disabilities – Nova Scotia Scenario Planning. Dalhousie University. https://www.dal.ca/dept/maceachen-institute/research/AccessibleTourism.html
42. McCabe, S., & Johnson, S. (2013). Social tourism and inclusion: International perspectives. Channel View Publications.
43. McCabe, S., Joldersma, T., & Li, C. (2010). Understanding the benefits of social tourism: Linking participation to subjective well‐being and quality of life. International Journal of Tourism Research, 12(6), 761-773. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.791
44. Mckercher, B., & Chan, A. (2005). How special is special interest tourism?. Journal of travel research, 44(1), 21-31.
45. McKercher, B., Packer, T., Yau, M. K., & Lam, P. (2003). Travel agents as facilitators or inhibitors of travel. Tourism Management, 24(4), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00107-3
46. Nalçacı İkiz, A., & Solunoğlu, A. (2018). Engelli çocuğa sahip ebeveynlerin turizm davranışları. Journal of Recreation and Tourism Research, 4(2), 92–104.
47. Nalçacı İkiz, F., & Solunoğlu, H. (2020). Engelli bireylerin turizm deneyimi ve bilgiye erişim sorunları. Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(1), 77–92.
48. Nicolaides, A., & Grobler, A. (2017). Spirituality, Wellness tourism and quality of life. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 6(1), 1-37.
49. Oduncuoğlu, B. (2019). Engelli çocuklu ailelerin turizm deneyiminde toplumsal dışlanma ve stres. Journal of Social Inclusion Studies, 6(3), 101–120.
50. Özalkan, S., Özkurt, D. Ş., & Ayyıldız, A. Y. (2022). Turist Rehberleri Bakış Açısıyla Dijitalleşme ve Robot Rehberler, A Study of. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 10(2), 1415-1435.
51. Özdemir, A. (2019). Uluslarin rekabetçi avantaji: Elmas model çerçevesi ve türk turizm sektörünün rekabet gücü. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, 6(1), 11-41.
52. Öztürk, Y., Yaylı, A., & Yeşiltaş, M. (2008). Is the Turkish tourism industry ready for disabled customers? Tourism Management, 29(2), 382–389.
53. Packer, T. L., McKercher, B., & Yau, M. K. (2007). Understanding the interplay of tourism, disability and environment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(4), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600756331
54. Poria, Y., Reichel, A., & Brandt, Y. (2010). The flight experience of people with disabilities. Journal of TraveResearch, 49(2), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287509336477
55. Pyke, J., Pyke, S., & Watuwa, R. (2019). Social tourism and well-being in a first nation community. Annals of Tourism Research, 77, 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.04.01
56. Richards, G., Pritchard, A., & Morgan, N. (2010). (Re)envisioning tourism and visual impairment. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(4), 1097–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2010.04.011
57. Rubio-Escuderos, L., García-Andreu, H., & Ullán De La Ros, J. (2021). Accessible tourism. European Journal of Tourism Research, 28, 2803. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v28i.2237
58. Sarıipek, S., & Demir Sarıipek, A. (2019). Sosyal turizmin engelliler ve aileleri üzerindeki etkisi. Türk Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(4):610-627.
59. Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability rights and the social model of disability. London: Routledge. Social Tourism Study. (2020). Inclusive tourism programs and family participation. European Social Tourism Network.
60. Statistics Canada (2022). Barriers to Accessibility in Public Spaces: Findings from the 2022 Canadian Survey on Disability. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/89-654-x/89-654-x2024003-eng.htm
61. Strathclyde Business School (2023). Accessible Tourism Scenario Planning Workshop. https://www.sbs.strath.ac.uk/newsletter/2023-11/also.asp
62. Sweden Mobility Study. (2023). Barriers for families with disabled children in tourism. Stockholm: Swedish National Tourism Board.
63. Tecău, A. S., Brătucu, G., Tescașiu, B., Chițu, I. B., Constantin, C. P., & Foris, D. (2019). Responsible tourism—integrating families with disabled children in tourist destinations. Sustainability, 11(16), 4420.
64. Toker, M., & Kaçmaz, Z. (2013). Engelliler ve ailelerinin turizme katılımı: Türkiye örneği. Ege Akademik Bakış, 13(3), 321–338.
65. Tour Guide Study. (2021). Communication challenges of guides with disabled tourists. Journal of Tourism Practice, 8(2), 40–58.
66. Tourism Australia. (2023). Accessible Tourism Guidelines and Initiatives. https://www.tourism.australia.com/en/industry/accessibility.html
67. Tourism HR Canada (2025). Beyond Barriers: Insights into Tourism Workplace Disability Inclusion. https://tourismhr.ca/2025/03/31/beyond-barriers-insights-into-tourism-workplace-disability-inclusion/
68. UNWTO. (2009). Declaration on the facilitation of tourist travel. United Nations World Tourism Organization.
69. UNWTO. (2013). Accessible tourism for all: Principles, tools and best practices. World Tourism Organization.
70. UNWTO. (2020). Accessible Tourism for All: Strategic Principles. World Tourism Organization.
71. UNWTO. (2025). Accessible tourism: A growing global commitment.
72. UNWTO. (2025). Accessible tourism: Global report 2025. Madrid: United Nations World Tourism Organization.
73. Walker S, Hill-Polerecky D (1996) Psychometric Evaluation of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. II. Unpublished manuscript. Omaha, University of Nebraska Medical Center.
74. Whitburn, J., Linklater, W., & Abrahamse, W. (2020). Meta‐analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior. Conservation biology, 34(1), 180-193.
75. W3C. (2018). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Recommendation.
76. World Tourism Organization (2013). Recommendations on Accesible Tourism, UNWTO, Madrid.
77. World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564182
78. Yau, M., McKercher, B., & Packer, T. (2004). Traveling with a disability: More than an access issue. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(4), 946–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.01.008
79. Yıldırım, A., & Simsek, H. (1999). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (11 baski: 1999-2018).