Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

AKADEMİK BİR METNİN SÖYLEM DÜZENLEMİSİNE YÖNELİK ALGILARDA CİNSİYET FARKLILIKLARI ÜZERİNE NİCEL BİR ÇALIŞMA

Year 2014, Issue: 58, 171 - 190, 20.03.2014

Abstract

Bu çalışma; daha önce yapılmış olan bir yüksek lisans tez çalışmasının, beşli likert ölçeği aracılığıyla farklı bir boyutunu ele almaktadır. Çalışma yüksek lisans tezlerinin giriş bölümlerinin söylem düzenlemesinde algı boyutunda cinsiyetler arası farklılıklardaki değişkenliğin ne yönde olduğunu ortaya koymayı hedeflemektedir, ve bu bağlamda, araştırma, söylem stratejilerinin uygulanması noktasında İngiliz Dili ve Eğitimi alanı üzerine çalışan bay ve bayanlar arasında algı yönünden farklılıklar olduğu varsayımı üzerinden ilerlemektedir. Sonuçlar, Swales’ın düzenlenmiş versiyonundaki modelde sunulan söylem yapısının uygulanmasında cinsiyetler arasında anlamlı bir farklılık olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu sonuç, çalışmanın ortaya attığı varsayımı doğrulamaktadır. Bu noktada, sonuçlar genel olarak modelin düzenlenmiş versiyonundaki yapının uygulanmasında bay katılımcıların bayan katılımcılardan daha fazla önem atfettiğini göstermektedir.

References

  • Colley, A., Todd, Z., Bland, M., Holmes, M., Khanon, R. & Pike, H. (2004). Style and content in emails and letters to male and female friends. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(3), 369–78.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2011) Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford Press:UK Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131–50.
  • Geçikli, M.(2012) Rhetoric in Master Thesis Introductions in the field of English Language Teaching within Turkish Context: A Genre Analysis. Master Thesis, Atatürk University, Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Erzurum Hartley, J., Betts, L. J. & Murray, W. (2007). Gender and assessment: Differences, similarities and implications. Psychology Teaching Review, 13(1), 34–47.
  • Hartley, J., Pennebaker, J. W. & Fox, C. (2003). Using new technology to assess the academic writing styles of male and female pairs and individuals. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 33(3), 243–61.
  • Hartley, J., Sotto, E. & Pennebaker, J, W. (2002). Style and substance in psychology: Are influential papers more readable than less influential ones? Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 321–34.
  • Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing. Routledge:USA and Canada Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Pearson Education Inc.:USA
  • Martin, M. (1997). Emotional and cognitive effects of examination proximity in female and male students. Oxford Review of Education, 23(4), 479–86.
  • Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R. & Niederhoffer, K. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–77.
  • Peterson, S. (2006). Influence of gender on writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.). Handbook of writing research (pp. 311–23). New York: Guilford.
  • Robson, J., Francis, B. & Read, B. (2002). Writes of passage: Stylistic features of male and female undergraduate history essays. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(4), 351–62.
  • Rude, S.S., Gortner, E-M. & Pennebaker, J. W. (2004). Language use of depressed anddepression-vulnerable college students. Cognition and Emotion, 18(8), 1121–33. Soler-Monreal, C; Carbonell-Olivares, M & Gil-Salom, L.(2011) A contrastive study of the rhetorical organization of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 4-17
  • Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Year 2014, Issue: 58, 171 - 190, 20.03.2014

Abstract

References

  • Colley, A., Todd, Z., Bland, M., Holmes, M., Khanon, R. & Pike, H. (2004). Style and content in emails and letters to male and female friends. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(3), 369–78.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2011) Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford Press:UK Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131–50.
  • Geçikli, M.(2012) Rhetoric in Master Thesis Introductions in the field of English Language Teaching within Turkish Context: A Genre Analysis. Master Thesis, Atatürk University, Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Erzurum Hartley, J., Betts, L. J. & Murray, W. (2007). Gender and assessment: Differences, similarities and implications. Psychology Teaching Review, 13(1), 34–47.
  • Hartley, J., Pennebaker, J. W. & Fox, C. (2003). Using new technology to assess the academic writing styles of male and female pairs and individuals. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 33(3), 243–61.
  • Hartley, J., Sotto, E. & Pennebaker, J, W. (2002). Style and substance in psychology: Are influential papers more readable than less influential ones? Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 321–34.
  • Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing. Routledge:USA and Canada Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Pearson Education Inc.:USA
  • Martin, M. (1997). Emotional and cognitive effects of examination proximity in female and male students. Oxford Review of Education, 23(4), 479–86.
  • Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R. & Niederhoffer, K. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–77.
  • Peterson, S. (2006). Influence of gender on writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.). Handbook of writing research (pp. 311–23). New York: Guilford.
  • Robson, J., Francis, B. & Read, B. (2002). Writes of passage: Stylistic features of male and female undergraduate history essays. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(4), 351–62.
  • Rude, S.S., Gortner, E-M. & Pennebaker, J. W. (2004). Language use of depressed anddepression-vulnerable college students. Cognition and Emotion, 18(8), 1121–33. Soler-Monreal, C; Carbonell-Olivares, M & Gil-Salom, L.(2011) A contrastive study of the rhetorical organization of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 4-17
  • Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Merve Geçikli This is me

Publication Date March 20, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Issue: 58

Cite

APA Geçikli, M. (2014). AKADEMİK BİR METNİN SÖYLEM DÜZENLEMİSİNE YÖNELİK ALGILARDA CİNSİYET FARKLILIKLARI ÜZERİNE NİCEL BİR ÇALIŞMA. EKEV Akademi Dergisi(58), 171-190.