Model analysis of daily magnetic flux density variations at the Ismayilli geostation

Azad Bayramov; Rauf Muradov; Nadirshah Khanbabayev; Lala Ibrahimova

doi:10.59849/2219-6641.2026.1.28

Model analysis of daily magnetic flux density variations at the Ismayilli geostation

Abstract

Abstract: In order to observe changes in the geomagnetic field strength (that is, magnetic induction - magnetic flux density) in 2025, 4 magnetometric variation stations (MVS) were operating in Azerbaijan – “Sheki”, “Ismayilli”, “Zagatala”, “Lankaran” and “Gusar”. The stations are equipped with American-made G-856 proton-type magnetometers and are equipped with internet connection facilities for initial analysis of the received data. The technical specifications of these stations are given using the example of the “Ismayilli” station. The daily average hourly and average daily magnetometric observation data from all MVS are recorded on the computer and transferred to the Magnetometry Department of the Seismological Service Center in Baku for analysis. The article shows the results of an experimental study of the daily variation of the magnetic flux density (magnetic induction) in the Imailla region of Azerbaijan. It was established that the magnitude of the magnetic induction decreases by 0.1% in the daytime between 12:00 and 16:00. This effect is related to the influence of the magnetic field created by the ionosphere, which increases during the day when the solar activity increases. A physical model of such an effect of solar activity is proposed, model calculations are performed.

Keywords

References

1. Bayramov, A.A., Hashimov, E.G., Nasibov, Y.A. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle applications for military GIS task solution: vol. 3, Book chapter 44 // Research Anthology on Reliability and Safety in Aviation Systems, Spacecraft, and Air Transport / Ed. D.B.A. Mehdi Khosrow-Pour. – USA : IGI-Global Publ, 2021. – Р. 1092–1115. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5357-2.ch044
2. Rzaev A.G., Yetirmishli G.D., Kazymova S.E. 2013. Reflection of the geodynamic regime in variations in geomagnetic field strength. ANAS Transactions. Earth Sciences, N4, p. 3-15.
3. Rzaev A.G., Isaeva M.I.2006 Magnetic properties and seismomagnetic effects of rocks in the Sheki-Shamakhi seismogenic zone. ANAS Transactions. Earth Sciences, №2. p. 38-41.
4. Rzaev A.G. Geology of Azerbaijan, volume IV, Tectonics, Baku, Publishing House "Nafta-Press", 2005, 506 p.
5. Rzaev A.G. et al., 2006 Relationship between anomalous changes in the geomagnetic field strength and seismotectonic processes in the Earth’s lithosphere ANAS Transactions. Earth Sciences, №3, p.58-63.
6. Evans, D. S.; Maynard, N. C.; Trøim, J.; Jacobsen, T.; Egeland, A. (1977). Auroral vector electric field and particle comparisons, 2, Electrodynamics of an arc". Journal of Geophysical Research. 82 (16): 2235–2249. doi:10.1029/JA082i016p02235.
7. Mishin V.М., Bazarzhapov А.D., Mishin V.V., Sukhbaatar U., M. Förster Events of 2 august 2002. 1. features of field-aligned currents of a substorm. Солнечно-земная физика. Вып. 17 (2011). С. 110–117.
8. Kopp M.I., Tur A.V., Yanovsky V.V. Nonlinear theory of dynamo. Nonlinear dynamics. 2015. Vol. 11. № 2. p. 241–266.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Seismology and Seismic Exploration, Geophysics (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Azad Bayramov ^*
Azerbaijan

Rauf Muradov This is me
Azerbaijan

Nadirshah Khanbabayev This is me
Azerbaijan

Lala Ibrahimova This is me
Azerbaijan

Publication Date

June 24, 2026

Submission Date

April 27, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 4, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 29 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.59849/2219-6641.2026.1.28

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA63JA64LE

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Bayramov, A., Muradov, R., Khanbabayev, N., & Ibrahimova, L. (2026). Model analysis of daily magnetic flux density variations at the Ismayilli geostation. Seismoprognosis Observations in the Territory of Azerbaijan, 29(1), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.59849/2219-6641.2026.1.28

AMA

1.Bayramov A, Muradov R, Khanbabayev N, Ibrahimova L. Model analysis of daily magnetic flux density variations at the Ismayilli geostation. Seismoprognosis Observations in the Territory of Azerbaijan. 2026;29(1):28-34. doi:10.59849/2219-6641.2026.1.28

Chicago

Bayramov, Azad, Rauf Muradov, Nadirshah Khanbabayev, and Lala Ibrahimova. 2026. “Model Analysis of Daily Magnetic Flux Density Variations at the Ismayilli Geostation”. Seismoprognosis Observations in the Territory of Azerbaijan 29 (1): 28-34. https://doi.org/10.59849/2219-6641.2026.1.28.

EndNote

Bayramov A, Muradov R, Khanbabayev N, Ibrahimova L (June 1, 2026) Model analysis of daily magnetic flux density variations at the Ismayilli geostation. Seismoprognosis Observations in the Territory of Azerbaijan 29 1 28–34.

IEEE

[1]A. Bayramov, R. Muradov, N. Khanbabayev, and L. Ibrahimova, “Model analysis of daily magnetic flux density variations at the Ismayilli geostation”, Seismoprognosis Observations in the Territory of Azerbaijan, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 28–34, June 2026, doi: 10.59849/2219-6641.2026.1.28.

ISNAD

Bayramov, Azad - Muradov, Rauf - Khanbabayev, Nadirshah - Ibrahimova, Lala. “Model Analysis of Daily Magnetic Flux Density Variations at the Ismayilli Geostation”. Seismoprognosis Observations in the Territory of Azerbaijan 29/1 (June 1, 2026): 28-34. https://doi.org/10.59849/2219-6641.2026.1.28.

JAMA

1.Bayramov A, Muradov R, Khanbabayev N, Ibrahimova L. Model analysis of daily magnetic flux density variations at the Ismayilli geostation. Seismoprognosis Observations in the Territory of Azerbaijan. 2026;29:28–34.

MLA

Bayramov, Azad, et al. “Model Analysis of Daily Magnetic Flux Density Variations at the Ismayilli Geostation”. Seismoprognosis Observations in the Territory of Azerbaijan, vol. 29, no. 1, June 2026, pp. 28-34, doi:10.59849/2219-6641.2026.1.28.

Vancouver

1.Azad Bayramov, Rauf Muradov, Nadirshah Khanbabayev, Lala Ibrahimova. Model analysis of daily magnetic flux density variations at the Ismayilli geostation. Seismoprognosis Observations in the Territory of Azerbaijan. 2026 Jun. 1;29(1):28-34. doi:10.59849/2219-6641.2026.1.28