DİJİTAL REFAH DEVLETLERİNİN İNSAN HAKLARI VE SOSYAL ADALET BAĞLAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: SOSYAL YARDIM VE HİZMETLERİN DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜMÜNDE ORTAYA ÇIKAN ETİK MESELELER

Öz

Bu çalışmada, dijital refah devletlerinin sosyal koruma sistemlerince planlanıp uygulanan sosyal yardım ve hizmetlerin dijitalleştirilmesinin ortaya çıkardığı sonuçlar, insan hakları bağlamında değerlendirilmektedir. Çalışmada, dijital refah devletlerinin ayırt edici özelliklerine değinildikten sonra, sosyal yardım ve hizmetlerin dijitalleştirilmesinin temelinde yatan finansal hedeflerin görünür kılınmasına çalışılmaktadır. Böylece, dijital refah devletlerinde insan haklarının korunması ve sosyal adaletin sağlanması idealinden, finansal hizmet sağlayıcısı kurumların yararı uğruna vazgeçilip geçilmediği sorusuna yanıt aranmaya çalışılmaktadır. Çalışmanın sonunda, çağımız bilgi toplumlarının içinde yer aldığı refah devletlerinin dijital dönüşümünün, sosyal yardım ve hizmetler aracılığıyla aşırı yoksulların dahi finansal hizmetlerle ilişkilendirilerek, finansal sermayenin korunmasına hizmet edecek türde bir dönüşüm olmaması, aksine Toplum 5.0 hedefleriyle örtüşen bir refah toplumunda her bir kişinin insan haklarının korunmasına ve en nihayetinde sosyal adaletin sağlanmasına katkı sunması gereğinin altı çizilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• dijital refah devleti
• sosyal koruma
• sosyal yardımlar
• sosyal hizmetler
• insan hakları ve sosyal adalet

EVALUATION OF DIGITAL WELFARE STATES IN THE CONTEXT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE: ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIAL ASSISTANCE AND SERVICES

Abstract

This study evaluates the consequences of the digitization of social assistance and services in the context of human rights, planned and implemented by the social protection systems of digital welfare states. After mentioning the special features of digital welfare states, the study tries to make visible the financial goals underlying the digitization of assistance and services. Thus, an answer is sought to the question of whether the ideal of protecting human rights and providing social justice in digital welfare states has been abandoned for the benefit of financial service providers. At the end of the study, it is emphasized that the digital transformation of the welfare states of today’s information societies should not be a transformation that serves to protect financial capital by connecting even the extreme poorest to financial services through social assistance and services. It is emphasized that this digital transformation should contribute to the protection of human rights and social justice for all in a welfare society that is aligned with the goals of Society 5.0.

Keywords

• digital welfare state
• social protection
• social assistance
• social services
• human rights and social justice

Kaynakça

1. Alston, P. (2017) “Statement on Visit to the USA, by Professor Philip Alston, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights”, https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=22533, indirilme tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019.
2. Alston, P. (2019) Extreme Poverty and Human Rights: Note/by the Secretary-general, Washington DC: United Nations General Assembly.
3. Alston, P. (2020) “What the ‘Digital Welfare State’ Really Means for Human Rights”, https://www.openglobalrights.org/digital-welfare-state-and-what-it-means-for-human-rights/, indirilme tarihi: 08 Ocak 2020.
4. Barca, V., ve R. Chirchir (2019) Building an Integrated and Digital Social Protection Information System, Bonn: GIZ/DFID.
5. Baur-Yazbeck, S. (2019) “A New Generation of Government-to-Person Payments is Emerging”, https://www.cgap.org/blog/new-generation-government-person-payments-emerging, indirilme tarihi: 01 Ekim 2020.
6. Baur-Yazbeck, S., G. Chen, ve J. Roest (2019a) The Future of G2P Payments: Expanding Customer Choice, Washington DC: CGAP.
7. Baur-Yazbeck, S., C. Kilfoil, ve I. Botea (2019b) The Future of G2P Payments: Expanding Customer Choice in Zambia, Washington DC: World Bank Group & CGAP.
8. Bekker, S. (2020) “Digital Welfare States: Boundaries and Opportunities”, https://socialeurope.eu/digital-welfare-states-boundaries-and-opportunities, indirilme tarihi: 21 Haziran 2021.

9. BTK (Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu Sektörel Araştırma ve Strateji Geliştirme Dairesi) (t.y.) Toplum 5.0, https://www.btk.gov.tr/uploads/pages/arastirma-raporlari/toplum-5-0-arastirma-raporu.pdf, indirilme tarihi: 03 Haziran 2021.
10. Büyükgöze, S., ve E. Dereli (2019) “Toplum 5.0 ve Dijital Sağlık” VI. Uluslararası Bilimsel ve Mesleki Çalışmalar Kongresi’nde sunulmuş bildiri, Ankara, 07-11 Kasım.
11. Carter, B., K. Roelen, S. Enfield, S., ve W. Avis (2019) Social Protection Topic Guide, K4D Emerging Issues Report, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
12. CGAP (Consultative Group to Assist the Poor) (2021) “About CGAP”, https://www.cgap.org/about, indirilme tarihi: 01 Temmuz 2021.
13. Dominelli, L. (2021) “A Green Social Work Perspective on Social Work during the Time of COVID‐19”, International Journal of Social Welfare, 30, 1, 7-16.
14. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2017) FAO’s Social Protection Framework: Enhancing Food Security, Nutrition and Rural Development Outcomes for All, Rome: FAO.
15. Frey, C. B., ve M. A. Osborne (2017) “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation?”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280.
16. From, D. M. (2015) “With a Little Help From a… Machine. Digital Welfare Technology and Sustainable Human Welfare”, The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 14, 2, 52-64.
17. Gentilini, Ugo et al. (2021) “Social protection and jobs responses to COVID-19”, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/281531621024684216/pdf/Social-Protection-and-Jobs-Responses-to-COVID-19-A-Real-Time-Review-of-Country-Measures-May-14-2021.pdf, indirilme tarihi: 14 Haziran 2021.
18. Gonzalez Vazquez, I. (2019) The Changing Nature of Work and Skills In the Digital Age, Paris: OECD. Hare, A., ve N. Parekh (2020) “Should Government Payments Be Digitized?”, https://www.povertyactionlab.org/blog/10-13-20/should-government-payments-be-digitized, indirilme tarihi: 13 Haziran 2021.
19. Immervol, H., D. MacDonald, E. Rovenskaya, ve L. Ilmola (2020) “Social Protection in the Face of Digitalisation and Labour Market Transformations”, Hynes, W., M. Lees ve J. Müller (der.), Systemic Thinking for Policy Making: The Potential of Systems Analysis for Addressing Global Policy Challenges in the 21st Century içinde, Paris: OECD.
20. Keidanren (2018) Society 5.0: Co-Creating the Future, Tokyo: Keidanren.
21. Kuçuradi, İ. (2007) İnsan Hakları Kavramları ve Sorunları, Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu.
22. McCully, J. (2020) “What is the Digital Welfare State?”, https://digitalfreedomfund.org/explainer-what-is-the-digital-welfare-state/, indirilme tarihi: 15 Eylül 2021.
23. McIntyre, N., ve D. Pegg (2018) “Councils Use 377,000 People’s Data in Efforts to Predict Child Abuse”, https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/sep/16/councils-use-377000-peoples-data-in-efforts-to-predict-child-abuse, indirilme tarihi: 16 Eylül 2019.
24. Nedelkoska, L., ve G. Quintini (2018) Automation, Skills Use and Training, Paris: OECD.
25. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation) (2019) OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work, Paris: OECD.
26. Pasi, G., ve G. Misuraca (2020) “Welfare 2.0: Future Scenarios of Social Protection Systems in the Digital Age”, Policy Design and Practice, 3, 2, 163-176.
27. Pegg, D., ve N. McIntyre (2018) “Child Abuse Algorithms: From Science Fiction to Cost-cutting Reality”, https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/sep/16/child-abuse-algorithms-from-science-fiction-to-cost-cutting-reality, indirilme tarihi: 16 Eylül 2019.
28. Perron, B., H. O. Taylor, J. E. Glass, ve J. Margerum-Leys (2010) “Information and Communication Technologies in Social Work”, Advances in Social Work, 11, 2, 67-81.
29. Ratcliffe, R. (2019) “How a Glitch in India’s Biometric Welfare System Can Be Lethal”, http://www.richardhartley.com/2019/10/how-a-glitch-in-indias-biometric-welfare-system-can-lead-to-starvation/, indirilme tarihi: 16 Eylül 2020.
30. Reamer, F. G. (2013) “Social Work in a Digital Age: Ethical and Risk Management Challenges”, Social Work, 58, 2, 163-172.
31. Rutkowski, M., A. G. Mora, G. L. Bull, B. Guermazi, ve C. Grown (2020) “Responding to Crisis with Digital Payments for Social Protection: Short-Term Measures with Long-Term Benefits”, https://blogs.worldbank.org/voices/responding-crisis-digital-payments-social-protection-short-term-measures-long-term-benefits, indirilme tarihi: 16 Eylül 2021.
32. Stuart, G. (2016) Government to Person Transfers: On-Ramp to Financial Inclusion?, Washington DC: Center for Financial Inclusion.
33. Svensson, L. (2019) “Automatisering–Till Nytta Eller Fördärv?”, Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 26, 3-4, 341-362.
34. UN (United Nations) (2019) “Extreme Poverty and Digital Welfare: New Report from UN Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty Raises Alarm about the Rise of a Digital Welfare Dystopia”, https://www.apc.org/en/news/extreme-poverty-and-digital-welfare-new-report-un-special-rapporteur-extreme-poverty-raises, indirilme tarihi: 25 Kasım 2020.
35. UNCDF (United Nations Capital Development Fund) (2017) “Government-to-Person (G2P) Payments”, https://www.uncdf.org/article/631/government-to-person-g2p-payments-migration, indirilme tarihi: 25 Kasım 2020.
36. Wong, Y. C., J. Y. C. Fung, C. K. Law, J. C. Y. Lam, ve V. W. P. Lee (2009) “Tackling the Digital Divide”, British Journal of Social Work, 39, 4, 754-767.
37. World Bank (2021) “G2PX: Digitizing Government-To-Person Payments”, https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/g2px, indirilme tarihi: 01 Temmuz 2021.
38. World Bank Group (2018) Integrating Financial Capability into Government Cash Transfer Programs. Washington DC: World Bank.
39. Zimmerman, J. M., M. A. May, E. Kellison, ve J. Klugman (2020) Digital Cash Transfers in the Time of Covid-19: Opportunities and Considerations for Women’s Inclusion and Empowerment.  Washington DC: World Bank Group.
40. Zhu, H., ve S. T. Andersen (2020) “ICT-Mediated Social Work Practice and Innovation: Professionals’ Experiences in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration”, Nordic Social Work Research.
41. Zhu, H., ve S. T. Andersen (2021) “Digital Competence In Social Work Practice And Education: Experiences From Norway”, Nordic Social Work Research.