Introduction: Book Symposium on ‘How the West Came to Rule’: Why the Disavowal of Eurocentrism is Insufficient

Abstract

   

Keywords

• Eurocentricism,Historical Sociology,International Relations Theory

References

1. Anievas, Alexander and Kerem Nı̇şancioğlu. How the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism. London: Verso, 2015.
2. Bhambra, Gurminder K. Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
3. Bhambra, Gurminder K. “Talking among Themselves? Weberian and Marxist Historical Sociologies as Dialogues without ‘Others’”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 2011, 39 (3): 667-681
4. Bhambra, Gurminder K. Connected Sociologies. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014
5. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
6. Dirlik, Arif. “Global Modernity? Modernity in an Age of Global Capitalism”, European Journal of Social Theory, 2003, 6(3): 275-92.
7. Hall, Stuart. “The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power” in Stuart Hall and Brian Gieben (eds.) Formations of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press/ Open University, 1992
8. Shilliam, Robbie. “The Atlantic as a Vector of Uneven and Combined Development”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 2, 2009, no. 1: 69-88.

9. Shilliam, Robbie (ed.). International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity. London: Routledge, 2010.
10. Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. ‘Connected Histories: Notes towards a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia,’ Modern Asian Studies, 1997, 31 (3): 735-62.