Research Article

A Cultural Political Economy of Financial Imaginaries: the (Re-)Making of ‘BRIC’ and the Case of China

Volume: 7 Number: 1 May 11, 2015
  • Ngai--ling Sum *
EN

A Cultural Political Economy of Financial Imaginaries: the (Re-)Making of ‘BRIC’ and the Case of China

Abstract

This article explores the role of economic/financial imaginaries (e.g., BRIC) from a cultural political economy (CPE) perspective. It is divided into four parts. Part one identifies some key questions from a CPE entry-point regarding the construction of economic imaginaries. Part two examines the role of (trans-)national forces in making and remaking the ‘BRIC’ (Brazil, Russia, India and China) as a ‘growth’ and ‘hope’ object over three overlapping stages. It notes that the national and transnational resonance of the BRIC imaginaries depends not only on developments in the financial and real economies but also on specific discourses, practices, and knowledge technologies. Part three examines how the ‘BRIC’ discourses are recontextualized in the Sinophone world as ‘four golden brick countries’ to signify ‘strength’ and ‘greatest at last’. Part four investigates how China, as one of the ‘golden bricks’, was eager to showcase its strength following the 2007 financial crisis, which led to a fall in China’s exports and rise in unemployment.. It promoted a vast stimulus package that has posed tremendous fiscal challenges, especially to its regional-local authorities, which increasingly rely on land as collateral for loans and source of revenue. This intensified land-based accumulation, inflating the ‘property bubble’ and stimulating land clearance/dispossession. In turn this has had very uneven effects on the ‘subaltern south’, illustrated here through impact on the aspirant middle class and migrant workers’ children. Though some measures have been taken to dampen the property market, they have been rather limited and social unrest continues. Part five ends with some comments on the contribution of the cultural political economy approach in understanding the role of ‘BRIC’ as well as other new acronyms such as ‘MINT’ and ‘MIST’ as economic imaginaries.

Keywords

References

  1. Åslund, A. (2013) Now the Brics Party is Over, They must Wind Down the State’s Role, Financial Times, 27 August. Available at http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0147b43c-040b11e3-8aab00144feab7de.html#axzz2slbmgNbH, accessed 08 February 2014.
  2. Buchanan, M. (2009) Decoupling is Happening for Real, 10 July 2009 http://www.chartwelletfadvisor.com/etf-newsletters/vol06-iss096.pdf, accessed on 21 February 2013.
  3. Business Week (2010) China Construction Bank 2009 Profit Up 15 Percent, 28 March, http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9EO1OQ00.htm, accessed on 08 February 2014.
  4. China Daily (2010) China’s Land Sales Revenue Close to $ 233 bln in 2009, 2 February http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-02/02/content_9417378.htm, accessed on 1 March 2013.
  5. Cruikshank, B. (1999) The Will to Empower, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  6. Drezner, Daniel J. (2009) BRIC-a-brac, http://drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/06/17/bric-a-brac, accessed on 08 February 2014.
  7. Dean, M. (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  8. Evans-Pritchard, A. (2011) Goldman Sachs Shuns the BRIC for Wall Street, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/8265175/Goldman-Sachs-shuns-theBRICs-for-Wall-Street.html, accessed 08 February 2014.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ngai--ling Sum * This is me

Publication Date

May 11, 2015

Submission Date

April 10, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2015 Volume: 7 Number: 1

APA
Sum, N.-- ling. (2015). A Cultural Political Economy of Financial Imaginaries: the (Re-)Making of ‘BRIC’ and the Case of China. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies, 7(1), 41-61. https://izlik.org/JA54LH67KW
AMA
1.Sum N ling. A Cultural Political Economy of Financial Imaginaries: the (Re-)Making of ‘BRIC’ and the Case of China. Spectrum. 2015;7(1):41-61. https://izlik.org/JA54LH67KW
Chicago
Sum, Ngai--ling. 2015. “A Cultural Political Economy of Financial Imaginaries: The (Re-)Making of ‘BRIC’ and the Case of China”. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies 7 (1): 41-61. https://izlik.org/JA54LH67KW.
EndNote
Sum N-- ling (May 1, 2015) A Cultural Political Economy of Financial Imaginaries: the (Re-)Making of ‘BRIC’ and the Case of China. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies 7 1 41–61.
IEEE
[1]N.-- ling Sum, “A Cultural Political Economy of Financial Imaginaries: the (Re-)Making of ‘BRIC’ and the Case of China”, Spectrum, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 41–61, May 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA54LH67KW
ISNAD
Sum, Ngai--ling. “A Cultural Political Economy of Financial Imaginaries: The (Re-)Making of ‘BRIC’ and the Case of China”. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies 7/1 (May 1, 2015): 41-61. https://izlik.org/JA54LH67KW.
JAMA
1.Sum N-- ling. A Cultural Political Economy of Financial Imaginaries: the (Re-)Making of ‘BRIC’ and the Case of China. Spectrum. 2015;7:41–61.
MLA
Sum, Ngai--ling. “A Cultural Political Economy of Financial Imaginaries: The (Re-)Making of ‘BRIC’ and the Case of China”. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, May 2015, pp. 41-61, https://izlik.org/JA54LH67KW.
Vancouver
1.Ngai--ling Sum. A Cultural Political Economy of Financial Imaginaries: the (Re-)Making of ‘BRIC’ and the Case of China. Spectrum [Internet]. 2015 May 1;7(1):41-6. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA54LH67KW