A Cultural Political Economy of Financial Imaginaries: the (Re-)Making of ‘BRIC’ and the Case of China
Abstract
This article explores the role of economic/financial imaginaries (e.g., BRIC) from a cultural
political economy (CPE) perspective. It is divided into four parts. Part one identifies some key
questions from a CPE entry-point regarding the construction of economic imaginaries. Part
two examines the role of (trans-)national forces in making and remaking the ‘BRIC’ (Brazil,
Russia, India and China) as a ‘growth’ and ‘hope’ object over three overlapping stages. It
notes that the national and transnational resonance of the BRIC imaginaries depends not only
on developments in the financial and real economies but also on specific discourses, practices,
and knowledge technologies. Part three examines how the ‘BRIC’ discourses are
recontextualized in the Sinophone world as ‘four golden brick countries’ to signify ‘strength’
and ‘greatest at last’. Part four investigates how China, as one of the ‘golden bricks’, was
eager to showcase its strength following the 2007 financial crisis, which led to a fall in China’s
exports and rise in unemployment.. It promoted a vast stimulus package that has posed
tremendous fiscal challenges, especially to its regional-local authorities, which increasingly
rely on land as collateral for loans and source of revenue. This intensified land-based
accumulation, inflating the ‘property bubble’ and stimulating land clearance/dispossession. In
turn this has had very uneven effects on the ‘subaltern south’, illustrated here through impact
on the aspirant middle class and migrant workers’ children. Though some measures have
been taken to dampen the property market, they have been rather limited and social unrest
continues. Part five ends with some comments on the contribution of the cultural political
economy approach in understanding the role of ‘BRIC’ as well as other new acronyms such as
‘MINT’ and ‘MIST’ as economic imaginaries.
Keywords
References
- Åslund, A. (2013) Now the Brics Party is Over, They must Wind Down the State’s Role, Financial Times, 27 August. Available at http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0147b43c-040b11e3-8aab00144feab7de.html#axzz2slbmgNbH, accessed 08 February 2014.
- Buchanan, M. (2009) Decoupling is Happening for Real, 10 July 2009 http://www.chartwelletfadvisor.com/etf-newsletters/vol06-iss096.pdf, accessed on 21 February 2013.
- Business Week (2010) China Construction Bank 2009 Profit Up 15 Percent, 28 March, http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9EO1OQ00.htm, accessed on 08 February 2014.
- China Daily (2010) China’s Land Sales Revenue Close to $ 233 bln in 2009, 2 February http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-02/02/content_9417378.htm, accessed on 1 March 2013.
- Cruikshank, B. (1999) The Will to Empower, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Drezner, Daniel J. (2009) BRIC-a-brac, http://drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/06/17/bric-a-brac, accessed on 08 February 2014.
- Dean, M. (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Evans-Pritchard, A. (2011) Goldman Sachs Shuns the BRIC for Wall Street, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/8265175/Goldman-Sachs-shuns-theBRICs-for-Wall-Street.html, accessed 08 February 2014.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Ngai--ling Sum
*
This is me
Publication Date
May 11, 2015
Submission Date
April 10, 2015
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2015 Volume: 7 Number: 1