Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2024, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 321 - 338, 01.10.2024
https://doi.org/10.37898/spiritualpc.1453742

Abstract

References

  • Acar, T. (2014). Validity evidence in scale development: the application of cross-validation and classification-sequencing validation. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(3), 973-976.
  • Aslan, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: nicel, nitel ve karma tasarımlar için bir rehber. Eğitim Yayınevi.
  • Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77–85.
  • Beattie, J., Hall, H., Biro, M. A., East, C., & Lau, R. (2017). Effects of mindfulness on maternal stress, depressive symptoms and awareness of present moment experience: a pilot randomized trial. Midwifery, 50, 174-183.
  • Bohlmeijer, E., Ten Klooster, P. M., Fledderus, M., Veehof, M., & Baer, R. (2011). Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment, 18(3), 308-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111408231
  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.
  • Browne, M. W. (1993). Testing structural equation models. (No Title), 136.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve uygulamada eğitim yönetimi, 32(32), 470-483.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Atıf İndeksi.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with mplus: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
  • Cerny, B. A., & Kaiser, H. F. (1977). A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12(1), 43-47.
  • Çapik, A., & Pasinlioglu, T. (2015). Validity and reliability study of the tilburg pregnancy distress scale into Turkish. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(4), 260-269.
  • Çapık, C., Gözüm, S., & Aksayan, S. (2018). Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlama aşamaları, dil ve kültür uyarlaması: güncellenmiş rehber. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 26(3), 199-210.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: spss ve lisrel uygulamaları (vol. 2). Pegem Akademi.
  • Davidson, R. J., Kabat-Zinn, J., Schumacher, J., Rosenkranz, M., Muller, D., Santorelli, S. F., Urbanowski, F., Harrington, A., Bonus, K., & Sheridan, J. F. (2003). Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(4), 564-570.
  • de Bruin, E. I., Topper, M., Muskens, J. G., Bögels, S. M., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2012). Psychometric properties of the five facets mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ) in a meditating and a non-meditating sample. Assessment, 19(2), 187-197.
  • DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy, S. M., & Kostas‐Polston, E. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 155-164.
  • Dimidjian, S., Goodman, S. H., Felder, J. N., Gallop, R., Brown, A. P., & Beck, A. (2015). An open trial of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for the prevention of perinatal depressive relapse/recurrence. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 18, 85-94.
  • Dimidjian, S., Goodman, S. H., Felder, J. N., Gallop, R., Brown, A. P., & Beck, A. (2016). Staying well during pregnancy and the postpartum: a pilot randomized trial of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for the prevention of depressive relapse/recurrence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(2), 134.
  • Dunn, C., Hanieh, E., Roberts, R., & Powrie, R. (2012). Mindful pregnancy and childbirth: effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on women’s psychological distress and well-being in the perinatal period. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 15, 139-143.
  • Erdoğan, S., Nahcivan, N., & Esin, M. N. (2015). Hemşirelikte araştırma: süreç, uygulama ve kritik. Nobel Tıp Kitabevi.
  • Erefe, İ. (2002). Veri toplama araçlarının niteliği. Hemşirelikte araştırma ilke süreç ve yöntemleri, 133-138. Odak Ofset.
  • Eyles, C., Leydon, G. M., Hoffman, C. J., Copson, E. R., Prescott, P., Chorozoglou, M., & Lewith, G. (2015). Mindfulness for the self-management of fatigue, anxiety, and depression in women with metastatic breast cancer: a mixed methods feasibility study. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 14(1), 42-56.
  • Gözüm, S. (2003). A guide for transcultural adaptation of the scale II: psychometric characteristics and cross‐cultural comparison. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 5, 3.
  • Guardino, C. M., Dunkel Schetter, C., Bower, J. E., Lu, M. C., & Smalley, S. L. (2014). Randomized controlled pilot trial of mindfulness training for stress reduction during pregnancy. Psychology & Health, 29(3), 334-349.
  • Hair, J., Andreson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. 5th (ed) Prentice-Hall Inc. Unites States of America.
  • Hair, J. F., Gabriel, M., & Patel, V. (2014). Amos covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2).
  • Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Kabat-Zinn, J., & Hanh, T. N. (2009). Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. Delta.
  • Karakoç, A. G. D. F. Y., & Dönmez, L. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında temel ilkeler. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 13(40), 39-49.
  • Kartal, M., & Bardakçı, S. (2018). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı örneklerle güvenirlik ve geçerlik analizleri. Akademisyen Kitabevi.
  • Li, C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936-949.
  • Matvienko-Sikar, K., & Dockray, S. (2017). Effects of a novel positive psychological intervention on prenatal stress and well-being: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Women and Birth, 30(2), e111-e118.
  • Meleis, A. I. (2010). Transitions theory: middle range and situation specific theories in nursing research and practice. Springer Publishing Company.
  • Meydan, C., & Sesen, H. (2011). Structural equation modeling AMOS applications. Detay Publishing.
  • Muthukrishnan, S., Jain, R., Kohli, S., & Batra, S. (2016). Effect of mindfulness meditation on perceived stress scores and autonomic function tests of pregnant Indian women. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 10(4), CC05.
  • Pop, V. J., Pommer, A. M., Pop-Purceleanu, M., Wijnen, H. A., Bergink, V., & Pouwer, F. (2011). Development of the Tilburg pregnancy distress scale: the TPDS. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 11(1), 1-8.
  • Rencher, A. C. (2002). Methods of multivariate analysis, 2nd ed., A John Wiley & Sons. New York.
  • Subaşı, H. E., Can, Ö., Cetin, H., Temiz, H. E., & Şimşek, E. E. (2021). Gebelikteki riskli durumlara ilişkin farkındalık ve bilgi düzeyi üzerine bir çalışma: gebe okulları etkin bir yol olabilir mi? Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 15(3), 434-442.
  • Taşkın, L. (2019). Doğum ve kadın sağlığı hemşireliği. Akademisyen Kitabevi.
  • Topuz, S., Ülger, Ö., Yakut, Y., & Gül Şener, F. (2011). Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the trinity amputation and prosthetic experience scales (TAPES) in lower limb amputees. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 35(2), 201-206.
  • Truijens, S. E., Nyklíček, I., van Son, J., & Pop, V. J. (2016). Validation of a short form three facet mindfulness questionnaire (TFMQ-SF) in pregnant women. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 118-124.
  • Van de Vijver, F., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: an overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54(2), 119-135.
  • Vieten, C., & Astin, J. (2008). Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention during pregnancy on prenatal stress and mood: results of a pilot study. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 11, 67-74.
  • Vieten, C., Laraia, B. A., Kristeller, J., Adler, N., Coleman-Phox, K., Bush, N. R., Wahbeh, H., Duncan, L. G., & Epel, E. (2018). The mindful moms training: development of a mindfulness-based intervention to reduce stress and overeating during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1757-6
  • Westen, D., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Quantifying construct validity: two simple measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 608.
  • Yazdanimehr, R., Omidi, A., Sadat, Z., & Akbari, H. (2016). The effect of mindfulness-integrated cognitive behavior therapy on depression and anxiety among pregnant women: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Caring Sciences, 5(3), 195.
  • Yüksel, A., Dabanlı, Z., & Yılmaz, B. (2020). Gebelerde bilinçli farkındalık ile depresyon, anksiyete ve stres düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi. JAREN, 6(2), 195-202. https://doi.org/0.5222/jaren.2020.55707

Validation of A Short Form Three Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (TFMQ-SF) in Pregnant Women

Year 2024, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 321 - 338, 01.10.2024
https://doi.org/10.37898/spiritualpc.1453742

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to adapt the Three Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form (TFMQ-SF) into Turkish.
Method: The sample of the methodological study consisted of 302 pregnant women. The data of the study were collected between May and August 2022 by using the Personal Information Form, TFMQ-SF and Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale. There are 12 items in the TFMQ-SF. Validity analysis of the data; content validity index, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis were performed with Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient. Ethics committee permission was obtained.
Results and Conclusion: The content validity index of the scale was found to be 0.93. As a result of Confirmatory Factor Analysis, x2: 1178,445 (degrees of freedom: 66), x2/df: 2.407 and RMSEA: 0.068 were found and the model indicated a good/excellent fit. The item means of the scale ranged between 2.34±1.20 and 2.99±1.15, the item factor-loads ranged between. 59-.82, and the effect of the scale items on the sub-dimension was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05).The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was found to be .84. These results showed that the TFMQ-SF is a valid and reliable measurement tool.
Keywords: pregnancy, mindfulness, nursing, validation, reliability

References

  • Acar, T. (2014). Validity evidence in scale development: the application of cross-validation and classification-sequencing validation. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(3), 973-976.
  • Aslan, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: nicel, nitel ve karma tasarımlar için bir rehber. Eğitim Yayınevi.
  • Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77–85.
  • Beattie, J., Hall, H., Biro, M. A., East, C., & Lau, R. (2017). Effects of mindfulness on maternal stress, depressive symptoms and awareness of present moment experience: a pilot randomized trial. Midwifery, 50, 174-183.
  • Bohlmeijer, E., Ten Klooster, P. M., Fledderus, M., Veehof, M., & Baer, R. (2011). Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment, 18(3), 308-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111408231
  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.
  • Browne, M. W. (1993). Testing structural equation models. (No Title), 136.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve uygulamada eğitim yönetimi, 32(32), 470-483.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Atıf İndeksi.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with mplus: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
  • Cerny, B. A., & Kaiser, H. F. (1977). A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12(1), 43-47.
  • Çapik, A., & Pasinlioglu, T. (2015). Validity and reliability study of the tilburg pregnancy distress scale into Turkish. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(4), 260-269.
  • Çapık, C., Gözüm, S., & Aksayan, S. (2018). Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlama aşamaları, dil ve kültür uyarlaması: güncellenmiş rehber. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 26(3), 199-210.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: spss ve lisrel uygulamaları (vol. 2). Pegem Akademi.
  • Davidson, R. J., Kabat-Zinn, J., Schumacher, J., Rosenkranz, M., Muller, D., Santorelli, S. F., Urbanowski, F., Harrington, A., Bonus, K., & Sheridan, J. F. (2003). Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(4), 564-570.
  • de Bruin, E. I., Topper, M., Muskens, J. G., Bögels, S. M., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2012). Psychometric properties of the five facets mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ) in a meditating and a non-meditating sample. Assessment, 19(2), 187-197.
  • DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy, S. M., & Kostas‐Polston, E. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 155-164.
  • Dimidjian, S., Goodman, S. H., Felder, J. N., Gallop, R., Brown, A. P., & Beck, A. (2015). An open trial of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for the prevention of perinatal depressive relapse/recurrence. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 18, 85-94.
  • Dimidjian, S., Goodman, S. H., Felder, J. N., Gallop, R., Brown, A. P., & Beck, A. (2016). Staying well during pregnancy and the postpartum: a pilot randomized trial of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for the prevention of depressive relapse/recurrence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(2), 134.
  • Dunn, C., Hanieh, E., Roberts, R., & Powrie, R. (2012). Mindful pregnancy and childbirth: effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on women’s psychological distress and well-being in the perinatal period. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 15, 139-143.
  • Erdoğan, S., Nahcivan, N., & Esin, M. N. (2015). Hemşirelikte araştırma: süreç, uygulama ve kritik. Nobel Tıp Kitabevi.
  • Erefe, İ. (2002). Veri toplama araçlarının niteliği. Hemşirelikte araştırma ilke süreç ve yöntemleri, 133-138. Odak Ofset.
  • Eyles, C., Leydon, G. M., Hoffman, C. J., Copson, E. R., Prescott, P., Chorozoglou, M., & Lewith, G. (2015). Mindfulness for the self-management of fatigue, anxiety, and depression in women with metastatic breast cancer: a mixed methods feasibility study. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 14(1), 42-56.
  • Gözüm, S. (2003). A guide for transcultural adaptation of the scale II: psychometric characteristics and cross‐cultural comparison. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 5, 3.
  • Guardino, C. M., Dunkel Schetter, C., Bower, J. E., Lu, M. C., & Smalley, S. L. (2014). Randomized controlled pilot trial of mindfulness training for stress reduction during pregnancy. Psychology & Health, 29(3), 334-349.
  • Hair, J., Andreson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. 5th (ed) Prentice-Hall Inc. Unites States of America.
  • Hair, J. F., Gabriel, M., & Patel, V. (2014). Amos covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2).
  • Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Kabat-Zinn, J., & Hanh, T. N. (2009). Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. Delta.
  • Karakoç, A. G. D. F. Y., & Dönmez, L. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında temel ilkeler. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 13(40), 39-49.
  • Kartal, M., & Bardakçı, S. (2018). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı örneklerle güvenirlik ve geçerlik analizleri. Akademisyen Kitabevi.
  • Li, C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936-949.
  • Matvienko-Sikar, K., & Dockray, S. (2017). Effects of a novel positive psychological intervention on prenatal stress and well-being: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Women and Birth, 30(2), e111-e118.
  • Meleis, A. I. (2010). Transitions theory: middle range and situation specific theories in nursing research and practice. Springer Publishing Company.
  • Meydan, C., & Sesen, H. (2011). Structural equation modeling AMOS applications. Detay Publishing.
  • Muthukrishnan, S., Jain, R., Kohli, S., & Batra, S. (2016). Effect of mindfulness meditation on perceived stress scores and autonomic function tests of pregnant Indian women. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 10(4), CC05.
  • Pop, V. J., Pommer, A. M., Pop-Purceleanu, M., Wijnen, H. A., Bergink, V., & Pouwer, F. (2011). Development of the Tilburg pregnancy distress scale: the TPDS. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 11(1), 1-8.
  • Rencher, A. C. (2002). Methods of multivariate analysis, 2nd ed., A John Wiley & Sons. New York.
  • Subaşı, H. E., Can, Ö., Cetin, H., Temiz, H. E., & Şimşek, E. E. (2021). Gebelikteki riskli durumlara ilişkin farkındalık ve bilgi düzeyi üzerine bir çalışma: gebe okulları etkin bir yol olabilir mi? Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 15(3), 434-442.
  • Taşkın, L. (2019). Doğum ve kadın sağlığı hemşireliği. Akademisyen Kitabevi.
  • Topuz, S., Ülger, Ö., Yakut, Y., & Gül Şener, F. (2011). Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the trinity amputation and prosthetic experience scales (TAPES) in lower limb amputees. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 35(2), 201-206.
  • Truijens, S. E., Nyklíček, I., van Son, J., & Pop, V. J. (2016). Validation of a short form three facet mindfulness questionnaire (TFMQ-SF) in pregnant women. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 118-124.
  • Van de Vijver, F., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: an overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54(2), 119-135.
  • Vieten, C., & Astin, J. (2008). Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention during pregnancy on prenatal stress and mood: results of a pilot study. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 11, 67-74.
  • Vieten, C., Laraia, B. A., Kristeller, J., Adler, N., Coleman-Phox, K., Bush, N. R., Wahbeh, H., Duncan, L. G., & Epel, E. (2018). The mindful moms training: development of a mindfulness-based intervention to reduce stress and overeating during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1757-6
  • Westen, D., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Quantifying construct validity: two simple measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 608.
  • Yazdanimehr, R., Omidi, A., Sadat, Z., & Akbari, H. (2016). The effect of mindfulness-integrated cognitive behavior therapy on depression and anxiety among pregnant women: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Caring Sciences, 5(3), 195.
  • Yüksel, A., Dabanlı, Z., & Yılmaz, B. (2020). Gebelerde bilinçli farkındalık ile depresyon, anksiyete ve stres düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi. JAREN, 6(2), 195-202. https://doi.org/0.5222/jaren.2020.55707
There are 48 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Social and Personality Psychology (Other)
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hafize Dağ Tüzmen

Kamile Altuntuğ 0000-0002-0215-6143

Publication Date October 1, 2024
Submission Date March 16, 2024
Acceptance Date August 27, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 9 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Dağ Tüzmen, H., & Altuntuğ, K. (2024). Validation of A Short Form Three Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (TFMQ-SF) in Pregnant Women. Spiritual Psychology and Counseling, 9(3), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.37898/spiritualpc.1453742