Review
BibTex RIS Cite

A New Outdoor Learning Geodesic Dome School Design

Year 2022, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 3 - 8, 30.06.2022

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to ensure that out-of-school learning environments for a sustainable environmental education in our world, which is under the threat of global warming, are started to be implemented in science and mathematics disciplines as of pre-school period, apart from primary, secondary and high school levels. The procedures for obtaining permission for school managers and teachers, high operating costs, seen as dangerous and a waste of time for parents are the problems of reaching out-of-school learning environments. In order to eliminate these problems, a school model was designed, which is located in the school garden, with an architecture in the form of an atomic model and included workshops created as a geodesic dome.

References

  • Akilli M., Seven S. (2014). “The effect of 3D computer models on academic achievement and spatial animation: Atom models” (Turkish Journal of Education).
  • Atar B. (2017). “The Journey of Our Food Wheat from the Past to the Future” (Süleyman Demirel University Yalvaç Academy Journal 2 (1) : 1-12, 2017).
  • Ateş, A. (2009). Landing vehicles to the sky: Planetariums. NTV Science, 7, 106-115.
  • Balkan Kıyıcı, F. & Atabek Yiğit, E. (2010). Science education beyond the classroom: A field trip to wind power plant. (International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 2(1), 225-243.)
  • Bakioglu, B. & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2014). Outdoor science education: Technical visit to a dialysis center, (Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 3(2), 15-26.)
  • Baxter, JM & Preece, PFW (2000). A comparison of dome and computer planetaria in the teaching of astronomy. Research in Science and Technological Education, 18(1), (63-69.)
  • Bishop, J.E. (2003). Pre-college astronomy education in the United States in the twentieth century. In Heck A. (Eds), Information Handling in Astronomy – Historical Vistas (pp.207-231.)
  • Braund, M. & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International (Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373-1388.)
  • Carrier, SJ (2009).The effects of outdoor science lessons with elementary school students on preservice teachersself-efficacy. (Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 35-48.)
  • Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Bozdogan, AE (2007). The place and importance of science and technology museums in science teaching. (PhD thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara).
  • Ertaş, H., Şen, A.İ., andparmaksızoğlu, A. (2011). The effect of out-of-school scientific activities on the level of associating energy with daily life of 9th grade students. (Necatibey Education Faculty Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 178-198.)
  • Erten Z., Taşçi G.(2016) “Developing Out-of-School Learning Environments Activities for Science Lesson and Evaluation of the Effects of Students on Scientific Process Skills” (Erzincan University Journal of Education Vol - Issue: 18 - 2 Year: 2016).
  • Gursoy G. (2018). “Out-of-school Learning Environments in Science Teaching” (Turkish Studies Educational Sciences).
  • Kubat U. (2018). “The Opinions of Science Teacher Candidates About Out-of-School Learning Environments (Mehmet Akif University Journal of Education Faculty).
  • Odabaş E, Günbey B.(2020) “The Silkworm’s Journey in the World and Anatolia” (Journal of Animal Sciences and Products).
  • Saraç H. (2017). “ Research on Out-of-School Learning Environments in Turkey : Content Analysis Study. (Journal of Educational Theory and Practice Research).
  • Sever R, Yalçınkaya E. (2018) .Environmental Education. Pegem Academy (Page 166).
  • Sontay, G & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2017). An Investigation of Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding Travel Organizing. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education. 32(4): 863-879.
  • Sontay, G., Tutar, M. & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2016). Student Views on Out-of-School Learning Environments and Science Teaching: Planetarium Trip. (Journal of Research in InformalEnvironments (JRINEN), 1(1), 1-24.)
  • Sonmez, V. & Alacapınar, FG (2011). Illustrated scientific research methods. Ankara: Memoir Publishing.
  • Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. November, 5, 2021, from https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Hayvancilik/Ipek-Bocekciligi
  • Türkiye Tohumcular Birliği. Retrived November, 6, 2021, from https://turktob.org.tr/tr/topraksiz-tarim/8760
  • Tznisli, D. (2013). Preservice primary school mathematics teachers’ questioning skills and knowledge of students in terms of pedagogical content knowledge. Education and Science, 38(2), 1-18.
  • Uludag G. (2017). “The Effect of Using Out-of-School Learning Environments in Science Education on Preschool Children’s Scientific Process Skills” (Hacettepe University Primary Education Department, Pre-School Education Department Doctoral Thesis).
Year 2022, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 3 - 8, 30.06.2022

Abstract

References

  • Akilli M., Seven S. (2014). “The effect of 3D computer models on academic achievement and spatial animation: Atom models” (Turkish Journal of Education).
  • Atar B. (2017). “The Journey of Our Food Wheat from the Past to the Future” (Süleyman Demirel University Yalvaç Academy Journal 2 (1) : 1-12, 2017).
  • Ateş, A. (2009). Landing vehicles to the sky: Planetariums. NTV Science, 7, 106-115.
  • Balkan Kıyıcı, F. & Atabek Yiğit, E. (2010). Science education beyond the classroom: A field trip to wind power plant. (International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 2(1), 225-243.)
  • Bakioglu, B. & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2014). Outdoor science education: Technical visit to a dialysis center, (Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 3(2), 15-26.)
  • Baxter, JM & Preece, PFW (2000). A comparison of dome and computer planetaria in the teaching of astronomy. Research in Science and Technological Education, 18(1), (63-69.)
  • Bishop, J.E. (2003). Pre-college astronomy education in the United States in the twentieth century. In Heck A. (Eds), Information Handling in Astronomy – Historical Vistas (pp.207-231.)
  • Braund, M. & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International (Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373-1388.)
  • Carrier, SJ (2009).The effects of outdoor science lessons with elementary school students on preservice teachersself-efficacy. (Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 35-48.)
  • Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Bozdogan, AE (2007). The place and importance of science and technology museums in science teaching. (PhD thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara).
  • Ertaş, H., Şen, A.İ., andparmaksızoğlu, A. (2011). The effect of out-of-school scientific activities on the level of associating energy with daily life of 9th grade students. (Necatibey Education Faculty Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 178-198.)
  • Erten Z., Taşçi G.(2016) “Developing Out-of-School Learning Environments Activities for Science Lesson and Evaluation of the Effects of Students on Scientific Process Skills” (Erzincan University Journal of Education Vol - Issue: 18 - 2 Year: 2016).
  • Gursoy G. (2018). “Out-of-school Learning Environments in Science Teaching” (Turkish Studies Educational Sciences).
  • Kubat U. (2018). “The Opinions of Science Teacher Candidates About Out-of-School Learning Environments (Mehmet Akif University Journal of Education Faculty).
  • Odabaş E, Günbey B.(2020) “The Silkworm’s Journey in the World and Anatolia” (Journal of Animal Sciences and Products).
  • Saraç H. (2017). “ Research on Out-of-School Learning Environments in Turkey : Content Analysis Study. (Journal of Educational Theory and Practice Research).
  • Sever R, Yalçınkaya E. (2018) .Environmental Education. Pegem Academy (Page 166).
  • Sontay, G & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2017). An Investigation of Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding Travel Organizing. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education. 32(4): 863-879.
  • Sontay, G., Tutar, M. & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2016). Student Views on Out-of-School Learning Environments and Science Teaching: Planetarium Trip. (Journal of Research in InformalEnvironments (JRINEN), 1(1), 1-24.)
  • Sonmez, V. & Alacapınar, FG (2011). Illustrated scientific research methods. Ankara: Memoir Publishing.
  • Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. November, 5, 2021, from https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Hayvancilik/Ipek-Bocekciligi
  • Türkiye Tohumcular Birliği. Retrived November, 6, 2021, from https://turktob.org.tr/tr/topraksiz-tarim/8760
  • Tznisli, D. (2013). Preservice primary school mathematics teachers’ questioning skills and knowledge of students in terms of pedagogical content knowledge. Education and Science, 38(2), 1-18.
  • Uludag G. (2017). “The Effect of Using Out-of-School Learning Environments in Science Education on Preschool Children’s Scientific Process Skills” (Hacettepe University Primary Education Department, Pre-School Education Department Doctoral Thesis).
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Elif Esin Bakır 0000-0003-3186-7435

Bahattin Aydınlı 0000-0002-6525-4162

Publication Date June 30, 2022
Submission Date December 11, 2021
Acceptance Date February 17, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 4 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Bakır, E. E., & Aydınlı, B. (2022). A New Outdoor Learning Geodesic Dome School Design. Social Scientific Centered Issues, 4(1), 3-8.

Creative Commons Lisansı
Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.


20077

Eurasian Scientific Journal Index

17629

Türk Eğitim İndeksi

17630

Asos Index

17631

Google Scholar