Research Article

COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY

Volume: 4 Number: 1 April 30, 2022
EN

COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the marginal adaptation of different framework materials polyetheretherketone (PEEK), zirconia, and cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) through direct metal laser sintered (DMLS) and conventional casting (CC) in fixed prosthetic restorations. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 stainless steel dies were embedded in silicone molds, and the master models obtained were divided into four groups (n=20): PEEK, zirconia, Co-Cr through DMLS and CC frameworks. The vertical marginal gap was measured by stereomicroscope at ×20 magnification. In addition to descriptive statistics in the evaluation of data, one-way ANOVA was used with the post hoc multiple comparison test Tamhane’s T2, as the data were normally distributed and variances differed according to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in vertical marginal gap before and after cementation in all groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Before and after cementation, vertical marginal gap values of laser sintered Co-Cr, zirconia, and PEEK frameworks were clinically acceptable. Keywords: PEEK; Marginal Adaptation; Laser Sintered Co-Cr; Zirconia; Framework

Keywords

Supporting Institution

ADYUBAPB-Adiyaman University Research Project Council (ADYUBAP)

Project Number

(ADYUBAP) – DHFDUP/2019-0003)

References

  1. American Dental Association. Guide to dental materials and devices. 5th ed. Chicago: American Dental Association; 1970. p. 87-8
  2. Att, W., Komine, F., Gerds, T., & Strub, J.R. (2009). Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 101(4), 239-47.
  3. Boitelle, P., Mawussi, B., Tapie, L., & Fromentin, O. (2014). A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 41(11), 853-74.
  4. Chaar, M.S., Passia, N., & Kern, M. (2020). Long-term clinical outcome of posterior metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with direct metal laser-sintering technology. Journal of prosthodontic research, 64(3), 354-7.
  5. Conrad, H.J., Seong, W.J., & Pesun, I.J. (2007). Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 98(5), 389-404.
  6. Contrepois, M., Soenen, A., Bartala, M., & Laviole, O. (2013). Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 110(6), 447-454.e10.
  7. Dahl, B.E., Dahl, J.E., & Rønold, H.J. (2018). Digital evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single-crown fixed dental prostheses. European journal of oral sciences, 126(6), 512-7.
  8. Gassino, G., Barone Monfrin, S., Scanu, M., Spina, G., & Preti, G. (2004). Marginal adaptation of fixed prosthodontics: a new in vitro 360-degree external examination procedure. The International journal of prosthodontics, 17(2), 218-23.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 30, 2022

Submission Date

December 28, 2021

Acceptance Date

April 29, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 4 Number: 1

APA
Çalışkan, C., Demirci, F., & Birgealp Erdem, M. (2022). COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences, 4(1), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.55895/sshs.1050112
AMA
1.Çalışkan C, Demirci F, Birgealp Erdem M. COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY. SSHS. 2022;4(1):28-45. doi:10.55895/sshs.1050112
Chicago
Çalışkan, Cevdet, Fatih Demirci, and Merve Birgealp Erdem. 2022. “COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY”. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences 4 (1): 28-45. https://doi.org/10.55895/sshs.1050112.
EndNote
Çalışkan C, Demirci F, Birgealp Erdem M (April 1, 2022) COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences 4 1 28–45.
IEEE
[1]C. Çalışkan, F. Demirci, and M. Birgealp Erdem, “COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY”, SSHS, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 28–45, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.55895/sshs.1050112.
ISNAD
Çalışkan, Cevdet - Demirci, Fatih - Birgealp Erdem, Merve. “COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY”. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences 4/1 (April 1, 2022): 28-45. https://doi.org/10.55895/sshs.1050112.
JAMA
1.Çalışkan C, Demirci F, Birgealp Erdem M. COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY. SSHS. 2022;4:28–45.
MLA
Çalışkan, Cevdet, et al. “COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY”. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, Apr. 2022, pp. 28-45, doi:10.55895/sshs.1050112.
Vancouver
1.Cevdet Çalışkan, Fatih Demirci, Merve Birgealp Erdem. COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY. SSHS. 2022 Apr. 1;4(1):28-45. doi:10.55895/sshs.1050112

Cited By

               34329                            
34328
 

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.