Review

Trends in Vertebral Augmentation Practice for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture

Volume: 5 Number: 3 December 31, 2023
EN

Trends in Vertebral Augmentation Practice for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture

Abstract

Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass, primarily affecting older individuals and a common complication is vertebral fractures. The collapse-induced height loss in vertebrae can result in spinal instability and progressive kyphotic deformity. Surgical intervention for osteoporotic vertebrae poses challenges due to poor bone quality and frequent medical comorbidities. In recent years, it has become the predominant method for vertebral augmentation in acute fractures, aiming to relieve pain, strengthen the vertebral structure, and prevent deformities by restoring height. These procedures involve percutaneous placement of cannulas into each collapsed vertebral body through a unipedicular or bipedicular approach. Novel products are emerging to strengthen vertebrae in treating osteoporotic compression fractures. Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are widely accepted and recognized as effective vertebral augmentation methods. Treatment guidelines are evolving with the introduction of innovative systems like Vertebral Body Stenting, Titanium Mesh, and Sky Bone Expander, claiming to achieve exceptional vertebral height restoration. Controversies persist regarding the optimal timing for vertebral augmentation post-fracture. Polymethylmethacrylate cement is extensively used to stabilize fractured vertebral bodies. Additionally, new calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite cements are gaining prominence. These advancements underscore the ongoing development in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Each innovative implant introduces unique features and indications. Precise confirmation of the source of the painful fracture is crucial for effective and safe treatment, ensuring proper timing and indication.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

none

Ethical Statement

none

Thanks

Thanks

References

  1. Aebli, N., Goss, B. G., Thorpe, P., Williams, R., & Krebs, J. (2006). In vivo temperature profile of intervertebral discs and vertebral endplates during vertebroplasty: an experimental study in sheep. Spine, 31(15), 1674–1679.
  2. Baecker, N., Tomic, A., Mika, C., Gotzmann, A., Platen, P., Gerzer, R., & Heer, M. (2003). Bone resorption is induced on the second day of bed rest: results of a controlled crossover trial. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985), 95(3), 977–982.
  3. Ensrud, K. E., & Schousboe, J. T. (2011). Clinical practice. Vertebral fractures. The New England journal of medicine, 364(17), 1634–1642.
  4. Farrokhi, M. R., Alibai, E., & Maghami, Z. (2011). Randomized controlled trial of percutaneous vertebroplasty versus optimal medical management for the relief of pain and disability in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 14(5), 561–569.
  5. Gangi, A., Sabharwal, T., Irani, F. G., Buy, X., Morales, J. P., Adam, A., & Standards of Practice Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology (2006). Quality assurance guidelines for percutaneous vertebroplasty. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 29(2), 173–178.
  6. Gehlbach, S. H., Burge, R. T., Puleo, E., & Klar, J. (2003). Hospital care of osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 14(1), 53–60.
  7. Kortebein, P., Symons, T. B., Ferrando, A., Paddon-Jones, D., Ronsen, O., Protas, E., Conger, S., Lombeida, J., Wolfe, R., & Evans, W. J. (2008). Functional impact of 10 days of bed rest in healthy older adults. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 63(10), 1076–1081.
  8. Longo, U. G., Loppini, M., Denaro, L., Maffulli, N., & Denaro, V. (2012). Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: current concepts of conservative care. British medical bulletin, 102, 171–189.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences (Other), Health Services and Systems (Other)

Journal Section

Review

Publication Date

December 31, 2023

Submission Date

November 30, 2023

Acceptance Date

December 29, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 5 Number: 3

APA
Gökyar, A. (2023). Trends in Vertebral Augmentation Practice for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences, 5(3), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.55895/sshs.1398464
AMA
1.Gökyar A. Trends in Vertebral Augmentation Practice for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture. SSHS. 2023;5(3):31-41. doi:10.55895/sshs.1398464
Chicago
Gökyar, Ahmet. 2023. “Trends in Vertebral Augmentation Practice for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture”. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences 5 (3): 31-41. https://doi.org/10.55895/sshs.1398464.
EndNote
Gökyar A (December 1, 2023) Trends in Vertebral Augmentation Practice for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences 5 3 31–41.
IEEE
[1]A. Gökyar, “Trends in Vertebral Augmentation Practice for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture”, SSHS, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 31–41, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.55895/sshs.1398464.
ISNAD
Gökyar, Ahmet. “Trends in Vertebral Augmentation Practice for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture”. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences 5/3 (December 1, 2023): 31-41. https://doi.org/10.55895/sshs.1398464.
JAMA
1.Gökyar A. Trends in Vertebral Augmentation Practice for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture. SSHS. 2023;5:31–41.
MLA
Gökyar, Ahmet. “Trends in Vertebral Augmentation Practice for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture”. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, Dec. 2023, pp. 31-41, doi:10.55895/sshs.1398464.
Vancouver
1.Ahmet Gökyar. Trends in Vertebral Augmentation Practice for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture. SSHS. 2023 Dec. 1;5(3):31-4. doi:10.55895/sshs.1398464

               34329                            
34328
 

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.