A Comparative Analysis of Gifted and Typically Developing Secondary School Students’ Perceptions of the Future

Abstract

This study is to examine the future perceptions of typically developing and gifted secondary school students. The participants consisted of sixth-grade students, typically developing and gifted, enrolled in two different secondary schools in the Marmara region of Turkey during the 2022-2023 academic year. The study, which was designed as a basic qualitative study, used a phenomenological study design. The future perceptions of typically developing and gifted students were assessed through story completion and drawing activities. The story completion activity revealed that the future literacy dimension of fictionalizing the future used the expressions corresponding to the dystopia (future anxiety) sub-dimension more intensely than the utopia (future hope) sub-dimension. In the drawing activity, it was observed that participants frequently used objects related to the Utopia sub-dimension. However, the fact that they did not include many expressions corresponding to the dimensions of preparing for the future, planning, and controlling the future shows that their future expectations are harmful and that they feel inadequate in terms of preparing, planning, and controlling against these negativities. For this reason, it would be beneficial to conduct studies on the development of future literacy skills in the curriculum so that students can take action to prepare for the future.

Keywords

• Future perception
• future literacy
• typically developing students
• gifted students

References

1. Acar, Ü. (2019). Know Past Understand Present Plan and Manage the Future. The Journal of Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute, 42, 379-391. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/susbed/issue/61823/925067
2. Akturan, U., & Esen, A. (2008). Phenomenology. U. Akturan ve A. Esen (Prepared for publication), In qualitative research methods. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing Company.
3. Altun, A. (2020). Future literacy and social studies teaching, M. Aydın & S. İnan (Prepared for publication) In the Book of Loyalty to Dr. Kemal Daşçıoğlu (pp. 29-41). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publication.
4. Avcı, S. (2008). The exlanatory and predictive relationship of future time perspective, academic delay of gratification, perceived instrumentality, socio-economical status and academical achievement of student teachers. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Yıldız Technic University, İstanbul.
5. Avcı, S., & Erden, M. (2009). Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the future time perception scale. The Journal of Çukurova University Faculty of Education (3) 37, 1-12. Retrieved from: https://avesis.marmara.edu.tr/yayin/51a5767d-cd47-4f1a-b08f-4d71635a96c1/gelecek-zaman-algisi-olceginin-turkce-formunun-gecerlik-ve-guvenirlik-calismasi/document.pdf
6. Avcı, S., & Erden. M. (2013). The Effect of The Future Time Perspective and Academic Delay of Gratification of The Prospective Teachers on Their Academic Achievements. The Journal of Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Education Faculty, 14(1), 389-406. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefad/issue/59473/854655
7. Balcı, A, (2001). Research, methods, techniques and principles in social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publication.
8. Baş, N, & Altun, F. (2020). The role of school attachment, quality of school life, and academic success in explaining the future expectations of secondary school students. Journal of Atatürk University Social Sciences Institute, 24(1), 197-213. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunisosbil/issue/53123/682903

9. Bayav, O. (2018). The effect of university students' anxiety levels on future time perception. Unpublished master's thesis. Near East University. Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.
10. Bembenutty H., & Karabenick S. A. (2004). Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychological Review, 16, 35-57. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000012344.34008.5c
11. Bilde, J., D., Vansteenkiste, M., & Lens, W. (2011). Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory. Journal of Learning and Instruction, 21, 332-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.002
12. Büyük, B., & Çelik, E. (2021). The future perception of gifted individuals and society about gifted individuals. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 6(2),143-154. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.840274
13. Büyükbingöl, A. (2018). Potential developments and risks about the future internet. International Journal of Information, Technology and Philosophy, 1(1), 18-33. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abdulkadir-Bueyuekbingoel-2/publication/355061425_Gelecegin_Internetine-Dair_Olasi_Gelismeler_ve_Riskler/links/615c2cf05a481543a87f229e/Gelecegin-Internetine-Dair-Olasi-Gelismeler-ve-Riskler.pdf
14. Büyüktopçu, U., K. (2017). Investigation of the university students attitudes towards future. Unpublished master's thesis. Ankara University, Ankara.
15. Carmi, N. (2013). Caring about tomorrow: Future orientation, environmental attitudes and behaviors. Environmental Education Research, 19(4), 430 444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.700697
16. Coudin, G. & Lima, M., L. (2011). Being well as time goes by: future time perspective and well-being. International Journal of Psychology and PsychologIcal therapy, 11(2), 219-232. Retrieved from: https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/9935/1/publisher_version_Int_J_Psychology_Psychlogical_Therapy.pdf
17. Daly, M., Delaney, L., & Baumeister, R., F. (2015). Self-control, future orientation, smoking, and the impact of Dutch tobacco control measures. Addictive Behavior Reports, 1, 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2015.07.002 Daştan, M. (2021). Effects of global uncertainties on macroeconomic activity: The case of Turkey. Unpublished master's thesis. Atatürk University, Erzurum.
18. Demirel, M., Işık, U., Üstün, Ü. D., & Gümüşgül, O. (2016). Future Time Perception: A study on School of Physical Education and Sports Students. Research in Sports Science, 6(1), 1303-1414. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309761136_Future_Time_Perception_A_study_on_School_of_Physical_Education_and_Sports_Students
19. Fingerman, K.L., & Perlmutter, M. (1995). Future time perspective and life events across adulthood. The Journal of General Psychology, 122(1), 95-111. Retrieved from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/8641806af5aca1674493ee7d1dc7e2e8/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1819280
20. Frey, T. (2014). Communicating with the future (C. Turan, tra.). İstanbul: Nail Press.
21. Gjesme, T. (1975). Slope of gradients for performance as a function of achievement motive, goal distance in time, and future time orientation. The Journal of Psychology, 91, (1) 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915808
22. Gjesme, T. (1979). Future time orientation as a function achievements motivates, ability, delay of gratification and sex. The Journal of Psychology, 101(2), 173-188. Retrieved from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/0c040579006bf1ab793243e6091113e7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1819279
23. Gjesme, T. (1983). On the concept of future time orientation: considerations of some functions' and measurements' implications. International Journal of Psychology, 18(1-4), 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598308247493
24. Gutiérrez-Braojos, C. (2015). Future time orientation and learning conceptions: Effects on metacognitive strategies, self-efficacy beliefs, study effort and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 35(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.858101
25. Hamarat, E. (2021). Sosyotopya. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publication.
26. Henry, H., Zacher, H., & Desmette, D. (2017). Future time perspective in the work context: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Journal of Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00413
27. Hortsmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 703-718. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X160778
28. Husman, J., & Shell, D. F. (2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: a measurement of future time perspective. Journal of Learning and Individual Differences 18(2), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.08.001
29. Joireman, J., & Liu, R. L. (2014). Future-oriented women will pay to reduce global warming: Mediation via political orientation, environmental values, and belief in global warming. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.005
30. Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272–1287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212449362 Kibar, K. (2014). Impact of story completion technique on student creativity in miniature practices. Unpublished master's thesis, Niğde University, Niğde.
31. Kocadağ, T., & Bardakçı, S. (2016). The relationship between teacher candidates' future time perspectives, decision-making styles and digital citizenship skills. (Conference presentation summary). 10. International Computer and Instructional Technologies Symposium.
32. Kocaman, S., & Kuybu-Rol, Elif, Pelin (2020). (The Effect of Professional Perceptions and Expectations and Future Anxiety on the Intention to Work in the Sector: An Applicatıon for Higher Education Tourism Students in Antalya. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 8(4), 3192-3217. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2020.758
33. Kooji, D., T., A., M., Kanfer, R., Betts, M., & Rudolph C., W. (2018). Future time perspective: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Psychological Association, 1(17), 1-23. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/apl0000306
34. Krneta, L. (2016). Perception of present and vision of future of gifted students. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(8), 1745-1752. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1110778.pdf
35. Lang, F., R., & Carstensen, L., L., (2002). Time counts: future time perspective, goals and social relationships. Journal of Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125-139. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125
36. Miller, R. (2015). Learning, the future, and complexity. an essay on the emergence of futures literacy. Europan Journal of Education, 50(4). 513-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12157
37. Ogurlu, Ü. (2016). Hopelessness and future expectations among gifted middle school students. Turkish Journal of Education, 5, 1, 4-17. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.30206
38. Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
39. Peetsma, T. D. (2000) Future time perspective as a predictor of school investment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(2), 177-192. Retrieved from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/8b235b27b3d51871fb9f4d1fc065aeab/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=48100 Sak, U. (2010). Gifted people: features, identification training. Ankara: Maya Academy.
40. Sarouphim, K. (2001). DISCOVER: Concurrent Validity, Gender Differences, and Identification of Minority Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 130 - 138. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620104500206
41. Şimşek, H., & Yıldırım, A. (2005). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing Company.
42. Summak Gören, E, A. (1998). An Analysis of high school students perceptions of probable futures by the year 2020 (A case study in Gaziantep). Unpublished master's thesis., Gaziantep University, Gaziantep.
43. Tayfun, A., Silik, C., E., Dülger, A., S., & Margazieva, N. (2022). Examining the Relationship Between Self-Efficacy Perceptions and Future Anxiety of University Students: The Case of Turkey-Kyrgyzstan. Journal of Turkish Tourism Research, 6(2), 570-590. Retrieved from: https://www.tutad.org/index.php/tutad/article/view/611
44. Uluçay, T., Özpolat, A. R., İşgör, İ. Y., & Taşkesen, O. (2014). A Study on High School Student's Future Expectations. NWSA-Education Sciences, 9(2), 234- 247. https://www.doi.org/10.12739/NWSA.2014.9.2.1C0616
45. UNESCO (2020). Future literacy: a 21st century skill. Retrieved from: https://www.unesco.org.tr/home/AnnouncementDetail/4589
46. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading Digital: Turning Technology into Business Transformation (Trans. Ü. Şensoy). İstanbul: Turkish Airlines Press
47. Yavuzer, H., Demir, İ., Meşeci, F., & Sertelin, Ç. (2005). Future expectatıons of today's youth. HAYEF Journal of Education, 2(1), 93-103. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iuhayefd/issue/8791/109826
48. Yıldırım, A. (2007). The teachers opinions regarding the effects of story completion technique applied in Turkish activities on childrens problem solving skills in preschool education. Unpublished master's thesis, Eskişehir Anadolu University, Eskişehir.