Research Article

The Review on the Science Process Skills and the Levels to Create a Graphic: The Sample on Preservice Science Teachers

Volume: 10 Number: 3 December 30, 2020
EN TR

The Review on the Science Process Skills and the Levels to Create a Graphic: The Sample on Preservice Science Teachers

Abstract

In science education, drawing tables and graphics is a part of science process skills, and preservice teachers are expected to have these skills. The aim of this study is to examine the science process skills and create a graphic levels of preservice science teachers based on a given problem scenario. In the research, the survey method has been used. The research has been conducted with 87 preservice teachers in total who receive their education at the third grade in The Department of Science Education in a state university in Blacksea region. The worksheet which has been developed by the expert researchers in their field has been used in order to collect the data. 17 items and 3 aspects have been used in order that the data on this activity worksheet has been evaluated. The exact statements which include the scientific accuracy have been encoded as sufficient, the partly scientific accuracy have been encoded as partially sufficient, and the incorrect statements and the empty answers have been encoded as insufficient. According to the frequency distribution table which has been made as a result of the data, it has been determined that the preservice teachers are insufficient on the subjects of being able to show the data of variables in the scenario on the ready figures, to position the variables correctly onto the axes. According to the results obtained from the research, it is thought that other studies can be conducted on the subjects that the preservice teachers are partially sufficient and insufficient.  

Keywords

References

  1. Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of ınquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37-41.
  2. Anagün, Ş. S. & Yaşar, Ş. (2009). İlköğretim beşinci sınıf fen ve teknoloji dersinde bilimsel süreç becerilerinin geliştirilmesi. İlköğretim Online, 8(3), 843-865.
  3. Aydoğdu, B. (2009). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde kullanılan farklı deney tekniklerinin öğrencilerin bilimsel süreç becerilerine, bilimin doğasına yönelik görüşlerine, laboratuvara yönelik tutumlarına ve öğrenme yaklaşımlarına etkileri. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  4. Başdaş, E. (2007). İlköğretim fen eğitiminde, basit malzemelerle yapılan fen aktivitelerinin bilimsel süreç becerilerine, akademik başarıya ve motivasyona etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Manisa.
  5. Bowen, G. M.& Roth, W.-M. (2005). Data and graph interpretation practices among preservice science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(10), 1063-1088.
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E.; Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  7. Demir, S. (2014). Bilimsel tartışma ve araştırmaya dayalı tasarlanan laboratuvar programının, fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bilimsel yaratıcılıklarına etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  8. Ewers, T. G. (2001). Teacher-directed versus learning cycles methods: Effects on science process skills mastery and teacher efficacy among elementary education students. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Idaho.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Other Fields of Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 30, 2020

Submission Date

October 10, 2019

Acceptance Date

October 8, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 10 Number: 3

APA
Demir Kaçan, S., Yenikalaycı, N., & Çelikler, D. (2020). The Review on the Science Process Skills and the Levels to Create a Graphic: The Sample on Preservice Science Teachers. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 10(3), 445-458. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.631918
AMA
1.Demir Kaçan S, Yenikalaycı N, Çelikler D. The Review on the Science Process Skills and the Levels to Create a Graphic: The Sample on Preservice Science Teachers. SUJE. 2020;10(3):445-458. doi:10.19126/suje.631918
Chicago
Demir Kaçan, Sibel, Nisa Yenikalaycı, and Dilek Çelikler. 2020. “The Review on the Science Process Skills and the Levels to Create a Graphic: The Sample on Preservice Science Teachers”. Sakarya University Journal of Education 10 (3): 445-58. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.631918.
EndNote
Demir Kaçan S, Yenikalaycı N, Çelikler D (December 1, 2020) The Review on the Science Process Skills and the Levels to Create a Graphic: The Sample on Preservice Science Teachers. Sakarya University Journal of Education 10 3 445–458.
IEEE
[1]S. Demir Kaçan, N. Yenikalaycı, and D. Çelikler, “The Review on the Science Process Skills and the Levels to Create a Graphic: The Sample on Preservice Science Teachers”, SUJE, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 445–458, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.19126/suje.631918.
ISNAD
Demir Kaçan, Sibel - Yenikalaycı, Nisa - Çelikler, Dilek. “The Review on the Science Process Skills and the Levels to Create a Graphic: The Sample on Preservice Science Teachers”. Sakarya University Journal of Education 10/3 (December 1, 2020): 445-458. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.631918.
JAMA
1.Demir Kaçan S, Yenikalaycı N, Çelikler D. The Review on the Science Process Skills and the Levels to Create a Graphic: The Sample on Preservice Science Teachers. SUJE. 2020;10:445–458.
MLA
Demir Kaçan, Sibel, et al. “The Review on the Science Process Skills and the Levels to Create a Graphic: The Sample on Preservice Science Teachers”. Sakarya University Journal of Education, vol. 10, no. 3, Dec. 2020, pp. 445-58, doi:10.19126/suje.631918.
Vancouver
1.Sibel Demir Kaçan, Nisa Yenikalaycı, Dilek Çelikler. The Review on the Science Process Skills and the Levels to Create a Graphic: The Sample on Preservice Science Teachers. SUJE. 2020 Dec. 1;10(3):445-58. doi:10.19126/suje.631918

Cited By