Teachers' Perception on Causes of Organizational Dissent

Year 2020, , 623 - 642, 30.12.2020

Orkun Öztürk , Osman Titrek

https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.794213

Cited By: 4

Abstract

In the study, it was aimed to present the perceptions of the teachers working at public and private schools located in Adapazarı, Serdivan and Erenler districts of Sakarya on causes of organizational dissent. The target population of the research consisted of 6277 teachers. As the sample of the study, 573 teachers who were chosen via stratified sampling method participated in the study. As the data collection tool, “Causes of Dissent”, a subscale of “Organizational Dissent Scale” which was developed by Özdemir (2010), was utilized. In the data analysis, means and standard deviations of the responses to the scale items were calculated. T-test and ANOVA were utilized to demonstrate whether the teachers’ perceptions on causes of organizational dissent showed any significant difference in accordance with different variables. The results of the study indicated that there is no significant difference in the teachers’ percepions on causes of organiational dissent according to gender, age, education level, work experience, marital status, union membership, school size, and managerial experience. On the other hand, it was found out that there is a significant difference in teachers’ perceptions on causes of organizational dissent in accordance with the perceived management style of school administrators.

Keywords

organizational dissent, school administration, causes of dissent, dissent in educational organizations

Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Muhalefetin Nedenlerine İlişkin Görüşleri

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Sakarya ili Adapazarı, Serdivan ve Erenler ilçelerindeki resmi ve özel okullarda görev yapan öğretmenlerin örgütsel muhalefet nedenlerine ilişkin görüşlerini ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini Adapazarı, Serdivan ve Erenler ilçelerinde görev yapan 6277 öğretmen oluşturmaktadır. Örneklem olarak bu evrenden, tabakalı örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen 573 öğretmen araştırmaya katılım sağlamıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak, Özdemir (2010) tarafından geliştirilen Örgütsel Muhalefet Ölçeği’nin, alt ölçeği olan Muhalefetin Nedenleri Ölçeği uygulanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde anket maddelerine verilen yanıtların aritmetik ortalama ve standart sapma değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Muhalefet nedenlerinin, çeşitli değişkenlere göre anlamlı fark gösterip göstermediği t-testi ve ANOVA ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada öğretmenlerin muhalefet nedenlerinin cinsiyet, yaş, eğitim durumu, mesleki kıdem, medeni durum, sendika üyeliği, okul büyüklüğü ve yöneticilik tecrübesine göre farklılık göstermediği, ancak okul yöneticisinin algılanan yönetim tarzına göre anlamlı fark olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

örgütsel muhalefet, okul yönetimi, muhalefetin nedenleri, eğitim örgütlerinde muhalefet

References

• Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
• Benkhoff, B. (1997). Disentangling organizational commitment. Personnel review.
• Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2015). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Kassing, J. W. (1997). Articulating, antagonizing, and displacing: A model of employee dissent. Communication Studies, 48(4), 311-332.
• Kassing, J. W. (1998). Development and validation of the organizational dissent scale. Management Communication Quarterly, 12(2), 183-229.
• Kassing, J. W., ve Avtgis, T. A. (1999). Examining the relationship between organizational dissent and aggressive communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(1), 100-115.
• Kassing, J. W. (2000). Exploring the relationship between workplace freedom of speech, organizational identification, and employee dissent. Communication Research Reports, 17(4), 387-396.
• Kassing, J. W., ve Armstrong, T. A. (2001). Examining the association of job tenure, employment history, and organizational status with employee dissent. Communication Research Reports, 18(3), 264-273.
• Kassing, J. W., & Armstrong, T. A. (2002). Someone’s going to hear about this: Examining the association between dissent-triggering events and employees’ dissent expression. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 39-65.
• Kassing, J. (2011). Dissent in organizations (Vol. 4). Polity.
• Kassing, J. W., & McDowell, Z. J. (2008). Disagreeing about what's fair: Exploring the relationship between perceptions of justice and employee dissent. Communication research reports, 25(1), 34-43.
• Kavak, O., & Kaygın, E. (2018). Örgütsel adalet algısının örgütsel muhalefet davranışı üzerindeki etkisi. Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences, 33.
• Garner, J. T. (2009). When things go wrong at work: An exploration of organizational dissent messages. Communication Studies, 60(2), 197-218.
• Goodboy, A. K., Chory, R. M., ve Dunleavy, K. N. (2008). Organizational dissent as a function of organizational justice. Communication Research Reports, 25(4), 255-265.
• Gorden, W. I. (1988). Range of employee voice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1(4), 283-299.
• Özdemir, M. (2010). Genel liselerde görev yapan öğretmenlerin örgütsel muhalefete ilişkin görüşleri (Ankara İli Örneği). (Doktora Tezi). YÖK Tez Merkezi veri tabanından erişildi (Tez No: 279917).
• Redding, W. C. (1985). Rocking boats, blowing whistles, and teaching speech communication. Communication Education, 34(3), 245-258.
• Sprague, J., & Ruud, G. L. (1988). Boat-rocking in the high-technology culture. American Behavioral Scientist, 32(2), 169-193.
• Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). BG Tabachnick. LS fidell using multivariate statistics (sixth ed.). Boston: Pearson
• Titrek, O. (2009). Okul türüne göre okullardaki örgütsel adalet düzeyi. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 551-573.
• Türk Dil Kurumu (TDK). (2019) Güncel Türkçe Sözlük. Ankara: TDK.