Research Trends and Features of Robotics Studies in Educational Technology and STEM Education: Data Mining on ERIC Samples

Year 2022, Volume: 12 Issue: 3, 545 - 572, 15.12.2022

Emre Çam

https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1188142

Abstract

In the research, publications in ERIC about Robotics, Educational Technology in Robotics (ET-in-Robotics), and STEM in Robotics (STEM-in-Robotics) have been reached through data mining, their release year, titles, abstracts, and ERIC descriptions have been analyzed. However, it has been aimed to put forward their research trends and features. The analysis of the 1339 publications that were published between 01/01/1973 and 31/12/2021 and available in ERIC has been made using several Python libraries and presented in the form of tables and word clouds. The results showed that the number of publications available in ERIC was the highest between 2017 and 2021 and in the last five years the number of publications available on Robotics in ERIC has gradually increased. In addition, it has been seen that the words "learning", "robotics", and "technology" are important for all three topics, the words “child”, "science", “programming” and "teacher" for ET-in-Robotics, and the words "school" and "engineering" for STEM-in-Robotics come to the fore. Also, the most frequently assigned descriptor by ERIC staff to these publications have been found to be "teaching methods". When evaluated in general, it has been seen in the STEM-in-Robotics field more specific topics were focused on and robotic activities are taken as a type of instructional technology while in the ET-in-Robotics field robotic activities were taken as a type of educational technology. As a result, a publication that will serve as a guide for new researches in the field of robotics has been presented.

Keywords

Robotics, Educational Technology, STEM, Big Data, Data Mining.

References

• Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 63-71. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1130924.pdf
• Alimisis, D., & Kynigos, C. (2009). Constructionism and robotics in education. Teacher education on robotic-enhanced constructivist pedagogical methods, 11-26. Retrieved from https://www.robolab.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/book_TeacherEducationOnRobotics-ASPETE.pdf
• Barak, M. & Assal, M. (2018). Robotics and STEM learning: Students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy—practice, problem solving, and projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9385-9
• Barker, B. S., & Ansorge, J. (2007). Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of research on technology in education, 39(3), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782481
• Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall, C. G., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition (pp. 1-60). The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/174879/
• Bers, M. U. (2010). The TangibleK Robotics program: Applied computational thinking for young children. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2), 1-20. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ910910.pdf
• Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020
• Beynon, M. (2016). Mindstorms Revisited: Making New Construals of Seymour Papert’s Legacy. In International Conference EduRobotics 2016 (pp. 3-19). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55553-9_1
• Bird, S., Klein, E., & Loper, E. (2009), Natural language processing with Python: analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media Inc. Retrieved from http://117.3.71.125:8080/dspace/bitstream/DHKTDN/6460/1/Natural%20Language%20Processing%20with%20Python.4149.pdf
• Brand, B., Collver, M., & Kasarda, M. (2008). Motivating students with robotics. Science Teacher Washington, 75(4), 44-49. Retrieved from https://cmapspublic2.ihmc.us/rid=1Q1BGFGR9-233PDVD-45ZG/NSTA_Motivating%20Students%20with%20Robotics.pdf
• Bybee, R.W. (2010). What is STEM education? Science, 329, 996. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194998
• Cam, E. & Kiyici, M. (2022). The impact of robotics assisted programming education on academic success, problem solving skills and motivation. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1028825
• Caron, D. (2010). Competitive robotics brings out the best in students. Tech Directions, 69(6), 21. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ894879
• Chang, C. W., Lee, J. H., Chao, P. Y., Wang, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2010). Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 13-24. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ895653
• Chaudhary, V., Agrawal, V., Sureka, P., & Sureka, A. (2016, December). An experience report on teaching programming and computational thinking to elementary level children using lego robotics education kit. In 2016 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E) (pp. 38-41). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2016.016
• Ching, Y. H., Yang, D., Wang, S., Baek, Y., Swanson, S., & Chittoori, B. (2019). Elementary school student development of STEM attitudes and perceived learning in a STEM integrated robotics curriculum. TechTrends, 63(5), 590-601. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00388-0
• Eguchi, A. (2010, March). What is educational robotics? Theories behind it and practical implementation. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 4006-4014). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/34007/
• Eraytaç, Ö. F. (2019). The effect of block-based teaching method on academic achievement of secondary school students in robotic coding training [Unpublished master dissertation]. Çukurova University.
• Feinleib, D. (2013). Big Data Demystified: How Big Data is Changing the Way We Live, Love, and Learn. Big Data Group.
• Foss, A., Wilcoxen, C., & Rasmus, J. (2019). The Academic and Behavioral Implications of Robotics in the Classroom: An Elementary Case Study. Technology & Innovation, 20(3), 321-332. https://doi.org/10.21300/20.3.2019.321
• Hangün, M. E. (2019). Effect of robot programming education on students' mathematical achievement, maths anxiety, programming self-efficacy and STEM attitude [Unpublished master dissertation]. Fırat University.
• İşbulan, O., Hamutoğlu, N. B., & Kıyıcı, M. (2021). Yükseköğretim Alanında Yapılan Ulusal ve Uluslararası Çalışmalardaki Eğilimlerin Büyük Veri ve Veri Madenciliği ile İncelenmesi: 1965-2019. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 11(2 Pt 1), 276-296. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.20.735528
• Ivey, D., & Quam, G. (2009). 4-H and tech ed partnership gets students geeked about STEM. Tech Directions, 69(3), 19. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ867163
• Jung, S. E., & Won, E. S. (2018). Systematic review of research trends in robotics education for young children. Sustainability, 10(4), 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040905
• Kazakoff, E. R., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5
• Kıyıcı, M., Çukurbaşı, B., & Çam, E. (2021). Discovering Studies on Nursing Students and Educational Technology by Data Mining. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(1), 133-144. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/baebd/issue/63124/896856
• Konyaoğlu, E. (2019). The effects of robotic coding education on the problem solving skills of secondary school students and the views of the students about robotic coding activities [Unpublished master dissertation]. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University.
• McKinney, W. (2010, June). Data structures for statistical computing in python. In Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. 445, 51-56. Retrieved from https://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/scipy2010/pdfs/mckinney.pdf
• Mikropoulos, T. A., & Bellou, I. (2013). Educational robotics as mindtools. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 5-14. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1130925.pdf
• Nourbakhsh, I. R., Crowley, K., Bhave, A., Hamner, E., Hsiu, T., Perez-Bergquist, A., ... & Wilkinson, K. (2005). The robotic autonomy mobile robotics course: Robot design, curriculum design and educational assessment. Autonomous Robots, 18(1), 103-127. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AURO.0000047303.20624.02
• Ospennikova, E., Ershov, M., & Iljin, I. (2015). Educational robotics as an inovative educational technology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.588
• Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. BasicBooks, 10 East 53rd St., New York, NY 10022-5299. Retrieved from https://learn.media.mit.edu/lcl/resources/readings/childrens-machine.pdf
• Rockland, R., Bloom, D. S., Carpinelli, J., Burr-Alexander, L., Hirsch, L. S., & Kimmel, H. (2010). Advancing the “E” in K-12 STEM Education. Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), 53-64. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ906161.pdf
• Şimşek, K. (2019). Investigation of the effects of robotic coding application on science achievement and scientific process skills of 6th grade students in science course matter and heat unit [Unpublished master dissertation]. Marmara University.
• Siper-Kabadayı, G. (2019). The effects of robotic activities on pre-school children'screative thinking skills [Unpublished master dissertation]. Hacettepe University.
• Spolaôr, N., & Benitti, F. B. V. (2017). Robotics applications grounded in learning theories on tertiary education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 112, 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.001
• Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9304-5
• Sullivan, F. R. (2017). The creative nature of robotics activity: Design and problem solving. In Robotics in STEM Education (pp. 213-230). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57786-9_9
• Yolcu, V. & Demirer, V. (2017). A review on the studies about the use of robotic technologies in education. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 4(2), 127-139. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sduijes/issue/32846/340897
• Yuen, T., Boecking, M., Stone, J., Tiger, E. P., Gomez, A., Guillen, A., & Arreguin, A. (2014). Group tasks, activities, dynamics, and interactions in collaborative robotics projects with elementary and middle school children. Journal of STEM Education, 15(1). Retrieved from https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/download/1853/1585
• Zeidler, D. L. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z