Τhe Turkish Nominal Syntagmatic Sets 'Ad tamlaması': A Linguistic Approach in Turkish Second Language Acquisition and Teaching

Year 2022, Volume: 12 Issue: 4, 932 - 962, 31.12.2022

Vasiliki Mavridou

https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1186631

Abstract

This paper investigates the second language (L2) acquisition of the Turkish category Ad tamlaması (AT). AT consists an umbrella term which is encountered in Turkish grammars and L2-Turkish coursebooks to refer to three forms of Nominal Syntagmatic Sets (NSS), namely a) N-(n)In N-(s)I(n), b) N N-(s)I(n) and c) N N-(y) . This paper is trying to examine whether the apparently formal similarity of these 3 Nominal Syntagmatic Sets Ad Tamlaması (NSS-AT) in Turkish can be correlated with a respective degree of ease in L2 acquisition and simultaneity in L2 teaching or not. The main aim of this paper is to delineate the differences of these three NSS forms by testing them upon 12 morpho-syntactic criteria. The test results will show how much syntactically analytic and semantically transparent each of these sets is. We will conclude that the formal differentiation of the 3 NSS types does not always correspond with functional- semantic differentiation, which has implications on the difficulties these forms create in L2-learners. We will show that in the L2 learning process of the 3 NSS-AT forms, we expect a learning step ahead in the analytic N-(n)In N-(s)I(n) form compared to non-analytic compounds such as the N N-(s)I(n) form and more blurred cases such as the N N-(y) form, which shares properties of both Noun Phrases (NPs) and compounds. From a didactic scope, we come to assume that the traditional interconnection of the three NSS-Ad Tamlaması forms in Turkish L2-teaching and L2-learning methods should be put aside and rather give its place in alternative more anti-holistic approaches which would uncover the hidden syntactic properties of the 3 forms rather than stress the similarities between them.

Keywords

Turkish as a second language, Turkish SLA, Turkish possessıves, Turkish compounds, Ad tamlaması

References

• References Aslan, E., & Altan, A. (2006). The Role of -(s)I in Turkish Indefinite Noun Compounds. Dil Dergisi, 131, 57-76.
• Bağrıaçık, M., & Ralli, A. (2013). Bare N(ominal) N(ominal) concatenations in Turkish: Compounds or syntactic fallacies? Στο N. Hathout, F. Montermini, & J. Tseng (ed.), Morphology in Toulouse. Selected proceedings of Décembrettes 7,Toulouse,2–3 December 2010 (p. 35-56). Munich: Lincom Academic Publishers.
• Bağrıaçık, M., & Andreou, M. (2011). Lexical categories and bare nominal concatenations in Turkish. 2nd Patras International Conference of Graduate Students in Linguistics, Proceedings (σσ. 33-46). Patras, Greece: University of Patras Publications.
• Bağrıaçık, M., & Ralli, A. (2015). NN-sI concatenations in Turkish: construct state nominals and phrasal compounds. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (p. 13-24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Presented at the 8th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL8-2012).
• Dede, M. A. (1978). A syntactic and semantic analysis of Turkish nominal compounds. PhD Dissertation. University of Michigan.
• Dafnopatidis, V., & Sanlioglu, H. (2011). Τουρκική γραμματική στα ελληνικά [Turkish Grammar in Greek]. Athens:Perugia.
• Göksel, A., & Kerlslake, C. (2005). Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
• Hankamer, J. (2008). Ad-phrasal affixes and suspended affixation. Chicago, IL: Paper presented at the SLA Annual Meeting.
• Ketrez, F. N. (2018). Acquisition of an agglutinating language under adverse neonatal conditions. Στο A. Bar-On, & D. Ravid (Εds.), Handbook of Communication Disorders: Theoretical, Empirical and Applied Linguistic Perspectives. Handbooks of Applied Linguistics 15. Mouton De Gruyter.
• Kharytonava, O. (2011). Noms composés en tyrc et le morphème -(s)I. PhD Dissertation. Ontario: University of Western Ontario.
• Kırkıcı, B. (2009). İmparator Çizelgesi vs. İmparatorlar Çizelgesi: On the (Non)-Use of Plural Non-Head Nouns in Turkish Nominal Compounding. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, (1), 35-53.
• Kunduracı, A. (2013). Turkish Noun-Noun Compounds: A Process-Based Paradigmatic Account. PhD Dissertation. Calgary University.
• Lewis, G. L. (2000 (1967)). Turkish Grammar (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Özer, S. (2010). Morphological Priming in Turkish Nominal Compound Processing. MA Thesis. Middle East Technical University.
• Tat, D. (2013). Word Syntax of Nominal Compounds: Internal and Aphasiological Evidence from Turkish. PhD Dissertation. Arizona: University of Arizona.
• Uzun, E. (ed.)(2011). Yeni Hitit 1 Yabancılar İçin Türkçe Ders Kitabı. Ankara:Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.
• Yılmaz, M. Y. (ed.) (2020). Yeni İstanbul. A1 Uluslararası Öğrenciler İçin Türkçe Ders Kitabı. İstanbul: Kültür Sanat Basımevi.
• Zegkinis, Ε., & Hidiroglu, P. (1995). Τουρκική γραμματική [Turkish Grammar]. Thessaloniki: Vanias.