Investigation of Cyberloafing Behaviours of University Students: Sakarya University Case

Year 2025, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 252 - 270, 31.08.2025

Faruk Dursun , Aykut Turan

https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1643915

Abstract

Cyberloafing refers to students using the Internet for personal reasons during academic activities, affecting their academic performance. This study investigates the prevalence, causes, and effects of cyberloafing among Sakarya University students. The aim is to explore the frequency of cyberloafing behaviors and their impact on students' academic performance at Sakarya University. Data were collected from 344 students at Sakarya University through a convenience sampling method. The study included students from Vocational Schools, Faculties, and Institutes. Data were collected between June 8, 2023, and January 12, 2024. There were no missing data. 66.9% of the students spend 3 hours or more daily on social networks, with the majority using smartphones (73.2%) or tablets (13.9%). Science department students exhibited less cyberloafing compared to social sciences students, likely due to hands-on experiments and application-based learning in their courses. Universities should update course content to engage students and enforce stricter technology use policies. Mentoring and behavioral change programs could help improve students' digital habits. Expanding this research to other universities is recommended for broader insights.

Keywords

Cyberloafing , Smart Devices , IT , Higher Education , University Students

References

• Aghaz, A., & Sheikh, A. (2016). Cyberloafing and job burnout: An investigation in the knowledge-intensive sector. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.069
• Akbulut, Y., Dönmez, O., & Dursun, Ö. Ö. (2017). Cyberloafing and social desirability bias among students and employees. Computers in Human Behavior. 72, 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.043
• Bağrıacık Yılmaz, A. (2017). Investigation of cyberloafing levels of graduate students in terms of various variables: A mixed method study. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 18(2), 113-134.
• Baturay, M. H., & Toker, S. (2015). An investigation of the impact of demographics on cyberloafing from an educational setting angle. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 358-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.081
• Borgers, N., Sikkel, D., & Hox, J. (2004). Response effects in surveys on children and adolescents: The effect of number of response options, negative wording, and neutral mid-point. Quality and Quantity, 38, 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUQU.0000013236.29205.a6
• Buntarangin, B., & Frantzen, F. (2022). Cyberloafing while working from home: Exploring the conceptualisation, drivers and implications. University of Agder.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (22. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
• Chen, L., Xu, Y., & He, Y. (2024). Social media use in the workplace: The role of social comparison in negative behaviors. Acta Psychologica, 243, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104144
• Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
• Çınar, O., & Cinisli, Z. (2018). In-class cyberloafing among undergraduate students of physical education and sports teaching department. Journal of Physical Education and Sports Studies, 10(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.30655/besad.2018.3
• Derin, N., & Gökçe, S. G. (2016). Are cyberloafers also innovators? A study on the relationship between cyberloafing and innovative work behavior. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 694-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.070
• Doğan, T., & Yıldırım, Y. (2024). The effect of consumers' fear of missing out (fomo) and hedonic consumptıon behavior on counterfeit product purchase behavior. The Journal of Academic Approaches, 15(3), 1575-1598. https://doi.org/10.54688/ayd.1478288
• Durak, H. Y., & Saritepeci, M. (2019). Occupational burnout and cyberloafing among teachers: Analysis of personality traits, individual and occupational status variables as predictors. The Social Science Journal, 56(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.10.011
• Garip, S. (2023). A theoretical study on the quantitative research tradition in social sciences. International Journal of Social Science Research, 12(1), 1-19.
• Glassman, J., Prosch, M., & Shao, B. B. M. (2015). To monitor or not to monitor: Effectiveness of a cyberloafing countermeasure. Information & Management, 52(2), 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.001.
• Golzar, J., & Tajik, H. (2022). Convenience sampling. International Journal of Education and Language Studies, 1(2), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijels.2022.162981
• Gökçeraslan, Ş., Mumcu, F., K., Haşlaman, T., & Çevik, Y. D. (2016). Modelling smartphone addiction: The role of smartphone usage, self-regulation, general self-efficacy and cyberloafing in university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 639-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.091
• Green, M. (2019). Smartphones, distraction narratives, and flexible pedagogies: students’ mobile technology practices in networked writing classrooms. Computers and Composition, 52, 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.01.009
• Gülnar, M., & Ünsal, H. (2020). A study on the smart phone cyberloafing activities of universty students in Turkey. International Journal of Science and Education, 3(2), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.47477/ubed.766531
• Güngör, A. (2021). An investigation on prospective teachers’ cyberloafing behaviours during distance education, and their reasons (The case of Kilis 7 aralık University, Faculty of Islamic Sciences). Kilis 7 Aralik University Faculty of Theology, 8(2), 517-548. https://doi.org/10.46353/k7auifd.995427
• Hinkin, T. R., Tracey, J. B., & Enz, C. A. (1997). Scale construction: Developing reliable and valid measurement instruments. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 21(1), 100-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108
• İlhan, A. G., & Önal, N. (2024). Reasons for cyberloafing by teacher candidates: Time management in the digital world. Journal of New Approaches in Education, 7(2), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.70325/eyyad.1578662
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
• Kim, S. J., & Byrne, S. (2011). Conceptualizing personal web usage in work contexts: A preliminary framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2271-2283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.006
• Koch, A. K., & Nafziger, J. (2016). Gift exchange, control, and cyberloafing: A real-effort experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 131, 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.09.008
• Li, Q., Xia, B., Zhang, H., Wang, W., & Wang, X. (2022). College students' cyberloafing and the sense of meaning of life: The mediating role of state anxiety and the moderating role of psychological flexibility. Frontiers Public Health, 10, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.905699
• Lim, V. K. G., & Chen, D. J. Q. (2012). Cyberloafing at the workplace: gain or drain on work? Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(4), 343e353.
• Luo, X., Xu, F., Zhang, J., Xiao, S., & Xue, B. (2022). Effects of organizational controls on employees' cyber-loafing: The moderating effects of trait mindfulness. Advances in Information Systems, 53(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514097.3514102
• MacCallum, R., C., & Widaman, K. F. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
• Marumpe, D. P., Rosnani, T., Fahruna, Y., & Jaya, A. (2023). Factors influencing cyberloafing behaviour in students. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 29(11), 57-70.
• Muthuswamy, V. V., & Varshika, G. (2023). Employees performance in digital enviornment: Role of cyber-loafing, electronic monitoring, social media context awareness and job crafting. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 17(1), 128-145. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4766608
• Ozdamli, F., & Ercag, E. (2021). Cyberloafing among university students. TEM Journal-Technology Education Management Informatics, 10(1), 421-426. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM101-53
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. Pegem Yayınevi.
• Rahimnia, F., & Mazidi, A. R. K. (2015). Functions of control mechanisms in mitigating workplace loafing; evidence from an Islamic society. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 671-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.035
• Ross, J. (2018). ‘Cyberloafing’ in health care: A real risk to patient safety. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 33(4), 560-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2018.05.003
• Rushiya, S., & Tolani, K. (2018). Cyber loafing at work place – A literature review. Helix, 8(6), 4316-4317. https://doi.org/10.29042/2018-4316-4317
• Sheikh, A., Atashgah, M. S., & Adibzadegon, M. (2015). The antecedents of cyberloafing: A case study in an Iranian copper industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.042
• Shekher, R., & Joshi, R. (2018). Cyberslacking facts of organization: Determinants and impact. Helix, 8(6), 4300-4303. https://doi.org/10.29042/2018-4300-4303
• Sinap, V. (2023). Determination of cyberloafing levels and reasons of higher education Students in the distance education process. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 13(2), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1094677
• Şenel, S., Günaydın, S., Sarıtaş, M. T., & Çiğdem, H. (2019). The factors predicting cyberloafing behaviors of undergraduate students. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2376
• Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
• Taneja, A., Fiore, V., & Fischer, B. (2015). Cyber-slacking in the classroom: Potential for digital distraction in the new age. Computers & Education, 82, 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.009
• Tatlı, Y., & Sadık, F. (2021). Investigating the reasons of pre-service teachers' cyberloafing during the lesson. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(43), 6530-6563. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.933566
• Tepe, N., & Ergüney, M. (2023). Investıgatıon of the predictive effect of cyberloading and cyberbullying on academic success. Inönü University Faculty of Communication Electronic Journal (INIF E-Journal), 8(1), 30-46. https://doi.org/10.47107/inifedergi.1247436
• Varol, F., & Yıldırım, E. (2019). Cyberloafing in higher education: Reasons and suggestions from students’ perspectives. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9340-1
• Wang, J., Tian, J., & Shen, Z. (2013). The effects and moderators of cyber-loafing controls: An empirical study of Chinese public servants. Information Technology and Management, 14, 269-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-013-0164-y
• Wang, T., Lin, Q., Zong, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Work-related computing at home and nonwork-related computing at work: A self-determination perspective. Information Technology&People, https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2023-0127