Resilience Levels of Care Leavers in Turkey

Year 2024, , 316 - 337, 30.11.2024

Ayşe Şeyma Turgut Arıkan , Yasemin Özkan

https://doi.org/10.58239/tamde.2024.02.009.x

Abstract

Gaining strength of care leavers in terms of psychosocial health and getting into the life out of an institution may be possible through social support systems’ get functionality. This research aims to test the resilience degrees of care leavers. We used the quantitative method in this research. The study sample includes voluntary care leavers registered to non-governmental organizations and the other care leavers that reached by using snowball sampling. To reveal the resilience degrees of care leavers, we used The Resilience Scale for Adults as a data collecting tool in this study. According to the research, we reached 107 care leavers. We used SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) 23 to analyze the data collected from the participants. We found that participants who received graduate education, gained higher income, and had a spouse had higher resilience levels than those who received less education, gained less income, and didn't have a spouse. Furthermore, participants who left institutional care at ages 7–17 had significantly higher score averages from the Social Resources sub-dimension, which is related to relationships with friends, the status of receiving social support, and the status of having a contact in case of need, than those who left institutional care at ages 18–22. It can be inferred that individuals who left institutional care at the ages of 7–17 received more social support.

Keywords

Resilience, Social work, Long-term care, Social policy, Social work research

Türkiye’de Kurum Bakımından Ayrılan Bireylerin Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Düzeyleri

Abstract

Kurum bakımından ayrılan bireylerin psikososyal sağlık açısından güçlenmesi ve kurum dışında bir yaşama geçmesi, sosyal destek sistemlerinin işlevselliği aracılığıyla mümkün olabilmektedir. Bu araştırma, kurum bakımı geçmişi olan bireylerin psikolojik dayanıklılık (yılmazlık) düzeylerini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu araştırmada nicel yöntem kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini sivil toplum kuruluşlarına kayıtlı olan ve kartopu örnekleme yöntemi ile ulaşılan kurum bakımından ayrılmış 107 birey oluşturmaktır. Veri toplama aracı olarak Yetişkinler İçin Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılardan toplanan verileri analiz etmek için SPSS 23 programı kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, kurum bakımından ayrılan bireylerin psikolojik dayanıklılıklarının, bakıma alınma yaşına, bakımdan ayrılma yaşına ve zor dönemlerinde sosyal destek alma durumuna göre farklılaştığını göstermektedir. Bulgular, yüksek lisans eğitimi alan, daha yüksek gelir elde eden ve eşi olan katılımcıların, daha az eğitim alan, daha az gelir elde eden ve eşi olmayan katılımcılara göre daha yüksek psikolojik dayanıklılık seviyelerine sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, 7–17 yaşları arasında kurum bakımından ayrılan katılımcılar, arkadaşlarla ilişkiler, sosyal destek alma durumu ve ihtiyaç halinde birine ulaşma durumu ile ilgili olan Sosyal Kaynaklar alt boyutundan 18–22 yaşları arasında kurum bakımından ayrılanlara göre anlamlı derecede daha yüksek ortalama puanlar almıştır. Bu, 7–17 yaşları arasında kurum bakımından ayrılan bireylerin daha fazla sosyal destek aldığını göstermektedir.

Keywords

Dayanıklılık, Sosyal hizmet, Uzun dönemli bakım, Sosyal politika, Sosyal hizmet araştırması

References

• AÇSHB [Aile ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı]. (2019). Koruma altındaki 14 bin çocuğumuza aile ortamı sağlıyoruz. Aile ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı. https://www.aile.gov.tr/chgm/haberler/koruma-alt%C4%B1ndaki-14-bin-%C3%A7ocu%C4%9Fumuza-aile-ortam%C4%B1-sa%C4%9Fl%C4%B1yoruz/
• Albrecht, T. L., & Adelman, M. B. (1987). Communicating social support: A theoretical perspective. In T. L. Albrecht & M. B. Adelman (Eds.), Communicating social support (pp. 18–39). Sage.
• ASAGEM. (2010). Türkiye’de aile değerleri araştırması. T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları.
• Attepe, S. (2010). Anne baba kaybının çocuklar üzerindeki etkileri. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 23(23), 23–28.
• Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J., Steele, H., Zeanah, C. H., Muhamedrahimov, R. J., Vorria, P., Dobrova‐Krol, N. A., & Gunnar, M. R. (2011). Attachment and emotional development in institutional care: Characteristics and catch up. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 76(4), 62–91.
• Basım, N., & Çetin, F. (2011). Yetişkinler için Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Ölçeğinin güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 22(2), 104–114.
• Biehal, N., & Wade, J. (1999). "I thought it would be easier": The early housing careers of young people leaving care. In J. Rugg (Ed.), Young people, housing and social policy (pp. 79–92). Routledge.
• Bowlby, J. (1951). Maternal care and mental health. World Health Organization Monograph Series (Serial No. 2).
• Buchanan, A. (1999). Are care leavers significantly dissatisfied and depressed in adult life? Adoption & Fostering, 23(4), 35–40.
• Cameron, C., Connelly, G., & Jackson, S. (2014). Educating children and young people in care: Learning placements and educational outcomes. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
• Cashmore, J., & Paxman, M. (2006). Predicting after-care outcomes: The importance of "felt" security. Child & Family Social Work, 11(3), 232–241.
• Chambers, J. M. (2017). Resilience in children and young people in care. In M. E. Ungar (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of social work and resilience (pp. 192–205). Sage.
• Coombes, R. (2004). Falling through the cracks. The Guardian. http://society.guardian.co.uk/homelessness/story/0,,1325383,00.html
• Cotton, D., Nash, T., & Kneale, P. (2014). The experience of care leavers in UK higher education. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 16(3), 5–21.
• Dixon, J., Wade, J., Byford, S., et al. (2006). Young people leaving care: A study of costs and outcomes. Social Work Research & Development Unit.
• Doğan, R. (2013). Bir koruma tedbiri olarak koruyucu aile kurumu ve koruyucu aile yönetmeliği. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 2, 146–170.
• Duncalf, J. (2010). Listen up! Adult care leavers speak out: The views of 310 care leavers aged 17–78. Who Cares? Scotland.
• Fisher, L., Ames, E., Chisholm, K., et al. (1997). Problems reported by parents of Romanian orphans adopted to British Columbia. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20(1), 67–82.
• Friborg, O., Hjemdal, O., Rosenvinge, H. J., et al. (2003). A new rating scale for adult resilience: What are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 12(1), 65–76.
• Frimpong-Manso, K. (2018). Building and utilising resilience: The challenges and coping mechanisms of care leavers in Ghana. Children and Youth Services Review, 87, 52–59.
• Gallwey, S. (2013). The relationship between attachment and resilience in foster care alumni. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1314577275?accountid=16382
• Garmezy, N. (1991). Resiliency and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty. American Behavioral Scientist, 34(4), 416–430.
• Gilligan, R. (2009). Promoting resilience: Supporting children and young people who are in care, adopted or in need. British Association for Adoption and Fostering (BAAF).
• Gilligan, R., Brady, E., & Cullen, L. (2022). One more adversity: The lived experience of care leavers in Ireland during the Covid-19 pandemic. Trinity College Dublin, School of Social Work & Social Policy.
• Haase, J. E. (2004). The Adolescent Resilience Model as a guide to interventions. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 21(5), 289–299.
• Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64–105.
• Hayat Sende Derneği. (2014). Kurum bakımından topluma geçişte gençler çalıştayı (1. Baskı) [Broşür]. Hayat Sende Derneği.
• Heath, S. (2008). Housing choices and issues for young people in the UK. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
• Höjer, I., & Sjöblom, Y. (2010). What makes a difference? Turning points in care leavers’ lives in Sweden. Adoption & Fostering, 34(3), 84–95.
• Humphreys, K. L., Gleason, M. M., Drury, S. S., et al. (2015). Effects of institutional rearing and foster care on psychopathology at age 12 years in Romania: Follow-up of an open, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2(7), 625–634.
• Koruyucu Aile Yönetmeliği. (2012). TC Resmi Gazete (28497).
• Leadbeater, B., Hellner, I., Allen, J. P., et al. (1989). Assessment of interpersonal negotiation strategies in youth engaged in problem behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 25(4), 465–472.
• Lyyra, T. M., & Heikkinen, R. L. (2006). Perceived social support and mortality in older people. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(2), 47–152.
• Malkoç, A. T., & Yalçın, İ. T. (2015). Relationships among resilience, social support, coping, and psychological well-being among university students. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 5(43), 35–42.
• Munro, E. R., Stein, M., & Ward, H. (2005). Outcomes for young people leaving care: Overcoming the odds. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
• Murphy, R. E. (2011). Psychological needs of young adults leaving the care system. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Cardiff University.
• Quinton, D., Rutter, M., & Liddle, C. (1984). Institutional rearing, parenting difficulties and marital support. Psychological Medicine, 14(1), 107–124.
• Reuben, S. (2024). Networking people for goal attainment: Psychosocial processes facilitating resilience of care-leavers in South Africa. Children and Youth Services Review, 163, 107798.
• Silva-Wayne, S. (1995). Contributions to resilience in children and youth: What successful child welfare graduates say. In J. Hudson & B. Galaway (Eds.), Child welfare in Canada: Research and policy implications (pp. 308–323). Thompson Educational Publishing.
• Sims‐Schouten, W., & Hayden, C. (2017). Mental health and wellbeing of care leavers: Making sense of their perspectives. Child & Family Social Work, 22(4), 1480–1487.
• Sims-Schouten, W., & Thapa, M. (2024). "Rocky road" & "brick walls": Multiple meanings of resilience in a social work context through the lens of critical realist informed grounded theory. Qualitative Social Work, 23(2), 382–398.
• Smyke, A. T., Zeanah, C. H., Gleason, M. M., et al. (2012). A randomized controlled trial comparing foster care and institutional care for children with signs of reactive attachment disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169(5), 508–514.
• Spitz, R. A. (1945). Hospitalism: An inquiry into the genesis of psychiatric conditions in early childhood. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1(1), 53–74.
• Stansfeld, S. A., Fuhrer, R., Head, J., et al. (1997). Work and psychiatric disorder in the Whitehall II study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 43(1), 73–81.
• Stein, M. (2005). Resilience and young people leaving care. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/185935369x.pdf
• Stein, M. (2006). Research review: Young people leaving care. Child & Family Social Work, 11(3), 273–279.
• Stein, M. (2008). Resilience and young people leaving care. Child Care in Practice, 14(1), 35–44.
• Sulimani-Aidan, Y., Achdut, N., Benbenishty, R., & Zeira, A. (2024). Unveiling the role of residential care in care leavers’ personal development and life outcomes. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.
• Tweddle, A. (2007). Youth leaving care: How do they fare? New Directions for Youth Development, 2007(113), 15–31.
• Ungar, M. (2004). The importance of parents and other caregivers to the resilience of high-risk adolescents. Family Process, 43(1), 23–41.
• Wade, J., Biehal, N., Farrelly, N., & Sinclair, I. (2011). Caring for abused and neglected children: Making the right decisions for reunification or long-term care. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
• Webb, L. (2013). Resilience: How to cope when everything around you keeps changing. Capstone.
• Yazgan-İnanç, B., & Yerlikaya, E. E. (2012). Kişilik kuramları (6. Baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
• Yıldırım, Ş. (2017). 2000’li yıllarda çocuk koruma sistemi içinde bakım hizmetlerinin genel görünümü. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 87–110.
• Yin, S. (2024). Navigating the world of work: Experiences and perspectives of care leavers in China. Journal of Public Child Welfare.
• Yüksel, Z., & Öncü, B. (2016). Geçmişte kurum bakımında kalmış bireylerin kurum bakımı deneyimlerine ilişkin özellikleri ve bağlanma biçimlerinin incelenmesi. Journal of Society & Social Work, 27(2), 63–77.