Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Yapay Zekada Posthümanizm ve Transhümanizm ile İlişkili Olarak Eğitim Biliminin Felsefi İnşası

Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 70 - 83, 20.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.1610935

Abstract

Yapay Zeka (YZ), modern çağın en dönüştürücü teknolojik gelişmelerinden biri olarak ortaya çıkmıştır ve eğitim de dahil olmak üzere çeşitli sektörler üzerinde derin bir etki sunmaktadır. YZ'nin eğitime entegrasyonu, kapsamlı bir araştırma gerektiren karmaşık bir fırsatlar, zorluklar ve riskler etkileşimi sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, YZ'nin eğitim bağlamındaki rolünü incelemek için bibliyometrik, kavramsal ve hermeneutik analizleri kullanan karma bir yöntem yaklaşımı benimsemektedir. Bibliyometrik analiz, Scopus veri tabanından “Yapay Zeka” VEYA “YZ” VE “Eğitim” anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak alınan 8.288 belgeyi analiz etmek için araçlar kullanarak araştırma eğilimlerini niceliksel ve görsel olarak haritalandırmaktadır. Son yirmi yılda bu alan, dünya çapında 28.740 yazarın katkılarıyla katlanarak büyümüştür. Haritalama, ChatGPT, sanal gerçeklik, büyük veri ve veri madenciliği gibi teknolojilerin yanı sıra makine öğrenimi, derin öğrenme, eğitim mühendisliği ve bilgisayar destekli öğretim gibi yapay zeka uygulamalarının temel alanlarını vurgulamaktadır. Kavramsal analiz, posthümanizm, transhümanizm gibi kritik fikirleri ve bunların eğitimde YZ ile kesişimini incelemektedir. Bu paradigmalar, insani gelişim ve toplumsal ilerleme için bir araç olarak geleneksel rollerine meydan okuyarak eğitimi yeniden şekillendirmektedir. YZ'nin kişiselleştirilmiş öğrenme deneyimlerini kolaylaştırmadaki rolü, verimliliği ve uyarlanabilirliği artırma potansiyelinin altını çizmektedir. Bununla birlikte, daha geniş eğitim hedefleriyle uyumu konusunda acil soruları da gündeme getirmektedir. Bilgi aktarımının ötesinde, eğitim karakter gelişimini, eleştirel düşünmeyi ve sosyal beceri alanlarını teşvik eder ve yapay zeka teknolojilerine aşırı güven nedeniyle potansiyel olarak zayıflar. Hermeneutik yöntem, felsefi metinlerin ve literatürün daha derinlemesine yorumlanmasını sağlayarak YZ'nin eğitime entegre edilmesinin etik ve toplumsal sonuçlarını vurgulamaktadır. İnsan yeteneklerinin teknolojik ilerlemelerle birleştirilmesini savunan posthümanizm ve transhümanizm, eğitimin temel değerlerine varoluşsal zorluklar getirmektedir. ChatGPT gibi araçlar güçlü olmakla birlikte, akademik bütünlüğü ve kritik beceri gelişimini aşındırma riski taşıyor. Örneğin, sınav problemlerini çözmek veya karmaşık sorguları yanıtlamak için yapay zekaya güvenmek, eğitimin temel bileşenleri olan çaba ve entelektüel gelişim ilkelerini zayıflatır. Araştırma, eğitimde YZ'nin iki uçlu doğasının altını çiziyor. Bir yandan, uyarlanabilir ve verimli öğrenme sistemlerini mümkün kılıyor. Öte yandan, geleneksel eğitim uygulamalarını bozarak etik ikilemleri ve insan merkezli öğrenmenin geleceği hakkında soruları gündeme getiriyor. Felsefi bakış açıları, teknolojik entegrasyonu temel akademik değerlerin korunmasıyla dengeleyen bir eğitim sistemini savunarak bu aksaklıkların üstesinden gelmek için çok önemlidir. Bu, yapay zeka uygulamalarını çevreleyen etik hususların, özellikle de posthümanist ve transhümanist ideolojilerin yan ürünleri olan ChatGPT gibi araçların potansiyel kötüye kullanımının ele alınmasını içerir. Dönüştürücü bir süreç olarak eğitim, YZ'yi sorumlu bir şekilde entegre edecek şekilde evrim geçirmeli ve insanın entelektüel çabalarının yerini almak yerine onları tamamlamasını sağlamalıdır. Bu, YZ teknolojilerinin istenmeyen sonuçlarını hafifletmek için eğitim sistemlerinin yeniden yapılandırılmasını gerektirir. Eğitimin amacına yönelik felsefi sorgulama, hızla gelişen dijital bir ortamda bilginin nasıl edinildiğini ve becerilerin nasıl geliştirildiğini vurgulayarak hedeflerinin yeniden düzenlenmesine rehberlik etmelidir. Eğitim kurumları, YZ'nin etik ve pratik sonuçları konusunda farkındalık yaratarak, eleştirel düşünce ve etik karar verme yeteneğine sahip çok yönlü bireylerin yetiştirilmesindeki rollerini geri kazanabilirler. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma, YZ'yi eğitime entegre etmek için dengeli bir yaklaşıma duyulan ihtiyacı vurgulamaktadır. Teknolojik gelişmeler inovasyon için benzeri görülmemiş fırsatlar sunarken, eğitimin özündeki insani değerleri gölgede bırakmamalıdır. Eğitim sektörü, posthümanizm ve transhümanizmin ortaya çıkardığı zorlukları ele alarak, 21. yüzyıl için sorumlu, etik ve yetenekli bireyler geliştirme misyonunu korurken YZ'nin potansiyelinden yararlanabilir.

Ethical Statement

Bu dergide değerlendirilmek üzere sunulan makale ile ilgili herhangi bir çıkar çatışması olmadığını beyan ederiz. Yazarın, bu makalede sunulan araştırma ve sonuçları uygunsuz bir şekilde etkileyebilecek hiçbir finansal, kişisel veya mesleki ilişkisi olmadığını teyit ederiz.

Thanks

Bu araştırmayı destekleyen Bilim Akademisi ve Kültürel Okuryazarlık Araştırma Topluluğu'na (KOPI ALINEA) teşekkür ederim.

References

  • Baelo-Allué, S., & Calvo-Pascual, M. (Eds.). (2021). Transhumanism and posthumanism in twenty-first century narrative. Routledge.
  • Barik, S. (2023). Embracing the transformative dynamics of English teaching and technology in higher education: A posthumanist perspective. Smart Moves Journal IJELLH, 17-31.
  • Buchanan, R. A., Forster, D. J., Douglas, S., Nakar, S., Boon, H. J., Heath, T., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1178-1197.
  • Chien, S. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). A research proposal for an AI chatbot as virtual patient agent to improve nursing students’ clinical inquiry skills. ICAIE, 13.
  • Cole‐Turner, R. (2022). Posthumanism and transhumanism. Encyclopedia of Religious Ethics, 1098-1105.
  • Coombs, C., Stacey, P., Kawalek, P., Simeonova, B., Becker, J., Bergener, K., & Trautmann, H. (2021). What is it about humanity that we can’t give away to intelligent machines? A European perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102311.
  • Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3), 02.
  • Essa, S. G., Celik, T., & Human-Hendricks, N. E. (2023). Personalized adaptive learning technologies based on machine learning techniques to identify learning styles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 11, 48392-48409.
  • Firdaus, T., Sholeha, S. A., Jannah, M., & Setiawan, A. R. (2024). Comparison of ChatGPT and Gemini AI in Answering Higher-Order Thinking Skill Biology Questions: Accuracy and Evaluation. International Journal of Science Education and Teaching, 3(3), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijset.2024.11
  • Ghio, A. (2024). Democratizing academic research with Artificial Intelligence: The misleading case of language. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 98, 102687.
  • Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692.
  • Guerreiro, J., Loureiro, S. M. C., Romero, J., Itani, O., & Eloy, S. (2022). Transhumanism and engagement-facilitating technologies in society. Journal of Promotion Management, 28(5), 537-558.
  • Kirby, A. (2023). Exploratory bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a preliminary research tool. Publications, 11(1), 10.
  • Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614.
  • Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973-1018.
  • Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2003). Konsep dan analisis konseptual. Penelitian Filsafat dan Fenomenologis, 67 (2), 253-282.
  • Merzlyakov, S. S. (2022). Posthumanism vs. Transhumanism: From the “End of Exceptionalism” to “Technological Humanism”. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 92(Suppl 6), S475-S482.
  • Munn, K. (2008). Introduction: what is ontology for?. Berlin: Ontos Verlag
  • Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022). AI-based personalized e-learning systems: Issues, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Access, 10, 81323-81342.
  • Myers, M. D. (2004). Hermeneutics in information systems research. Social theory and philosophy for information systems, 103-128.
  • Neubauer, A. C. (2021). The future of intelligence research in the coming age of artificial intelligence–With a special consideration of the philosophical movements of trans-and posthumanism. Intelligence, 87, 101563.
  • Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., & Maggio, L. A. (2022). Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on medical education, 11(3), 173-176.
  • Nurziana, S., & Firdaus, T. (2025). The Concept of Divinity in Javanese Mysticism: Viewing the Universe as a Manifestation of God. Samsara: International Journal of Eastern Philosophy, 1(1), 1-11.
  • Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & mass communication educator, 78(1), 84-93.
  • Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO
  • Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., ... & Mondelli, V. (2021). EDUCAUSE horizon report teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE: Boulder, CO, USA, 2-50.
  • Pesonen, J. A. (2021, July). ‘Are You OK?’Students’ Trust in a Chatbot Providing Support Opportunities. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 199-215). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Sallam, M. (2023, March). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 6, p. 887). MDPI.
  • Saputra, I., Astuti, M., Sayuti, M., & Kusumastuti, D. (2023). Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities, Challenges, Threats and Obstacles. A Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 12(4).
  • Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025.
Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 70 - 83, 20.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.1610935

Abstract

References

  • Baelo-Allué, S., & Calvo-Pascual, M. (Eds.). (2021). Transhumanism and posthumanism in twenty-first century narrative. Routledge.
  • Barik, S. (2023). Embracing the transformative dynamics of English teaching and technology in higher education: A posthumanist perspective. Smart Moves Journal IJELLH, 17-31.
  • Buchanan, R. A., Forster, D. J., Douglas, S., Nakar, S., Boon, H. J., Heath, T., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1178-1197.
  • Chien, S. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). A research proposal for an AI chatbot as virtual patient agent to improve nursing students’ clinical inquiry skills. ICAIE, 13.
  • Cole‐Turner, R. (2022). Posthumanism and transhumanism. Encyclopedia of Religious Ethics, 1098-1105.
  • Coombs, C., Stacey, P., Kawalek, P., Simeonova, B., Becker, J., Bergener, K., & Trautmann, H. (2021). What is it about humanity that we can’t give away to intelligent machines? A European perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102311.
  • Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3), 02.
  • Essa, S. G., Celik, T., & Human-Hendricks, N. E. (2023). Personalized adaptive learning technologies based on machine learning techniques to identify learning styles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 11, 48392-48409.
  • Firdaus, T., Sholeha, S. A., Jannah, M., & Setiawan, A. R. (2024). Comparison of ChatGPT and Gemini AI in Answering Higher-Order Thinking Skill Biology Questions: Accuracy and Evaluation. International Journal of Science Education and Teaching, 3(3), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijset.2024.11
  • Ghio, A. (2024). Democratizing academic research with Artificial Intelligence: The misleading case of language. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 98, 102687.
  • Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692.
  • Guerreiro, J., Loureiro, S. M. C., Romero, J., Itani, O., & Eloy, S. (2022). Transhumanism and engagement-facilitating technologies in society. Journal of Promotion Management, 28(5), 537-558.
  • Kirby, A. (2023). Exploratory bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a preliminary research tool. Publications, 11(1), 10.
  • Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614.
  • Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973-1018.
  • Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2003). Konsep dan analisis konseptual. Penelitian Filsafat dan Fenomenologis, 67 (2), 253-282.
  • Merzlyakov, S. S. (2022). Posthumanism vs. Transhumanism: From the “End of Exceptionalism” to “Technological Humanism”. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 92(Suppl 6), S475-S482.
  • Munn, K. (2008). Introduction: what is ontology for?. Berlin: Ontos Verlag
  • Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022). AI-based personalized e-learning systems: Issues, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Access, 10, 81323-81342.
  • Myers, M. D. (2004). Hermeneutics in information systems research. Social theory and philosophy for information systems, 103-128.
  • Neubauer, A. C. (2021). The future of intelligence research in the coming age of artificial intelligence–With a special consideration of the philosophical movements of trans-and posthumanism. Intelligence, 87, 101563.
  • Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., & Maggio, L. A. (2022). Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on medical education, 11(3), 173-176.
  • Nurziana, S., & Firdaus, T. (2025). The Concept of Divinity in Javanese Mysticism: Viewing the Universe as a Manifestation of God. Samsara: International Journal of Eastern Philosophy, 1(1), 1-11.
  • Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & mass communication educator, 78(1), 84-93.
  • Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO
  • Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., ... & Mondelli, V. (2021). EDUCAUSE horizon report teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE: Boulder, CO, USA, 2-50.
  • Pesonen, J. A. (2021, July). ‘Are You OK?’Students’ Trust in a Chatbot Providing Support Opportunities. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 199-215). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Sallam, M. (2023, March). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 6, p. 887). MDPI.
  • Saputra, I., Astuti, M., Sayuti, M., & Kusumastuti, D. (2023). Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities, Challenges, Threats and Obstacles. A Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 12(4).
  • Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025.
Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 70 - 83, 20.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.1610935

Abstract

References

  • Baelo-Allué, S., & Calvo-Pascual, M. (Eds.). (2021). Transhumanism and posthumanism in twenty-first century narrative. Routledge.
  • Barik, S. (2023). Embracing the transformative dynamics of English teaching and technology in higher education: A posthumanist perspective. Smart Moves Journal IJELLH, 17-31.
  • Buchanan, R. A., Forster, D. J., Douglas, S., Nakar, S., Boon, H. J., Heath, T., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1178-1197.
  • Chien, S. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). A research proposal for an AI chatbot as virtual patient agent to improve nursing students’ clinical inquiry skills. ICAIE, 13.
  • Cole‐Turner, R. (2022). Posthumanism and transhumanism. Encyclopedia of Religious Ethics, 1098-1105.
  • Coombs, C., Stacey, P., Kawalek, P., Simeonova, B., Becker, J., Bergener, K., & Trautmann, H. (2021). What is it about humanity that we can’t give away to intelligent machines? A European perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102311.
  • Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3), 02.
  • Essa, S. G., Celik, T., & Human-Hendricks, N. E. (2023). Personalized adaptive learning technologies based on machine learning techniques to identify learning styles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 11, 48392-48409.
  • Firdaus, T., Sholeha, S. A., Jannah, M., & Setiawan, A. R. (2024). Comparison of ChatGPT and Gemini AI in Answering Higher-Order Thinking Skill Biology Questions: Accuracy and Evaluation. International Journal of Science Education and Teaching, 3(3), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijset.2024.11
  • Ghio, A. (2024). Democratizing academic research with Artificial Intelligence: The misleading case of language. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 98, 102687.
  • Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692.
  • Guerreiro, J., Loureiro, S. M. C., Romero, J., Itani, O., & Eloy, S. (2022). Transhumanism and engagement-facilitating technologies in society. Journal of Promotion Management, 28(5), 537-558.
  • Kirby, A. (2023). Exploratory bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a preliminary research tool. Publications, 11(1), 10.
  • Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614.
  • Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973-1018.
  • Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2003). Konsep dan analisis konseptual. Penelitian Filsafat dan Fenomenologis, 67 (2), 253-282.
  • Merzlyakov, S. S. (2022). Posthumanism vs. Transhumanism: From the “End of Exceptionalism” to “Technological Humanism”. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 92(Suppl 6), S475-S482.
  • Munn, K. (2008). Introduction: what is ontology for?. Berlin: Ontos Verlag
  • Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022). AI-based personalized e-learning systems: Issues, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Access, 10, 81323-81342.
  • Myers, M. D. (2004). Hermeneutics in information systems research. Social theory and philosophy for information systems, 103-128.
  • Neubauer, A. C. (2021). The future of intelligence research in the coming age of artificial intelligence–With a special consideration of the philosophical movements of trans-and posthumanism. Intelligence, 87, 101563.
  • Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., & Maggio, L. A. (2022). Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on medical education, 11(3), 173-176.
  • Nurziana, S., & Firdaus, T. (2025). The Concept of Divinity in Javanese Mysticism: Viewing the Universe as a Manifestation of God. Samsara: International Journal of Eastern Philosophy, 1(1), 1-11.
  • Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & mass communication educator, 78(1), 84-93.
  • Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO
  • Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., ... & Mondelli, V. (2021). EDUCAUSE horizon report teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE: Boulder, CO, USA, 2-50.
  • Pesonen, J. A. (2021, July). ‘Are You OK?’Students’ Trust in a Chatbot Providing Support Opportunities. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 199-215). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Sallam, M. (2023, March). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 6, p. 887). MDPI.
  • Saputra, I., Astuti, M., Sayuti, M., & Kusumastuti, D. (2023). Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities, Challenges, Threats and Obstacles. A Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 12(4).
  • Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025.

The Philosophical Construction of Educational Science in Relation to Posthumanism and Transhumanism in Artificial Intelligence

Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 70 - 83, 20.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.1610935

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as one of the most transformative technological developments of the modern era, offering a profound impact on various sectors, including education. The integration of AI into education presents a complex interplay of opportunities, challenges, and risks that require comprehensive exploration. This study adopts a mixed-methods approach, utilizing bibliometric, conceptual, and hermeneutic analyses to examine the role of AI in educational contexts. Bibliometric analysis quantitatively and visually maps research trends, employing tools to analyze 8,288 documents retrieved from the Scopus database using the keywords "Artificial Intelligence" OR "AI" AND "Education." Over the past two decades, the field has seen exponential growth, with contributions from 28,740 authors worldwide. The mapping highlights key areas of AI application, such as machine learning, deep learning, educational engineering, and computer-aided instruction, alongside technologies like ChatGPT, virtual reality, big data, and data mining. Conceptual analysis dissects critical ideas such as posthumanism, transhumanism, and their intersection with AI in education. These paradigms are reshaping education by challenging its traditional roles as a vehicle for human development and societal progress. AI's role in facilitating personalized learning experiences underscores its potential for enhancing efficiency and adaptability. However, it also raises pressing questions about its alignment with broader educational objectives. Beyond knowledge transfer, education fosters character development, critical thinking, and social skills areas potentially undermined by overreliance on AI technologies. The hermeneutic method provides a deeper interpretation of philosophical texts and literature, emphasizing the ethical and societal implications of integrating AI into education. Posthumanism and transhumanism, which advocate for merging human capabilities with technological advancements, pose existential challenges to education's foundational values. Tools like ChatGPT, while powerful, risk eroding academic integrity and critical skill development. For instance, reliance on AI for solving exam problems or answering complex queries undermines the principles of effort and intellectual growth, essential components of education. The research underscores the dual-edged nature of AI in education. On one hand, it enables adaptive and efficient learning systems. On the other hand, it disrupts traditional educational practices, raising ethical dilemmas and questions about the future of human-centric learning. Philosophical perspectives are crucial in navigating these disruptions, advocating for an education system that balances technological integration with the preservation of core academic values. This involves addressing the ethical considerations surrounding AI applications, particularly the potential misuse of tools like ChatGPT, which are byproducts of posthumanist and transhumanist ideologies. Education, as a transformative process, must evolve to integrate AI responsibly, ensuring that it complements rather than replaces human intellectual efforts. This requires reconstructing educational systems to mitigate the unintended consequences of AI technologies. Philosophical inquiry into the purpose of education must guide the realignment of its goals, emphasizing how knowledge is acquired and skills are nurtured in a rapidly evolving digital landscape. By fostering awareness of the ethical and practical implications of AI, educational institutions can reclaim their role in cultivating well-rounded individuals capable of critical thought and ethical decision-making. In conclusion, this study highlights the need for a balanced approach to integrating AI into education. While technological advancements offer unprecedented opportunities for innovation, they must not overshadow the humanistic values at the core of education. By addressing the challenges posed by posthumanism and transhumanism, the educational sector can harness AI's potential while safeguarding its mission to develop responsible, ethical, and capable individuals for the 21st century.

Ethical Statement

We hereby declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with the manuscript submitted for consideration in this journal. We confirm that author have no financial, personal, or professional affiliations that could inappropriately influence the research and conclusions presented in this manuscript.

Thanks

I would like to thank Academy of Science and Cultural Literacy Research Community (KOPI ALINEA) for supporting this research.

References

  • Baelo-Allué, S., & Calvo-Pascual, M. (Eds.). (2021). Transhumanism and posthumanism in twenty-first century narrative. Routledge.
  • Barik, S. (2023). Embracing the transformative dynamics of English teaching and technology in higher education: A posthumanist perspective. Smart Moves Journal IJELLH, 17-31.
  • Buchanan, R. A., Forster, D. J., Douglas, S., Nakar, S., Boon, H. J., Heath, T., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1178-1197.
  • Chien, S. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). A research proposal for an AI chatbot as virtual patient agent to improve nursing students’ clinical inquiry skills. ICAIE, 13.
  • Cole‐Turner, R. (2022). Posthumanism and transhumanism. Encyclopedia of Religious Ethics, 1098-1105.
  • Coombs, C., Stacey, P., Kawalek, P., Simeonova, B., Becker, J., Bergener, K., & Trautmann, H. (2021). What is it about humanity that we can’t give away to intelligent machines? A European perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102311.
  • Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3), 02.
  • Essa, S. G., Celik, T., & Human-Hendricks, N. E. (2023). Personalized adaptive learning technologies based on machine learning techniques to identify learning styles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 11, 48392-48409.
  • Firdaus, T., Sholeha, S. A., Jannah, M., & Setiawan, A. R. (2024). Comparison of ChatGPT and Gemini AI in Answering Higher-Order Thinking Skill Biology Questions: Accuracy and Evaluation. International Journal of Science Education and Teaching, 3(3), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijset.2024.11
  • Ghio, A. (2024). Democratizing academic research with Artificial Intelligence: The misleading case of language. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 98, 102687.
  • Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692.
  • Guerreiro, J., Loureiro, S. M. C., Romero, J., Itani, O., & Eloy, S. (2022). Transhumanism and engagement-facilitating technologies in society. Journal of Promotion Management, 28(5), 537-558.
  • Kirby, A. (2023). Exploratory bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a preliminary research tool. Publications, 11(1), 10.
  • Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614.
  • Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973-1018.
  • Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2003). Konsep dan analisis konseptual. Penelitian Filsafat dan Fenomenologis, 67 (2), 253-282.
  • Merzlyakov, S. S. (2022). Posthumanism vs. Transhumanism: From the “End of Exceptionalism” to “Technological Humanism”. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 92(Suppl 6), S475-S482.
  • Munn, K. (2008). Introduction: what is ontology for?. Berlin: Ontos Verlag
  • Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022). AI-based personalized e-learning systems: Issues, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Access, 10, 81323-81342.
  • Myers, M. D. (2004). Hermeneutics in information systems research. Social theory and philosophy for information systems, 103-128.
  • Neubauer, A. C. (2021). The future of intelligence research in the coming age of artificial intelligence–With a special consideration of the philosophical movements of trans-and posthumanism. Intelligence, 87, 101563.
  • Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., & Maggio, L. A. (2022). Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on medical education, 11(3), 173-176.
  • Nurziana, S., & Firdaus, T. (2025). The Concept of Divinity in Javanese Mysticism: Viewing the Universe as a Manifestation of God. Samsara: International Journal of Eastern Philosophy, 1(1), 1-11.
  • Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & mass communication educator, 78(1), 84-93.
  • Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO
  • Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., ... & Mondelli, V. (2021). EDUCAUSE horizon report teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE: Boulder, CO, USA, 2-50.
  • Pesonen, J. A. (2021, July). ‘Are You OK?’Students’ Trust in a Chatbot Providing Support Opportunities. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 199-215). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Sallam, M. (2023, March). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 6, p. 887). MDPI.
  • Saputra, I., Astuti, M., Sayuti, M., & Kusumastuti, D. (2023). Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities, Challenges, Threats and Obstacles. A Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 12(4).
  • Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025.
Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 70 - 83, 20.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.1610935

Abstract

References

  • Baelo-Allué, S., & Calvo-Pascual, M. (Eds.). (2021). Transhumanism and posthumanism in twenty-first century narrative. Routledge.
  • Barik, S. (2023). Embracing the transformative dynamics of English teaching and technology in higher education: A posthumanist perspective. Smart Moves Journal IJELLH, 17-31.
  • Buchanan, R. A., Forster, D. J., Douglas, S., Nakar, S., Boon, H. J., Heath, T., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1178-1197.
  • Chien, S. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). A research proposal for an AI chatbot as virtual patient agent to improve nursing students’ clinical inquiry skills. ICAIE, 13.
  • Cole‐Turner, R. (2022). Posthumanism and transhumanism. Encyclopedia of Religious Ethics, 1098-1105.
  • Coombs, C., Stacey, P., Kawalek, P., Simeonova, B., Becker, J., Bergener, K., & Trautmann, H. (2021). What is it about humanity that we can’t give away to intelligent machines? A European perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102311.
  • Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3), 02.
  • Essa, S. G., Celik, T., & Human-Hendricks, N. E. (2023). Personalized adaptive learning technologies based on machine learning techniques to identify learning styles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 11, 48392-48409.
  • Firdaus, T., Sholeha, S. A., Jannah, M., & Setiawan, A. R. (2024). Comparison of ChatGPT and Gemini AI in Answering Higher-Order Thinking Skill Biology Questions: Accuracy and Evaluation. International Journal of Science Education and Teaching, 3(3), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijset.2024.11
  • Ghio, A. (2024). Democratizing academic research with Artificial Intelligence: The misleading case of language. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 98, 102687.
  • Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692.
  • Guerreiro, J., Loureiro, S. M. C., Romero, J., Itani, O., & Eloy, S. (2022). Transhumanism and engagement-facilitating technologies in society. Journal of Promotion Management, 28(5), 537-558.
  • Kirby, A. (2023). Exploratory bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a preliminary research tool. Publications, 11(1), 10.
  • Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614.
  • Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973-1018.
  • Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2003). Konsep dan analisis konseptual. Penelitian Filsafat dan Fenomenologis, 67 (2), 253-282.
  • Merzlyakov, S. S. (2022). Posthumanism vs. Transhumanism: From the “End of Exceptionalism” to “Technological Humanism”. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 92(Suppl 6), S475-S482.
  • Munn, K. (2008). Introduction: what is ontology for?. Berlin: Ontos Verlag
  • Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022). AI-based personalized e-learning systems: Issues, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Access, 10, 81323-81342.
  • Myers, M. D. (2004). Hermeneutics in information systems research. Social theory and philosophy for information systems, 103-128.
  • Neubauer, A. C. (2021). The future of intelligence research in the coming age of artificial intelligence–With a special consideration of the philosophical movements of trans-and posthumanism. Intelligence, 87, 101563.
  • Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., & Maggio, L. A. (2022). Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on medical education, 11(3), 173-176.
  • Nurziana, S., & Firdaus, T. (2025). The Concept of Divinity in Javanese Mysticism: Viewing the Universe as a Manifestation of God. Samsara: International Journal of Eastern Philosophy, 1(1), 1-11.
  • Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & mass communication educator, 78(1), 84-93.
  • Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO
  • Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., ... & Mondelli, V. (2021). EDUCAUSE horizon report teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE: Boulder, CO, USA, 2-50.
  • Pesonen, J. A. (2021, July). ‘Are You OK?’Students’ Trust in a Chatbot Providing Support Opportunities. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 199-215). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Sallam, M. (2023, March). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 6, p. 887). MDPI.
  • Saputra, I., Astuti, M., Sayuti, M., & Kusumastuti, D. (2023). Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities, Challenges, Threats and Obstacles. A Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 12(4).
  • Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025.
Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 70 - 83, 20.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.1610935

Abstract

References

  • Baelo-Allué, S., & Calvo-Pascual, M. (Eds.). (2021). Transhumanism and posthumanism in twenty-first century narrative. Routledge.
  • Barik, S. (2023). Embracing the transformative dynamics of English teaching and technology in higher education: A posthumanist perspective. Smart Moves Journal IJELLH, 17-31.
  • Buchanan, R. A., Forster, D. J., Douglas, S., Nakar, S., Boon, H. J., Heath, T., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1178-1197.
  • Chien, S. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). A research proposal for an AI chatbot as virtual patient agent to improve nursing students’ clinical inquiry skills. ICAIE, 13.
  • Cole‐Turner, R. (2022). Posthumanism and transhumanism. Encyclopedia of Religious Ethics, 1098-1105.
  • Coombs, C., Stacey, P., Kawalek, P., Simeonova, B., Becker, J., Bergener, K., & Trautmann, H. (2021). What is it about humanity that we can’t give away to intelligent machines? A European perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102311.
  • Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3), 02.
  • Essa, S. G., Celik, T., & Human-Hendricks, N. E. (2023). Personalized adaptive learning technologies based on machine learning techniques to identify learning styles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 11, 48392-48409.
  • Firdaus, T., Sholeha, S. A., Jannah, M., & Setiawan, A. R. (2024). Comparison of ChatGPT and Gemini AI in Answering Higher-Order Thinking Skill Biology Questions: Accuracy and Evaluation. International Journal of Science Education and Teaching, 3(3), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijset.2024.11
  • Ghio, A. (2024). Democratizing academic research with Artificial Intelligence: The misleading case of language. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 98, 102687.
  • Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692.
  • Guerreiro, J., Loureiro, S. M. C., Romero, J., Itani, O., & Eloy, S. (2022). Transhumanism and engagement-facilitating technologies in society. Journal of Promotion Management, 28(5), 537-558.
  • Kirby, A. (2023). Exploratory bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a preliminary research tool. Publications, 11(1), 10.
  • Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614.
  • Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973-1018.
  • Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2003). Konsep dan analisis konseptual. Penelitian Filsafat dan Fenomenologis, 67 (2), 253-282.
  • Merzlyakov, S. S. (2022). Posthumanism vs. Transhumanism: From the “End of Exceptionalism” to “Technological Humanism”. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 92(Suppl 6), S475-S482.
  • Munn, K. (2008). Introduction: what is ontology for?. Berlin: Ontos Verlag
  • Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022). AI-based personalized e-learning systems: Issues, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Access, 10, 81323-81342.
  • Myers, M. D. (2004). Hermeneutics in information systems research. Social theory and philosophy for information systems, 103-128.
  • Neubauer, A. C. (2021). The future of intelligence research in the coming age of artificial intelligence–With a special consideration of the philosophical movements of trans-and posthumanism. Intelligence, 87, 101563.
  • Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., & Maggio, L. A. (2022). Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on medical education, 11(3), 173-176.
  • Nurziana, S., & Firdaus, T. (2025). The Concept of Divinity in Javanese Mysticism: Viewing the Universe as a Manifestation of God. Samsara: International Journal of Eastern Philosophy, 1(1), 1-11.
  • Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & mass communication educator, 78(1), 84-93.
  • Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO
  • Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., ... & Mondelli, V. (2021). EDUCAUSE horizon report teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE: Boulder, CO, USA, 2-50.
  • Pesonen, J. A. (2021, July). ‘Are You OK?’Students’ Trust in a Chatbot Providing Support Opportunities. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 199-215). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Sallam, M. (2023, March). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 6, p. 887). MDPI.
  • Saputra, I., Astuti, M., Sayuti, M., & Kusumastuti, D. (2023). Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities, Challenges, Threats and Obstacles. A Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 12(4).
  • Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025.
Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 70 - 83, 20.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.1610935

Abstract

References

  • Baelo-Allué, S., & Calvo-Pascual, M. (Eds.). (2021). Transhumanism and posthumanism in twenty-first century narrative. Routledge.
  • Barik, S. (2023). Embracing the transformative dynamics of English teaching and technology in higher education: A posthumanist perspective. Smart Moves Journal IJELLH, 17-31.
  • Buchanan, R. A., Forster, D. J., Douglas, S., Nakar, S., Boon, H. J., Heath, T., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1178-1197.
  • Chien, S. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). A research proposal for an AI chatbot as virtual patient agent to improve nursing students’ clinical inquiry skills. ICAIE, 13.
  • Cole‐Turner, R. (2022). Posthumanism and transhumanism. Encyclopedia of Religious Ethics, 1098-1105.
  • Coombs, C., Stacey, P., Kawalek, P., Simeonova, B., Becker, J., Bergener, K., & Trautmann, H. (2021). What is it about humanity that we can’t give away to intelligent machines? A European perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102311.
  • Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3), 02.
  • Essa, S. G., Celik, T., & Human-Hendricks, N. E. (2023). Personalized adaptive learning technologies based on machine learning techniques to identify learning styles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 11, 48392-48409.
  • Firdaus, T., Sholeha, S. A., Jannah, M., & Setiawan, A. R. (2024). Comparison of ChatGPT and Gemini AI in Answering Higher-Order Thinking Skill Biology Questions: Accuracy and Evaluation. International Journal of Science Education and Teaching, 3(3), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijset.2024.11
  • Ghio, A. (2024). Democratizing academic research with Artificial Intelligence: The misleading case of language. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 98, 102687.
  • Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692.
  • Guerreiro, J., Loureiro, S. M. C., Romero, J., Itani, O., & Eloy, S. (2022). Transhumanism and engagement-facilitating technologies in society. Journal of Promotion Management, 28(5), 537-558.
  • Kirby, A. (2023). Exploratory bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a preliminary research tool. Publications, 11(1), 10.
  • Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614.
  • Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973-1018.
  • Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2003). Konsep dan analisis konseptual. Penelitian Filsafat dan Fenomenologis, 67 (2), 253-282.
  • Merzlyakov, S. S. (2022). Posthumanism vs. Transhumanism: From the “End of Exceptionalism” to “Technological Humanism”. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 92(Suppl 6), S475-S482.
  • Munn, K. (2008). Introduction: what is ontology for?. Berlin: Ontos Verlag
  • Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022). AI-based personalized e-learning systems: Issues, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Access, 10, 81323-81342.
  • Myers, M. D. (2004). Hermeneutics in information systems research. Social theory and philosophy for information systems, 103-128.
  • Neubauer, A. C. (2021). The future of intelligence research in the coming age of artificial intelligence–With a special consideration of the philosophical movements of trans-and posthumanism. Intelligence, 87, 101563.
  • Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., & Maggio, L. A. (2022). Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on medical education, 11(3), 173-176.
  • Nurziana, S., & Firdaus, T. (2025). The Concept of Divinity in Javanese Mysticism: Viewing the Universe as a Manifestation of God. Samsara: International Journal of Eastern Philosophy, 1(1), 1-11.
  • Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & mass communication educator, 78(1), 84-93.
  • Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO
  • Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., ... & Mondelli, V. (2021). EDUCAUSE horizon report teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE: Boulder, CO, USA, 2-50.
  • Pesonen, J. A. (2021, July). ‘Are You OK?’Students’ Trust in a Chatbot Providing Support Opportunities. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 199-215). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Sallam, M. (2023, March). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 6, p. 887). MDPI.
  • Saputra, I., Astuti, M., Sayuti, M., & Kusumastuti, D. (2023). Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities, Challenges, Threats and Obstacles. A Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 12(4).
  • Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025.
Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 70 - 83, 20.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.1610935

Abstract

References

  • Baelo-Allué, S., & Calvo-Pascual, M. (Eds.). (2021). Transhumanism and posthumanism in twenty-first century narrative. Routledge.
  • Barik, S. (2023). Embracing the transformative dynamics of English teaching and technology in higher education: A posthumanist perspective. Smart Moves Journal IJELLH, 17-31.
  • Buchanan, R. A., Forster, D. J., Douglas, S., Nakar, S., Boon, H. J., Heath, T., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1178-1197.
  • Chien, S. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). A research proposal for an AI chatbot as virtual patient agent to improve nursing students’ clinical inquiry skills. ICAIE, 13.
  • Cole‐Turner, R. (2022). Posthumanism and transhumanism. Encyclopedia of Religious Ethics, 1098-1105.
  • Coombs, C., Stacey, P., Kawalek, P., Simeonova, B., Becker, J., Bergener, K., & Trautmann, H. (2021). What is it about humanity that we can’t give away to intelligent machines? A European perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102311.
  • Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3), 02.
  • Essa, S. G., Celik, T., & Human-Hendricks, N. E. (2023). Personalized adaptive learning technologies based on machine learning techniques to identify learning styles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 11, 48392-48409.
  • Firdaus, T., Sholeha, S. A., Jannah, M., & Setiawan, A. R. (2024). Comparison of ChatGPT and Gemini AI in Answering Higher-Order Thinking Skill Biology Questions: Accuracy and Evaluation. International Journal of Science Education and Teaching, 3(3), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijset.2024.11
  • Ghio, A. (2024). Democratizing academic research with Artificial Intelligence: The misleading case of language. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 98, 102687.
  • Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692.
  • Guerreiro, J., Loureiro, S. M. C., Romero, J., Itani, O., & Eloy, S. (2022). Transhumanism and engagement-facilitating technologies in society. Journal of Promotion Management, 28(5), 537-558.
  • Kirby, A. (2023). Exploratory bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a preliminary research tool. Publications, 11(1), 10.
  • Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614.
  • Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973-1018.
  • Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2003). Konsep dan analisis konseptual. Penelitian Filsafat dan Fenomenologis, 67 (2), 253-282.
  • Merzlyakov, S. S. (2022). Posthumanism vs. Transhumanism: From the “End of Exceptionalism” to “Technological Humanism”. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 92(Suppl 6), S475-S482.
  • Munn, K. (2008). Introduction: what is ontology for?. Berlin: Ontos Verlag
  • Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022). AI-based personalized e-learning systems: Issues, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Access, 10, 81323-81342.
  • Myers, M. D. (2004). Hermeneutics in information systems research. Social theory and philosophy for information systems, 103-128.
  • Neubauer, A. C. (2021). The future of intelligence research in the coming age of artificial intelligence–With a special consideration of the philosophical movements of trans-and posthumanism. Intelligence, 87, 101563.
  • Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., & Maggio, L. A. (2022). Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on medical education, 11(3), 173-176.
  • Nurziana, S., & Firdaus, T. (2025). The Concept of Divinity in Javanese Mysticism: Viewing the Universe as a Manifestation of God. Samsara: International Journal of Eastern Philosophy, 1(1), 1-11.
  • Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & mass communication educator, 78(1), 84-93.
  • Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO
  • Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., ... & Mondelli, V. (2021). EDUCAUSE horizon report teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE: Boulder, CO, USA, 2-50.
  • Pesonen, J. A. (2021, July). ‘Are You OK?’Students’ Trust in a Chatbot Providing Support Opportunities. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 199-215). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Sallam, M. (2023, March). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 6, p. 887). MDPI.
  • Saputra, I., Astuti, M., Sayuti, M., & Kusumastuti, D. (2023). Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities, Challenges, Threats and Obstacles. A Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 12(4).
  • Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Philosophy of Science, Ethics, Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence, Teaching Philosophy
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Thoriqi Firdaus 0009-0005-2340-8468

Early Pub Date March 21, 2025
Publication Date March 20, 2025
Submission Date January 1, 2025
Acceptance Date March 11, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Firdaus, T. (2025). The Philosophical Construction of Educational Science in Relation to Posthumanism and Transhumanism in Artificial Intelligence. Turkish Academic Research Review, 10(1), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.1610935

Turkish Academic Research Review 
Creative Commons Lisansı Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY-NC 4.0) ile lisanslanmıştır.