Farklı toprak düzenleyicilerinin yetişme ortamında ve marul (Lactuca sativa L.) bitkisinin bazı özelliklerinde meydana getirdiği değişimler

Öz

Bu çalışmada yetiştirme ortamında toprak düzenleyici olarak kullanılan pomza, vermikülit ve vermikompostun marul bitkilerinin gelişimine, besin içeriklerine ve yetiştirme ortamı özelliklerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Deneme tesadüf parselleri deneme desenine göre, 3 kg kapasiteli 27 adet plastik saksıda, üç tekrarlamalı olarak yürütülmüştür. Toprak düzenleyici olarak kullanılan materyallerin (pomza, vermikülit ve vermikompost) her biri %0 (kontrol)- %2- % 4olmak üzere üç farklı dozda uygulanmıştır. Deneme 7 hafta sonra sonlandırılarak hasat edilen bitkilerde bitki gelişim kriterleri, yaprak klorofil içeriği, makro ve mikro besin elementleri, kül ve C içeriği belirlenmiştir. Farklı uygulamalara ait toprak örneklerinde kontrol ve diğer uygulamalara kıyasla en yüksek toprak organik maddesi (%1.12), fosfor içeriği (24.89 mg kg -1), tuz (EC 1.32 dSm-1) ve kireç (%14.72) içeriğinin ikinci doz vermikompost uygulamasında elde edildiği belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışmada bitki gelişim kriterleri üzerindeki olumlu etkileri bakımından uygulanan toprak düzenleyiciler genel olarak pomza> vermikülit> vermikompost sıralamasında yer almışlardır. En yüksek kök yaş ve kuru ağırlığı, bitki çapı, bitki ağırlığı ve yaprak sayısı ortalamaları pomza uygulamasında sırası ile 13.05 g, 2.18 g, 13.23 cm, 138.1 g ve 28 adet olarak elde edilmiştir Uygulamaların bitki besin elementi içeriklerine etkileri incelendiğinde, artan vermikompost, vermikülit ve pomza dozlarının marul bitkisinin kök ve yaprak P içeriğinde kontrole kıyasla artış sağladığı belirlenmiştir. En yüksek kök P konsantrasyonu ortalamaları % 0.27 olarak vermikompost ve pomza uygulamalarında elde edilmiştir. En yüksek yaprak P konsantrasyonu ortalaması % 0.38 olarak vermikompost uygulamasında elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Toprak düzenleyici
• Bitki gelişimi
• Marul
• Fizyolojik parametre
• Besin elementi

Changes caused by different soil amendments in some properties of the growing media and lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) plant

Öz

In this study, the effects of pumice, vermiculite and vermicompost, used as soil conditioners in the growing environment, on the development of lettuce plants, their nutrient content and the properties of the growing environment were investigated. The experiment was carried out according to the randomized plot design in 27 plastic pots containing 3 kg soil with three replications. Each of the materials used as soil conditioners (pumice, vermiculite and vermicompost) were applied at three different doses as 0% (control), 2 % and 4 %. The experiment was ended after 7 weeks and plant development criteria, leaf chlorophyll content, macro and micro nutrients, ash and C content were determined in the harvested plants. In soil samples from different applications, it was determined that the highest soil organic matter (1.12%), phosphorus content (24.89mg kg-1), salt (EC 1.32 dSm-1) and lime (14.72%) content were obtained in the second dose vermicompost application compared to the control and other applications. In this study, the soil conditioners applied in terms of their positive effects on plant development criteria were generally ranked in the order of pumice > vermicult > vermicompost. The highest means of root fresh and dry weight, plant diameter, plant weight and number of leaves were obtained in pumice application as 13.05 g, 2.18 g, 13.23 mm, 138.1 g and 28, respectively. When the effects of the applications on plant nutrient contents were considered, it was determined that increasing doses of vermicompost, vermiculite and pumice increased the root and leaf P contents of lettuce plants compared to the control.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Soil conditioner
• plant growth
• lettuce physiological parameters
• nutrient

Kaynakça

1. Aguiar NO, Olivares FL, Novotny EH, Dobbss LB, Balmori DM, Santos-Júnior LG, Façanha AR, Canellas LP. 2013. Bioactivity of humic acids isolated from vermicomposts at different maturation stages. Plant and Soil, 362, 161-174.
2. Akşahin V, Gülser F. 2019. Bazı organik materyallerin ve inorganik gübrelerin çemenin (trigonella foenum graecum) besin elementi içeriğine etkileri. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 32, 47-53.
3. Angelova VR, Akova VI, Artinova NS, Ivanov KI. 2013. The effect of organic amendments on soil chemical characteristics. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 19(5), 958-971.
4. Ansari AA. 2008. Effect of vermicompost on the productivity of potato (Solanum tuberosum), spinach (Spinacia oleracea) and turnip (Brassica campestris). World J. of Agricultural Sciences, 4(3), 333-336.
5. Atiyeh RM, Edwards CA, Subler S, Metzger JD. 2001. Pig manure vermicompost as a component of a horticultural bedding plant medium: effects on physicochemical properties and plant growth. Bioresource Technology, 78(1), 11-20.
6. Balkıç R, Torun M, Demirkaplan G, Gübbük H. 2021. Pomza Kullanımının Muz Yetiştiriciliğinde Morfolojik Özellikler, Verim ve Bazı Kalite Parametreleri Üzerine Etkileri. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 182-188.
7. Black CA. 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part I, Physical and Mineralogical Properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
8. Bustamante MA, Gomis MP, Pérez-Murcia MD, Gangi D, Ceglie FG, Paredes C, Bernal MP, Moral R. 2021. Use of livestock waste composts as nursery growing media: Effect of a washing pre-treatment. Scientia Horticulturae, 281, 109954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.109954

9. Candemir F, Gülser C. 2011. Effects of different agricultural wastes on some soil quality indexes in clay and loamy sand fields. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 42(1), 13-28.
10. Chen M, Guo, Q., Pei, F., Chen, L., Rehman, S., Liang, S., Dang, Z.,Wu, P. (2020). The role of Fe (III) in enhancement of interaction between chitosan and vermiculite for synergistic Co-removal of Cr (VI) and Cd (II). Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 606, 125356.
11. Conley DJ, Paerl HW, Howarth RW, Boesch DF, Seitzinger SP, Havens KE, Lancelot C, Likens GE. 2009. Controlling eutrophication: nitrogen and phosphorus. Science, 323(5917), 1014-1015.
12. Çelik H. 2010. Süs Bitkileri ve Peyzaj (İç Mekân Süs Bitkileri, Tek Yıllık Bahçe Çiçekleri ve Peyzaj). Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı No: 54. sf:202.
13. Demir Z, Gülser C. 2021. Effects of Rice Husk Compost on Some Soil Properties, Water Use Efficiency and Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Yield under Greenhouse and Field Conditions. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, pp.1-18.
14. Demir Z. 2019. Effects of vermicompost on soil physicochemical properties and lettuce (Lactuca sativa Var. Crispa) yield in greenhouse under different soil water regimes. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 50(17), 2151-2168.
15. Dhanalakshmi V, Remia KM, Shanmugapriyan R, Shanthi K. 2014. Impact of addition of vermicompost on vegetable plant growth. International Research Journal of Biological Sciences 3(12):56–61.
16. Durak A, Altuntaş Ö, Kutsal İK, Işık R, Karaat FE. 2017. The effects of vermicompost on yield and some growth parameters of lettuce. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 5(12), 1566-1570. https://doi.org/ 10.24925/turjaf.v5i12.1566-1570.1461.
17. Edwards CA, Burrows I. 1988. Potential of earthworm composts as plant growth media. Earthworms in waste and environmental management/edited by Clive A. Edwards and Edward F. Neuhauser.
18. Fornes F, Carrión C, García-de-la-Fuente R, Puchades R, Abad M. 2010. Leaching composted lignocellulosic wastes to prepare container media: Feasibility and environmental concerns. Journal of environmental management, 91(8), 1747-1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.017
19. Gabriels D, Maene L, Lenvain J, De Boodt M. 1977. Possibilities of using soil conditioners for soil erosion control. In Soil Conservation and Management in the Humid Tropics; Proceedings of the International Conference.
20. Gallardo-Lara F, Nogales R. 1987. Effect of the application of town refuse compost on the soil-plant system: A review. Biological wastes, 19(1), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7483(87)90035-8
21. Gee GW, Bauder JW. 1986. Particle‐size analysis. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 Physical and mineralogical methods, 5, 383-411.
22. Goh TB, Arnaud RS, Mermut AR. 1993. Aggregate stability to water. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 177-180.
23. Gopinath KA, Saha S, Mina BL, Kundu S, Selvakumar G, Gupta HS. 2009. Bell pepper yield and soil properties during conversion from conventional to organic production in İndian Himalayas. Scienceta Horticulturae, 122(3): 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.05.016
24. Gülser C, Candemir F, Kanel Y, Demirkaya S. 2015. Effect of manure on organic carbon content and fractal dimensions of aggregates. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 4(1), 1-5.
25. Gülser C, Demir Z, İç S. 2010. Changes in some soil properties at different incubation periods after tobacco waste application. Journal of Environmental Biology, 31:671-674.
26. Gülser F. 2005. Effects of ammonium sulphate and urea on NO3− and NO2− accumulation, nutrient contents and yield criteria in spinach. Scientia horticulturae, 106(3), 330-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125356
27. Jones JB Jr, Wolf B, Mills HA. 1991. Plant Analysis Handbook. Micro- Nacro Publishing INc., Georgia. 30607.USA. Kacar B, İnal A. 2008. Bitki analizleri, Cilt 1, Nobel yayını, Ankara, s. 892.
28. Kacar B. 2009. Toprak analizleri (Genişletilmiş İkinci Baskı). Nobel Yayın No: 1387, Ankara.
29. Köksal SB, Aksu G, Altay H. 2017. Vermikompostun Bazı Toprak Özellikleri ve Pazı Bitkisinde Verim Üzerine Etkisi. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 5 (2): 123–128.
30. Liu R, Lal R. 2015. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Science of the total environment, 514, 131-139.
31. Lv G, Wang X, Liao L, Li Z, He M. 2013. Simultaneous removal of low concentrations of ammonium and humic acid from simulated groundwater by vermiculite/palygorskite columns. Applied Clay Science, 86, 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2013.08.043
32. Marschner P, Rengel Z. 2012. Nutrient Availability in Soils, Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. London, pp. 347–364
33. Olsen SR, Sommers LE. 1982. Nitrogen-total. Methods of soil analysis, Part II (Page AL, Miller RM, Keeney DR, eds).
34. Ordoñez-Arévalo B, Guillén-Navarro K, Huerta E, Cuevas R, Calixto-Romo MA. 2018. Enzymatic dynamics into the Eisenia fetida (Savigny, 1826) gut during vermicomposting of coffee husk and market waste in a tropical environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 1576-1586.
35. Orozco FH, Cegarra J, Trujillo LM, Roig A. 1996. Vermicomposting of coffee pulp using the earthworm Eisenia fetida: effects on C and N contents and the availability of nutrients. Biology and fertility of soils, 22:162-166.
36. Ouda BA, Mahadeen AY. 2008. Effect of fertilizers on growth, yield, yield components, quality and certain nutrient contents in broccoli (Brassica oleracea). International Journal of Agriculture and biology, 10(6), 627-632.
37. Özkan ŞG, Tuncer G. 2001. Pomza madenciliğine genel bir bakış. 4. Endüstriyel Hammaddeler Sempozyumu. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi, İzmir.
38. Pérez-Urrestarazu L, Fernández-Cañero R, Campos-Navarro P, Sousa-Ortega C, Egea G. 2019. Assessment of perlite, expanded clay and pumice as substrates for living walls.Scientia horticulturae, 254, 48-54.
39. Rezaeinejad R, Khademi H, Ayoubi S, Mosaddeghi MR. 2021. Roots under water stress induce K release from phlogopite, bio-transforming to vermiculite. Rhizosphere, 17, 100310.
40. Rostami, M, Koocheki AR, Mahallati MN, Kafi M. 2008. Evaluation of chlorophyll meter (SPAD) data for prediction of nitrogen status in corn (Zea mays L.). American-Eurasian Journal Agriculture Science, 3(1), 79-85.
41. Sahin U, Anapali O. 2006. Addition of pumice affects physical properties of soil used for container grown plants. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 71(2), 59-64.
42. Shinde R, Sarkar PK, Thombare N. 2019. Soil conditioners. Agriculture and Food: e-newsletter, 1(10), 1-5.
43. Shinzato MC, Wu LF, Mariano TO, Freitas JG, Martins TS. 2020. Mineral sorbents for ammonium recycling from industry to agriculture. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(12), 13599-13616.
44. Silva DRG, Spehar CR, Marchi G, Soares DDA, Cancellier EL, Martins EDS. 2014. Yield, nutrient uptake and potassium use efficiency in rice fertilized with crushed rocks. Africa Journal Agricultural Research,9, 455-64.
45. SPSS, 2018. IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Tangolar S, Tangolar S, Torun AA, Ada M, Aydın O. 2019. Bağ toprağına uygulanan organik materyallerin verim, kalite ve besin elementleri alımına etkisi. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 32, 135-140.
46. Tiessen HJWB. 1993. Characterization of available P by sequential extraction. Soil sampling and methods of analysis.
47. Tomati U, Grappelli A, Galli E. 1987. The presence of growth regulators in earthworm-worked wastes. In On earthworms. Proceedings of international symposium on earthworms. Selected symposia and monographs, Unione Zoologica Italiana (Vol. 2, pp. 423-435).
48. Turhan E, Sevgican A. 1999. Effects of different growing media on greenhouse lettuce grown in soilless culture. In International Symposium Greenhouse Management for Better Yield and Quality in Mild Winter Climates, Antalya.
49. Yang X, Feng Y, Zhang X, Sun M, Qiao D, Li J, Li X. 2020. Mineral soil conditioner requirement and ability to adjust soil acidity. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 18207.
50. Yörük E, Eren E, Hazneci E, Özer H, Gülser C. 2024. Potential Use of Postharvest Tomato Wastes as a Growing Media in Soilless Culture. Compost Science & Utilization, 31(1-2), pp.1-8.
51. Zhang H, Tan SN, Teo CH, Yew YR, Ge L, Chen X, Yong JWH. 2015. Analysis of phytohormones in vermicompost using a novel combinative sample preparation strategy of ultrasound-assisted extraction and solid-phase extraction coupled with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta, 139, 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.02.052.