The relationships among the some basic soil properties and selenium content of different region soils under garlic cultivation in Turkey

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 72 - 79, 22.07.2019

Hanife Akça Murat Ali Turan Nilgün Taban Süleyman Taban , Abdoul Rasmane Ouedraogo Nilüfer Türkmen

https://doi.org/10.33409/tbbbd.595214

Öz

In this study, it is
intended to determine the available selenium concentration of soil samples and
the basic relationships among the basic soil properties of the areas in terms
of garlic farming in Turkey. Total 224 soil samples were collected from
Balıkesir, Kırklareli, Kahramanmaraş, Hatay, Antalya, Karaman, Muğla and
Kastamonu provinces where garlic production is at the first place in our
country. The soils sample texture, pH, EC, lime, organic matter and available
selenium analyses were determined. As a result of garlic cultivated soils
analyses, the plant available selenium concentration in soil was varied between
1,31 and 27,83 µg kg^-1 with an average of 13,45 µg kg^-1.
 It was found that the highest available selenium concentrations were in
Kastamonu (27,83 µg kg^-1) and the lowest is in Hatay (1,31 µg kg^-1)
regions. The textural class was heavy clay, 53,57 % of total samples was
slightly alkaline, there was not any EC problem, 41,07 % of total soil samples
was high and very high lime and 47,32 % of soil samples were low and very low
in organic matter. Based on the correlation analysis; positive relations (r=
0,330***) between available selenium concentration-soil reaction and negative
relations (respectively r= -0,260***, r= -0,259***) between lime-organic matter
were determined. It was determined that Se availability increases with
the rising pH value, whereas Se availability decreases with the increasing of
lime and organic matter.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Garlic, selenium, basic soil properties

Türkiye’de sarımsak tarımı yapılan farklı yöre topraklarının selenyum içerikleri ve bazı temel toprak özellikleri arasındaki ilişkiler

Öz

Ülkemizde sarımsak tarımında ilk sıralarda yer alan illerden alınan
toprak örneklerinde bitkiye yarayışlı selenyum konsantrasyonları ile bazı temel
toprak özellikleri arasındaki ilişkilerin belirlenmesinin amaçlandığı bu çalışmada,
Balıkesir, Kırklareli, Kahramanmaraş, Hatay, Antalya, Karaman, Muğla ve
Kastamonu illerinden toplam 224 adet toprak örneği alınmıştır. Alınan toprak
örneklerinde tekstür, pH, EC, kireç, organik madde ile bitkiye yarayışlı
selenyum analizleri yapılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, farklı yörelerden
alınan toprak örnekleri birlikte değerlendirildiğinde, bitkiye yarayışlı
selenyum konsantrasyonlarının 1,31-27,83 µg kg^-1 arasında değiştiği
ve ortalama 13,45 µg kg^-1 olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bitkiye yarayışlı
ortalama selenyum konsantrasyonun en fazla Kastamonu (27,83 µg kg^-1),
en az ise Hatay (1,31 µg kg^-1) yöresi topraklarında olduğu
belirlenmiştir. Sarımsak tarımı yapılan toprakların ağırlıklı olarak kil
bünyeli, % 53,57’sinin hafif alkali, EC yönünden sorun taşımadığı, %
41,07’sinin çok ve çok fazla kireçli, % 47,32’sinin ise az ve çok az organik
madde içerdiği belirlenmiştir. Bitkiye yarayışlı selenyum konsantrasyonu ile
toprak reaksiyonu arasında önemli pozitif (r= 0,330***), kireç ve organik madde
miktarları arasında ise önemli negatif (sırasıyla r= -0,260***, r= -0,259***)
ilişkiler belirlenmiştir. Toprakta reaksiyonun yükselmesi durumunda Se
yarayışlılığının arttığı, buna karşın kireç ve organik maddenin artması
durumunda ise Se yarayışlılığının azaldığı belirlenmiştir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sarımsak, selenyum, temel toprak özellikleri

Kaynakça

• Akça H, Taşkın MB, Şahin Ö, Kaya EC, Turan MA, Taban S, Balcı M, 2017. Beypazarı yöresinde havuç (Daucus carota L.) tarımı yapılan toprakların verimlilik durumları ile havuç bitkisinin potansiyel beslenme sorunlarının belirlenmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 31(2):123-138.
• Anonim, 1988. Türkiye gübreler ve gübreleme rehberi. Köy Hizmetleri Gen. Müd., Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Ens. Müg. Genel Yayın No: 151, Teknik Yayınlar No: T-59, pp: 231.
• Anonymous, 1951. Soil survey manual. Handbook No:18, U.S.D.A.
• Banuelos GS, Meek DW, 1989. Selenium accumulation in selected vegetables, 1. Plant Nutrition 12, 1255-1272.
• Bouyoucos GJ, 1951. A recalibration of hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal 43:434-438.
• Bryant RD, Laishley EJ, 1988. Evidence for two transporters of sulfur and selenium oxyanions in clostridium pasteurianum. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 34:700-703.
• Campen van DR, 1991. Trace elements in human nutrition, micronutrients in agriculture, ed: Morvedt, J.J., Cox, F.R., Shuman, L.M., Welch, R.M., SSSA Book Series No: 4, Madison. WI. U.S.A. pp: 603-701.
• Cao ZH,Wang XC, Yao DH, Zhang XL,Wong MH, 2001. Selenium geochemistry of paddy soils in Yangtze River Delta. Environment International 26:5, 335–339.
• Davis JG, Steffens TJ, Engle TE, Mallow KL, Cotton SE, 2006. Diagnosing selenium toxicity. Colorado State University Extension Bulletin No: 6, 109:1-4.
• Dungan RS, Yates SR, Frankenberger WT, 2002. Volatilization and degradation of soilapplied dimethylselenide. Journal of Environmental Quality 31(6):2045–2050.
• Finley JW, 2005. Selenium accumulation in plant foods. Nutrition Reviews 63:196-202.
• Floor GH, Calabrese S, Román-Ross G, Aiuppa A, 2011. Selenium mobilization in soils due to volcanic derived acid rain: an example from Mt Etna volcano, Sicily. Chemical Geology 289 (3): 235–244.
• Grewelling T, Peech M, 1960. Chemical soil test. Cornell University Agricultural. Expt. Sta. Bull., No: 960.
• Halilova H, 2004. Mikroelementlerin (I, Zn, Co, Mn, Cu, Se) biyojeokimyası. İlke-Emek Yayınları, Ankara, pp. 110.
• Harmankaya M, 2009. Orta Anadolu Bölgesinde toprakların ve buğdayın selenyum düzeyinin belirlenmesi ve selenyum gübrelemesine farklı buğday genotiplerinin tepkisinin araştırılması. T.C. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Toprak Anabilim Dalı (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi).
• Hızalan E, Ünal H, 1966. Topraklarda önemli kimyasal analizler. A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları 278, pp: 88.
• Hurd-Karrer AM, 1938. Relation of sulphate to selenium absorption by plants. American Journal of Botany 25:666-675.
• Ip C, Birringer M, Block E, Kotrebai M, Tyson JF, Uden PC, Lisk DJ, 2000. Chemical speciation influences comparative activity of selenium-enriched garlic and yeast in mammary cancer prevention. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48:2062-2070.
• Ip C, Lisk DJ, 1994. Enrichment of selenium in allium vegetables for cancer prevention. Carcinogenesis, 15:1881-1885. Irmak S, Semercioğlu T, 2012. Çukurova Bölgesi’nde yetiştirilen bazı buğday (Triticum Spp.) çeşitlerinde toprak-bitki selenyum içeriği arasındaki ilişki. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 5(2):19-23.
• Jackson ML, 1962. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall. Inc. New York, pp. 498.
• Johnson CC, Ge X, Green KA, Liu X, 2000. Selenium distribution in the local environment of selected villages of the Keshan Disease belt, Zhangjiakou District, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China. Applied Geochemistry 15(3):385–401.
• Johnsson L, 1991. Selenium uptake by plants as a function of soil type, organic matter content and pH. Plant and Soil 133:57-64.
• Kacar B, Katkat AV, 1998. Bitki besleme. Uludağ Üniversitesi Güçlendirme Vakfı Yayın No: 127, VİPAŞ Yayınları: 3, Bursa, pp. 594.
• Kacar B, S Taban, M Alpaslan, G Fuleky, 1998. Zinc-phosphorus relationship in the dry matter yield and the uptake of zn, p, fe and mn of rice plants (Otyza sativa L.) as affected by the total carbonate content of the soil. Second International Zinc Symposium. October 2-3, 1998, Ankara-Turkey.
• Kausch M, Ng P, Ha J, Pallud C, 2012. Soil-aggregate-scale heterogeneity in microbial selenium reduction. Vadose Zone Journal 11(2).
• Kausch MF, Pallud CE, 2013. Modeling the impact of soil aggregate size on selenium immobilization. Biogeosciences 10(3):1323–1336.
• Kudryevsev AA, Andreyev MN, 1969. Bolezni nedostatoçnostı molodnyanca shjivotnih, ihprofilakticai leçeniye. Materiali dokladov Vsesoyuznoy Konferensii terapevtovi diagnostov posvyasennoy 100 letiyu prof. Ruhyadyeva T. I. Kazan.
• Li Z, Liang D, Peng Q, Cui Z, Huang J, Lin Z, 2017. Interaction between selenium and soil organic matter and its impact on soil selenium bioavailability: A review. Geoderma 295:69-79.
• Mayland HF, James LF, Panter KE, Sonderegger JL, 1989. Selenium in seleniferious environments. Selenium Agriculture and the Environment. (ed. L.W. Jacobs) Spec. Publ. 23. Soil Science of America, Madison, Wl. pp. 15-50.
• Mengel K, Kirkby EA, 1982. Principles of plant nutrition. 3th ed, International Potash Institute,Worblaufen-Bern, Switzerland, pp: 655. Mikkelsen RL, Page AL, Bingham FT, 1989. Factors affecting selenium accumulation by agricultural crops, selenium in agriculture and the environment. (eds. Jacobs LW) Amer. Soc. Agron. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, Wis. pp. 65-94.
• Mikkelsen RL, Wan HF, 1990. The effect of selenium on sulfur uptake by barley and rice. Plant and Soil 121:151-153.
• Miller E, Lei RX, Ullrey DE, 1991. Trace elements in animal nutrition. Micronutrients in Agriculture 2 Ed, (eds. Mortvedt JJ, Cox FR, Shuman LM, Welch RM) SSSA Book Series No: 4. Madison, WI. USA., pp. 593-662.
• Nguyen VK, Park Y, Yu J, Lee T, 2016. Microbial selenite reduction with organic carbon and electrode as sole electron donor by a bacteriumisolated fromdomesticwastewater. Bioresource Technoogy 212:182–189.
• Olson OE, Novacek EJ, Whitehead EI, Palmer IS, 1970. Investigations on selenium in wheat. Phytochemistry 9:1181-1188.
• Park JH, Lamb D, Paneerselvam P, Choppala G, Bolan N, Chung JW, 2011. Role of organic amendments on enhanced bioremediation of heavy metal (loid) contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials 185(2):549–574.
• Perkins AT, King HH, 1938. Selenium and tenmarg wheat. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron. 30:664-667.
• Rosen C, R Becker, V Fritz, B Hutchison, J Percich, C Tong, J. Wright, 1999. Growing garlic in Minnesota. http://www.Extension.umn.edu/distribution/cropsystems/components/7317-mulching.html
• Scharrer K, Schropp W, 1950. Sand und wasserkulturversuche mit selen und tellur. Z. Pflanzenernahrung Düng. Bodenk. 50:187-202.
• Sharma VK, McDonald TJ, Sohn M, Anquandah GA, Pettine M, Zboril R, 2015. Biogeochemistry of selenium. A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 13(1):49–58.
• Soltanpour PN, 1991. Determination of nutrient availability and elemental toxicity by AB-DTPA soil test and ICPS. Advance Soil Science 16:165-190.
• Taban S, Alparslan M, Hashemi AG, Eken D, 1997. Orta Anadolu’da çeltik tarımı yapılan toprakların bazı fiziksel ve kimyasal özellikleri. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 3(3):457-466.
• Taban S, Çıkılı Y, Kebeci F, Taban N, Sezer SM, 2004. taşköprü yöresinde sarımsak tarımı yapılan toprakların verimlilik durumu ve potansiyel beslenme problemlerinin ortaya konulması. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 10 (3) 297-304.
• Taban S, Turan MA, Sezer SM, Türkmen N, 2013. Kastamonu Taşköprü yöresinde yetiştirilen sarımsak bitkisinin selenyum içerikleri ve bazı toprak özellikleri arasındaki ilişkiler. Uudağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 27(1):39-47
• Terry N, Zayed AM, 1998. Phytoremediation of seleniurn. Environrnental Chernistry of Selenium. (eds. Frankenberger VVT Jr, Engberg RA) Marcel Dekker lnc, New York, pp. 633-655.
• Trelease SF, DiSomma AA, Jacobs AL, 1960. Seleno-Amino acid found in Astragalus Bisulcatus, Science 132:6-18.
• Trelease SF, Trelease HM, 1938. Selenium as a stimulating and possibly essential element for indicator plants. American Journal of Botany 25:372-380.
• Turan MA, Taban N, Türkmen N, Taban S, 2010. Selenium concentration of garlic bulbs grown in different parts of Turkey. Asian Journal of Chemistry 22(8):6563-6568.
• Udo EJ, H L Bohn, TC Tucker, 1970. Zinc adsorption by calcareous soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 34: 405-410.
• Wang Z, Gao Y, 2001. Biogeochemical cycling of selenium in Chinese environments. Applied Geochemistry 16(11):1345–1351.
• Whalen JK, Hu Q, Liu A, 2003. Compost applications increase water-stable aggregates in conventional and no-tillage systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67 (6):1842–1847.
• Zayed AM, Terry N, 1992. Selenium volatilization in broccoli as influenced by sulfate supply. Journal of Plant Physiology 140:646-652.
• Zhang Y, Frankenberger WT, 2003. Factors affecting removal of selenate in agricultural drainage water utilizing rice straw. Science of The Total Environment 305(1):207–216.
• Zhu S, Liang Y, Gao D, An X, Kong F, 2017. Spraying foliar selenium fertilizer on quality of table grape (Vitis vinifera L.) from different source varieties. Scientia Horticulturae 218:87-94.
• Gabos MB, Alleoni LRF, Abreu CA, 2014. Background levels of selenium in some selected Brazilian tropical soils. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 145:35-39.
• Zhang HH, Wu ZF, Yang CL, Xia B, Xu DR, Yuan HX, 2008. Spatial distributions and potential risk analysis of total soil selenium in Guangdong province, China. Journal of Environmental Quality 37:780–787.
• Yamada H, Kamada A, Usuki M, Yanai J, 2009. Total selenium content of agricultural soils in Japan. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 55:616–622.
• Pezzarossa B, Petruzzelli G, 2001. Selenium contamination in soil: sorption and desorption processes. In: Selim, H.S., Sparks, D.L. (Eds.), Heavy Metals Release in Soils. CRC Press, pp. 191–206.
• Fordyce FM, Brereton N, Hughes J, Luo W, Lewis J, 2010. An initial study to assess the use of geological parent materials to predict the Se concentration in overlying soils and in five staple foodstuffs produced on them in Scotland. Science of The Total Environment 408:5295–5305.
• Yan Dong D, Lisk DJ, Block E, Ip C, 2001. Characterization of the Biological Activity of -Glutamyl-Se- methylselenocysteine, Cancer Research 61:2923-2928.